Next Article in Journal
Chemotherapy-Free Targeted Anti-BCR-ABL+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Therapy May Benefit the Heart
Next Article in Special Issue
Management of Esophageal Cancer-Associated Respiratory–Digestive Tract Fistulas
Previous Article in Journal
Brentuximab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab Combination in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Single-Centre Retrospective Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immunotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: State-of-the Art in 2021
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Endoscopic Management for Post-Surgical Complications after Resection of Esophageal Cancer

Cancers 2022, 14(4), 980; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14040980
by Dörte Wichmann 1,*, Stefano Fusco 2, Christoph R. Werner 2, Sabrina Voesch 2, Benedikt Duckworth-Mothes 1, Ulrich Schweizer 1, Dietmar Stüker 1, Alfred Königsrainer 1, Karolin Thiel 1 and Markus Quante 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cancers 2022, 14(4), 980; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14040980
Submission received: 28 December 2021 / Revised: 11 February 2022 / Accepted: 12 February 2022 / Published: 15 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Esophageal Cancer Management)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Interesting summary of endoscopic treatment of postoperative complication after esophageal resection.

I would recommend minor revisions:

  • Please give the number of analyzed studies in the review
  • Please provide a flow chart of the review process

68-71: Consider evaluation of main topics out of prevalence and not out of clinical practice. If this is the case, please mention it.

72-82: Was literature search done according to PRISMA-guidelines? If yes, please mention.

137: Think about mentioning hemostatic gel.

208-209: Please state in which case EVT should be placed intraluminal (no relevant extraluminal fluid collection or no big wound cavity) and when not.

287: Data for bouginage for strictures?

Please proof-read your work for minor grammatic corrections.

Author Response

Dear reviewer, I would like to thank you for reviewing the manuscript, for the supportive comments and valuable advices. Your mentioned points and remarks were very helpful. See the point-by-point answer below:

  • Please give the number of analyzed studies in the review: The number of 4871 studies is documented now in line 78
  • Please provide a flow chart of the review process: The flowchart is implemented
  • 68-71: Consider evaluation of main topics out of prevalence and not out of clinical practice. If this is the case, please mention it. : Thanks for this remark. The sentence: 

    "The selection of the main topics for the review is based on their prevalence and clinical relevance: anastomotic hemorrhage, anastomotic insufficiency, conduit ischemia, delayed gastric emptying, and anastomotic stenosis." is inserted in line 70-72

  • 72-82: Was literature search done according to PRISMA-guidelines? If yes, please mention. Thanks for this valuable remark. We inserted the infomration and the flowchart
  • 137: Think about mentioning hemostatic gel. This was a very heplful comment. We inserted infomrations about the hematsatic gel in line 150 and 166-171.
  • 208-209: Please state in which case EVT should be placed intraluminal (no relevant extraluminal fluid collection or no big wound cavity) and when not. We inserted the sentence: Intracavitary therapy is used for large, contaminated wound cavities with a broad entrance. The endoluminal position of the OPSD is used for small defects and no big wound cavities. in line 231-233.
  • 287: Data for bouginage for strictures? Thank for this remark, we inserted infomrations about bougienage and the new tool BougieCap in this paragraph in line 316/317 and 323-325. 
  • Please proof-read your work for minor grammatic corrections: the manuscript is total revised, thanks for this remark.

Thanks again! Your Dörte Wichmann

Reviewer 2 Report

First I want to thank for the opportunity to review the manuscript titled "Endoscopic Management for Post-Surgical Complications after Resection of Esophageal Cancer" submitted by Wichmann and colleagues.

I have read this comprehensive review with great interest because I have been working as a thoracic and general surgeon for nearly 20 years and I´m very, very familiar with these different postoperative complications after esophagectomy and reconstrcution by gastric-pull up.

The authors have adressed the most frequent types of complications in a very satisfying way which enables the experienced and interested reader/ surgeon to get an update on the current therapeutic treatment options in a very short time.

No further queries.

Good luck for the authors!

Author Response

Dear reviewer, thank you very much for your positive assessment of the manuscript. We also had a lot of enjoyment working on it and gained interesting insights. Thanks again, Your Dörte Wichmann 

Back to TopTop