Next Article in Journal
ONX-0914 Induces Apoptosis and Autophagy with p53 Regulation in Human Glioblastoma Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Tat-hspb1 Suppresses Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (ccRCC) Growth via Lysosomal Membrane Permeabilization
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 22
10.3390/cancers14225711
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Circular RNAs in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: From Biomarkers to Therapeutic Targets

by
Yumin Qiu
1,
Yan Chen
1,
Oluwatobi Agbede
1,
Esra Eshaghi
1 and
Chun Peng
1,2,*
1
Department of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
2
Centre for Research on Biomolecular Interactions, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(22), 5711; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225711
Submission received: 31 October 2022 / Revised: 15 November 2022 / Accepted: 16 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Molecular Profiling and Identification of Molecular Signatures Associated with Tissue Development, Tumorigenesis, and Anticancer Agents’ Action)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the deadliest cancer in the female reproductive system. Currently, there are no effective early detection methods for this disease, and the treatments for advanced stages of EOC have a low success rate. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are noncoding RNAs generated from the “back-splicing” of precursor messenger RNAs. Recent studies have shown that many circRNAs are aberrantly expressed in tumor tissues and/or plasma of EOC patients, and they regulate EOC cell activity and tumor growth. In this review, we provide an overview of EOC and circRNA biology. We then summarize circRNAs that are dysregulated and exert tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressive effects in EOC. We also discuss the possibility of using circRNAs as diagnostic/prognostic markers and therapeutic targets.

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecological cancer, and more than 70% of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Despite the application of surgery and chemotherapy, the prognosis remains poor due to the high relapse rate. It is urgent to identify novel biomarkers and develop novel therapeutic strategies for EOC. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a class of noncoding RNAs generated from the “back-splicing” of precursor mRNA. CircRNAs exert their functions via several mechanisms, including acting as miRNA sponges, interacting with proteins, regulating transcription, and encoding functional proteins. Recent studies have identified many circRNAs that are dysregulated in EOC and may be used as diagnostic and prognostic markers. Increasing evidence has revealed that circRNAs play a critical role in ovarian cancer progression by regulating various cellular processes, including proliferation, apoptosis, metastasis, and chemosensitivity. The circRNA-based therapy may be a novel strategy that is worth exploring in the future. Here, we provide an overview of EOC and circRNA biogenesis and functions. We then discuss the dysregulations of circRNAs in EOC and the possibility of using them as diagnostic/prognostic markers. We also summarize the role of circRNAs in regulating ovarian cancer development and speculate their potential as therapeutic targets.

1. Introduction

Ovarian cancer (OC) consists of three major types: epithelial, stromal, and germ cell cancer. Among them, epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most common one, representing over 90% of cases [1,2]. EOC is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women in Canada [3]. Due to the presentation of non-specific symptoms and the lack of effective early diagnosis markers, most EOC patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Standard chemotherapies for EOC are not effective and patients often develop drug resistance and relapse [1]. Therefore, the development of effective early diagnosis tools and treatment strategies for the late stages of the disease is urgently needed.
Recent studies have revealed that a novel class of RNAs, circular RNAs (circRNAs), plays critical roles in cancer development [4]. CircRNAs are single-stranded RNAs joined covalently at the 5′ and 3′ ends, which are generated from pre-mRNAs via back-splicing [5]. CircRNAs function through multiple mechanisms, most commonly by sponging microRNAs (miRNAs) to affect their target gene expression. Other functions include interacting with proteins to modulate their activities and regulating the transcription of their host genes [6,7,8]. Dysregulation of circRNAs is linked to the development of many diseases, particularly cancers [9]. Aberrant expression of circRNAs occurs in various cancer types, including EOC [10,11]. Emerging evidence suggests that circRNAs are promising diagnostic and therapeutic targets for cancers [12].
In this review, we provide a brief overview of EOC and circRNA biology. We then discuss the potential role of circRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. We also summarize the role of circRNAs in promoting or suppressing EOC development, focusing on circRNAs that have the potential to serve as therapeutic targets for EOC. Finally, we propose some future directions in the field.

2. Overview of EOC

2.1. Histological Subtypes of EOC

EOC is a highly heterogeneous disease with several major histological subtypes, each one with unique origins and distinct molecular features. The vast majority of EOC tumors can be classified into high-grade serous, low-grade serous, endometroid, mucinous, and clear cell carcinoma [1,13,14,15]. Other rare subtypes include undifferentiated and mixed carcinoma, as well as Brenner tumors [14,16].
High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common subtype of EOC (70–74%) and is responsible for the majority of death from EOC [1]. HGSC contains glandular and papillary cells and also possesses high-grade nuclear atypia, frequent mitotic division, and high chromosomal instability [13]. HGSC mostly develops from non-invasive serous tubal intra-epithelial carcinoma (STIC) originating from a precursor lesion present at the fimbriated ends of the fallopian tubes [17,18]. Prevalent mutation of tumor suppressor genes including TP53 and BRCA1/2 commonly occurs in HGSC. Although HGSC tumors are initially sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, most patients with advanced-stage cancer will relapse [19].
Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) accounts for less than 5% of EOC and typically develops from serous borderline tumors that could be originated from fallopian tubes [20], endosalpingiosis [15], or ovaries [21]. LGSC tissues are characterized by infrequent mitotic division, an invasive micropapillary pattern, and the presence of round psammoma bodies [22]. Unlike HGSC, mutations of KRAS, HER2, BRAF, and NRAS genes are frequently identified in LGSC [15,23]. LGSC patients are typically younger and are resistant to paclitaxel (PTX) and carboplatin drugs, while they are more susceptible to etoposide and doxorubicin-based treatments [24,25].
Endometroid carcinoma (EC) accounts for about 10–15% of EOC [15,26]. It resembles the endometrium in the presence of extensive tubular glands and occasional squamous cells [27]. Although EC likely originates from ovarian endometriosis, more recent studies suggest that it may also develop from the fallopian tubes [28]. Mutations in numerous genes, including CTNNB1, ARID1A, TP53, PTEN, PIK3CA, KRAS, and PPP2R1A, have been reported in EC patients [29].
Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) accounts for approximately 6–10% of EOC [15,30]. CCC progression is strongly associated with endometriosis and benign tumors known as clear cell adenofibromas [1]. Essential genes regulating the CCC development pathway are similar to those of EC, including ARID1A, PIK3CA, PTEN, KRAS, PPP2R1A, HNF1B, and BRCA1/2. Genetic alterations, including mutation, copy number alteration, and post-translational modification of these genes, contribute to an increased incidence of CCC [1,31]. This subtype is characterized by clear cells, stromal hyalinization, and papillary, tubulocystic and solid cell patterns [31]. CCC has low responsiveness to platinum-based chemotherapy [32].
Mucinous carcinoma (MC) accounts for 3–4% of EOC with a favorable prognosis [15]. Genes with mutation or amplification identified in MC include KRAS, TP53, ERBB2, BRAF, HER2, APC, and CTNNB1 [1,33]. MC presents as a stratified tissue with atypical nuclei-containing mucins [33]. The growth of MC stems from endometriosis followed by slow and progressive advancement of normal epithelia cells into invasive carcinoma, and this can be explained as the primary developmental pattern of MC. While the distinct origin is unknown, it sometimes originates from other sources including germ cells, teratoma, and metaplasia, and develops at the fallopian tubes, ovaries, or cortical inclusion cysts [15,34].

2.2. Stages of EOC

EOC progression is divided into four stages (I to IV) based on the location and metastasis of the cancerous cells as outlined by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) [35]. The survival rate of patients decreases as cancer progresses from stages I to IV [2]. Stage I tumor is limited to the ovary. The 5-year survival rate at this stage is up to 85–90%. Stage II is characterized by the extension of tumor cells to pelvic organs. By this stage, the 5-year survival rate decreases to about 57–70%. Stage III is marked by tumor cells spreading to the pelvic and abdominal peritoneum, as well as retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Due to the extended metastasis at this stage, the survival rate reduces to 39–59%. Stage IV is defined as distant metastasis (e.g., lung, liver, spleen). At this stage, patients have the worst prognosis and the survival rate is less than 17% [35].

2.3. Diagnosis and Treatment

Early diagnosis of EOC is key to reducing morbidity and mortality. Symptoms are usually unhelpful in diagnosing this cancer as they are non-specific. Current imaging techniques, such as transvaginal ultrasound, have limited sensitivity to detect small, early-stage lesions [1]. Two widely used FDA-approved biomarkers, the human carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) and the human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), are primarily applied to assist in monitoring cancer progression or recurrence, rather than early diagnosis [36]. CA125 is elevated in only 50% of patients with stage I disease [37], and it is also increased in other gynecological or non-gynecological malignancies [1,38] and benign diseases (such as endometriosis) [39]. HE4 is more specific than CA125, especially in the distinction between endometriosis and the EC subtype [40]; however, the relatively low sensitivity in early diagnosis limits its application [1]. Differential expression patterns of these biomarkers between different cancer subtypes also make it difficult to rely on them as a primary diagnostic tool. Moreover, hormonal contraceptive use, smoking and age all contribute to variations in HE4 levels [39,41,42]. Whether menopausal status could affect the performance of HE4 is still controversial [43].
Currently, surgical resection of the affected region is used as the default treatment. This is usually followed by adjuvant chemotherapy to prevent the recurrence of cancer. In cases where surgical resection is impossible or difficult, chemotherapy could be used before and after surgery to shrink the tumor size [44]. The major concern of this treatment regimen is the toxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs to the cells, as intense cycles of chemotherapy (between 3–6 complete cycles, depending on the cancer stage) are needed to manage EOC. In addition, many patients develop chemoresistance and relapse [45].
Several targeted therapies designed to block abnormal cellular pathways associated with cancerous cell growth in the patient have been under development for EOC. Some of these treatments include small molecule inhibitors, immunotherapy, and antiangiogenic agents. Promising pathways currently exploited in targeted therapy include the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP), folate and folate receptor α (FRA), human epithelial growth factor receptor (HER1) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, amidst others [46,47].
PARP inhibitor-based treatment is more widespread and three major inhibitors (olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib) have been approved by FDA and are currently used to treat patients with EOC [48]. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting VEGF, has also been approved as first-line therapy for EOC patients while multiple VEGF inhibitors are in clinical trials [49]. Combinations of bevacizumab and olaparib targeting both VEGF and PARP have shown efficacy as first-line or second-line maintenance regimens [49]. However, HER1 and CAR T cell-based therapies are still in phase 1 clinical trials [47,50,51].

3. Overview of Circular RNA

3.1. Biogenesis of circRNAs

The majority of circRNAs are generated from protein-coding genes. While linear mRNAs are processed through canonical eukaryotic pre-mRNA splicing, circRNAs are formed through the back-splicing process, in which a downstream donor splice site is covalently joined to an upstream acceptor splice site in a reverse manner [52]. Most circRNAs are produced from pre-mRNAs and are classified into three groups: exonic circRNAs (ecircRNAs), exon-intron circRNAs (EIciRNAs), and circular intronic RNAs (ciRNAs). EcircRNAs, which consist of one or more exons, are the most common type accounting for 80% of circRNAs [53] and are mostly detected in the cytoplasm [54]. EIciRNAs are derived from exons and introns whereas ciRNAs contain only introns, both of which are in the nucleus [55].
The biogenesis of circRNAs is controlled by trans-regulatory factors and cis-regulatory elements. Although the precise mechanisms are not entirely clear, three models have been proposed to explain how circRNAs are generated (Figure 1). In the lariat-driven circularization model (also known as the exon skipping model), a lariat containing both exons and introns is formed when the upstream acceptor and downstream splice donor get close during the pre-mRNA splicing process. Then introns are spliced, and exons join each other via a covalent bond to form the ecircRNA [53,54]. In some cases, the introns are not removed, which results in the formation of EIciRNAs [56]. When a 7 nt GU-rich sequence is present at the 5′ splicing site and an 11 nt C-rich motif at the 3′ site, a lariat can be formed that only contains introns and eventually leads to the formation of ciRNAs [57]. In the intron-paring model, when the intronic sequences upstream of the splice acceptor and downstream of the splice donor have inverted complementarity, such as the ALU sequence, they join via complementary base pairing and are then excised to form ecircRNAs or EIciRNAs. For the circRNAs to form through this model, each acceptor and donor should have at least 100 nt of ALU complementary sequence [58]. Finally, in the RBP-mediated circularization model, several RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), such as quaking [59] and muscleblind [60], form a bridge to bring the flanking introns of upstream and downstream splice sites into proximity, thereby promoting back-splicing [59,60]. Trans-acting proteins such as spliceosome factors, cleavage factors, and RNA helicases also play a role in regulating circRNA biogenesis [61].

3.2. Mechanisms of circRNA Functions

In general, circRNAs exert their biological functions through several mechanisms. The most reported role of circRNAs is to act as a microRNA (miRNA) sponge. miRNAs are small, single-stranded RNAs that primarily inhibit gene expression by binding to the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of target mRNAs to induce their degradation and inhibit their translation [62]. Numerous studies have reported that circRNAs can bind to miRNAs and this sponging process reduces miRNA availability and thereby releases the inhibitory effect on their target mRNAs, resulting in the upregulation of target genes [6,52]. In addition, many studies have demonstrated that circRNAs interact with proteins, including RBPs and transcription factors [8]. CircRNAs can act as either protein decoys/sponges or scaffolds to affect the functions of the proteins. As protein sponges, they bind to proteins and reduce their interaction with target genes, mRNAs, or interacting proteins. As protein scaffolds, circRNAs can either recruit proteins to specific subcellular locations or facilitate their interaction with other proteins to influence biological processes [53]. The circRNA-protein interaction occurs through specific nucleotide sequences and unique tertiary structures of circRNAs and this is important not only for circRNA functions but also for their biogenesis and degradation [58]. Furthermore, some circRNAs that contain an internal ribosome entry site (IRES), an open reading frame (ORF), and N6-methyladenosine modification can be translated into functional proteins or peptides [53,63], which are mostly found in cancer cells [53]. Finally, EIciRNAs and ciRNAs are mainly located in the nucleus [53]. EIciRNAs interact with U1 snRNP and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) to induce the transcription of their parental genes [53,55]. Similarly, ciRNAs enhance their host gene transcription by associating with Pol II transcriptional machinery [64]. Notably, some ecircRNAs have also been found in the nucleus and regulate their host gene transcription [65].

4. CircRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in EOC

CircRNAs are detectable in tissues and body fluids, such as blood, urine, and saliva [66]. Due to their unique circular structures without free 5′ and 3′ ends, circRNAs are resistant to RNA exonucleases and therefore, have a long half-life [67,68]. Recently, accumulating studies have shown the dysregulations of circRNAs in OC and their clinical relevance. The circRNAs that have been reported to be dysregulated in OC and suggested to have diagnostic and prognostic potentials are listed in Table 1. Most of these studies used host gene symbols for circRNAs. In some cases, several circRNAs can be generated from the same precursor mRNA; therefore, we also include the numeric circBase ID in Table 1. Many of these studies did not specify the types and subtypes of OC. Given that the majority of OC cases fall into the EOC group, we include them in the list. However, we limit our discussion to those studies that have good sample sizes, clearly described tumor samples, and have comprehensively analyzed the association between the circRNA and clinicopathologic features, patient survival, and/or chemosensitivity.

4.1. CircRNAs as Potential Prognostic Biomarkers

Several circRNAs have been reported to be upregulated in EOC tissues and are associated with poor prognosis of patients. For instance, circABCB10 [88] and circHIPK3 [73] were significantly elevated in EOC tissues compared with the adjacent non-cancerous tissues. Patients with a high level of circABCB10 showed advanced FIGO stage, bigger tumor size, poorer differentiation, and worse overall survival (OS). Similarly, high circHIPK3 levels were associated with advanced stage, lymph node metastasis, and poor survival rate. The Cox regression analysis indicated that circHIPK3 could serve as an independent prognostic factor for worse outcomes of EOC patients. Recently, Li et al. [97] reported that the upregulation of circITGB6 was correlated with low chemosensitivity and poor prognosis in EOC patients. CircITGB6 expression was markedly elevated in tumor tissues obtained from patients with cisplatin (DDP) resistance, as compared with that from chemosensitive patients. In addition, circITGB6 levels were positively associated with advanced FIGO stage, ascites with tumor cells, tumor recurrence, and drug resistance in EOC patients, with most of them having serous carcinomas. Patients with high tumor circITGB6 levels had a higher relapse rate and lower OS. These findings suggest that high levels of circABCB10, circHIPK3, and circITGB6 in EOC tissues may be potential indicators of poor patient outcomes and/or responsiveness to DDP.
Conversely, the downregulation of some circRNAs in EOC tissues may predict a poor prognosis of EOC patients. Ning et al. [106] investigated circRNA expression profiles in EOC specimens compared with normal ovarian tissues through circRNA-sequencing followed by validation using real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Five downregulated circRNAs (circBNC2, circEXOC6B, circFAM13B, circN4BP2L2, and circRHOBTB3) and one upregulated circRNA (circCELSR1) were identified in the EOC specimens. Among them, downregulation of circEXOC6B and circN4BP2L2 were significantly associated with advanced FIGO stage and/or lymph node metastasis, as well as poor OS and progress-free survival (PFS), respectively. Similarly, circITCH has also been reported to be downregulated in EOC and other tumors [118,119,120]. Luo et al. [102] confirmed the downregulation of circITCH in EOC tissues compared with paired adjacent samples. The lower circITCH levels were correlated with larger tumor size, advanced FIGO stage and shorter OS. Moreover, circ_0078607 levels were reported to be decreased in HGSC tissues and were negatively correlated with the FIGO stage and serum CA125 levels. The subsequent Cox regression analysis showed that reduced circ_0078607 level was a risk factor for poor PFS and OS [109]. These findings suggest that high levels of circEXOC6B, circN4BP2L2, circITCH, and circ_0078607 are good prognostic markers for EOC patients. However, more studies with a larger group of samples are needed to confirm this. In addition, the correlation between the expression of circRNAs and specific subtypes of EOC remains to be elucidated.
While the circRNAs discussed above raise the possibility of using them as biomarkers for patient prognosis, these studies used adjacent non-cancerous tissues or normal ovarian tissues as controls for the evaluation of circRNA expression levels in EOC. This is not ideal as the majority of EOC tumors originate from epithelial cells outside of the ovary whereas the ovarian tissue contains follicles and stromal tissues and very few epithelial cells [121]. Since circRNAs are expressed in a cell/tissue-dependent manner, the differential expression of circRNAs between EOC and normal ovarian may reflect the different expression levels in different cell types, rather than cancer vs. non-cancerous cells. Therefore, a comparison of circRNAs in serum/plasma between EOC patients and healthy subjects will likely identify more reliable markers. Additionally, liquid biopsy can potentially be repeated as often as necessary to track disease progression and relapse in a real-time manner with minimal harm to patients [122]. Recently, extracellular vesicle (EV)-derived circRNAs in serum have been reported to have a prognostic role in EOC. Luo et al. [99] revealed the potential of circulating exosomal circFOXP1 as a predictor of survival and DDP resistance in EOC. In their study, circFOXP1 was reported to be enriched in exosomes of serum samples and it was strongly upregulated in patients with EOC. Compared with the DDP-sensitive cohort, the expression of exosomal circFOXP1 in DDP-resistant EOC patients was significantly elevated. In addition, the level of exosomal circFOXP1 was positively correlated with FIGO stage, primary tumor size, as well as lymph node and distant metastasis. EOC patients with high circFOXP1 levels presented shorter OS and disease-free survival (DFS), and exosomal circFOXP1 was an independent factor affecting the survival of EOC patients [99]. This study shed light on the application of exosomal circRNAs as prognostic biomarkers in EOC. Similarly, another EV-derived circRNA, circC20orf11, has been identified as a potential prognostic indicator in EOC. Yin et al. [96] demonstrated that increased serum EV-circC20orf11 expression was associated with advanced FIGO stage, high histological grade, and severe lymph node metastasis in EOC patients. EV-circC20orf11 expression was substantially upregulated in the serum of DDP-resistant patients, as compared with that of the DDP-sensitive cohort. The survival rate of patients with enhanced EV-circC20orf11 was significantly decreased. EV-circC20orf11 may act as an indicator of chemotherapy effectiveness and outcome of patients, providing a valuable clue to support the application of EV-derived cargo circRNA as a clinical marker in EOC.

4.2. Circulating circRNAs as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers

To date, no reliable biomarker or panel test exists for EOC diagnosis [1]. Most circRNA biomarker studies in EOC have focused on their prognostic value, while the diagnostic role of circRNAs is rarely studied. Recently, some circRNAs detected in tissue biopsies or blood samples have shown potential in EOC diagnosis. Liquid biopsy is more suitable as a screening tool for early detection due to its advantages of non-invasive, rapid detection and repeatability [122]. Therefore, here we focus only on the diagnostic value of serum/plasma-based circRNAs.
Luo et al. [99] reported that exosomal circFOXP1 was drastically upregulated in the serum of EOC patients and had good diagnostic efficacy in distinguishing EOC patients from healthy volunteers, with the area under curve (AUC) for the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) of 0.914. However, it is unclear whether there is a difference in circFOXP1 levels between healthy subjects and patients with early stages of EOC. Serum circSETDB1 was significantly elevated in patients with serous ovarian tumors, especially in patients with platinum-taxane-combined chemoresistance [98]. Serum circSETDB1 could not only distinguish serous ovarian cancer patients from healthy volunteers with an AUC of 0.8031 (sensitivity 78.33%, specificity 73.33%) but also effectively separate patients with primary chemoresistance from those with primary chemosensitivity (AUC: 0.8107, sensitivity 77.78%, specificity 76.74%) [98], suggesting its potential as a biomarker for diagnosis and chemosensitivity prediction. Since EOC could be easily misdiagnosed as some benign diseases, including endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory mass, it is crucial to consider the efficacy of circRNAs in separating patients with EOC (especially early-stage) from those with benign diseases. However, none of the above studies included patients with benign disorders in the control group, thus the role of these circRNAs may require further verification in optimized control cohorts with potential confounding conditions.
Several recent studies have compared the diagnostic efficacy of plasma circRNAs with CA125 and HE4 in patients. Ge et al. [117] identified two circRNAs, circ_0003972 and circ_0007288, to be considerably downregulated in the plasma of EOC patients. The diagnostic performance of these two circRNAs, either alone or combined (circCOMBO) in distinguishing EOC from benign controls was evaluated. Circ_0007288 (AUC: 0.79), circ_0003972 (AUC: 0.724) or circCOMBO (AUC: 0.781) did not show better diagnostic efficacy than CA125 (AUC: 0.824); however, the combination of CA125 and circCOMBO was more effective (AUC: 0.923) [117], suggesting that the two circRNAs may act as an adjunct to CA125. Excitingly, it was reported recently that plasma circBNC2 was downregulated in EOC patients compared with the benign or healthy cohorts, which might be superior to CA125 and HE4 for EOC detection, especially for early diagnosis [36]. In this study, CA125 showed a poor performance in distinguishing whole-stage (AUC: 0.373) or early-stage (stage I + II) EOC (AUC: 0.204) from the benign cohort, while circBNC2 remained powerful even in the diagnosis of early-stage EOC (AUC: 0.864, sensitivity 92.0%, specificity 80.7%) [36], suggesting that plasma circBNC2 might be a promising novel diagnostic biomarker. Notably, plasma circBNC2 showed the highest sensitivity (95.2%) compared to HE4 (80.7%) and CA125 (24.1%) in the discrimination between EOC and healthy cohorts, and its advantage over CA125 (AUC: 0.204) was the most outstanding in separating early-stage EOC from the benign group [36]. Similarly, Ning et al. [43] reported that plasma circN4BP2L2 could significantly discriminate between EOC and benign or normal cohorts. More importantly, plasma circN4BP2L2 also efficiently separated early-stage EOC from the benign or normal cohort, and the combination of circN4BP2L2 with CA125 and HE4 achieved the best, with an AUC of 0.91 (EOC vs. benign), 89% sensitivity and 87% specificity [43]. However, the study didn’t evaluate the efficiency of combined CA125 and HE4 for early detection, and whether the introduction of circN4BP2L2 could bring significant optimization to the combined CA125 and HE4 was unknown. Notably, circN4BP2L2 performed equally well for EOC diagnosis in both pre- and post-menopausal women, whereas HE4 showed limitations in pre-menopausal cases. Therefore, circN4BP2L2 may serve as a complementary or superior diagnostic biomarker over CA125 and HE4 in EOC.

5. circRNAs as Potential Therapeutic Targets

To date, many studies have reported the role of circRNAs in regulating various aspects of EOC development, such as proliferation, metastasis, apoptosis, autophagy, and chemosensitivity. Table 2 lists the circRNAs that are shown to exert either tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressive effects on EOC and the mechanisms underlying their actions. We also include the experimental models in these studies, such as the cell lines used. Since comprehensive reviews on circRNA functions have been published recently [10,123,124], we focus on circRNAs that are strongly dysregulated in EOC and have been studied using multiple model systems, especially animal models, and discuss their therapeutic potential.

5.1. circRNAs That Exert Tumor-Promoting Effects in EOC

Most circRNAs studied in EOC to date have been reported to exert tumor-promoting effects by inducing proliferation, metastasis, and/or reducing apoptosis via sponging various miRNAs. For instance, circ_0000144 was shown to act as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) for miR-610 to induce ELK3 expression, and subsequently promote EOC cell proliferation, migration and invasion, as well as tumor formation in nude mice. This circRNA was also elevated in tumor samples and serum of EOC patients and was negatively associated with patient survival [93]. Similarly, circ_0004712 was increased in EOC tissues compared with adjacent non-cancerous samples and was associated with high grade of tumor and lymph node metastasis, as well as poor outcomes of patients. Knockdown of circ_0004712 impaired proliferation, migration, invasion, viability, and tumor formation. Mechanistically, circ_0004712 acts as a tumor promoter by binding to miR-331-3p to upregulate its target gene, FZD4 [94]. Although these findings suggest that circ_0000144 and circ_0004712 have tumor-promoting effects, more studies with larger sample sizes and histological subtype-matched cell lines are needed to further evaluate their therapeutic potential.
Several circRNAs have recently been identified to promote EOC growth and metastasis by interacting with proteins or by potentially translating into a functional protein. CircRHOC was markedly upregulated in tumors, and it induced EOC cell viability, migration, and invasion in vitro. Silencing of circRHOC significantly reduced the size and number of tumor nodes in the mesentery of mice intraperitoneally injected with EOC cells, suggesting the promoting effect of circRHOC on tumor dissemination. These effects are likely mediated through both indirect and direct regulation of VEGF. First, circRHOC acts as a miR-302e sponge to upregulate VEGFA, which is a target gene of miR-302e. Second, circRHOC may directly bind and modulate VEGFA expression in EOC [78]. Chen et al. [76] discovered that circNOLC1, which was upregulated in EOC tumors when compared with benign and normal ovaries, promoted cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, but inhibited apoptosis in EOC in vitro. Using a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model, they found that EOC cells transfected with short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting circNOLC1 formed smaller tumors than the control cells, suggesting that knockdown of this circRNA inhibits EOC development. Mechanistically, circNOLC1 exerts these effects likely by interacting with ESRP1 protein to upregulate downstream CDK1 and RhoA. Additionally, Li et al. [150] showed that circ_0001756 exhibited various tumor-promoting effects on EOC via binding with IGF2BP2 protein. Circ_0001756 could bind and positively regulate IGF2BP2 and RAB5A to activate the downstream EGFR/MAPK signaling pathway, thereby inducing cell proliferation, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Interestingly, circCRIM1 was discovered to enhance EOC cell viability and metastasis not only by sponging miR-145-5p and miR-383-5p but may also by translating into a protein. CircCRIM1 harbors an ORF with 188 amino acids spanning the splice junction. Overexpression of this protein induced cell viability, migration and invasion, and inhibited apoptosis in EOC, suggesting a tumor-promoting activity of the circCRIM1-encoded protein [171]. However, whether circCRIM1 is endogenously translated into the protein remains to be confirmed.
Tumor cells in ascites are known to play a major role in EOC metastasis [190,191]. EOC cells disseminate from the primary site to ascites through EMT and transfer to the peritoneal cavity via ascites circulation, where they form metastatic lesions [190,192,193]. A recent study identified upregulated circ_0000497 and circ_0000918 in ascites tumor cells (ASCs) when compared with cells from primary and metastatic tumors in patients with HSGC. Transcriptomic analyses revealed that the ASCs exhibited mesenchymal phenotypes while the tumor cells from primary and metastatic lesions displayed gene expression patterns of epithelial cells. In vitro studies showed that these two circRNAs promoted migration and invasion, downregulated ZO1 and E-cadherin, and upregulated N-cadherin and vimentin in EOC cells [161], suggesting that the circRNAs may contribute to EOC metastasis by modulating EMT. However, the therapeutic potential of these circRNAs remains to be evaluated in vivo.
Like EMT, mesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (MMT) also contributes to peritoneal metastasis of EOC and exosomes from primary tumor cells are involved in this process [194]. CircWHSC1 [170] and circPUM1 [77] were reported to not only promote EOC cell proliferation, migration and invasion by sponging miRNAs but also act on the peritoneum in an exosome-dependent manner. When circWHSC1- and circPUM1-rich exosomes isolated from EOC cells were injected into mice grafted intraperitoneally with EOC cells, the peritoneal mesothelial cells were converted into carcinoma-associated fibroblasts in mice, thus providing a suitable environment for peritoneal implantation and dissemination of EOC in vivo. These studies suggest that targeting circWHSC1 and circPUM1 may be a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with metastatic EOC.
Angiogenesis increases intratumoral perfusion of nutrients and oxygen and plays an essential role in solid tumor growth and metastasis [1,195]. CircASH2L and circPTK2 have been reported to promote angiogenesis and tumor progression in EOC. Chen et al. [86] showed that circASH2L was remarkably upregulated in tumor tissues, and was associated with advanced FIGO stage, large tumor size, and lymph node metastasis. CircASH2L stimulated VEGFA expression by sponging miR-665, thereby enhancing the invasion and proliferation of EOC cells and angiogenic activity of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in vitro. Notably, silencing of circASH2L hindered tumor-associated angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, and repressed tumor growth in mice. Additionally, Wu et al. [155] reported that the expression of circPTK2 was significantly higher in tumors than in normal ovarian tissues. CircPTK2 promoted migration, invasion and EMT of EOC cells, and also induced angiogenesis capability of HUVECs in vitro. Overexpression of circPTK2 accelerated EOC tumorigenesis in a mouse xenograft model. These effects were mediated through the miR-639/FOXC1 axis. Therefore, targeting circASH2L and circPTK2 using small interfering RNA (siRNA) or shRNA may serve as a potential anti-angiogenic strategy in EOC.
Autophagy is another critical process in EOC development. Autophagy could play a tumor-suppressive role by reducing the damaged organelles (e.g., mitochondria) that lead to genomic instability and inducing autophagic cell death [196,197,198]. On the other hand, autophagy also increases the tolerance to nutrient deprivation and maintains the survival of tumor cells [199,200]. Recently, circRNF144B was reported to promote EOC progression by inhibiting tumor-suppressing autophagy. CircRNF144B was upregulated in tumor specimens in comparison to that in adjacent non-tumor tissues. Knockdown of circRNF144B increased autophagy and reduced tumor cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro. When circRNF144B knockdown cells were subcutaneously inoculated into nude mice, they formed small tumors than the control cells. Through tail vein injection, it was also found that the circRNF144B-silenced cells had lower metastatic potential. Further experiments showed that circRNF144B could sponge miR-342-3p to induce FBXL11 expression, leading to the ubiquitination and degradation of Beclin-1 and subsequent suppression of autophagy and EOC progression [92]. On the other hand, circMUC16 and circRAB11FIP1 were reported to induce tumor-promoting autophagy in EOC. CircMUC16 expression was higher in tumors and serum of EOC patients and was positively associated with advanced FIGO stage and tumor grade. CircMUC16 induced autophagy flux and LC3-II accumulation in EOC cells, and the circMUC16-mediated autophagy promoted cellular proliferation and invasion [84]. Silencing of circMUC16 suppressed pelvic peritoneal metastasis in EOC tumor-bearing mice. Mechanistically, circMUC16 induced autophagy via a circMUC16/miR-199a-5p/RUNX1 feedback loop [84]. Similarly, circRAB11FIP1 was found to promote autophagy of EOC through interacting with the miR-129 and DSC1. This circRNA was upregulated in EOC tissues and induced autophagy to accelerate cellular proliferation and invasion, while knockdown of which inhibited tumor dissemination in the peritoneal cavity of mice. CircRAB11FIP1 upregulated ATG14 and ATG7 by sponging miR-129 and by binding to DSC1 to facilitate its interaction with ATG101, thereby inducing autophagy of EOC to promote tumor progression [157].
Chemotherapy resistance is one of the main causes of poor survival in EOC patients [201]. Several circRNAs were discovered to contribute to chemoresistance in EOC. Using microarray and subsequent qPCR analyses, researchers found circTNPO3 to be one of the most strongly upregulated circRNAs in PTX-resistant EOC tissues when compared with PTX-sensitive EOC tumors. Silencing of circTNPO3 significantly enhanced the responsiveness of EOC cells to the PTX treatment both in vivo and in vitro. These effects are likely mediated via the miR-1299/NEK2 pathway [89]. In another study, circCELSR1 was one of the most highly upregulated circRNAs in PTX-resistant EOC tumors. CircCELSR1 targeted the miR-1252/FOXR2 axis to enhance the PTX resistance of tumor cells. Knockdown of circCELSR1 increased the cytotoxic activity of PTX in vitro and enhanced PTX-mediated tumor growth inhibition in mice [129]. Additionally, Li et al. [97] illustrated that circITGB6 enhanced the DDP resistance of EOC through a mechanism involving tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). CircITGB6 was identified to be highly upregulated in tumors and serums of EOC patients resistant to DDP treatment. Overexpression of circITGB6 reduced while silencing of circITGB6 enhanced, the antitumor effect of DDP in vivo. Further examination revealed that circITGB6 induced macrophage polarization toward the pro-tumor M2 phenotype through the direct interaction with IGF2BP2 to stabilize FGF9 mRNA. The circITGB6-mediated TAM M2 polarization resulted in an immunosuppressive microenvironment and thus led to DDP resistance of EOC. Interestingly, intraperitoneal injection of an antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) targeting circITGB6 into mice bearing EOC tumors significantly inhibited M2 polarization, enhanced DDP sensitivity and increased the OS rate of mice. These studies raise the possibility of targeting these circRNAs to overcome chemoresistance in EOC.

5.2. circRNAs That Exert Tumor-Suppressing Effects in EOC

Several circRNAs have been reported to suppress tumor development in EOC. Recently, Wu et al. [114] discovered that circFBXO7 inhibited malignancies of EOC cells by inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin activity. Through rRNA-depleted RNA-seq, circFBXO7 was identified to be highly downregulated in EOC tissues, as compared with normal ovary samples. Functional analysis showed that overexpression of circFBXO7 repressed EOC cell proliferation, migration and invasion, while knockdown of circFBXO7 had the opposite effect. Importantly, circFBXO7 overexpression suppressed both local tumor growth and metastasis in mice that had been inoculated with EOC cells. CircFBXO7 exerts these anti-tumor effects by acting as a ceRNA of miR-96-5p to upregulate its target gene MTSS1, which in turn, inhibits the activity of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [114].
CircRHOBTB3 (circ_0007444) was reported to inhibit EOC progression by serving as a ceRNA to facilitate PTEN expression [110,111]. PTEN is a critical tumor suppressor in a variety of cancers, including EOC [202,203,204,205]. Wu et al. [111] showed that circ_0007444 was markedly decreased in tumor samples, as compared with normal tissues. Patients with low circ_0007444 expression presented with advanced tumor stages and grades, large tumor sizes, and low 5-year survival. Circ_0007444 attenuated proliferation, migration and invasion, and induced apoptosis of EOC cells. Overexpression of circ_0007444 also substantially inhibited tumor growth in nude mice. These effects were mediated via targeting miR-570-3p to upregulate PTEN expression. Similarly, Fu et al. [110] reported that circRHOBTB3 was downregulated in EOC tissues, and its expression was negatively correlated with advanced FIGO stage, lymph node metastasis and poor OS. CircRHOBTB3 could absorb miR-23a-3p to upregulate PTEN, thereby blocking AKT activation. Mediated by the miR-23a-3p/PTEN/AKT axis, circRHOBTB3 suppressed proliferation, G1/S transition, invasion, and induced apoptosis in EOC cells. Overexpression of circRHOBTB3 also greatly inhibited tumor growth in nude mice. These studies suggest that circRHOBTB3 exerts a potent tumor-suppressive effect by upregulating PTEN. PTEN loss or mutations are common in EC and CCC [1]. PTEN loss or downregulation is also a frequent event in HGSC that defines a molecular subgroup with a significantly worse prognosis [206]. Therefore, targeting circRHOBTB3 to reconstitute PTEN function might be a potential therapeutic strategy for EOC.
CircCDR1as, also known as ciRS-7, is one of the most well-studied circRNAs. CircCDR1as is mostly regarded as a tumor-promoting circRNA in a variety of cancers, but its role in EOC is still controversial. Three studies reported that circCDR1as enhanced chemosensitivity and reduced cell proliferation, migration, and invasion [70,71,72], while another study showed that circCDR1as promoted EOC progression [69]. Zhao et al. [71] observed that circCDR1as sensitized EOC to DDP by modulating the miR-1270/SCAI signaling pathway. CircCDR1as was remarkably downregulated in tumor tissues and serum exosomes from OC patients with DDP resistance, as compared with that from DDP-sensitive patients. CircCDR1as overexpression enhanced while its knockdown reduced basal and DDP-induced apoptosis in vitro. Silencing of circCDR1as also accelerated tumor growth in vivo and strongly attenuated the inhibitory effect of DDP on tumor growth [71], suggesting its potential involvement in the response of tumor cells to DDP. CircCDR1as could bind to miR-1270 to weaken its suppression on the downstream SCAI, thereby enhancing the DDP chemosensitivity of EOC [71]. Similar effects of circCDR1as on increasing DDP activity in vitro and in vivo were reported in another study, in which miR-1299 and its target gene, PPP1R12B, were identified as downstream effectors [70]. CircCDR1as has also been reported to have lower expression in EOC tumors and inhibit cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro [72]. In contrast, Zhang et al., reported that circCDR1as was upregulated in EOC tissues and its knockdown decreased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and tumor growth in vivo [69]. The reason for these opposite findings is unknown. One possibility may be due to the different histological subtypes of the samples examined. The controls used in these two studies were ovarian epithelial tissues from non-cancer patients and ovarian tissues adjacent to the tumors, respectively. As these control samples have different cell types, this may have contributed to such discrepancies. Also, techniques used in circRNA research, such as qPCR and si/shRNA-mediated circRNA knockdown, have limitations. Therefore, more studies are required to determine the involvement of circCDR1as in EOC development and its potential as a therapeutic target.
CircPLEKHM3 has been reported to have tumor-suppressive effects on EOC [115,177]. Sun et al. [177] showed that circPLEKHM3 exacerbated the curcumin-mediated tumor suppression by targeting the miR320a/SMG1 axis. CircPLEKHM3 was significantly downregulated in tumors compared with normal ovarian tissues. CircPLEKHM3 enhanced the cytotoxicity of curcumin in EOC cells and strengthened the anti-tumor effect of curcumin in mice. In addition, Zhang et al. [115] reported that circPLEKHM3 inhibited EOC progression through the modulation of a miR-9/BRCA1/DNAJB6/KLF4/AKT1 axis. Using RNA-seq, qRT-PCR, and single-molecule RNA in situ hybridization, the authors found that circPLEKHM3 was strongly downregulated in tumors when compared with that of normal ovarian tissues and was also reduced in peritoneal metastatic ovarian tumors as compared with the corresponding primary lesions. Downregulation of circPLEKHM3 was correlated with short OS and recurrence-free survival in EOC patients. On the other hand, the linear PLEKHM3 mRNA expression did not differ between tumor tissues and normal samples and was not associated with patient outcomes, suggesting that circPLEKHM3 acts as a tumor suppressor independent of its linear transcript. In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that circPLEKHM3 played an anti-tumor role by sponging miR-9 to enhance the tumor-suppressive effect of BRCA1, DNAJB6, and KLF4, and consequently inactivated the AKT signaling in EOC. However, it remains to be investigated whether circPLEKHM3 overexpression could inhibit tumor formation or reduce tumor burden and therefore, serves as a potential therapeutic strategy for EOC.
CircATRNL1 is known to inhibit EOC development by acting as a ceRNA or translating into a protein. Wang et al. [107] reported that circATRNL1 was significantly reduced in tumor tissues, and its low expression was correlated with advanced stage, lymph node metastasis, and poor survival rate of patients. CircATRNL1 exerted anti-tumor functions by targeting miR-378 to activate the SMAD4 pathway. Overexpression of circATRNL1 restrained the proliferation, migration and invasion of EOC cells and inhibited angiogenesis of HUVECs in vitro. In a mouse intraperitoneal xenograft model, overexpression of circATRNL1 significantly reduced the number and weight of tumor nodules in the abdomen, suggesting that circATRNL1 effectively represses tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Additionally, Lyu et al. [179] suggested that circATRNL1 may act as a tumor suppressor by encoding a 131 amino acid protein in EOC cells. CircATRNL1 was downregulated in tumor samples from stage III-IV HGSC patients, as compared with paired normal ovarian tissues, and it inhibited proliferation, migration, and invasion of EOC cells. CircATRNL1 harbors an ORF and an IRES that may initiate ORF translation. However, whether circATRNL1 is endogenously translated into the protein and the biological activity of this encoded protein remain to be confirmed.

6. Concluding Remarks and Future Directions

Increasing evidence has suggested that dysregulation of circRNAs contributes to EOC development. However, research on circRNA in EOC is still at an early stage and much work needs to be done to develop circRNA-based biomarkers and therapeutics. The up- or downregulation of certain circRNAs in EOC tissues or patient serum samples and their association with patient survival, cancer stages and/or grades, and chemosensitivity suggest that circRNAs could be used as diagnostic or prognostic markers of EOC. However, most studies published to date did not specify histologic subtypes of EOC. Therefore, circRNAs dysregulated in each subtype of EOC and their correlations with the genomic characteristics remain to be explored. Given the heterogeneous origins of EOC, a single circRNA biomarker is highly unlikely to be sufficient for all subtypes, and circRNA panels will probably be more robust. In the future, multi-center prospective studies with large sample cohorts with defined histology subtypes and EOC stages will likely facilitate the transformation of circRNA research from the laboratory to the clinic. Also, the potential of using circRNAs as predictive biomarkers of EOC remains to be elucidated. It might also be interesting to establish algorithms based on circRNAs and their combination with other markers, such as HE4 and CA125. The risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), which combines HE4 and CA125 measurements with menopausal status, has been approved by the FDA to determine the risk of malignancy in women with pelvic mass [1,207,208,209]. It will be interesting to determine if the introduction of circRNAs into the ROMA algorithm may lead to the development of effective screening or early detection tools for EOC.
Most studies reported so far used qRT-PCR to quantify circRNAs in cells and tissues. However, since this technique relies on reverse transcription and PCR amplification with divergent primers, there could be experimental bias and artifacts [210,211]. The nanoString nCounter, a novel digital counting technology, is already in clinical use for breast cancer prognostication based on the prediction analysis of microarray 50 (PAM50) mRNA test [212,213]. With color-coded probes spanning the specific back-spliced junctions of circRNAs, the nanoString nCounter is also applicable for circRNAs detection [210]. This novel enzyme-free approach was proven to be superior to qRT-PCR in sensitivity, specificity, and quantitative accuracy of circRNA detection [210]. It is reliable even in low-quality RNA samples such as those from severely degraded formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues [210]. In the future, the application of novel technologies in EOC studies will likely accelerate the discovery and implementation of circRNA-based biomarkers in clinical practice.
So far, more than ninety circRNAs have been reported to regulate EOC cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, invasion, chemosensitivity, and/or tumor growth. The research strategies employed in these studies generally include the measurement of circRNA levels and their clinicopathological relevance in patient samples, functional assessment using knockdown and overexpression approaches, and xenograft mouse models to evaluate the in vivo functions of circRNAs. Determination of the interacting molecules (e.g., miRNAs and proteins) and their downstream target genes is also investigated. For in vitro models of these studies, SKOV3 and A2780 are the most frequently used cell lines. SKOV3 is also the most used cell line for in vivo models (Table 2). These cell lines represent the EC subtype of EOC [1]. Given that HGSC is the most common subtype, more cell lines derived from HGSC should be used. Some of the cell lines used are problematic. For example, HO-8910 cells have been reported to be contaminated with cervical adenocarcinoma HeLa cells [214,215]. The OV-1063 cell line might be partially misidentified (www.atcc.org accessed on 27 October 2022), and the SW626 cell line may be established from an ovarian metastasis of a colonic carcinoma [216]. Therefore, it is important to not only use multiple cell models representing different subtypes but also select appropriate cell lines for EOC studies.
Functional studies of circRNAs in EOC have been commonly carried out using overexpression and knockdown approaches. Overexpression is typically achieved by transfecting a circRNA-expressing vector into EOC cells. However, it has been reported that circRNA-expressing plasmids could also co-produce linear RNAs [217]. Therefore, to make sure that the phenotypes observed are indeed due to the circRNA overexpression, it is recommended to measure both circ- and linear RNAs and/or include a construct lacking one or two intronic repeats as a control vector, which cannot be spliced into the circRNA [217]. In loss-of-function experiments, siRNAs or shRNAs targeting the back-splice junction are used. These si/shRNAs may also result in reduced levels of the cognate linear mRNAs [217,218]. Recently, CRISPR/Cas13 system, a more specific knockdown technique, has been applied to silence circRNAs [218,219] and this could be used in future EOC studies to reduce off-target effects in loss-of-function assays. Another circRNA depletion strategy, which uses ASO to target the back-splicing junction of circRNA, has also shown promising tumor-suppressing effects in other cancers [220,221]. This strategy has been reported recently to inhibit circITGB6 in EOC [97]. However, more studies are needed to further investigate the therapeutic potential of ASO-based strategy in EOC.
To study the in vivo effects of circRNAs in EOC development, researchers inoculated mice with tumor cells with stable overexpression or knockdown of a circRNA. Other in vivo delivery strategies with clinical potential, including nanoparticle delivery systems, remain to be explored in EOC. Nanoparticle delivery systems have shown good delivery efficiency for circRNAs in other cancers. Du et al. [222] reported that injection of a siRNA targeting circDnmt1 conjugated with gold nanoparticles inhibited breast cancer progression and extended the lifespan of mice. Lu et al. [223] have shown that circEHMT1 plasmid-loaded nanoparticles inhibited lung metastasis of breast cancer in vivo. Therefore, nanoparticle delivery of circRNA-based agents will be useful to investigate the therapeutic potential of circRNAs in EOC in the future.
In summary, although some circRNAs have been proposed to play important roles in EOC and have diagnostic and therapeutic potentials, there are still lots of challenges in this field. In the future, more rigorous and comprehensive studies are needed to identify biomarkers for EOC and to clarify the functions and mechanisms of circRNAs. Development of in vivo delivery strategies of circRNAs is also required to advance their clinical potential in EOC. Although there is more work to be done, the development and application of circRNA-based prediction, diagnosis, and prognostic assessment and therapeutics could lead to early detection of EOC and help guide clinicians to make optimal personalized treatment decisions, monitor disease progression and recurrence, and thus greatly improve the survival and life quality of EOC patients.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Q. and C.P.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Q., O.A., E.E. and C.P.; writing—review & editing, Y.C., C.P. and Y.Q.; visualization, Y.C.; supervision, C.P.; funding acquisition, C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-166079 and PJT-153146) and Cancer Research Society to C.P.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. Ovarian Cancers: Evolving Paradigms in Research and Care; National Academies Press (US): Washington, DC, USA, 2016.
  2. Torre, L.A.; Trabert, B.; DeSantis, C.E.; Miller, K.D.; Samimi, G.; Runowicz, C.D.; Gaudet, M.M.; Jemal, A.; Siegel, R.L. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Arora, N.; Talhouk, A.; McAlpine, J.N.; Law, M.R.; Hanley, G.E. Long-term mortality among women with epithelial ovarian cancer: A population-based study in British Columbia, Canada. BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bach, D.H.; Lee, S.K.; Sood, A.K. Circular RNAs in Cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2019, 16, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Xiao, M.S.; Ai, Y.; Wilusz, J.E. Biogenesis and Functions of Circular RNAs Come into Focus. Trends Cell Biol. 2020, 30, 226–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. He, A.T.; Liu, J.; Li, F.; Yang, B.B. Targeting circular RNAs as a therapeutic approach: Current strategies and challenges. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yang, Q.; Li, F.; He, A.T.; Yang, B.B. Circular RNAs: Expression, localization, and therapeutic potentials. Mol. Ther. 2021, 29, 1683–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Du, W.W.; Zhang, C.; Yang, W.; Yong, T.; Awan, F.M.; Yang, B.B. Identifying and Characterizing circRNA-Protein Interaction. Theranostics 2017, 7, 4183–4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Verduci, L.; Tarcitano, E.; Strano, S.; Yarden, Y.; Blandino, G. CircRNAs: Role in human diseases and potential use as biomarkers. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, X.; Mei, J.; Wang, H.; Gu, D.; Ding, J.; Liu, C. The emerging roles of circular RNAs in ovarian cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2020, 20, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Foruzandeh, Z.; Zeinali-Sehrig, F.; Nejati, K.; Rahmanpour, D.; Pashazadeh, F.; Seif, F.; Alivand, M.R. CircRNAs as potent biomarkers in ovarian cancer: A systematic scoping review. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 2021, 26, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, F.; Yang, Q.; He, A.T.; Yang, B.B. Circular RNAs in cancer: Limitations in functional studies and diagnostic potential. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021, 75, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Prat, J.; D’Angelo, E.; Espinosa, I. Ovarian carcinomas: At least five different diseases with distinct histological features and molecular genetics. Hum. Pathol. 2018, 80, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kobel, M.; Kang, E.Y. The Evolution of Ovarian Carcinoma Subclassification. Cancers 2022, 14, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. De Leo, A.; Santini, D.; Ceccarelli, C.; Santandrea, G.; Palicelli, A.; Acquaviva, G.; Chiarucci, F.; Rosini, F.; Ravegnini, G.; Pession, A.; et al. What Is New on Ovarian Carcinoma: Integrated Morphologic and Molecular Analysis Following the New 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Adhikari, H.; Hassell, L.A. WHO Classification. Available online: https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/ovarytumorwhoclassif.html (accessed on 11 November 2022).
  17. Kim, J.; Park, E.Y.; Kim, O.; Schilder, J.M.; Coffey, D.M.; Cho, C.H.; Bast, R.C., Jr. Cell Origins of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cancers 2018, 10, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kurman, R.J.; Carcangiu, M.L.; Herrington, C.S.; Young, R.H. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs, 4th ed.; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  19. Matulonis, U.A.; Sood, A.K.; Fallowfield, L.; Howitt, B.E.; Sehouli, J.; Karlan, B.Y. Ovarian cancer. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2016, 2, 16061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, J.; Abushahin, N.; Pang, S.; Xiang, L.; Chambers, S.K.; Fadare, O.; Kong, B.; Zheng, W. Tubal origin of ‘ovarian’ low-grade serous carcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24, 1488–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Vang, R.; Shih Ie, M.; Kurman, R.J. Fallopian tube precursors of ovarian low- and high-grade serous neoplasms. Histopathology 2013, 62, 44–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ahn, G.; Folkins, A.K.; McKenney, J.K.; Longacre, T.A. Low-grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 52 Invasive Cases and Identification of a Possible Noninvasive Intermediate Lesion. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2016, 40, 1165–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moujaber, T.; Balleine, R.L.; Gao, B.; Madsen, I.; Harnett, P.R.; DeFazio, A. New therapeutic opportunities for women with low-grade serous ovarian cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2021, 29, R1–R16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Santillan, A.; Kim, Y.W.; Zahurak, M.L.; Gardner, G.J.; Giuntoli, R.L., 2nd; Shih, I.M.; Bristow, R.E. Differences of chemoresistance assay between invasive micropapillary/low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2007, 17, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Babaier, A.; Mal, H.; Alselwi, W.; Ghatage, P. Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary: The Current Status. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Peres, L.C.; Cushing-Haugen, K.L.; Kobel, M.; Harris, H.R.; Berchuck, A.; Rossing, M.A.; Schildkraut, J.M.; Doherty, J.A. Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Survival by Histotype and Disease Stage. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2019, 111, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Cho, K.R.; Shih Ie, M. Ovarian cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2009, 4, 287–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, Y.; Mang, M.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Klein, R.; Kong, B.; Zheng, W. Tubal origin of ovarian endometriosis and clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 5, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Chen, S.; Li, Y.; Qian, L.; Deng, S.; Liu, L.; Xiao, W.; Zhou, Y. A Review of the Clinical Characteristics and Novel Molecular Subtypes of Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 668151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhu, C.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, T.; Qian, L.; Xiao, W.; Wei, H.; Jin, T.; Zhou, Y. Updates of Pathogenesis, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives for Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma. J. Cancer 2021, 12, 2295–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Iida, Y.; Okamoto, A.; Hollis, R.L.; Gourley, C.; Herrington, C.S. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: A clinical and molecular perspective. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2021, 31, 605–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Oseledchyk, A.; Leitao, M.M., Jr.; Konner, J.; O’Cearbhaill, R.E.; Zamarin, D.; Sonoda, Y.; Gardner, G.J.; Long Roche, K.; Aghajanian, C.A.; Grisham, R.N.; et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I endometrioid or clear cell ovarian cancer in the platinum era: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Cohort Study, 2000-2013. Ann. Oncol. 2017, 28, 2985–2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Babaier, A.; Ghatage, P. Mucinous Cancer of the Ovary: Overview and Current Status. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Koshiyama, M.; Matsumura, N.; Konishi, I. Recent concepts of ovarian carcinogenesis: Type I and type II. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 934261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Prat, J. FIGO’s staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: Abridged republication. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015, 26, 87–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Hu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Lang, J.; Ning, L. Utility Of Plasma circBNC2 As A Diagnostic Biomarker In Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Onco. Targets Ther. 2019, 12, 9715–9723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Bast, R.C., Jr.; Badgwell, D.; Lu, Z.; Marquez, R.; Rosen, D.; Liu, J.; Baggerly, K.A.; Atkinson, E.N.; Skates, S.; Zhang, Z.; et al. New tumor markers: CA125 and beyond. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2005, 15 (Suppl. 3), 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sroczynski, G.; Gogollari, A.; Conrads-Frank, A.; Hallsson, L.R.; Pashayan, N.; Widschwendter, M.; Siebert, U. Cost-Effectiveness of Early Detection and Prevention Strategies for Endometrial Cancer-A Systematic Review. Cancers 2020, 12, 1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dochez, V.; Caillon, H.; Vaucel, E.; Dimet, J.; Winer, N.; Ducarme, G. Biomarkers and algorithms for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: CA125, HE4, RMI and ROMA, a review. J. Ovarian Res. 2019, 12, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Sandri, M.T.; Bottari, F.; Franchi, D.; Boveri, S.; Candiani, M.; Ronzoni, S.; Peiretti, M.; Radice, D.; Passerini, R.; Sideri, M. Comparison of HE4, CA125 and ROMA algorithm in women with a pelvic mass: Correlation with pathological outcome. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013, 128, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ferraro, S.; Schiumarini, D.; Panteghini, M. Human epididymis protein 4: Factors of variation. Clin. Chim. Acta 2015, 438, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moore, R.G.; Miller, M.C.; Eklund, E.E.; Lu, K.H.; Bast, R.C., Jr.; Lambert-Messerlian, G. Serum levels of the ovarian cancer biomarker HE4 are decreased in pregnancy and increase with age. Am. J. Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 206, 349 e341–e347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Ning, L.; Lang, J.; Wu, L. Plasma circN4BP2L2 is a promising novel diagnostic biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer 2022, 22, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Coleridge, S.L.; Bryant, A.; Kehoe, S.; Morrison, J. Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 2, CD005343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Matulonis, U.A. Ovarian Cancer; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 32. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sapiezynski, J.; Taratula, O.; Rodriguez-Rodriguez, L.; Minko, T. Precision targeted therapy of ovarian cancer. J. Control Release 2016, 243, 250–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Yang, C.; Xia, B.R.; Zhang, Z.C.; Zhang, Y.J.; Lou, G.; Jin, W.L. Immunotherapy for Ovarian Cancer: Adjuvant, Combination, and Neoadjuvant. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 577869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kurnit, K.C.; Fleming, G.F.; Lengyel, E. Updates and New Options in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treatment. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 137, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Murphy, A.D.; Morgan, R.D.; Clamp, A.R.; Jayson, G.C. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2022, 126, 851–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bonello, M.; Sims, A.H.; Langdon, S.P. Human epidermal growth factor receptor targeted inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Cancer Biol. Med. 2018, 15, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Wu, J.W.Y.; Dand, S.; Doig, L.; Papenfuss, A.T.; Scott, C.L.; Ho, G.; Ooi, J.D. T-Cell Receptor Therapy in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Mini Review. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 672502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kristensen, L.S.; Andersen, M.S.; Stagsted, L.V.W.; Ebbesen, K.K.; Hansen, T.B.; Kjems, J. The biogenesis, biology and characterization of circular RNAs. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2019, 20, 675–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhao, X.; Cai, Y.; Xu, J. Circular RNAs: Biogenesis, Mechanism, and Function in Human Cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Jeck, W.R.; Sorrentino, J.A.; Wang, K.; Slevin, M.K.; Burd, C.E.; Liu, J.; Marzluff, W.F.; Sharpless, N.E. Circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats. RNA 2013, 19, 141–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, Z.; Huang, C.; Bao, C.; Chen, L.; Lin, M.; Wang, X.; Zhong, G.; Yu, B.; Hu, W.; Dai, L.; et al. Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2015, 22, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Geng, X.; Jia, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, L.; Li, Q.; Zang, A.; Wang, H. Circular RNA: Biogenesis, degradation, functions and potential roles in mediating resistance to anticarcinogens. Epigenomics 2020, 12, 267–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Su, M.; Xiao, Y.; Ma, J.; Tang, Y.; Tian, B.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Wu, Z.; Yang, D.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Circular RNAs in Cancer: Emerging functions in hallmarks, stemness, resistance and roles as potential biomarkers. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Huang, A.; Zheng, H.; Wu, Z.; Chen, M.; Huang, Y. Circular RNA-protein interactions: Functions, mechanisms, and identification. Theranostics 2020, 10, 3503–3517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Conn, S.J.; Pillman, K.A.; Toubia, J.; Conn, V.M.; Salmanidis, M.; Phillips, C.A.; Roslan, S.; Schreiber, A.W.; Gregory, P.A.; Goodall, G.J. The RNA binding protein quaking regulates formation of circRNAs. Cell 2015, 160, 1125–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Ashwal-Fluss, R.; Meyer, M.; Pamudurti, N.R.; Ivanov, A.; Bartok, O.; Hanan, M.; Evantal, N.; Memczak, S.; Rajewsky, N.; Kadener, S. circRNA biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell 2014, 56, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Huang, Y.; Zhu, Q. Mechanisms Regulating Abnormal Circular RNA Biogenesis in Cancer. Cancers 2021, 13, 4185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. O’Brien, J.; Hayder, H.; Zayed, Y.; Peng, C. Overview of MicroRNA Biogenesis, Mechanisms of Actions, and Circulation. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Sinha, T.; Panigrahi, C.; Das, D.; Chandra Panda, A. Circular RNA translation, a path to hidden proteome. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 2022, 13, e1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.O.; Chen, T.; Xiang, J.F.; Yin, Q.F.; Xing, Y.H.; Zhu, S.; Yang, L.; Chen, L.L. Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs. Mol. Cell 2013, 51, 792–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lei, K.; Bai, H.; Wei, Z.; Xie, C.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Chen, Q. The mechanism and function of circular RNAs in human diseases. Exp. Cell Res. 2018, 368, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kristensen, L.S.; Jakobsen, T.; Hager, H.; Kjems, J. The emerging roles of circRNAs in cancer and oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 19, 188–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Beilerli, A.; Gareev, I.; Beylerli, O.; Yang, G.; Pavlov, V.; Aliev, G.; Ahmad, A. Circular RNAs as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022, 83, 242–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Jeck, W.R.; Sharpless, N.E. Detecting and characterizing circular RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, F.; Xu, Y.; Ye, W.; Jiang, J.; Wu, C. Circular RNA S-7 promotes ovarian cancer EMT via sponging miR-641 to up-regulate ZEB1 and MDM2. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20200825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, H.; Zhao, X.; Wang, J.; Jiang, X.; Cheng, Y.; He, Y.; Sun, L.; Zhang, G. Circular RNA CDR1as Alleviates Cisplatin-Based Chemoresistance by Suppressing MiR-1299 in Ovarian Cancer. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 815448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Zhao, Z.; Ji, M.; Wang, Q.; He, N.; Li, Y. Circular RNA Cdr1as Upregulates SCAI to Suppress Cisplatin Resistance in Ovarian Cancer via miR-1270 Suppression. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2019, 18, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Chen, H.; Mao, M.; Jiang, J.; Zhu, D.; Li, P. Circular RNA CDR1as acts as a sponge of miR-135b-5p to suppress ovarian cancer progression. Onco Targets Ther 2019, 12, 3869–3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Liu, N.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.Y.; Wang, L. CircHIPK3 is upregulated and predicts a poor prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 3713–3718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, M.; Xia, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Lou, G. Circular RNA (hsa_circ_0051240) promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion in ovarian cancer through miR-637/KLK4 axis. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019, 47, 1224–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Li, Q.H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, S.; Zong, Z.H.; Du, Y.P.; Sheng, X.J.; Zhao, Y. circ-CSPP1 promotes proliferation, invasion and migration of ovarian cancer cells by acting as a miR-1236-3p sponge. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 114, 108832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chen, S.; Wu, W.; Li, Q.H.; Xie, B.M.; Shen, F.; Du, Y.P.; Zong, Z.H.; Wang, L.L.; Wei, X.Q.; Zhao, Y. Circ-NOLC1 promotes epithelial ovarian cancer tumorigenesis and progression by binding ESRP1 and modulating CDK1 and RhoA expression. Cell Death Discov. 2021, 7, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Guan, X.; Zong, Z.H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, L.L.; Zhao, Y. circPUM1 Promotes Tumorigenesis and Progression of Ovarian Cancer by Sponging miR-615-5p and miR-6753-5p. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2019, 18, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Wang, L.L.; Zong, Z.H.; Liu, Y.; Guan, X.; Chen, S.; Zhao, Y. CircRhoC promotes tumorigenicity and progression in ovarian cancer by functioning as a miR-302e sponge to positively regulate VEGFA. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 8472–8481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. You, J.; Han, Y.; Qiao, H.; Han, Y.; Lu, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, X.; Kai, H.; Zheng, Y. Hsa_circ_0063804 enhances ovarian cancer cells proliferation and resistance to cisplatin by targeting miR-1276/CLU axis. Aging (Albany NY) 2022, 14, 4699–4713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, S.; Li, Z.; Zhu, G.; Hong, L.; Hu, C.; Wang, K.; Cui, K.; Hao, C. RNA-binding protein IGF2BP2 enhances circ_0000745 abundancy and promotes aggressiveness and stemness of ovarian cancer cells via the microRNA-3187-3p/ERBB4/PI3K/AKT axis. J. Ovar. Res. 2021, 14, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cao, Y.; Xie, X.; Li, M.; Gao, Y. CircHIPK2 Contributes to DDP Resistance and Malignant Behaviors of DDP-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Cells Both in vitro and in vivo Through circHIPK2/miR-338-3p/CHTOP ceRNA Pathway. Oncol. Targets Ther. 2021, 14, 3151–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, Y.; Lin, S.; An, N. Hsa_circ_0009910: Oncogenic circular RNA targets microRNA-145 in ovarian cancer cells. Cell Cycle 2020, 19, 1857–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhao, Y.; Hu, Y.; Shen, Q.; Chen, Q.; Zhu, X.J.; Jiang, S.S.; Zhang, Q. CircRNA_MYLK promotes malignant progression of ovarian cancer through regulating microRNA-652. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 24, 5281–5291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Gan, X.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, X.; Obiegbusi, S.C.; Yong, M.; Long, X.; Hu, J. CircMUC16 promotes autophagy of epithelial ovarian cancer via interaction with ATG13 and miR-199a. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Sun, D.; Liu, J.; Zhou, L. Upregulation of circular RNA circFAM53B predicts adverse prognosis and accelerates the progression of ovarian cancer via the miR646/VAMP2 and miR647/MDM2 signaling pathways. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 42, 2728–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chen, J.; Li, X.; Yang, L.; Li, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J. CircASH2L Promotes Ovarian Cancer Tumorigenesis, Angiogenesis, and Lymphangiogenesis by Regulating the miR-665/VEGFA Axis as a Competing Endogenous RNA. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 595585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Pei, C.; Wang, H.; Shi, C.; Zhang, C.; Wang, M. CircRNA hsa_circ_0013958 may contribute to the development of ovarian cancer by affecting epithelial-mesenchymal transition and apoptotic signaling pathways. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2020, 34, e23292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Chen, Y.; Ye, X.; Xia, X.; Lin, X. Circular RNA ABCB10 correlates with advanced clinicopathological features and unfavorable survival, and promotes cell proliferation while reduces cell apoptosis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Biomark 2019, 26, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Xia, B.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, J. Circular RNA circTNPO3 Regulates Paclitaxel Resistance of Ovarian Cancer Cells by miR-1299/NEK2 Signaling Pathway. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 21, 780–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liang, Y.X.; Zhang, L.L.; Yang, L. circANKRD17(has_circ_0007883) confers paclitaxel resistance of ovarian cancer via interacting with FUS to stabilize FOXR2. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yong, M.; Hu, J.; Zhu, H.; Jiang, X.; Gan, X.; Hu, L. Circ-EEF2 facilitated autophagy via interaction with mir-6881-3p and ANXA2 in EOC. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2020, 10, 3737–3751. [Google Scholar]
  92. Song, W.; Zeng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Cheng, H.; Wang, J.; Wu, F. CircRNF144B/miR-342-3p/FBXL11 axis reduced autophagy and promoted the progression of ovarian cancer by increasing the ubiquitination of Beclin-1. Cell Death Dis. 2022, 13, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wu, D.; Liu, J.; Yu, L.; Wu, S.; Qiu, X. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0000144 aggravates ovarian Cancer progression by regulating ELK3 via sponging miR-610. J. Ovar. Res. 2022, 15, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhou, X.; Jiang, J.; Guo, S. Hsa_circ_0004712 downregulation attenuates ovarian cancer malignant development by targeting the miR-331-3p/FZD4 pathway. J. Ovar. Res. 2021, 14, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ma, L.; Liu, W.; Li, M. Circ_0061140 Contributes to Ovarian Cancer Progression by Targeting miR-761/LETM1 Signaling. Biochem. Genet. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yin, J.; Huang, H.Y.; Long, Y.; Ma, Y.; Kamalibaike, M.; Dawuti, R.; Li, L. circ_C20orf11 enhances DDP resistance by inhibiting miR-527/YWHAZ through the promotion of extracellular vesicle-mediated macrophage M2 polarization in ovarian cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2021, 22, 440–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Li, H.; Luo, F.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, W.; Xiang, T.; Pan, Q.; Cai, L.; Zhao, J.; Weng, D.; Li, Y.; et al. CircITGB6 promotes ovarian cancer cisplatin resistance by resetting tumor-associated macrophage polarization toward the M2 phenotype. J. Immunother. Cancer 2022, 10, e004029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wang, W.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, G. Serum circSETDB1 is a promising biomarker for predicting response to platinum-taxane-combined chemotherapy and relapse in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Oncol. Targets Ther. 2019, 12, 7451–7457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Luo, Y.; Gui, R. Circulating exosomal circFoxp1 confers cisplatin resistance in epithelial ovarian cancer cells. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2020, 31, e75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, X.; Yao, Y.; Jin, M. Circ-0001068 is a novel biomarker for ovarian cancer and inducer of PD1 expression in T cells. Aging (Albany NY) 2020, 12, 19095–19106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lin, C.; Xu, X.; Yang, Q.; Liang, L.; Qiao, S. Circular RNA ITCH suppresses proliferation, invasion, and glycolysis of ovarian cancer cells by up-regulating CDH1 via sponging miR-106a. Cancer Cell Int. 2020, 20, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Luo, L.; Gao, Y.; Sun, X. Circ-ITCH correlates with small tumor size, decreased FIGO stage and prolonged overall survival, and it inhibits cells proliferation while promotes cells apoptosis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Biomark 2018, 23, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Li, X.; Lin, S.; Mo, Z.; Jiang, J.; Tang, H.; Wu, C.; Song, J. CircRNA_100395 inhibits cell proliferation and metastasis in ovarian cancer via regulating miR-1228/p53/epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) axis. J. Cancer 2020, 11, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zou, T.; Wang, P.L.; Gao, Y.; Liang, W.T. Circular RNA_LARP4 is lower expressed and serves as a potential biomarker of ovarian cancer prognosis. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 7178–7182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Zheng, Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, S.; Wang, Y.; Luan, Z. CircEXOC6B Suppresses the Proliferation and Motility and Sensitizes Ovarian Cancer Cells to Paclitaxel Through miR-376c-3p/FOXO3 Axis. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 2020, 37, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ning, L.; Long, B.; Zhang, W.; Yu, M.; Wang, S.; Cao, D.; Yang, J.; Shen, K.; Huang, Y.; Lang, J. Circular RNA profiling reveals circEXOC6B and circN4BP2L2 as novel prognostic biomarkers in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 53, 2637–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhou, J.H.; Shen, F.R.; Shi, X.; Chen, Y.G. CircATRNL1 activates Smad4 signaling to inhibit angiogenesis and ovarian cancer metastasis via miR-378. Mol. Oncol. 2021, 15, 1217–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Jin, Y.; Wang, H. Circ_0078607 inhibits the progression of ovarian cancer via regulating the miR-32-5p/SIK1 network. J. Ovar. Res. 2022, 15, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Zhang, N.; Yang, Z.; Jin, Y.; Cheng, S.; Yang, J.; Wang, Y. Low Expression of Circular RNA hsa_circ_0078607 Predicts Poor Prognosis in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Manag. Res. 2021, 13, 2877–2883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fu, Y.; Sun, H. The molecular mechanism of circRHOBTB3 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of epithelial ovarian cancer by serving as the ceRNA of miR-23a-3p. J. Ovar. Res. 2022, 15, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wu, X.; Liu, D.; Wang, S.; Liu, J. Circ_0007444 Inhibits the Progression of Ovarian Cancer via Mediating the miR-570-3p/PTEN Axis. Oncol. Targets Ther. 2021, 14, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Gao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M. Circular RNA profiling reveals circRNA1656 as a novel biomarker in high grade serous ovarian cancer. Biosci. Trends 2019, 13, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Wu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Li, Y.; Shi, X.; Shen, F.; Chen, M.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J. Hsa_circ_0001445 works as a cancer suppressor via miR-576-5p/SFRP1 axis regulation in ovarian cancer. Cancer Med. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wu, M.; Qiu, Q.; Zhou, Q.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; Zheng, C.; Luo, A.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, X.; et al. circFBXO7/miR-96-5p/MTSS1 axis is an important regulator in the Wnt signaling pathway in ovarian cancer. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhang, L.; Zhou, Q.; Qiu, Q.; Hou, L.; Wu, M.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Lu, B.; Cheng, X.; Liu, P.; et al. CircPLEKHM3 acts as a tumor suppressor through regulation of the miR-9/BRCA1/DNAJB6/KLF4/AKT1 axis in ovarian cancer. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Liu, T.; Yuan, L.; Zou, X. Circular RNA circ-BNC2 (hsa_circ_0008732) inhibits the progression of ovarian cancer through microRNA-223-3p/ FBXW7 axis. J. Ovar. Res. 2022, 15, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Ge, L.; Sun, Y.; Shi, Y.; Liu, G.; Teng, F.; Geng, Z.; Chen, X.; Xu, H.; Xu, J.; Jia, X. Plasma circRNA microarray profiling identifies novel circRNA biomarkers for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. J. Ovar. Res. 2022, 15, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Wang, X.; Wang, R.; Wu, Z.; Bai, P. Circular RNA ITCH suppressed prostate cancer progression by increasing HOXB13 expression via spongy miR-17-5p. Cancer Cell Int. 2019, 19, 328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Li, Y.; Ge, Y.Z.; Xu, L.; Jia, R. Circular RNA ITCH: A novel tumor suppressor in multiple cancers. Life Sci. 2020, 254, 117176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zheng, R.; Wu, P.; Sun, Z.; Chen, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Qian, H.; Jiang, J.; et al. Circular RNA ITCH suppresses metastasis of gastric cancer via regulating miR-199a-5p/Klotho axis. Cell Cycle 2021, 20, 522–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Kurman, R.J.; Shih Ie, M. Molecular pathogenesis and extraovarian origin of epithelial ovarian cancer—Shifting the paradigm. Hum. Pathol. 2011, 42, 918–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Ionescu, F.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L. Clinical Applications of Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer: From Screening to Predictive Biomarker. Cancers 2022, 14, 1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Shabaninejad, Z.; Vafadar, A.; Movahedpour, A.; Ghasemi, Y.; Namdar, A.; Fathizadeh, H.; Pourhanifeh, M.H.; Savardashtaki, A.; Mirzaei, H. Circular RNAs in cancer: New insights into functions and implications in ovarian cancer. J. Ovar. Res. 2019, 12, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Najafi, S. The emerging roles and potential applications of circular RNAs in ovarian cancer: A comprehensive review. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhu, J.; Luo, J.E.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Q. Circ_0061140 knockdown inhibits tumorigenesis and improves PTX sensitivity by regulating miR-136/CBX2 axis in ovarian cancer. J. Ovar. Res. 2021, 14, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Chen, Q.; Zhang, J.; He, Y.; Wang, Y. hsa_circ_0061140 Knockdown Reverses FOXM1-Mediated Cell Growth and Metastasis in Ovarian Cancer through miR-370 Sponge Activity. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2018, 13, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Zhang, Y.; Di, Q.; Chen, J.; Chang, M.; Ma, Y.; Yu, J. Circ_0061140 Contributes to the Malignant Progression in Ovarian Cancer Cells by Mediating the RAB1A Level Through Sponging miR-361-5p. Biochem. Genet. 2022, 60, 1946–1962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Wei, S.; Qi, L.; Wang, L. Overexpression of circ_CELSR1 facilitates paclitaxel resistance of ovarian cancer by regulating miR-149-5p/SIK2 axis. Anticancer Drugs 2021, 32, 496–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Zhang, S.; Cheng, J.; Quan, C.; Wen, H.; Feng, Z.; Hu, Q.; Zhu, J.; Huang, Y.; Wu, X. circCELSR1 (hsa_circ_0063809) Contributes to Paclitaxel Resistance of Ovarian Cancer Cells by Regulating FOXR2 Expression via miR-1252. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 19, 718–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Zeng, X.Y.; Yuan, J.; Wang, C.; Zeng, D.; Yong, J.H.; Jiang, X.Y.; Lan, H.; Xiao, S.S. circCELSR1 facilitates ovarian cancer proliferation and metastasis by sponging miR-598 to activate BRD4 signals. Mol. Med. 2020, 26, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Huang, H.; Yan, L.; Zhong, J.; Hong, L.; Zhang, N.; Luo, X. Circ_0025033 deficiency suppresses paclitaxel resistance and malignant development of paclitaxel-resistant ovarian cancer cells by modulating the miR-532-3p/FOXM1 network. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2022, 44, 275–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Hou, W.; Zhang, Y. Circ_0025033 promotes the progression of ovarian cancer by activating the expression of LSM4 via targeting miR-184. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2021, 217, 153275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Gao, Y.; Huang, Y. Circ_0007841 knockdown confers c.cisplatin sensitivity to ovarian cancer cells by down-regulation of NFIB expression in a miR-532-5p-dependent manner. J. Chemother. 2022, 2022, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Huang, K.; Liu, D.; Su, C. Circ_0007841 accelerates ovarian cancer development through facilitating MEX3C expression by restraining miR-151-3p activity. Aging (Albany NY) 2021, 13, 12058–12066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yang, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhang, G.; Hou, J.; Yang, J. Circ_MUC16 attenuates the effects of Propofol to promote the aggressive behaviors of ovarian cancer by mediating the miR-1182/S100B signaling pathway. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021, 21, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Lin, X.; Chen, Y.; Ye, X.; Xia, X. Circular RNA ABCB10 promotes cell proliferation and invasion, but inhibits apoptosis via regulating the microRNA1271mediated Capn4/Wnt/betacatenin signaling pathway in epithelial ovarian cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2021, 23, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Sheng, M.; Wei, N.; Yang, H.Y.; Yan, M.; Zhao, Q.X.; Jing, L.J. CircRNA UBAP2 promotes the progression of ovarian cancer by sponging microRNA-144. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 7283–7294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Xu, Q.; Deng, B.; Li, M.; Chen, Y.; Zhuan, L. circRNA-UBAP2 promotes the proliferation and inhibits apoptosis of ovarian cancer though miR-382-5p/PRPF8 axis. J. Ovar. Res. 2020, 13, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, M.; Chi, C.; Zhou, L.; Chen, Y.; Tang, X. Circular PVT1 regulates cell proliferation and invasion via miR-149-5p/FOXM1 axis in ovarian cancer. J. Cancer 2021, 12, 611–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Sun, X.; Luo, L.; Gao, Y. Circular RNA PVT1 enhances cell proliferation but inhibits apoptosis through sponging microRNA-149 in epithelial ovarian cancer. J. Obstet Gynaecol. Res. 2020, 46, 625–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Ding, J.; Wang, Q.; Guo, N.; Wang, H.; Chen, H.; Ni, G.; Li, P. CircRNA circ_0072995 promotes the progression of epithelial ovarian cancer by modulating miR-147a/CDK6 axis. Aging (Albany NY) 2020, 12, 17209–17223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Huang, X.; Luo, Y.; Li, X. Circ_0072995 Promotes Ovarian Cancer Progression Through Regulating miR-122-5p/SLC1A5 Axis. Biochem. Genet. 2022, 60, 153–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Liang, Y.; Meng, K.; Qiu, R. Circular RNA Circ_0013958 Functions as a Tumor Promoter in Ovarian Cancer by Regulating miR-637/PLXNB2 Axis. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 644451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Li, M.; Cai, J.; Han, X.; Ren, Y. Downregulation of circNRIP1 Suppresses the Paclitaxel Resistance of Ovarian Cancer via Regulating the miR-211-5p/HOXC8 Axis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 9159–9171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Xie, W.; Liu, L.U.; He, C.; Zhao, M.; Ni, R.; Zhang, Z.; Shui, C. Circ_0002711 knockdown suppresses cell growth and aerobic glycolysis by modulating miR-1244/ROCK1 axis in ovarian cancer. J. Biosci. 2021, 46, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Guo, M.; Li, S.; Zhao, X.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, B.; Guan, Y. Knockdown of Circular RNA Hsa_circ_0000714 Can Regulate RAB17 by Sponging miR-370-3p to Reduce Paclitaxel Resistance of Ovarian Cancer Through CDK6/RB Pathway. Oncol. Targets Ther. 2020, 13, 13211–13224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Ying, H.; Zhao, R.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, K.; Deng, Q. CircATL2 enhances paclitaxel resistance of ovarian cancer via impacting miR-506-3p/NFIB axis. Drug. Dev. Res. 2022, 83, 512–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Liu, X.; Yin, Z.; Wu, Y.; Zhan, Q.; Huang, H.; Fan, J. Circular RNA lysophosphatidic acid receptor 3 (circ-LPAR3) enhances the cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 3739–3750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Xu, F.; Ni, M.; Li, J.; Cheng, J.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, J.; Huang, S.; Wu, X. Circ0004390 promotes cell proliferation through sponging miR-198 in ovarian cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 526, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Ji, J.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Huang, H.; Li, Y.; Fang, J. Hsa_circ_0001756 promotes ovarian cancer progression through regulating IGF2BP2-mediated RAB5A expression and the EGFR/MAPK signaling pathway. Cell Cycle 2022, 21, 685–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Yin, Y.; Li, J.; Rong, J.; Zhang, B.; Wang, X.; Han, H. Circ_0067934 reduces JNK phosphorylation through a microRNA-545-3p/PPA1 axis to enhance tumorigenesis and cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2022, 44, 261–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Fu, L.; Zhang, D.; Yi, N.; Cao, Y.; Wei, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, L. Circular RNA circPBX3 promotes cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer cells via interacting with IGF2BP2 to stabilize ATP7A mRNA expression. Hum. Cell 2022, 35, 1560–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Qu, D.; Zou, X.; Liu, Z. Propofol modulates glycolysis reprogramming of ovarian tumor via restraining circular RNA-zinc finger RNA-binding protein/microRNA-212-5p/superoxide dismutase 2 axis. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 11881–11892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Zhang, M.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, B.; Lou, G. Circular RNA circE2F2 promotes malignant progression of ovarian cancer cells by upregulating the expression of E2F2 protein via binding to HuR protein. Cell Signal. 2021, 84, 110014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Wu, S.G.; Zhou, P.; Chen, J.X.; Lei, J.; Hua, L.; Dong, Y.; Hu, M.; Lian, C.L.; Yang, L.C.; Zhou, J. circ-PTK2 (hsa_circ_0008305) regulates the pathogenic processes of ovarian cancer via miR-639 and FOXC1 regulatory cascade. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Yang, X.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Sun, Y.; Tong, X. Downregulation of hsa_circ_0026123 suppresses ovarian cancer cell metastasis and proliferation through the miR1243p/EZH2 signaling pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2021, 47, 668–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Zhang, Z.; Zhu, H.; Hu, J. CircRAB11FIP1 promoted autophagy flux of ovarian cancer through DSC1 and miR-129. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Zhou, J.; Dong, Z.N.; Qiu, B.Q.; Hu, M.; Liang, X.Q.; Dai, X.; Hong, D.; Sun, Y.F. CircRNA FGFR3 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition of ovarian cancer by regulating miR-29a-3p/E2F1 axis. Aging (Albany NY) 2020, 12, 14080–14091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. An, Q.; Liu, T.; Wang, M.Y.; Yang, Y.J.; Zhang, Z.D.; Lin, Z.J.; Yang, B. circKRT7-miR-29a-3p-COL1A1 Axis Promotes Ovarian Cancer Cell Progression. Oncol. Targets Ther. 2020, 13, 8963–8976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Qiao, L.; Wang, H. CircRNA circ_0000554 promotes ovarian cancer invasion and proliferation by regulating miR-567. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 19072–19080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Luo, N.; Sulaiman, Z.; Wang, C.; Ding, J.; Chen, Y.; Liu, B.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, S. Hsa_circ_0000497 and hsa_circ_0000918 contributed to peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer via ascites. J. Transl. Med. 2022, 20, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Xie, J.; Wang, S.; Li, G.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, F.; Liu, J.; Tan, W. circEPSTI1 regulates ovarian cancer progression via decoying miR-942. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 3597–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Liu, J.; Yu, F.; Wang, S.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, F.; Xie, J.; Deng, M. circGFRA1 Promotes Ovarian Cancer Progression By Sponging miR-449a. J. Cancer 2019, 10, 3908–3913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Sun, Y.; Li, X.; Chen, A.; Shi, W.; Wang, L.; Yi, R.; Qiu, J. circPIP5K1A serves as a competitive endogenous RNA contributing to ovarian cancer progression via regulation of mi.iR-661/IGFBP5 signaling. J. Cell Biochem. 2019, 120, 19406–19414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Wang, G.; Zhang, H.; Li, P. Upregulation of hsa_circRNA_102958 Indicates Poor Prognosis and Promotes Ovarian Cancer Progression Through miR-1205/SH2D3A Axis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 4045–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Li, B.; Zhang, L. CircSETDB1 knockdown inhibits the malignant progression of serous ovarian cancer through miR-129-3p-dependent regulation of MAP3K3. J. Ovar. Res. 2021, 14, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Zhang, C.; Li, Y.; Zhao, W.; Liu, G.; Yang, Q. Circ-PGAM1 promotes malignant progression of epithelial ovarian cancer through regulation of the miR-542-3p/CDC5L/PEAK1 pathway. Cancer Med. 2020, 9, 3500–3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Wang, L.; Chen, J.; Lu, C. Circular RNA Foxo3 enhances progression of ovarian carcinoma cells. Aging (Albany NY) 2021, 13, 22432–22443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Ma, R.; Ye, X.; Cheng, H.; Cui, H.; Chang, X. Tumor-derived exosomal circRNA051239 promotes proliferation and migration of epithelial ovarian cancer. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021, 13, 1125–1139. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  170. Zong, Z.H.; Du, Y.P.; Guan, X.; Chen, S.; Zhao, Y. CircWHSC1 promotes ovarian cancer progression by regulating MUC1 and hTERT through sponging miR-145 and miR-1182. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Du, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S.; Chen, S.; Guan, X.; Li, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhao, Y. CircCRIM1 promotes ovarian cancer progression by working as ceRNAs of CRIM1 and targeting miR-383-5p/ZEB2 axis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2021, 19, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Lu, H.; Zheng, G.; Gao, X.; Chen, C.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, L. Propofol suppresses cell viability, cell cycle progression and motility and induces cell apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells through suppressing MEK/ERK signaling via targeting circVPS13C/miR-145 axis. J. Ovar. Res. 2021, 14, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Cai, W.; Zhang, Q. The transcription factor ZEB1 mediates the progression of epithelial ovarian cancer by promoting the transcription of CircANKRD17. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2022, 36, e23086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Du, Z.; Wang, L.; Xia, Y. Circ_0015756 promotes the progression of ovarian cancer by regulating miR-942-5p/CUL4B pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2020, 20, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Sheng, S.; Hu, Y.; Yu, F.; Tong, W.; Wang, S.; Cai, Y.; Zhu, J. circKIF4A sponges miR-127 to promote ovarian cancer progression. Aging (Albany NY) 2020, 12, 17921–17929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Wang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Fang, J.; Xie, P.; Miao, M.; Yang, H. Circular RNA circEXOC6B Inhibits the Progression of Ovarian Cancer by Sponging miR-421 and Regulating RUS1 Expression. Oncol. Targets Ther. 2020, 13, 8233–8243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Sun, S.; Fang, H. Curcumin inhibits ovarian cancer progression by regulating circ-PLEKHM3/miR-320a/SMG1 axis. J. Ovar. Res. 2021, 14, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Yalan, S.; Yanfang, L.; He, C.; Yujie, T. Circular RNA circRHOBTB3 inhibits ovarian cancer progression through PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Panminerva Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Lyu, M.; Li, X.; Shen, Y.; Lu, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhong, S.; Wang, J. CircATRNL1 and circZNF608 Inhibit Ovarian Cancer by Sequestering miR-152-5p and Encoding Protein. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 784089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hu, J.; Wang, L.; Chen, J.; Gao, H.; Zhao, W.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, T.; Zhou, J.; Chen, Y. The circular RNA circ-ITCH suppresses ovarian carcinoma progression through targeting miR-145/RASA1 signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 505, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Luo, L.; Gao, Y.Q.; Sun, X.F. Circular RNA ITCH suppresses proliferation and promotes apoptosis in human epithelial ovarian cancer cells by sponging miR-10a-alpha. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018, 22, 8119–8126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Yan, H.; Xiang, H.; Sun, B.; Feng, F.; Chen, P. Circular RNA-ITCH Inhibits the Proliferation of Ovarian Carcinoma by Downregulating lncRNA HULC. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 27, 375–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Zhang, N.; Jin, Y.; Hu, Q.; Cheng, S.; Wang, C.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Y. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0078607 suppresses ovarian cancer progression by regulating miR-518a-5p/Fas signaling pathway. J. Ovar. Res. 2020, 13, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Lin, W.; Ye, H.; You, K.; Chen, L. Up-regulation of circ_LARP4 suppresses cell proliferation and migration in ovarian cancer by regulating miR-513b-5p/LARP4 axis. Cancer Cell Int. 2020, 20, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Gong, J.; Xu, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y. Circular RNA-9119 suppresses in ovarian cancer cell viability via targeting the microRNA-21-5p-PTEN-Akt pathway. Aging (Albany NY) 2020, 12, 14314–14328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Wang, N.; Cao, Q.X.; Tian, J.; Ren, L.; Cheng, H.L.; Yang, S.Q. Circular RNA MTO1 Inhibits the Proliferation and Invasion of Ovarian Cancer Cells Through the miR-182-5p/KLF15 Axis. Cell Transplant. 2020, 29, 963689720943613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Li, L.; Yu, P.; Zhang, P.; Wu, H.; Chen, Q.; Li, S.; Wang, Y. Upregulation of hsa_circ_0007874 suppresses the progression of ovarian cancer by regulating the miR-760/SOCS3 pathway. Cancer Med. 2020, 9, 2491–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Teng, F.; Xu, J.; Zhang, M.; Liu, S.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Ni, J.; Qian, B.; Shen, R.; et al. Comprehensive circular RNA expression profiles and the tumor-suppressive function of circHIPK3 in ovarian cancer. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2019, 112, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Li, X.; Jiang, X.; Lu, J.; Lin, Y.; Jiang, L.; Li, Y.; Wan, F.; Wang, C. CircCERS6 Suppresses the Development of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Through Mediating miR-630/RASSF8. Biochem. Genet. 2022, 60, 2611–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Ford, C.E.; Werner, B.; Hacker, N.F.; Warton, K. The untapped potential of ascites in ovarian cancer research and treatment. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 123, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Nguyen, V.H.L.; Yue, C.; Du, K.Y.; Salem, M.; O’Brien, J.; Peng, C. The Role of microRNAs in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Rickard, B.P.; Conrad, C.; Sorrin, A.J.; Ruhi, M.K.; Reader, J.C.; Huang, S.A.; Franco, W.; Scarcelli, G.; Polacheck, W.J.; Roque, D.M.; et al. Malignant Ascites in Ovarian Cancer: Cellular, Acellular, and Biophysical Determinants of Molecular Characteristics and Therapy Response. Cancers 2021, 13, 4318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Yousefi, M.; Dehghani, S.; Nosrati, R.; Ghanei, M.; Salmaninejad, A.; Rajaie, S.; Hasanzadeh, M.; Pasdar, A. Current insights into the metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer—Hopes and hurdles. Cell Oncol. 2020, 43, 515–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Pascual-Anton, L.; Cardenes, B.; Sainz de la Cuesta, R.; Gonzalez-Cortijo, L.; Lopez-Cabrera, M.; Cabanas, C.; Sandoval, P. Mesothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Exosomes in Peritoneal Metastasis of Ovarian Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Majidpoor, J.; Mortezaee, K. Angiogenesis as a hallmark of solid tumors—Clinical perspectives. Cell Oncol. 2021, 44, 715–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Zada, S.; Hwang, J.S.; Ahmed, M.; Lai, T.H.; Pham, T.M.; Elashkar, O.; Kim, D.R. Cross talk between autophagy and oncogenic signaling pathways and implications for cancer therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 2021, 1876, 188565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Yun, C.W.; Lee, S.H. The Roles of Autophagy in Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  198. White, E.; DiPaola, R.S. The double-edged sword of autophagy modulation in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 5308–5316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  199. Das, C.K.; Mandal, M.; Kogel, D. Pro-survival autophagy and cancer cell resistance to therapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018, 37, 749–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Li, X.; He, S.; Ma, B. Autophagy and autophagy-related proteins in cancer. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Xing, Y.; Liang, X.; Lv, X.; Cheng, Y.; Du, J.; Liu, C.; Yang, Y. New insights into the role of circular RNAs in ovarian cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2022, 238, 154073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Chong, X.; Chen, J.; Zheng, N.; Zhou, Z.; Hai, Y.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, Q.; Yu, S.; Chen, Z.; et al. PIK3CA mutations-mediated downregulation of circLHFPL2 inhibits colorectal cancer progression via upregulating PTEN. Mol. Cancer 2022, 21, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Zhou, H.; Du, Y.; Wei, X.; Song, C.; Song, J.; Xu, N.; Huang, W.; Chen, L.; Yao, F.; Du, D.; et al. DDX56 transcriptionally activates MIST1 to facilitate tumorigenesis of HCC through PTEN-AKT signaling. Theranostics 2022, 12, 6069–6087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Bi, X.; Lv, X.; Liu, D.; Guo, H.; Yao, G.; Wang, L.; Liang, X.; Yang, Y. METTL3-mediated maturation of miR-126-5p promotes ovarian cancer progression via PTEN-mediated PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Cancer Gene Ther. 2021, 28, 335–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Zhu, X.; Shen, H.; Yin, X.; Yang, M.; Wei, H.; Chen, Q.; Feng, F.; Liu, Y.; Xu, W.; Li, Y. Macrophages derived exosomes deliver miR-223 to epithelial ovarian cancer cells to elicit a chemoresistant phenotype. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Martins, F.C.; Santiago, I.; Trinh, A.; Xian, J.; Guo, A.; Sayal, K.; Jimenez-Linan, M.; Deen, S.; Driver, K.; Mack, M.; et al. Combined image and genomic analysis of high-grade serous ovarian cancer reveals PTEN loss as a common driver event and prognostic classifier. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  207. Moore, R.G.; McMeekin, D.S.; Brown, A.K.; DiSilvestro, P.; Miller, M.C.; Allard, W.J.; Gajewski, W.; Kurman, R.; Bast, R.C., Jr.; Skates, S.J. A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol. Oncol. 2009, 112, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  208. Moore, R.G.; Miller, M.C.; Disilvestro, P.; Landrum, L.M.; Gajewski, W.; Ball, J.J.; Skates, S.J. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm in women with a pelvic mass. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 118, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  209. Moore, R.G.; Brown, A.K.; Miller, M.C.; Skates, S.; Allard, W.J.; Verch, T.; Steinhoff, M.; Messerlian, G.; DiSilvestro, P.; Granai, C.O.; et al. The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol. Oncol. 2008, 108, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Dahl, M.; Daugaard, I.; Andersen, M.S.; Hansen, T.B.; Gronbaek, K.; Kjems, J.; Kristensen, L.S. Enzyme-free digital counting of endogenous circular RNA molecules in B-cell malignancies. Lab. Invest. 2018, 98, 1657–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  211. Kristensen, L.S. Profiling of circRNAs using an enzyme-free digital counting method. Methods 2021, 196, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Gnant, M.; Filipits, M.; Greil, R.; Stoeger, H.; Rudas, M.; Bago-Horvath, Z.; Mlineritsch, B.; Kwasny, W.; Knauer, M.; Singer, C.; et al. Predicting distant recurrence in receptor-positive breast cancer patients with limited clinicopathological risk: Using the PAM50 Risk of Recurrence score in 1478 postmenopausal patients of the ABCSG-8 trial treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy alone. Ann. Oncol. 2014, 25, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Dowsett, M.; Sestak, I.; Lopez-Knowles, E.; Sidhu, K.; Dunbier, A.K.; Cowens, J.W.; Ferree, S.; Storhoff, J.; Schaper, C.; Cuzick, J. Comparison of PAM50 risk of recurrence score with oncotype DX and IHC4 for predicting risk of distant recurrence after endocrine therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 2783–2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Ye, F.; Chen, C.; Qin, J.; Liu, J.; Zheng, C. Genetic profiling reveals an alarming rate of cross-contamination among human cell lines used in China. FASEB J. 2015, 29, 4268–4272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  215. Bian, X.; Yang, Z.; Feng, H.; Sun, H.; Liu, Y. A Combination of Species Identification and STR Profiling Identifies Cross-contaminated Cells from 482 Human Tumor Cell Lines. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Furlong, M.T.; Hough, C.D.; Sherman-Baust, C.A.; Pizer, E.S.; Morin, P.J. Evidence for the colonic origin of ovarian cancer cell line SW626. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1999, 91, 1327–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  217. Nielsen, A.F.; Bindereif, A.; Bozzoni, I.; Hanan, M.; Hansen, T.B.; Irimia, M.; Kadener, S.; Kristensen, L.S.; Legnini, I.; Morlando, M.; et al. Best practice standards for circular RNA research. Nat. Methods 2022, 19, 1208–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Li, S.; Li, X.; Xue, W.; Zhang, L.; Yang, L.Z.; Cao, S.M.; Lei, Y.N.; Liu, C.X.; Guo, S.K.; Shan, L.; et al. Screening for functional circular RNAs using the CRISPR-Cas13 system. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Zhang, Y.; Nguyen, T.M.; Zhang, X.O.; Wang, L.; Phan, T.; Clohessy, J.G.; Pandolfi, P.P. Optimized RNA-targeting CRISPR/Cas13d technology outperforms shRNA in identifying functional circRNAs. Genome Biol. 2021, 22, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Gu, Y.; Wang, Y.; He, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, X.; Liu, N.; Wang, J.; Lu, T.; He, L.; Tian, Y.; et al. Circular RNA circIPO11 drives self-renewal of liver cancer initiating cells via Hedgehog signaling. Mol. Cancer 2021, 20, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Han, K.; Wang, F.W.; Cao, C.H.; Ling, H.; Chen, J.W.; Chen, R.X.; Feng, Z.H.; Luo, J.; Jin, X.H.; Duan, J.L.; et al. CircLONP2 enhances colorectal carcinoma invasion and metastasis through modulating the maturation and exosomal dissemination of microRNA-17. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  222. Du, W.W.; Yang, W.; Li, X.; Awan, F.M.; Yang, Z.; Fang, L.; Lyu, J.; Li, F.; Peng, C.; Krylov, S.N.; et al. A circular RNA circ-DNMT1 enhances breast cancer progression by activating autophagy. Oncogene 2018, 37, 5829–5842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Lu, M.; Wu, Y.; Zeng, B.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Luo, J.; Wang, L.; Yi, Z.; Li, H.; Ren, G. CircEHMT1 inhibits metastatic potential of breast cancer cells by modulating miR-1233-3p/KLF4/MMP2 axis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 526, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 14 05711 g001 550
Figure 1. The biogenesis and functions of circRNAs. CircRNAs can be generated through multiple mechanisms. In the lariat-driven circularization model, a lariat is formed during pre-mRNA splicing to generate either ecircRNA, EIciRNA, or ciRNA. In the intron pairing-driven circularization model, the inverted complementary sequences between the upstream acceptor and downstream donor join via complementary base pairing, leading to the formation of EIciRNA or ecircRNA. In the RBP-driven model, some RBPs bring the acceptor and donor to proximity and promote circularization, resulting in the formation of EIciRNA or ecircRNA. CircRNAs exert their biological functions through several mechanisms. They can sponge miRNAs to inhibit their functions or interact with proteins directly to regulate their activity. Some circRNAs also translate functional proteins/peptides, or function in the nucleus by regulating their parental gene transcription.
Figure 1. The biogenesis and functions of circRNAs. CircRNAs can be generated through multiple mechanisms. In the lariat-driven circularization model, a lariat is formed during pre-mRNA splicing to generate either ecircRNA, EIciRNA, or ciRNA. In the intron pairing-driven circularization model, the inverted complementary sequences between the upstream acceptor and downstream donor join via complementary base pairing, leading to the formation of EIciRNA or ecircRNA. In the RBP-driven model, some RBPs bring the acceptor and donor to proximity and promote circularization, resulting in the formation of EIciRNA or ecircRNA. CircRNAs exert their biological functions through several mechanisms. They can sponge miRNAs to inhibit their functions or interact with proteins directly to regulate their activity. Some circRNAs also translate functional proteins/peptides, or function in the nucleus by regulating their parental gene transcription.
Cancers 14 05711 g001
Table
Table 1. Dysregulated circRNAs in OC and their potential as biomarkers.
Table 1. Dysregulated circRNAs in OC and their potential as biomarkers.
circRNA
(circBase ID)		Level
in OC		Detection Methods,
Cohort Size/Subtype		Sample SourceClinicopathologic FeaturesPrognosisDiagnosisRefs
circCDR1as
(ciRS-7, circ_0001946)		UpqRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 40)TissuesTNM stage,
metastasis		OS-[69]
DownqRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 6)Tissues---[70]
DownMicroarray: DDP-resistant vs. DDP-sensitive SOC (n = 5).
qRT-PCR: DDP-resistant SOC (tissues and serum exosome, n = 36), DDP-sensitive SOC (tissues and serum exosome, n = 30), adjacent normal tissues (n = 66).		Tissues, serumDDP resistance--[71]
DownqRT-PCR: OC (n = 65), normal ovarian epithelial tissues (n = 37)Tissues---[72]
circHIPK3 *UpqRT-PCR: EOC vs. adjacent non-cancerous tissues (n = 69)TissuesFIGO stage, metastasisOS, DFS-[73]
circCEACAM5 (circ_0051240)UpMicroarray: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 10)
qRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent non-cancerous tissues (n = 33)		TissuesFIGO stage, metastasisOS-[74]
circCSPP1 (circ_0001806)UpqRT-PCR: EOC (n = 117), borderline tumors (n = 12), normal ovarian tissues (n = 15), benign ovarian tumors (n = 12)TissuesFIGO stage, differentiation--[75]
circNOLC1 (circ_0000257)UpqRT-PCR: EOC (86 serous, 32 others), normal ovarian tissues (n = 15), benign ovarian tumors (n = 11), borderline ovarian tumors (n = 11)TissuesFIGO stage, differentiation, serum CA125 level--[76]
circPUM1 (circ_0000043)UpqRT-PCR: EOC (n = 62), normal ovarian tissues (n = 13)TissuesFIGO stage--[77]
circRHOC (circ_0013549)UpqRT-PCR: OC (100 serous carcinomas, 27 others), normal ovarian tissues (n = 24)TissuesFIGO stage, differentiation--[78]
circCELSR1 (circ_0063804)UpqRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 108)TissuesFIGO stage, tumor grade, tumor sizeOS-[79]
circSPECC1 (circ_0000745)UpqRT-PCR: OC (35 EOC, 9 germ cell tumors, 6 others), para-cancerous tissues (n = 50)TissuesFIGO stage, tumor grade--[80]
circHIPK2 (circ_0001756)UpqRT-PCR: OC (26 DDP-sensitive, 20 DDP-resistant), adjacent normal tissues (n = 46)TissuesFIGO stage, tumor size, metastasis, DDP resistance--[81]
circMFN2 (circ_0009910)UpqRT-PCR: OC (n = 50), normal ovarian tissues (n = 50) TissuesFIGO stage, metastasisOS-[82]
circMYLK *UpqRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 46)TissuesTNM stageOS-[83]
circMUC16 (circ_0049116)UpRNA-seq: EOC (n = 3), healthy ovarian tissues (n = 4).
qRT-PCR: EOC (n = 70), normal ovarian tissues (n = 30); serum of EOC patients (n = 70), serum of healthy subjects (n = 30)		Tissues, serumFIGO stage, tumor grade--[84]
circFAM53B (circ_0000267)UpqRT-PCR: EOC (36 serous, 18 mucinous), paired non-cancerous tissues (n = 54)TissuesFIGO stage, tumor size, metastasisOS-[85]
circASH2L (circ_0006302)UpqRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 50) TissuesFIGO stage, tumor size, metastasis--[86]
circACP6 (circ_0013958)UpqRT-PCR: serous ovarian carcinomas (SOC, n = 45), normal ovarian tissues (n = 45)TissuesFIGO stage, metastasis-AUC = 0.912[87]
circABCB10 *UpqRT-PCR: EOC (67 serous, 36 others), adjacent tissues (n = 53)TissuesFIGO stage, differentiation, tumor sizeOSAUC = 0.766[88]
circTNPO3 (circ_0001741)UpMicroarray: PTX-sensitive vs. PTX-resistant OC (n = 3)
qRT-PCR: OC (20 PTX-sensitive, 28 PTX-resistant), adjacent normal tissues (n = 48)		TissuesFIGO stage, PTX resistanceOSAUC = 0.910[89]
circANKRD17 (circ_0007883)UpRNA-seq: EOC (n = 3), healthy ovarian tissues (n = 4)
qRT-PCR: EOC (28 serous, 20 mucinous; 28 PTX resistant, 20 PTX sensitive), adjacent normal tissues (n = 48)		TissuesPTX resistanceOS-[90]
circEEF2 (circ_0048559)UpFISH: EOC (40 serous, 9 mucinous, 8 clear cell), normal ovarian tissues (n = 12)TissuesFIGO stage, tumor grade--[91]
circRNF144B (circ_0075797)UpRNA-seq: OC tissues with high and low LC3 dots (n =3)
qRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent non-cancerous tissues (n = 36)		TissuesMetastasisOS-[92]
circSLAMF6 (circ_0000144)UpqRT-PCR: OC tissues vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 60); serum of OC patients vs. serum of healthy (n = 60)Tissues, serum-OS, DFS-[93]
circPDE7B (circ_0004712)UpqRT-PCR: EOC (20 serous, 10 mucinous) vs. adjacent
non-cancerous tissues (n = 30)		TissuesTumor grade, metastasisOS, PFS-[94]
circC20orf11 (circ_0061140)UpqRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 55) TissuesTNM stage, metastasis, tumor size--[95]
circC20orf11 *UpqRT-PCR: OC (47 serous, 13 others; 26 DDP-sensitive, 34 DDP-resistant)SerumFIGO stage, tumor grade, metastasis, DDP resistanceOS-[96]
circITGB6 (circ_0056856)UpRNA-seq: DDP-sensitive vs. resistant OC tissues (n = 5)
qRT-PCR: Serum of OC (20 DDP-resistant, 20 DDP-sensitive), serum of normal controls (n = 15); OC tissues (20 DDP-resistant, 20 DDP-sensitive).
ISH: EOC tissues (95 SOC, 18 MC, 3 EC, 2 CCC, 1 other)		Serum, tissueFIGO stage, tumor recurrence, DDP resistanceOS, RFS-[97]
circSETDB1 (circ_0006352)UpqRT-PCR: SOC (18 primary chemoresistance, 42 primary chemosensitive), healthy (n = 60).SerumFIGO stage, metastasis, chemosensitivityPFSSOC vs. healthy: AUC = 0.803
Chemoresistant vs. chemosensitive SOC:
AUC = 0.811		[98]
circFOXP1 (circ_0001320)UpqRT-PCR: EOC (46 DDP-resistant, 76 DDP-sensitive), healthy (n = 82)SerumFIGO stage, metastasis, tumor size, DDP resistanceOS, DFSAUC = 0.914[99]
circMGAT5 (circ_0001068)UpMicroarray: OC vs. healthy (n = 4).
qRT-PCR: (1) training set: OC (n = 10), healthy (n = 10); (2) larger cohort: OC (n = 85), healthy (n = 43). 		Serum--AUC = 0.970[100]
circITCH *DownqRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 45)TissuesFIGO stage, tumor sizeOS-[101]
circITCH *DownqRT-PCR: EOC (48 serous, 29 others) vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 77)TissuesFIGO stage, tumor sizeOS-[102]
circRNA_100395 (circ_0015278) #DownqRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 60)TissuesFIGO stage, metastasisOS-[103]
circLARP4 *DownqRT-PCR: EOC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 78)TissuesFIGO stage, metastasis.OS, DFS-[104]
circEXOC6B (circ_0009043)DownqRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 60)TissuesTNM stage, metastasisOS-[105]
circEXOC6B (circ_0009043)DownRNA-seq: EOC vs. normal ovarian tissues (n = 4)
qRT-PCR: EOC vs. normal ovarian tissues (n = 54)		TissuesMetastasisOS-[106]
circATRNL1 (circ_0020093)DownqRT-PCR: OC (30 serous, 26 others), adjacent non-cancerous tissues (n = 56)TissuesFIGO stage, metastasisOS-[107]
circSLC22A3 (circ_0078607)DownqRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 43)TissuesFIGO stage, metastasis--[108]
qRT-PCR: HGSC vs. adjacent non-cancerous tissues (n = 49)FIGO stage, serum CA125 levelOS, PFS[109]
circRHOBTB3 (circ_0007444)DownqRT-PCR: EOC (n = 40), normal ovarian tissues (n = 20)TissuesFIGO stage, metastasisOS-[110]
qRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent normal tissues (n = 87)FIGO stage, grade, tumor sizeOS[111]
circRNA1656 (circ_0002755)DownRNA-seq: HGSC (n = 3), benign ovarian diseases (n = 3).
qRT-PCR: HGSC (n = 60), ovarian benign diseases (n = 60)		TissuesFIGO stage--[112]
circSMARCA5 (circ_0001445)DownqRT-PCR: OC (36 serous, 14 others), normal ovarian tissues TissuesFIGO stage, metastasisOS-[113]
circFBXO7 (circ_0001222)DownRNA-seq: EOC (n = 27), normal tissues(n = 26)
qRT-PCR: OC vs. normal tissues (n = 12)
BaseScope assay: EOC (n = 77)		Tissues-OS, RFS-[114]
circPLEKHM3 (circ_0001095)DownRNA-seq: OC vs. normal ovarian tissues (n = 5)
qRT-PCR: OC vs. normal ovarian tissues (n = 12); primary OC vs. matched peritoneal metastatic OC (n = 26)
BaseScope assay: OC (n = 86)		TissuesMetastasisOS, RFS-[115]
circBNC2 (circ_0008732)DownqRT-PCR: EOC vs. benign ovarian cysts vs. healthy (n = 83)PlasmaTumor grade, subtype, metastasis-EOC vs. benign: AUC = 0.879
EOC vs. healthy: AUC = 0.923
Early stage EOC vs. benign: AUC = 0.864
Early stage EOC vs. healthy: AUC = 0.908		[36]
qRT-PCR: OC vs. adjacent tissues (n = 40)TissuesFIGO stage, metastasisOS-[116]
circN4BP2L2 *DownqRT-PCR: Stage I + II EOC (n = 36), stage III + IV EOC (n  =  90), benign ovarian cysts (n = 126), healthy (n = 126)PlasmaFIGO stage, tumor grade, metastasis-EOC vs. benign: AUC = 0.82
EOC vs. normal: AUC = 0.90
Early-stage EOC vs. benign: AUC = 0.81
Early stage EOC vs. normal: AUC = 0.90		[43]
circN4BP2L2 (circ_0000471)DownRNA-seq: EOC vs. normal ovarian tissues (n = 4)
qRT-PCR: EOC vs. normal ovarian tissues (n = 54)		TissuesFIGO stage, metastasisPFS-[106]
circFAM120A (circ_0003972) circTOM1L1 (circ_0007288)DownMicroarray: OC (n = 4), vs. uterine myoma patients (n = 4)
qRT-PCR: OC (n = 60: 48 EOC) vs. benign tumors (n = 60)		PlasmaMetastasis (circ_0007288)-circ_0003972: AUC = 0.724
circ_0007288: AUC = 0.790 		[117]
Abbreviations: qRT-PCR, real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; RFS, relapse-free survival; PFS, progression-free survival; ISH, in situ hybridization; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; TNM, tumor node metastasis; DDP, cisplatin; PTX, paclitaxel; SOC, serous ovarian cancer; AUC, area under curve; * circBase ID was not reported by the study; # The circRNA name reported was converted to circBase ID through the website: http://www.bio-inf.cn/CircIDTrans.aspx (accessed on 27 October 2022).
Table
Table 2. Effects of circRNAs in EOC.
Table 2. Effects of circRNAs in EOC.
circRNA
(circBase ID)		Experimental ModelsFunctionsMolecular MechanismsRefs
circC20orf11 (circ_0061140)SKOV3/PTX, HEYA8/PTX
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3/PTX		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/PTX resistance; ↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/PTX resistance		miR-136/CBX2[125]
SKOV3, A2780
Male BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/EMT
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-370/FOXM1[126]
SKOV3, A2780
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↑ angiogenesis; ↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-761/LETM1[95]
SKOV3, CAOV3
BALB/c female mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/EMT; ↑ angiogenesis; ↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-361-5p/RAB1A[127]
circC20orf11 *SKOV3, A2780, SKOV3/DDP, A2780/DDP
Male BALB/c mice s.c. injected with A2780/DDP and SKOV3/DDP		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/DDP resistance;
↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor DDP resistance		miR-527/YWHAZ[96]
circCELSR1 *SKOV3/PTX, A2780/PTX
BALB/c mice inoculated with SKOV3/PTX		In vitro: ↑ PTX resistance/viability/proliferation;
↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor PTX resistance		miR-149-5p/SIK2[128]
circCELSR1 (circ_0063809)SKOV3, HEYA8, SKOV3/PTX,
HEYA8/PTX
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3/PTX		In vitro: ↑ PTX resistance
In vivo: ↑ tumor PTX resistance		miR-1252/FOXR2[129]
SKOV3, A2780
Athymic female nude mice i.p. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/EMT;
↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-598/BRD4[130]
circCELSR1 (circ_0063804)OVCAR3, SKOV3
Nude mice s.c. injected with OVCAR3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/DDP resistance;
↓ apoptosis.
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/DDP resistance		miR-1276/CLU[79]
circFOXM1 (circ_0025033)SKOV3/PTX, HEYA8/PTXIn vitro: ↑ PTX resistance/migration/invasion;
↓ apoptosis		miR-532-3p/FOXM1[131]
SKOV3, A2780
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/glycolysis.
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-184/LSM4[132]
circSEC61A1 (circ_0007841)A2780/DDP, SKOV3/DDP
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3/DDP		In vitro: ↑viability/proliferation/invasion/migration/DDP resistance; ↓ apoptosis.
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/DDP resistance		miR-532-5p/NFIB[133]
SKOV3, OVCAR3
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-151-3p/MEX3C[134]
circMUC16 (circ_0049116)SKOV3, A2780
BALB/c mice i.p. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ autophagy/proliferation/invasion
In vivo: ↑ tumor metastasis		miR-199a-5p/Beclin1 & RUNX1;
ATG13 protein		[84]
A2780, SKOV3
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with A2780		In vitro: ↓ anti-tumor effects of Propofol
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth, ↓ anti-tumor effects of Propofol		miR-1182/S100B[135]
circABCB10 *SKOV3, UWB1.289In vitro: ↑ proliferation/invasion; ↓ apoptosismiR-1271/Wnt/β-catenin[136]
In vitro: ↑ proliferation; ↓ apoptosis.miR-1271, miR-1252, miR-203[88]
circUBAP2 *OVCAR3, HO8910In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migrationmiRNA-144/CHD2[137]
circUBAP2 *OVCAR3, ES-2In vitro: ↑ proliferation; ↓ apoptosis.miR-382-5p/PRPF8[138]
circPVT1 *SKOV3, A2780In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasionmiR-149-5p/FOXM1[139]
circPVT1 *CAOV3, SKOV3In vitro: ↑ proliferation; ↓ apoptosis.miR-149[140]
circRGNEF (circ_0072995)A2780, HO8910
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with HO8910 		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration;
↓ apoptosis.
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-147a/CDK6[141]
OVCAR3, SKOV3
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with OVCAR3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↓ apoptosis.
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-122-5p/SLC1A5[142]
circACP6 (circ_0013958)SKOV3, CAOV3
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↓ apoptosis.
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-637/PLXNB2[143]
A2780, OVCAR3In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/EMT; ↓ apoptosis [87]
circNRIP1 (circ_0002711)A2780/PTX, SKOV3/PTX
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3/PTX		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/PTX resistance; ↓ apoptosis.
In vivo: ↑ tumor PTX resistance		miR-211-5p/HOXC8[144]
SKOV3, OV90
Nude mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ viability/proliferation/glycolysis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-1244/ROCK1[145]
circAARS (circ_0000714)A2780/PTXIn vitro: ↑ PTX resistance/proliferation/cell cycle progressionmiR-370-3p/RAB17[146]
circATL2 (circ_0000993)HEYA8/PTX, SKOV3/PTX
BALB/c mice s.c. infected with SKOV3/PTX		In vitro: ↑ PTX resistance/proliferation; ↓ cell cycle arrest/apoptosis.
In vivo: ↑ tumor PTX resistance		miR-506-3p/NFIB[147]
circTNPO3 (circ_0001741)SKOV3, HEYA8, SKOV3/PTX, HEYA8/PTX
Nude mice s.c. injected with SKOV3/PTX		In vitro: ↑ PTX resistance/cell cycle progression;
↓ apoptosis.
In vivo: ↑ tumor PTX resistance		miR-1299/NEK2[89]
circLPAR3 (circ_0004390)SKOV3/DDP, A2780/DDP
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3/DDP		In vitro: ↑ DDP resistance resistances/proliferation/migration/invasion;
↓ apoptosis.
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/DDP resistance		miR-634/PDK1[148]
SKOV3, HEYA8, OVCAR429In vitro: ↑ proliferationmiR-198/MET[149]
circHIPK2 (circ_0001756)SKOV3/DDP, A2780/DDP
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with A2780/DDP		In vitro: ↑ DDP resistance/proliferation/cell cycle progression/migration/invasion; ↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor DDP resistance/growth		miR-338-3p/CHTOP[81]
SKOV3, A2780
Female BALB/c mice i.v. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/invasion/EMT
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		IGF2BP2/EGFR/MAPK[150]
circFOXP1 (circ_0001320)COC1, SKOV3, SKOV3/DDP
Nude mice s.c. injected with SKOV3/DDP		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/DDP resistance
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/DDP resistance		miR-22 & miR-150-3p/CEBPG & FMNL3[99]
circPRKCI (circ_0067934)A2780/DDP
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with A2780/DDP		In vitro: ↑ DDP resistance/proliferation/invasion;
↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-545-3p/PPA1/JNK[151]
circPBX3 (circ_0004804)OV90, SKOV3; OV90-Res; SKOV3-Res
Female nude mice s.c. injected with OV90		In vitro: ↑ DDP resistance
In vivo: ↑ tumor DDP resistance		IGF2BP2/ATP7A[152]
circZFR*A2780In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/glycolysis; ↓ apoptosismiR-212-5p/SOD2[153]
circE2F2 (circ_0000030)OVCAR3, SKOV3
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with OVCAR3 		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/
glucose.
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		HuR/E2F2.[154]
circPTK2 (circ_0008305)SKOV3, OVCAR3
Female nude mice i.p. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ migration/invasion/EMT;
↑ angiogenesis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-639/FOXC1[155]
circASH2L (circ_0006302)A2780, SKOV3
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ invasion/proliferation; ↑angiogenesis
In vivo: ↑ tumor angiogenesis/lymphangiogenesis/growth		miR-665/VEGFA[86]
circITGB6 (circ_0056856)OVCAR3, CAOV3, ID8 (mice)
Female C57BL/6 mice i.p. injected with ID8		In vitro: ↑ DDP resistance
In vivo: ↑ M2 macrophage-dependent DDP resistance of tumor		IGF2BP2/FGF9[97]
circMGAT5
(circ_0001068)		A2780In vitro: ↑ PD1 expression in T cells, ↑ T cell exhaustionmiR-28-5p/PD1[100]
circSPECC1 (circ_0000745)ES-2, SKOV3In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/EMT/stemnessmiR-3187-3p/ERBB4/PI3K/AKT[80]
circTUBA1B (circ_0026123)SKOV3
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ migration/proliferation/cancer stem cell differentiation
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-124-3p/EZH2[156]
circRAB11FIP1 (circ_0005630)SKOV3, A2780
BALB/c mice i.p. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ autophagic flux/proliferation/invasion
In vivo: ↑ tumor metastasis		miR-129/ATG14 & ATG7; DSC1/ATG101[157]
circFGFR3 *SKOV3, A2780
Mice inoculated with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/EMT
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-29a-3p/E2F1[158]
circCSPP1 (circ_0001806)OVCAR3, A2780, CAOV3In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/EMTmiR-1236-3p/ZEB1[75]
circKRT7 (circ_0026360)ES-2, SKOV3
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with ES-2		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/EMT
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-29a-3p/COL1A1[159]
circLIN52 (circ_0000554)HO8910In vitro: ↑ proliferation/invasion/EMTmiR-567[160]
circSLAIN1 (circ_0000497) circGMIP (circ_0000918)SKOV3, OVCAR3In vitro: ↑ migration/invasion/EMTpredicted miRNAs/mRNAs[161]
circEPSTI1 (circ_0000479)OV119, A2780
BALB/c mice injected (s.c. and i.v.) with OV119 		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/invasion;
↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-942/EPSTI1[162]
circGFRA1 *OV119, A2780
BALB/c mice injected (s.c. and i.v.) with OV119		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/invasion
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-449a/GFRA1[163]
circMFN2 (circ_0009910)SKOV3In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasionmiR-145/NF-κB & Notch[82]
circCEACAM5 (circ_0051240)OVCAR3, HO8910
Male nude mice, s.c. injected with OVCAR3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion
In vivo: ↑ tumorigenesis		miR-637/KLK4[74]
circPIP5K1A (circ_0014130)SKOV3, A2780
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-661/IGFBP5[164]
circRNA_102958 (circ_0003854) #SKOV3, OVCAR3In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasionmiR-1205/SH2D3A[165]
circFAM53B (circ_0000267)A2780, HO8910In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↓ apoptosis		miRNA-646/VAMP2, miRNA-647/MDM2[85]
circSETDB1 (circ_0006352)A2780, SKOV3
Female BALB/c mice i.p. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/invasion/migration;
↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-129-3p/MAP3K3[166]
circPDE7B (circ_0004712)OVCAR3, SKOV3
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/invasion/migration;
↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-331-3p/FZD4[94]
circMYLK *A2780, CAOV3In vitro: ↑ proliferationmiR-652[83]
circPGAM1 (circ_0019340)CAOV3, OVCAR3
Nude mice s.c. injected with CAOV3 and OVCAR3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-542-3p/CDC5L/PEAK1[167]
circFOXO3 *SKOV3In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasionmiR-422a/PLP2[168]
circRNA_051239 (circ_0051239) #SKOV3, SKOV3.ipIn vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasionmiR-509-5p/PRSS3[169]
circPUM1 (circ_0000043)A2780, CAOV3
Female BALB/c mice i.p. injected with A2780 and CAOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↓ apoptosis; ↑ MMT of peritoneal mesothelial cells
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-615-5p/NF-κB, miR-6753-5p/MMP2[77]
circWHSC1 (circ_0001387)CAOV3, OVCAR3
Female BALB/c mice injected (s.c. or i.p.) with CAOV3.		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↓ apoptosis; ↑ MMT of peritoneal mesothelial cells
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-145 & miR-1182/MUC1 & hTERT[170]
circRHOC (circ_0013549)A2780, CAOV3
Female BALB/c mice i.p. injected with A2780		In vitro: ↑ viability/migration/invasion
In vivo: ↑ tumor metastasis		miR-302e/VEGFA; VEGFA[78]
circNOLC1 (circ_0000257)CAOV3, A2780
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with A2780		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		ESRP1/CDK1/RhoA[76]
circCRIM1 (circ_0002346)OVCAR3, CAOV3
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with CAOV3		In vitro: ↑ viability/migration/invasion;
↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-145-5p/CRIM1, miR-383-5p/ZEB2; encoding a 188aa protein[171]
circVPS13C*A2780, SKOV3In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion/cell cycle progression; ↓ apoptosismiR-145/MEK/ERK[172]
circSLAMF6 (circ_0000144)SKOV3, ES-2
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/invasion/migration
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-610/ELK3[93]
circRNF144B (circ_0075797)SKOV3, OVCAR3
Mice s.c. injected (s.c. and i.v.) with SKOV3		In vitro: ↓ autophagy; ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-342-3p/FBXL11/Beclin-1[92]
circANKRD17 (circ_0007883)A2780, SKOV3, A2780/PTX, SKOV3/PTX
BALB/c female mice s.c. injected with SKOV3/PTX 		In vitro: ↑ PTX chemoresistance
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/PTX chemoresistance		FUS/FOXR2[90]
A2780, SKOV3In vitro: ↑ proliferation/invasion/migration/EMT; ↓ apoptosisZEB1/circANKRD17[173]
circEEF2 (circ_0048559)SKOV3, A2780
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3, A2780 and i.p. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ autophagy/proliferation/invasion
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-6881-3p/ATG5 & ATG7,
ANXA2/p-mTOR		[91]
circCFH (circ_0015756)OV90, SKOV3
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↓ apoptosis
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-942-5p/CUL4B[174]
circKIF4A (circ_0007255)CAOV3, SKOV3
Female BALB/c mice injected (s.c. and i.v.) with EOC cells		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/invasion
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-127/JAM3[175]
circEXOC6B (circ_0009043)A2780, SKOV3
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasion/PTX resistance
In vivo: ↓ tumor PTX resistance		miR-376c-3p/FOXO3[105]
circEXOC6B*A2870, SKOV3In vitro: ↓ proliferation/invasion; ↑ apoptosismiR-421/RUS1[176]
circPLEKHM3 (circ_0001095)A2780, MDAH2274, OV90
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with A2780		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/EMT
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth		miR-9/BRCA1/DNAJB6/KLF4/AKT[115]
SKOV3, A2780
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with A2780		In vitro: ↓ proliferation; ↑ apoptosis; ↑ anti-tumor effect of curcumin
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth; ↑ anti-tumor effect of curcumin		miR-320a/SMG1[177]
circCDR1as (ciRS-7, circ_0001946)SKOV3, A2780
Male BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↑ proliferation/migration/invasion
In vivo: ↑ tumor growth		miR-641/ZEB1 & MDM2[69]
SKOV3, SKOV3/CDDP, HO8910, HO8910/CDDP
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↓ DDP resistance resistance/proliferation/migration/invasion;
↑ apoptosis
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth/DDP resistance		miR-1299/PPP1R12B; AKT/mTOR[70]
A2780, SKOV3, A2780-DDP, SKOV3-DDP
BALB/c female mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↓ DDP resistance/proliferation/migration; ↑ apoptosis
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth/DDP resistance		miR-1270/SCAI[71]
A2780, HO8910In vitro: ↓ proliferation/invasion/migrationmiR-135b-5p/HIF1AN[72]
circRHOBTB3 *A2780, OV90
Female BALB/mice s.c. injected with A2780		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasion/glycolysis/EMT
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth/metastasis		PI3K/AKT[178]
circRHOBTB3 (circ_0007444)SKOV3, OVCAR8
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3 		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/G1/S transition/invasion; ↑ apoptosis
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth		miR-23a-3p/PTEN/AKT[110]
SKOV3, OVCAR3
Female nude mice s.c. injected with SKOV3, OVCAR3		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↑ apoptosis.
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth		miR-570-3p/PTEN[111]
circATRNL1 (circ_0020093)SKOV3, CAOV3
Nude mice i.p. injected with SKOV3 and CAOV3		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↓ angiogenesis; ↑ apoptosis
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-378/SMAD4[107]
A2780, SKOV3, SW626In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasionencoding a 131 aa protein[179]
circITCH *SKOV3, CAOV3
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasion
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth		miR-145/RASA1[180]
circITCH *SKOV3In vitro: ↓ proliferation; ↑ apoptosismiR-10a[181]
circITCH *UWB1.289  +  BRCA1, UWB1.289In vitro: ↓ proliferationlncRNA HULC[182]
circITCH *A2780, OVCAR3
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with OVCAR3		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/invasion/glycolysis;
↑ apoptosis
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth		miR-106a/CDH1[101]
circSLC22A3 (circ_0078607)HEY, ES-2
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with HEY		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↑ apoptosis
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth		miR-32-5p/SIK1[108]
SKOV3, A2780In vitro: ↓ proliferation; ↑ apoptosismiR-518a-5p/Fas[183]
circRNA_100395 (circ_0015278) #SKOV3, ES-2In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasion/EMTmiR-1228/p53[103]
circLARP4 *SKOV3, A2780In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↑ apoptosis		miR-513b-5p/LARP4[184]
circFBXO7 (circ_0001222)A2780, MDAH2774, SKOV3, OV90
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with MDAH2774, NOD/SCID mice i.p. injected with MDAH2774		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasion
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-96-5p/MTSS1/Wnt/β-catenin[114]
circBNC2 (circ_0008732)SKOV3, HO8910In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasionmiR-223-3p/FBXW7[116]
circ_9119 *ES-2, SKOV3
Female BALB/c mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↓ proliferation; ↑ apoptosis
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth		miR-21/PTEN/AKT[185]
circZNF608 (circ_0001523)A2780, SKOV3, SW626In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasionmiR-152-5p[179]
circMTO1 *SKOV3, OVCAR3In vitro: ↓ proliferation/invasionmiR-182-5p/KLF15[186]
circMTO1 (circ_0007874)A2780, SKOV3
BALB/c mice s.c. injected with A2780		In vitro: ↓ migration/proliferation
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth		miR-760/SOCS3[187]
circHIPK3 (circ_0000284)A2780, SKOV3In vitro: ↓ proliferation/migration/invasion;
↑ apoptosis		predicted miRNAs/mRNAs[188]
circSMARCA5 (circ_0001445)SKOV3, HO8910
Female BALB/c mice injected (s.c. and i.p.) with HO8910		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/invasion/migration;
↑ apoptosis
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth/metastasis		miR-576-5p/SFRP1/WNT/β-catenin[113]
circCERS6 (circ_0007024)SKOV3, OVCAR3
Nude mice s.c. injected with SKOV3		In vitro: ↓ proliferation/invasion/migration/EMT
In vivo: ↓ tumor growth		miR-630/RASSF8[189]
Abbreviations: EMT, epithelial-mesenchymal transition; MMT, mesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition; DDP, cisplatin; PTX, paclitaxel; s.c., subcutaneous injection; i.p., intraperitoneal injection; i.v., intravenous injection; ↑ increased; ↓ decreased; * circBase ID was not reported by the study; # The circRNA name reported was converted to circBase ID through the website: http://www.bio-inf.cn/CircIDTrans.aspx (accessed on 27 October 2022).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Agbede, O.; Eshaghi, E.; Peng, C. Circular RNAs in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: From Biomarkers to Therapeutic Targets. Cancers 2022, 14, 5711. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225711

AMA Style

Qiu Y, Chen Y, Agbede O, Eshaghi E, Peng C. Circular RNAs in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: From Biomarkers to Therapeutic Targets. Cancers. 2022; 14(22):5711. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225711

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Yumin, Yan Chen, Oluwatobi Agbede, Esra Eshaghi, and Chun Peng. 2022. "Circular RNAs in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: From Biomarkers to Therapeutic Targets" Cancers 14, no. 22: 5711. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225711

APA Style

Qiu, Y., Chen, Y., Agbede, O., Eshaghi, E., & Peng, C. (2022). Circular RNAs in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: From Biomarkers to Therapeutic Targets. Cancers, 14(22), 5711. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225711

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop