Next Article in Journal
Predictive Factors of Long-Term Survival after Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in High-Risk Breast Cancer
Next Article in Special Issue
Bevacizumab beyond Progression for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma (BIOMARK): Phase II Safety, Efficacy and Biomarker Study
Previous Article in Journal
Recurrent NOMO1 Gene Deletion Is a Potential Clinical Marker in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer and Is Involved in the Regulation of Cell Migration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Metabolic Profiling of MYC-Amplified Medulloblastoma Tumors Reveals Key Dependencies on Amino Acid, Tricarboxylic Acid and Hexosamine Pathways
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 16
10.3390/cancers14164032
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Adenosine Targeting as a New Strategy to Decrease Glioblastoma Aggressiveness

by
Valentina Bova
1,†,
Alessia Filippone
1,†,
Giovanna Casili
1,
Marika Lanza
1,
Michela Campolo
1,
Anna Paola Capra
1,
Alberto Repici
1,
Lelio Crupi
1,
Gianmarco Motta
2,
Cristina Colarossi
2,
Giulia Chisari
2,
Salvatore Cuzzocrea
1,
Emanuela Esposito
1,* and
Irene Paterniti
1
1
Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno D’Alcontres, 31-98166 Messina, Italy
2
Istituto Oncologico del Mediterraneo, Via Penninazzo 7, 95029 Viagrande, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cancers 2022, 14(16), 4032; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164032
Submission received: 12 July 2022 / Revised: 17 August 2022 / Accepted: 18 August 2022 / Published: 20 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates on Molecular Targeted Therapies for CNS Tumors)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Given the rising mortality rate caused by GBM, current therapies do not appear to be effective in counteracting tumor progression. The role of adenosine and its interaction with specific receptor subtypes in various physiological functions has been studied for years. Only recently, adenosine has been defined as a tumor-protective target because of its accumulation in the tumor microenvironment. Current knowledge of the adenosine pathway and its involvement in brain tumors would support research in the development of adenosine receptor antagonists that could represent alternative treatments for glioblastoma, used either alone and/or in combination with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or both.

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most commonly malignant and aggressive brain tumor, with a high mortality rate. The role of the purine nucleotide adenosine and its interaction with its four subtypes receptors coupled to the different G proteins, A1, A2A, A2B, and A3, and its different physiological functions in different systems and organs, depending on the active receptor subtype, has been studied for years. Recently, several works have defined extracellular adenosine as a tumoral protector because of its accumulation in the tumor microenvironment. Its presence is due to both the interaction with the A2A receptor subtype and the increase in CD39 and CD73 gene expression induced by the hypoxic state. This fact has fueled preclinical and clinical research into the development of efficacious molecules acting on the adenosine pathway and blocking its accumulation. Given the success of anti-cancer immunotherapy, the new strategy is to develop selective A2A receptor antagonists that could competitively inhibit binding to its endogenous ligand, making them reliable candidates for the therapeutic management of brain tumors. Here, we focused on the efficacy of adenosine receptor antagonists and their enhancement in anti-cancer immunotherapy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Brain tumors affect different areas of the brain, including the cerebellum, and portions of the central nervous system (CNS), such as the spinal cord, that normally control voluntary and involuntary functions [1]. Physiologically and anatomically, the brain is separated from the blood by the blood–brain barrier (BBB), made up of tightly junctioned endothelial cells, astrocytes, and pericytes, which selectively control the exchange of substances between the two compartments [2]. Being intracranial, tumor cell growth causes an increase in the tumor mass that compresses the blood vessels, initiating a tumor-associated cerebral edema process that compromises the integrity of the BBB itself, and causes an active outflow of molecules [3]. It has been reported that the tumor mass increases the intracranial pressure that disrupts the homeostasis of the brain-affected area surrounding the tumor site and generates secondary effects [4].
Although clinical symptoms depend on the location and size of the tumor mass, the most common symptoms of all brain tumors include headache, seizures, nausea and vomiting, confusion and disorientation, loss of balance or dizziness, and memory loss (Figure 1B) [5]. The specific causes of brain tumors are unclear, but a set of risk factors should be considered in the tumor development and progression: age, exposure to ionizing radiation, decrease in immune defenses, and genetic predisposition of proto-oncogenes [6].
Still, CNS tumors are rare; they represent 1.6% of all tumors, especially in the last three decades, during which a progressive increase in the incidence of brain tumors development has been reported, particularly in adults over 65 years of age [7].
Brain tumors are classified into primary tumors, which originate in the brain, and can be benign and malignant tumors, and secondary tumors, which represent metastatic tumors [8]. A second classification is based on the origin of the cells from which brain tumors derive, such as glial cells, responsible for myelin production and represent 40% of all primary tumors and 78% of all malignant tumors [9]. One of the most common gliomas is astrocytoma, which originates from astrocyte cells and is distinguished by pilocytic tumors, very rare tumors that account for about 5% of gliomas and are more common in children [10]. Unlike other gliomas, these rarely develop into more aggressive tumors and can be cured with surgery [11]. There are also diffuse and anaplastic astrocytomas consisting mainly of immature cells, which, over time, tend to transform into more aggressive forms [12]. Oligodendroglioma originates from oligodendroglia cells and includes tumors with different grades and aggressivity, and ependymoma originates from ependymal cells that line the ventricular system and represent 2–3% of all brain tumors (Figure 1A) [13]. Finally, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common, invasive, and malignant of all brain tumors, characterized by rapid growth and the invasion of adjacent regions of the brain, such as the meninges or cerebrospinal fluid [14].
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), GBM accounts for 75% of aggressive malignant brain tumors in adults [15] and has been classified as a grade IV tumor. Moreover, a further classification divides GBM into a primary tumor [16] that is aggressive and invasive whose are not derived from other diseases, and which represents the most common form (about 95%), affecting the elderly population. It is also classified as a secondary tumor [16], which derives instead from low-grade astrocytomas, with an incidence rate in young people [17]. Human GBM is a heterogeneous tumor consisting of tumor cells and a small portion of cancer stem cells (CSCs), which have a high tumorigenic potential and are characterized by excessive proliferation, invasiveness, and metastasis [18], and by high resistance to standard therapy, in which case the patient’s estimated time of survival is about 15 months from the first diagnosis [19].
It was initially thought that GBM derived exclusively from glial cells, but scientific evidence has shown that there are other native cell types, similar to neuronal stem cells, from which GBM originates [20]. Glia, neurons, and stem cells show alterations in their functions that contribute to the development and progression of the tumor. There are two forms of heterogeneity in GBM: the intertumor and the intratumor. First, intertumoral heterogeneity refers to the genetic alterations that occur in individual tumors [21]. Secondly, intratumoral heterogeneity refers to the diversity of the phenotypes of the tumor cells that make up the tumor mass and other cellular entities recruited into TME, such as microglia and/or macrophages and endothelial cells [22]. However, it is difficult to identify their cell of origin [23] and remains a subject of debate to this day. Initially, considering the ability of astrocytes to replicate in the adult brain, it was hypothesized that an oncogenic alteration of astrocytes could give rise to GBM [23]; later, other hypotheses were developed, such as derivation from precursors such as oligodendrocytic or neuronal cells [24]. Recent studies have focused on glioma stem cells, which have the ability to self-renew and form tumors in vivo with the same characteristics as the primary tumor [25], offering greater resistance to chemotherapy, thus associating their presence with tumor heterogeneity [25,26]. Moreover, various pathways and molecular mechanisms are involved in the development and progression of GBM [27], including the microenvironment of GBM, characterized by hypoxic regions [18] whose oxygen deficiency determines the activation of the transcription factor; the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) [28], inducing gene transcription that promotes the production of various pro-angiogenic factors including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [29], which leads to the formation of new blood vessels; fibroblast growth factor (FGF) [30], which promotes the proliferation and differentiation of endothelial, smooth muscle, and fibroblast cells; and finally platelet growth factor (PDGF) [31], released by platelets and stimulating the proliferation and migration cancer cells, all factors that promote the progression of GBM.
The immune system is also an essential component for tumor development and progression, especially in GBM [32]. Activation of the immune system contributes to creating an immunosuppressive microenvironment in GBM [33], which consists of the production and release of immunosuppressive cytokines and chemokines, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), interleukin 10 (IL-10), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and many immune cells, such as immunosuppressive natural killer (NKT) cells, regulatory T/B cells (T/B-reg), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) [34,35].
The hypoxic state of the GBM microenvironment results in an increase in the concentration of adenosine, a small nucleoside and key mediator of several biological functions, thus defining it as tumor-derived adenosine [36]. In fact, adenosine through interaction with its four G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), A1, A2A, A2B, and A3, is involved in the blocking of anti-tumor immunity. Confirming what has been written, Hoskin et al. showed that adenosine, present in the GBM microenvironment, can inhibit the function of natural killer cells, as well as the ability of cytotoxic T cells to adhere to tumor cell targets [36]. In particular, it is thought that it is GBM itself, through activation of the A2A receptor, above all, which causes adenosine to carry out an activity opposite to the biological one. In fact, in this regard, almost 20% of human cancers contain mutations in genes that code for GPCRs [37]. By exploring the sequencing data from the Genomic Data Commons data portal (GDC), cancer-associated mutations of the A2A receptor affecting its activity were identified, further confirming the involvement of adenosine and its receptor in GBM development [38].
Treatment of GBM requires a multidisciplinary approach and consists of surgical excision, followed by radiation treatment with concomitant temozolomide (TMZ), and finally chemotherapy with TMZ [39], although, an unfavorable condition of combined treatment of radiotherapy and high-dose TMZ is lymphopenia, defined as a reduction in peripheral blood lymphocytes [40]. Where surgical excision is not possible, other therapeutic approaches are used, some of which have already been approved by regulatory agencies in the United States and consist of the use of monoclonal antibodies (mAb), such as Bevacizumab [41], a humanized mAb that blocks VEGF, blocking angiogenesis. Regorafenib is involved in GBM relapse, which acts on the processes of angiogenesis, with the modification of TME [42]. Tumor treatment field therapy (TTF) is a non-invasive anti-cancer treatment [43] that uses alternating electric fields tuned to low intensity (1–3V/cm) and intermediate frequency (100–300 kHz) to stop the splitting of solid tumor cells. This therapy has limitations due to its mechanism of action, which blocks biological processes, such as DNA repair mechanisms, and its cost [43,44]. Finally, gene therapy represents the recourse in the therapeutic approach for the treatment of GBM, which consists of the use of genetic fragments in association with viral vectors [45,46] capable of replicating within tumor cells, causing their death and also releasing viral particles capable of infecting and killing adjacent cancer cells [47]. In the context of GBM, considering the presence of immune cells with immunosuppressive action, an immune checkpoint has recently been identified, represented by BACE1; although BACE1 is a beta-secretase involved in the cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein [48] and used in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), its inhibition was effective for GBM. This approach represents an opportunity to safeguard depleted T lymphocytes, while also inducing increased infiltration of CD8+ T lymphocytes into the GBM [49]. In addition, the use of chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAT-T), which produce T cells capable of acting in TME, has been shown to be effective. Several antigens have been targeted with this technique, optimizing the anti-tumor activity [50]. A last therapeutic strategy recently discovered and still under development concerns the use of adenosine receptor antagonists [51], which have been shown to prevent the effects related to extracellular adenosine.

2. Adenosine and Adenosine Receptors (ARs)

Adenosine is a small molecule present throughout the human body, capable of performing various physiological functions following interaction with its receptor subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3). It is present in the cardiovascular system, where it modulates the vasoconstriction and vasodilation of arteries and veins [52]; in the metabolic context, adenosine inhibits lipolysis and induces bronchoconstriction [53,54], and regulates diuresis, muscle tone, and locomotion. At the level of the CNS, it exerts neuroprotective activity against ischemic events [55], hypoxia, and oxidative stress, and modulates the release of neurotransmitters; it is also involved in the regulation of cytokines and the production of T lymphocytes by the immune system [56,57]. There are two forms of adenosine: intracellular and extracellular [58], widely expressed in all tissues, and obtained by the dephosphorylation of its precursors, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and adenosine monophosphate (AMP), or by hydrolysis of S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) [59]. Physiologically, the intracellular concentration of adenosine is regulated by an important enzyme known as adenosine kinase (ADK), and by two transporters: the equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENT) and the bidirectional passive transporters, which play a critical role, as they allow free movement of adenosine across the cell membrane [60], and nucleoside concentrative transporters (CNTs), Na-dependent transporters that coordinate the adenosine gradient transport [61]. The direction of this nucleoside, absorbed or released by cells, is determined by the difference in concentration between the two forms, intracellular and extracellular, across the membrane [58]. Adenosine is defined as a “helper” in protecting cells such as neurons and cardiomyocytes against stressful conditions, allowing them to regulate their activity to reduce ATP requirements and ensure cell survival [58]. This is possible because adenosine can be released into the extracellular environment, where it acts as a specific modulator through cell surface receptors [56]; these receptors, called “ado receptors” (Ars), are GPCRs and are classified into four subtypes: A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 [62], which differ in the number of amino acids (Figure 2) and in their affinity towards adenosine. In fact, A1 and A2A possess a high affinity for adenosine compared to A2B and A3, which have a low affinity for the nucleoside [63].
Among them, A1A and A3A receptors are coupled to Gi and Go proteins that inhibit adenylate cyclase activity and reduce intracellular cAMP levels. This will result in the activation of phospholipase C(PLC)-β, thereby increasing inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) [64] and intracellular calcium levels, which in turn stimulate activation of the Ca-dependent protein kinase (PKC) and all calcium-binding proteins [64]. In the CNS, A1AR is expressed in microglia/macrophages and neurons, and plays a crucial role in their activation [65]; peripherally, it is also highly expressed in cardiac, renal, and adipose tissue. As demonstrated by Synowitz M. et al. in A1AR knockout mice, there is an increase in neuroinflammation and microglia activity [66], and this suggests that, in pathological conditions, A1AR activation produces a neuroprotective effect [67]. In physiological conditions, adenosine, through A1AR, determined a decrease in the proliferation of astrocytes, inducing the release of neurotrophic growth factor (NGF) [68]. A3AR, however, has a low expression in the CNS, but it is highly expressed in immune cells [59], cardiac cells, epithelial cells, colon mucosa, lung parenchyma, and bronchi. It is demonstrated that A3AR is expressed in cells involved in inflammatory processes, suggesting its potential involvement in inflammatory pathologies, such as lung injury, autoimmune diseases, and eye diseases [69]. Moreover, A3AR is present in many types of tumor cells, including astrocytomas, lymphoma, GBM, and other types of cancers [70].
A2AA and A2BA receptors are coupled to the Gs proteins, activating adenylate cyclase and increasing intracellular cAMP levels [71]; moreover, A2AAR activation can promote Protein kinase C (PKC) activation into cyclic AMP-dependent or independent mechanisms [72]. A2BAR activation, however, can stimulate PKC activity by coupling with the Gq protein [73]. They are mainly expressed in the CNS, especially in pre-synaptic regions of the hippocampus, where the release of neurotransmitters such as glutamate, acetylcholine, GABA, and noradrenaline is modulated [74,75], and in post-synaptic regions of the basal ganglia, where they modulate neuronal plasticity. They are also expressed in the astrocytes and oligodendrocytes [76,77] and on the cell surfaces of the immune system [78], such as regulatory T cells, macrophages, and natural killer cells (NKCs) [79], suggesting that they could be valid candidates for cancer immunotherapy. All subtypes of adenosine receptors are expressed on the surface of immune cells, such as macrophages and monocytes, and their expression is regulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially IL-1B and the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) [80], which determined an increase in A2AAR levels on human monocytes [81]. The same pro-inflammatory stimuli regulate the expression of the A2BAR of the macrophages [82]. In physiological conditions, central A2AAR increases NGF and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels from the hippocampus and cortical neurons [83]. Therefore, given both the prevalence of A2AAR in the CNS and its expression regulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, this receptor plays a crucial role in inflammatory processes involving microglia, determining the release of IL-1β and IL-18 [84]. In fact, an antagonistic action against A2AAR prevents hippocampal neuroinflammation and IL-1β-induced exacerbation of neuronal toxicity [85]. Evidence showed that, in spinal intermediate neurons of the striatum, this receptor is related to the dopaminergic D2 receptor, where direct and indirect interactions with cholinergic, GABAergic, dopaminergic, and glutamatergic systems have been described, both in the basal ganglia and in other brain structures [86]. In the periphery, A2AAR is localized in the vascular smooth muscle and, together with A1AR, exerts a vasodilatory action. In this context, at the coronary levels, vasodilation mediated by the activation of A2AAR and A1AR is induced by the endothelial enzyme nitric oxidase synthase [87], producing large quantities of nitric oxide and inducing an increase in coronary flow, thus exerting a cardio-protective role [87], and this action depends on an increase in the intracellular cAMP levels [87]. Depending on the location of its receptors by which it interacts, adenosine exerts multiple physiological actions, including the protection of normal tissues and organs from the autoimmune response of immune cells, following binding with A2AAR [88]. In this regard, following damage to the cell, such as hypoxia, inflammation, and tissue injury, ADK activity is reduced, leading to increased levels of extracellular adenosine [59] in the extracellular space, which modulates the immune response, thus containing the inflammatory damage tissue. However, chronic exposure to extracellular adenosine can be harmful in some conditions, as adenosine itself can create an immunosuppressed niche, which is necessary for the development of neoplasia and infections [89,90]. In this context, it has been observed that Treg cells can release ATP, convert it to adenosine, and cause cytotoxic T cell suppression in the local tumor environment [91].

3. The Role of Adenosine in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Studies report that extracellular adenosine is an important regulator of several aspects of tumorigenesis, angiogenesis, tumor cell growth, and metastasis [92]. Kezemi et al. provide an interesting review of the expression of adenosine receptors in different tumor cell lines and their effect, including proliferative and tumor-protective expressions, following their activation [93].
It is hypothesized that in the brain, ATP released from the pre- and post-synaptic terminals of neurons and glial cells is the source of extracellular adenosine [94]. In the extracellular area, adenosine is produced from ATP after dephosphorylation by specific ectoenzymes, in this case, CD39 and CD73, expressed in microglial cells [90]. In physiological conditions, CD39 and CD73 exert an important role in the purinergic signals delivered to immune cells through the conversion of ADP/ATP to AMP to adenosine [95]. The CD39/CD73 pathway changes with the pathophysiological context in which it is embedded [89]. It has been demonstrated in vivo study that mice deprived of CD73 presented a lower level of extracellular adenosine, suggesting that ATP degradation is the main source of extracellular adenosine [96]. CD39 is expressed on the surface of the regulatory T cells, and it is the dominant ectoenzyme that controls extracellular nucleoside concentration [90]. Considering that angiogenesis is an important process for the growth of the tumor cells, it has been demonstrated that in mice deprived of CD39, angiogenesis is blocked, causing a slowdown in tumor growth [95].
High concentrations of adenosine and its receptors have also been found in the interstitial fluid tumor, modulating tumor growth [97]. Since the TME contains high levels of extracellular adenosine, it is hypothesized that tumor-derived adenosine is a mechanism by which tumors evade the immune response [98,99]. This evasion strategy is due not so much to the inability of immune cells to recognize the tumor, but the failure of the immune system to activate in the presence of the antigen [100] due to the inhibition of T cells by adenosine itself [100].
It is known that the immune system, through antigen-presenting cells (APC), is able to recognize a specific antigen [101], subsequently allowing the binding with B and T lymphocytes through their receptors, B-cell receptor (BCR) and T-cell receptor (TCR), respectively, thus initiating the immune response. In this tumor context, the activation of the immune system will lead to the secretion of anti-cancer cytokines [102], such as Interferon-gamma (INF-γ), TNF-α, and IL-6, and cell phagocytosis to eliminate the tumor, thus becoming a tool for the development of new treatments in cancer therapy [103]. Nevertheless, most tumors are able to implement various mechanisms to evade the immune response, such as inhibiting tumor-specific immune cells [104]. As is often the case, a particular tumor may express an antigen that, if presented by resting cells or by unprofessional APCs, recognition of the TCR will not lead to tumor destruction, but to inactivation of the tumor-specific T cell [105] (Figure 3).
An important aspect of the mechanism of escape by the tumor from the immune system is the TME [106], which is characterized by a hypoxic state and is rich in inhibitory ligands and cytokines, such as IL-10 and TGF-β, which lead to tolerance by the immune cells towards the tumor [107,108] (Figure 3). These conditions determine the increase in the expression of CD39 and CD73 [89], present on the surface of the tumor by stimulating the production of extracellular adenosine, by activating A2AAR. Moreover, at the same time, there is a reduction in the activity of the adenosine metabolizing enzyme, ADK [109].
In addition, it has been reported that the deletion of functional adenosine receptors, in particular A1AR, results in increased GBM growth [66]. However, subsequent studies have found that the interaction of adenosine with A2AAR induces inhibition of the adaptive immune response, inhibiting the function of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and NKCs and IL-2/Nkp46-activated NK cells specifically via A2AAR [110], thus promoting tumor escape from the immune system and metastasis [111,112]. Several in vitro and in vivo studies report that genetic deletion of the A2AAR enhances the anti-tumor responses, confirming adenosine’s role in evading the tumor from the immune system [113]. Second, adenosine appears to block both the generation and effector phases of anti-tumor responses. In vitro studies have been conducted on GBM cell lines U87MG, U373MG [59], and ASB19, which were subjected to hypoxia [59] for 24 and 72 hrs using ATB702 dichloride hydrate (15uM), an ADK inhibitor, and resulted in an accumulation of adenosine [114]. Subsequently, the cells were treated with TMZ (100 µM), which resulted in a decrease in the vitality of the tumor cells compared with the control GBM cells, thus demonstrating the tumor-protective role of endogenous adenosine against TMZ [115].
It has been shown that extracellular adenosine, defined as an immunosuppressive factor through interaction with its receptor, exploiting the hypoxic condition of the TME [116], is able to lead to an increase in intracellular cAMP, inhibiting lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis and, consequently, functional inhibition of immune cells, thus acting as a protective shield against the tumor, helping it to evade the immune system [99]. Therefore, if GBM cells contribute to immunosuppression, the immune cells recruited into the tumor may also participate in its immune escape [32]. Indeed, most of the anti-tumor immune cells recruited to the TME adopt an immunosuppressive phenotype due to the cytokines secreted by GBM [32].
In this context, a large number of experiments have shown that the concentration of adenosine in the TME is much higher than in normal tissues [117].
Hypoxia and tissue damage are not the only factors determining the release of extracellular adenosine; it is also generated from extracellular nucleotides by ectonucleotidases [95] CD39 and CD73 [89]. Through clinical studies, CD73, rather than CD39, was found to be a critical component in adenosine accumulation and tumor immunosuppression. Indeed, overexpression of CD73 was reported to be a component of glioma cell adhesion and tumor cell–extracellular matrix interactions [118].
Moreover, high adenosine concentrations also induce receptor-independent reactions by reversing the reaction catalyzed by S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (SAH-hydrolase), leading to an accumulation of SAH-inhibiting methyltransferases [119], as was shown in a recent study in which adenosine induced DNA hypomethylation in the brain by inhibiting trans-methylation reactions [120]. This connection between adenosine and methyl group metabolism is important for diagnostic purposes because an alteration in methyl group metabolism has been shown to be a risk factor in brain diseases such as GBM and neurodegenerative diseases [121,122].
In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that the presence of adenosine receptors in microglia is well established [123]. Cell cultures of rat microglia specifically express the A2AAR and were treated with the specific agonist CGS21680, inducing the expression of K+ channels, which are linked to microglia activation [124]. Again, there is conflicting evidence regarding the role of this receptor: stimulation of the A2AAR in rat microglia induces the expression of nerve growth factor and its release, thus exerting a neuroprotective effect [125], and at the same time induces the expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in rat microglia by releasing prostaglandin [126].
To confirm the involvement of adenosine and its receptors in tumorigenesis and its tumor-protective role, in vivo studies were conducted using the adenosine receptor agonists or antagonists [127]. A2AAR blocking using SCH58261, an A2AAR antagonist, inhibited the tumor growth, reducing CD4+ and regulatory T cells, and improving the anti-tumor response by T cells [127].
There is conflicting evidence regarding adenosine-mediated receptor actions on GBM proliferation. In glioblastoma stem cells, activation of A1AR and A2BAR appears to have reduced tumor proliferation and induced apoptosis [119], whereas in non-glioblastoma stem cell lines, activation of A1, A2B and/or A3 receptors induced an increase in proliferation. Liu et al. reported a pro-proliferative action of adenosine mediated by activation of the A2B receptor on glioblastoma cell lines subjected to hypoxia [128].

4. Adenosine Receptor Antagonists

The A2R-mediated adenosine pathway and its immunosuppressive role has allowed research to focus on novel therapeutic approaches to provide prolonged life expectancy in patients with tumors refractory to other therapies. One such approach that has proved effective in enhancing immunotherapy involves the development of selective adenosine receptor antagonists [129], which are able to prevent the effects of extracellular adenosine produced by both tissue and T cells [127]. Given that the first clinical trials of A2AAR antagonists date back to 2020, further clinical studies are underway regarding the anti-tumor activity, as well as the efficacy, of these new therapeutic candidates.
Adenosine receptor antagonists belong to a variety of chemical classes and are divided into two groups: xanthine derivates, of which the best known are Istradefylline (KW-6002) [130] and 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine derivates (DMPX), and non-xanthine derivates, the Polyheterocyclic nitrogen system, especially Ciforadenant (CPI-444) and Imaradenant (AZD4635) [131] (Figure 4).

4.1. Xanthine Derivates

Compounds belonging to this group result from modifications of the two main alkaloids, caffeine and theophylline [132]. These derivates show a high affinity for all the adenosine receptors, but in the GBM context, receptor affinity must be directed towards A2AAR in order to bind it selectively and competitively, reducing adenylate cyclase activity [133]. The main A2AAR xanthine antagonists are 8-(3-chlorostyryl) caffeine (CSC,7), 1,3-dipropyl-7-methyl-8-(3,4,-dimethoxystyryl)xanthine (KF 17837), 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine derivates (DMPX), and Istradefylline (KW-6002), which has a Ki of 2.2 nM, and is an extremely strong, selective, and orally active adenosine A2A receptor antagonist [134]. DMPX was the first selective A2AAR to be detected [135]. Many selective A2AAR antagonists have been obtained, some of which are being used in clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, given the interconnection between dopaminergic D2 receptors and adenosine [136,137].

4.2. Polyheterocyclic Nitrogen System

Another group of A2AAR antagonists is represented by the polyheterocyclic nitrogen system, including Preladenant (SCH-420814), Ciforadenant (CPI-444) [138], Taminadenant (NIR178) [139], Imaradenant (AZD4635) [131], SCH442416 [140], and ZM241385 [141], characterized by small molecules that selectively bind to the A2A receptor, competitively inhibiting adenosine binding and signaling [142]. In the GBM context, this compound presents troubles that prevent its use in clinical trials, as it has a high binding affinity for the A2B receptor subtype [138]. With a Ki of 0.048 for human A2AAR, the SCH442416 antagonist is considered a strong, selective, and brain-penetrant antagonist of A2AAR [143]. However, strong evidence has been shown by Ciforadenant being active in multiple preclinical tumor models, both as monotherapy and in combination with PDL1 targets, and it has over 66-fold selectivity over the adenosine A1 receptor [144] (Table 1). Clinical studies conducted on GBM patients under 1 and 4 months of treatment with Ciforadenant have shown that it possesses immunomodulatory effects [145]. Through in vitro studies, it was possible to characterize adenosine-related gene expression with the production of chemokines and cytokines, including CXCL5, CCl2, IL-8, and CXCL1, of monocytic, CD14+ origin, using the receptor agonist NECA [146], and how Ciforadenant is able to neutralize them [145]. Thus, these reports suggest that adenosine signaling not only directly reduces T lymphocyte immunity but also shifts the balance from T effector responses to both recruitment and myeloid suppressor functions [138].

4.3. Enhancement of Immunotherapy Induced by Adenosine Receptor Antagonists

Another therapeutic approach to enhance immunotherapy targets the immune cells in the TME [56]. As previously reported, the A2AAR is expressed on the surface of many cells of the immune system, the activation of which induced an immunosuppressive effect [56]. Consequently, a selective A2AAR antagonist reducing intracellular cAMP levels allows lymphocytes to effectively fight tumor cells. Since A2A and A2B adenosine receptors are coupled to the G proteins, and both increase intracellular cAMP levels [71], the use of A2BAR antagonists leads to a reduction in cAMP by restoring the anti-tumor functions of lymphocytes [145]. It is of interest to note the relationship between A2A and A2B adenosine receptors: A2A is involved in the expression of A2BAR [67]; furthermore, its activity is influenced by the expression of A2BAR, and both proteins can interact to form new functional units [147]. This evidence, therefore, suggests that blocking these receptors may be an effective means of combating cancer [147]. In this regard, clinical trials are already underway in patients with different tumor types where either the use of selective antagonists for individual receptors or dual antagonists is employed [56].
For the treatment of advanced malignant tumors, such as GBM, a trial has been updated for 2021, showing the combined treatment of the dual A2AAR/A2BAR antagonist with the AB122 antibody and standard chemotherapy [56].

5. Future Perspectives

Given the increasing mortality rate caused by GBM and despite the many strategies adopted to counteract the tumor’s progression, current treatments do not appear to be effective in influencing tumor growth. It is clear that each tumor is unique and different from the others, and that it is why the development of drugs capable of blocking its growth and at the same time reducing the impact of therapy on the body requires a better understanding of the mechanisms triggered by the tumor. Here, the knowledge about the adenosine pathway and its involvement in the TME has been established and would support research and the discovery of new strategies, including the development of adenosine receptor antagonists. Other approaches to boost immunotherapy would be the use of dual antagonists, both for the A2A and A2B adenosine receptors, given their functional interconnection as immunosuppressive agents.

6. Conclusions

Despite the positive results and the numerous clinical trials underway, there are limitations to the development of these new candidates due to the pharmacokinetic complexity. Therefore, considering the promising effect of adenosine receptor antagonists, they could represent alternative treatments for GBM by using them alone or in combination with chemotherapy to improve patients’ quality of life.

Author Contributions

I.P., E.E. and S.C. contributed to the conception and design of the review; G.C. (Giovanna Casili), M.L., M.C., A.P.C., A.R. and L.C. contributed to the interpretation of studies included in the review; V.B. and A.F. drafted the text; V.B. and A.F. contributed to preparing the figures; G.M., C.C. and G.C. (Giulia Chisari) contributed to the revision of the review. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bondy, M.L.; Scheurer, M.E.; Malmer, B.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S.; Davis, F.G.; Il’yasova, D.; Kruchko, C.; McCarthy, B.J.; Rajaraman, P.; Schwartzbaum, J.A.; et al. Brain tumor epidemiology: Consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium. Cancer 2008, 113, 1953–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Daneman, R.; Zhou, L.; Kebede, A.A.; Barres, B.A. Pericytes are required for blood-brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature 2010, 468, 562–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wu, K.L.; Chan, S.H.; Chan, J.Y. Neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in rostral ventrolateral medulla contribute to neurogenic hypertension induced by systemic inflammation. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. McFaline-Figueroa, J.R.; Lee, E.Q. Brain Tumors. Am. J. Med. 2018, 131, 874–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ansell, P.; Johnston, T.; Simpson, J.; Crouch, S.; Roman, E.; Picton, S. Brain tumor signs and symptoms: Analysis of primary health care records from the UKCCS. Pediatrics 2010, 125, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Minniti, G.; Traish, D.; Ashley, S.; Gonsalves, A.; Brada, M. Risk of second brain tumor after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for pituitary adenoma: Update after an additional 10 years. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 800–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wirsching, H.G.; Galanis, E.; Weller, M. Glioblastoma. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2016, 134, 381–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kaplan, K.; Kaya, Y.; Kuncan, M.; Ertunc, H.M. Brain tumor classification using modified local binary patterns (LBP) feature extraction methods. Med. Hypotheses 2020, 139, 109696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ardizzone, A.; Scuderi, S.A.; Giuffrida, D.; Colarossi, C.; Puglisi, C.; Campolo, M.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Esposito, E.; Paterniti, I. Role of Fibroblast Growth Factors Receptors (FGFRs) in Brain Tumors, Focus on Astrocytoma and Glioblastoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 3825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, Y.; Uhrbom, L. On the origin of glioma. Upsala J. Med. Sci. 2012, 117, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Watanabe, T.; Nobusawa, S.; Kleihues, P.; Ohgaki, H. IDH1 mutations are early events in the development of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 174, 1149–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Al-Ali, F.; Hendon, A.J.; Liepman, M.K.; Wisniewski, J.L.; Krinock, M.J.; Beckman, K. Oligodendroglioma metastatic to bone marrow. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005, 26, 2410–2414. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Neumann, J.E.; Spohn, M.; Obrecht, D.; Mynarek, M.; Thomas, C.; Hasselblatt, M.; Dorostkar, M.M.; Wefers, A.K.; Frank, S.; Monoranu, C.M.; et al. Molecular characterization of histopathological ependymoma variants. Acta Neuropathol. 2020, 139, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, W.; Yoo, H.; Shin, S.H.; Gwak, H.S.; Lee, S.H. Extraneural Metastases of Glioblastoma without Simultaneous Central Nervous System Recurrence. Brain Tumor Res. Treat. 2014, 2, 124–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Scuderi, S.A.; Casili, G.; Ardizzone, A.; Forte, S.; Colarossi, L.; Sava, S.; Paterniti, I.; Esposito, E.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Campolo, M. KYP-2047, an Inhibitor of Prolyl-Oligopeptidase, Reduces GlioBlastoma Proliferation through Angiogenesis and Apoptosis Modulation. Cancers 2021, 13, 3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ohgaki, H.; Kleihues, P. Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 170, 1445–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Louis, D.N. Molecular pathology of malignant gliomas. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2006, 1, 97–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Colwell, N.; Larion, M.; Giles, A.J.; Seldomridge, A.N.; Sizdahkhani, S.; Gilbert, M.R.; Park, D.M. Hypoxia in the glioblastoma microenvironment: Shaping the phenotype of cancer stem-like cells. Neuro Oncol. 2017, 19, 887–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jovcevska, I. Genetic secrets of long-term glioblastoma survivors. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2019, 19, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, H.J.; Park, J.W.; Lee, J.H. Genetic Architectures and Cell-of-Origin in Glioblastoma. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 615400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dirkse, A.; Golebiewska, A.; Buder, T.; Nazarov, P.V.; Muller, A.; Poovathingal, S.; Brons, N.H.C.; Leite, S.; Sauvageot, N.; Sarkisjan, D.; et al. Stem cell-associated heterogeneity in Glioblastoma results from intrinsic tumor plasticity shaped by the microenvironment. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Anderson, N.M.; Simon, M.C. The tumor microenvironment. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, R921–R925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Heiland, D.H.; Ravi, V.M.; Behringer, S.P.; Frenking, J.H.; Wurm, J.; Joseph, K.; Garrelfs, N.W.C.; Strahle, J.; Heynckes, S.; Grauvogel, J.; et al. Tumor-associated reactive astrocytes aid the evolution of immunosuppressive environment in glioblastoma. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Zong, H.; Verhaak, R.G.; Canoll, P. The cellular origin for malignant glioma and prospects for clinical advancements. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 2012, 12, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ohta, A.; Sitkovsky, M. Role of G-protein-coupled adenosine receptors in downregulation of inflammation and protection from tissue damage. Nature 2001, 414, 916–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Koritzinsky, M.; Seigneuric, R.; Magagnin, M.G.; van den Beucken, T.; Lambin, P.; Wouters, B.G. The hypoxic proteome is influenced by gene-specific changes in mRNA translation. Radiother. Oncol. 2005, 76, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liebelt, B.D.; Shingu, T.; Zhou, X.; Ren, J.; Shin, S.A.; Hu, J. Glioma Stem Cells: Signaling, Microenvironment, and Therapy. Stem. Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 7849890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Kietzmann, T.; Mennerich, D.; Dimova, E.Y. Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs) and Phosphorylation: Impact on Stability, Localization, and Transactivity. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Das, S.; Marsden, P.A. Angiogenesis in glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 1561–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gabler, L.; Jaunecker, C.N.; Katz, S.; van Schoonhoven, S.; Englinger, B.; Pirker, C.; Mohr, T.; Vician, P.; Stojanovic, M.; Woitzuck, V.; et al. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 promotes glioblastoma progression: A central role of integrin-mediated cell invasiveness. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2022, 10, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Westermark, B. Platelet-derived growth factor in glioblastoma-driver or biomarker? Upsala J. Med. Sci. 2014, 119, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pearson, J.R.D.; Cuzzubbo, S.; McArthur, S.; Durrant, L.G.; Adhikaree, J.; Tinsley, C.J.; Pockley, A.G.; McArdle, S.E.B. Immune Escape in Glioblastoma Multiforme and the Adaptation of Immunotherapies for Treatment. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 582106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chouaib, S.; El Hage, F.; Benlalam, H.; Mami-Chouaib, F. Immunotherapy of cancer: Promise and reality. Med. Sci. 2006, 22, 755–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Nakamura, K.; Smyth, M.J. Myeloid immunosuppression and immune checkpoints in the tumor microenvironment. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Goswami, S.; Walle, T.; Cornish, A.E.; Basu, S.; Anandhan, S.; Fernandez, I.; Vence, L.; Blando, J.; Zhao, H.; Yadav, S.S.; et al. Immune profiling of human tumors identifies CD73 as a combinatorial target in glioblastoma. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fishman, P.; Bar-Yehuda, S.; Synowitz, M.; Powell, J.D.; Klotz, K.N.; Gessi, S.; Borea, P.A. Adenosine receptors and cancer. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2009, 193, 399–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Borea, P.A.; Gessi, S.; Merighi, S.; Vincenzi, F.; Varani, K. Pharmacology of adenosine receptors: The state of the art. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 1591–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. O’Hayre, M.; Vazquez-Prado, J.; Kufareva, I.; Stawiski, E.W.; Handel, T.M.; Seshagiri, S.; Gutkind, J.S. The emerging mutational landscape of G proteins and G-protein-coupled receptors in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 412–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Geraldo, L.H.M.; Garcia, C.; da Fonseca, A.C.C.; Dubois, L.G.F.; de Sampaio, E.S.T.C.L.; Matias, D.; de Camargo Magalhaes, E.S.; do Amaral, R.F.; da Rosa, B.G.; Grimaldi, I.; et al. Glioblastoma Therapy in the Age of Molecular Medicine. Trends Cancer 2019, 5, 46–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stupp, R.; Dietrich, P.Y.; Ostermann Kraljevic, S.; Pica, A.; Maillard, I.; Maeder, P.; Meuli, R.; Janzer, R.; Pizzolato, G.; Miralbell, R.; et al. Promising survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme treated with concomitant radiation plus temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 20, 1375–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ghiaseddin, A.; Peters, K.B. Use of bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma. CNS Oncol. 2015, 4, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lombardi, G.; Caccese, M.; Padovan, M.; Cerretti, G.; Pintacuda, G.; Manara, R.; Di Sarra, F.; Zagonel, V. Regorafenib in Recurrent Glioblastoma Patients: A Large and Monocentric Real-Life Study. Cancers 2021, 13, 4731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Green, A.L.; Mulcahy Levy, J.M.; Vibhakar, R.; Hemenway, M.; Madden, J.; Foreman, N.; Dorris, K. Tumor treating fields in pediatric high-grade glioma. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2017, 33, 1043–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mehta, M.; Wen, P.; Nishikawa, R.; Reardon, D.; Peters, K. Critical review of the addition of tumor treating fields (TTFields) to the existing standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2017, 111, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ram, Z.; Culver, K.W.; Oshiro, E.M.; Viola, J.J.; DeVroom, H.L.; Otto, E.; Long, Z.; Chiang, Y.; McGarrity, G.J.; Muul, L.M.; et al. Therapy of malignant brain tumors by intratumoral implantation of retroviral vector-producing cells. Nat. Med. 1997, 3, 1354–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Klatzmann, D.; Valery, C.A.; Bensimon, G.; Marro, B.; Boyer, O.; Mokhtari, K.; Diquet, B.; Salzmann, J.L.; Philippon, J. A phase I/II study of herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase "suicide" gene therapy for recurrent glioblastoma. Study Group on Gene Therapy for Glioblastoma. Hum. Gene Ther. 1998, 9, 2595–2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Raffel, C.; Culver, K.; Kohn, D.; Nelson, M.; Siegel, S.; Gillis, F.; Link, C.J.; Villablanca, J.G.; Anderson, W.F. Gene therapy for the treatment of recurrent pediatric malignant astrocytomas with in vivo tumor transduction with the herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene/ganciclovir system. Hum. Gene Ther. 1994, 5, 863–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhou, W.; Qing, H.; Tong, Y.; Song, W. BACE1 gene expression and protein degradation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004, 1035, 49–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cloughesy, T.F.; Mochizuki, A.Y.; Orpilla, J.R.; Hugo, W.; Lee, A.H.; Davidson, T.B.; Wang, A.C.; Ellingson, B.M.; Rytlewski, J.A.; Sanders, C.M.; et al. Neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 immunotherapy promotes a survival benefit with intratumoral and systemic immune responses in recurrent glioblastoma. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 477–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bagley, S.J.; Desai, A.S.; Linette, G.P.; June, C.H.; O’Rourke, D.M. CAR T-cell therapy for glioblastoma: Recent clinical advances and future challenges. Neuro Oncol. 2018, 20, 1429–1438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Decking, U.K.; Schlieper, G.; Kroll, K.; Schrader, J. Hypoxia-induced inhibition of adenosine kinase potentiates cardiac adenosine release. Circ. Res. 1997, 81, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, J.; Fenton, R.A.; Wheeler, H.B.; Powell, C.C.; Peyton, B.D.; Cutler, B.S.; Dobson, J.G., Jr. Adenosine A2a receptors increase arterial endothelial cell nitric oxide. J. Surg. Res. 1998, 80, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bouma, M.G.; Stad, R.K.; van den Wildenberg, F.A.; Buurman, W.A. Differential regulatory effects of adenosine on cytokine release by activated human monocytes. J. Immunol. 1994, 153, 4159–4168. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Van der Graaf, P.H.; Van Schaick, E.A.; Visser, S.A.; De Greef, H.J.; Ijzerman, A.P.; Danhof, M. Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of antilipolytic effects of adenosine A(1) receptor agonists in rats: Prediction of tissue-dependent efficacy in vivo. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1999, 290, 702–709. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Williams-Karnesky, R.L.; Stenzel-Poore, M.P. Adenosine and stroke: Maximizing the therapeutic potential of adenosine as a prophylactic and acute neuroprotectant. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2009, 7, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Franco, R.; Rivas-Santisteban, R.; Navarro, G.; Reyes-Resina, I. Adenosine Receptor Antagonists to Combat Cancer and to Boost Anti-Cancer Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy. Cells 2021, 10, 2831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Coney, A.M.; Marshall, J.M. Role of adenosine and its receptors in the vasodilatation induced in the cerebral cortex of the rat by systemic hypoxia. J. Physiol. 1998, 509 Pt 2, 507–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Manjunath, S.; Sakhare, P.M. Adenosine and adenosine receptors: Newer therapeutic perspective. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2009, 41, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Marcelino, H.; Carvalho, T.M.A.; Tomas, J.; Teles, F.I.; Honorio, A.C.; Rosa, C.B.; Costa, A.R.; Costa, B.M.; Santos, C.R.A.; Sebastiao, A.M.; et al. Adenosine Inhibits Cell Proliferation Differently in Human Astrocytes and in Glioblastoma Cell Lines. Neuroscience 2021, 467, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Deussen, A.; Stappert, M.; Schafer, S.; Kelm, M. Quantification of extracellular and intracellular adenosine production: Understanding the transmembranous concentration gradient. Circulation 1999, 99, 2041–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Collins, J.F.; Ghishan, F.K. Molecular cloning, functional expression, tissue distribution, and in situ hybridization of the renal sodium phosphate (Na+/P(i)) transporter in the control and hypophosphatemic mouse. FASEB J. 1994, 8, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Chen, J.F.; Eltzschig, H.K.; Fredholm, B.B. Adenosine receptors as drug targets—What are the challenges? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013, 12, 265–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Palmer, T.M.; Benovic, J.L.; Stiles, G.L. Molecular basis for subtype-specific desensitization of inhibitory adenosine receptors. Analysis of a chimeric A1-A3 adenosine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 15272–15278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Sidders, B.; Zhang, P.; Goodwin, K.; O’Connor, G.; Russell, D.L.; Borodovsky, A.; Armenia, J.; McEwen, R.; Linghu, B.; Bendell, J.C.; et al. Adenosine Signaling Is Prognostic for Cancer Outcome and Has Predictive Utility for Immunotherapeutic Response. Clin. Cancer Res. 2020, 26, 2176–2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Luongo, L.; Guida, F.; Imperatore, R.; Napolitano, F.; Gatta, L.; Cristino, L.; Giordano, C.; Siniscalco, D.; Di Marzo, V.; Bellini, G.; et al. The A1 adenosine receptor as a new player in microglia physiology. Glia 2014, 62, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Synowitz, M.; Glass, R.; Farber, K.; Markovic, D.; Kronenberg, G.; Herrmann, K.; Schnermann, J.; Nolte, C.; van Rooijen, N.; Kiwit, J.; et al. A1 adenosine receptors in microglia control glioblastoma-host interaction. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 8550–8557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Marti Navia, A.; Dal Ben, D.; Lambertucci, C.; Spinaci, A.; Volpini, R.; Marques-Morgado, I.; Coelho, J.E.; Lopes, L.V.; Marucci, G.; Buccioni, M. Adenosine Receptors as Neuroinflammation Modulators: Role of A1 Agonists and A2A Antagonists. Cells 2020, 9, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Muroi, Y.; Ishii, T.; Teramoto, K.; Hori, M.; Nishimura, M. Calcineurin contributes to the enhancing effect of adenosine on nerve growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth via the decreased duration of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2004, 95, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Barkan, K.; Lagarias, P.; Stampelou, M.; Stamatis, D.; Hoare, S.; Safitri, D.; Klotz, K.N.; Vrontaki, E.; Kolocouris, A.; Ladds, G. Pharmacological characterisation of novel adenosine A3 receptor antagonists. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 20781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rocha, R.; Torres, A.; Ojeda, K.; Uribe, D.; Rocha, D.; Erices, J.; Niechi, I.; Ehrenfeld, P.; San Martin, R.; Quezada, C. The Adenosine A(3) Receptor Regulates Differentiation of Glioblastoma Stem-Like Cells to Endothelial Cells under Hypoxia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Weaver, D.R. A2a adenosine receptor gene expression in developing rat brain. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 1993, 20, 313–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Singh, B.L.; Chen, L.; Cai, H.; Shi, H.; Wang, Y.; Yu, C.; Chen, X.; Han, X.; Cai, X. Activation of adenosine A2a receptor accelerates and A2a receptor antagonist reduces intermittent hypoxia induced PC12 cell injury via PKC-KATP pathway. Brain Res. Bull. 2019, 150, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Luongo, L.; Guida, F.; Maione, S.; Jacobson, K.A.; Salvemini, D. Adenosine Metabotropic Receptors in Chronic Pain Management. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 651038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Cunha, R.A.; Almeida, T.; Ribeiro, J.A. Modification by arachidonic acid of extracellular adenosine metabolism and neuromodulatory action in the rat hippocampus. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 37572–37581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Rebola, N.; Rodrigues, R.J.; Oliveira, C.R.; Cunha, R.A. Different roles of adenosine A1, A2A and A3 receptors in controlling kainate-induced toxicity in cortical cultured neurons. Neurochem. Int. 2005, 47, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, X.X.; Nomura, T.; Aihara, H.; Nishizaki, T. Adenosine enhances glial glutamate efflux via A2a adenosine receptors. Life Sci. 2001, 68, 1343–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Melani, A.; Cipriani, S.; Vannucchi, M.G.; Nosi, D.; Donati, C.; Bruni, P.; Giovannini, M.G.; Pedata, F. Selective adenosine A2a receptor antagonism reduces JNK activation in oligodendrocytes after cerebral ischaemia. Brain 2009, 132, 1480–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Huang, S.; Apasov, S.; Koshiba, M.; Sitkovsky, M. Role of A2a extracellular adenosine receptor-mediated signaling in adenosine-mediated inhibition of T-cell activation and expansion. Blood 1997, 90, 1600–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Young, A.; Ngiow, S.F.; Gao, Y.; Patch, A.M.; Barkauskas, D.S.; Messaoudene, M.; Lin, G.; Coudert, J.D.; Stannard, K.A.; Zitvogel, L.; et al. A2AR Adenosine Signaling Suppresses Natural Killer Cell Maturation in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 1003–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ott, M.; Tomaszowski, K.H.; Marisetty, A.; Kong, L.Y.; Wei, J.; Duna, M.; Blumberg, K.; Ji, X.; Jacobs, C.; Fuller, G.N.; et al. Profiling of patients with glioma reveals the dominant immunosuppressive axis is refractory to immune function restoration. JCI Insight 2020, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Block, E.T.; Cronstein, B.N. Interferon-gamma inhibits adenosine A2A receptor function in hepatic stellate cells by STAT1-mediated repression of adenylyl cyclase. Int. J. Interferon Cytok. Mediat. Res. 2010, 2010, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Cohen, H.B.; Ward, A.; Hamidzadeh, K.; Ravid, K.; Mosser, D.M. IFN-gamma Prevents Adenosine Receptor (A2bR) Upregulation To Sustain the Macrophage Activation Response. J. Immunol. 2015, 195, 3828–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Arslan, G.; Kontny, E.; Fredholm, B.B. Down-regulation of adenosine A2A receptors upon NGF-induced differentiation of PC12 cells. Neuropharmacology 1997, 36, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Orr, A.G.; Orr, A.L.; Li, X.J.; Gross, R.E.; Traynelis, S.F. Adenosine A(2A) receptor mediates microglial process retraction. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12, 872–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Simoes, A.P.; Duarte, J.A.; Agasse, F.; Canas, P.M.; Tome, A.R.; Agostinho, P.; Cunha, R.A. Blockade of adenosine A2A receptors prevents interleukin-1beta-induced exacerbation of neuronal toxicity through a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J. Neuroinflammation 2012, 9, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Real, J.I.; Simoes, A.P.; Cunha, R.A.; Ferreira, S.G.; Rial, D. Adenosine A2A receptors modulate the dopamine D2 receptor-mediated inhibition of synaptic transmission in the mouse prefrontal cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2018, 47, 1127–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ray, C.J.; Marshall, J.M. The cellular mechanisms by which adenosine evokes release of nitric oxide from rat aortic endothelium. J. Physiol. 2006, 570, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Peng, W.; Wu, Z.; Song, K.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Xu, M. Regulation of sleep homeostasis mediator adenosine by basal forebrain glutamatergic neurons. Science 2020, 369, eabb0556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Antonioli, L.; Yegutkin, G.G.; Pacher, P.; Blandizzi, C.; Hasko, G. Anti-CD73 in cancer immunotherapy: Awakening new opportunities. Trends Cancer 2016, 2, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Li, X.Y.; Moesta, A.K.; Xiao, C.; Nakamura, K.; Casey, M.; Zhang, H.; Madore, J.; Lepletier, A.; Aguilera, A.R.; Sundarrajan, A.; et al. Targeting CD39 in Cancer Reveals an Extracellular ATP- and Inflammasome-Driven Tumor Immunity. Cancer Discov. 2019, 9, 1754–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Maj, T.; Wang, W.; Crespo, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, W.; Wei, S.; Zhao, L.; Vatan, L.; Shao, I.; Szeliga, W.; et al. Oxidative stress controls regulatory T cell apoptosis and suppressor activity and PD-L1-blockade resistance in tumor. Nat. Immunol. 2017, 18, 1332–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Arab, S.; Hadjati, J. Adenosine Blockage in Tumor Microenvironment and Improvement of Cancer Immunotherapy. Immune. Netw. 2019, 19, e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. MacKenzie, W.M.; Hoskin, D.W.; Blay, J. Adenosine suppresses alpha(4)beta(7) integrin-mediated adhesion of T lymphocytes to colon adenocarcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2002, 276, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Seydyousefi, M.; Moghanlou, A.E.; Metz, G.A.S.; Gursoy, R.; Faghfoori, M.H.; Mirghani, S.J.; Faghfoori, Z. Exogenous adenosine facilitates neuroprotection and functional recovery following cerebral ischemia in rats. Brain Res. Bull. 2019, 153, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Yang, R.; Elsaadi, S.; Misund, K.; Abdollahi, P.; Vandsemb, E.N.; Moen, S.H.; Kusnierczyk, A.; Slupphaug, G.; Standal, T.; Waage, A.; et al. Conversion of ATP to adenosine by CD39 and CD73 in multiple myeloma can be successfully targeted together with adenosine receptor A2A blockade. J. Immunother. Cancer 2020, 8, e000610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Volmer, J.B.; Thompson, L.F.; Blackburn, M.R. Ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73)-mediated adenosine production is tissue protective in a model of bleomycin-induced lung injury. J. Immunol. 2006, 176, 4449–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Antonioli, L.; Fornai, M.; Pellegrini, C.; D’Antongiovanni, V.; Turiello, R.; Morello, S.; Hasko, G.; Blandizzi, C. Adenosine Signaling in the Tumor Microenvironment. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021, 1270, 145–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Koussemou, M.; Lorenz, K.; Klotz, K.N. The A2B adenosine receptor in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells diminishes ERK1/2 phosphorylation by activation of MAPK-phosphatase-1. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ohta, A.; Gorelik, E.; Prasad, S.J.; Ronchese, F.; Lukashev, D.; Wong, M.K.; Huang, X.; Caldwell, S.; Liu, K.; Smith, P.; et al. A2A adenosine receptor protects tumors from antitumor T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 13132–13137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Overwijk, W.W.; Restifo, N.P. Creating therapeutic cancer vaccines: Notes from the battlefield. Trends Immunol. 2001, 22, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ablamunits, V. The importance of APC. J. Autoimmune Dis. 2005, 2, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Gonzalez, H.; Hagerling, C.; Werb, Z. Roles of the immune system in cancer: From tumor initiation to metastatic progression. Genes Dev. 2018, 32, 1267–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Leone, R.D.; Lo, Y.C.; Powell, J.D. A2aR antagonists: Next generation checkpoint blockade for cancer immunotherapy. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2015, 13, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Mapara, M.Y.; Sykes, M. Tolerance and cancer: Mechanisms of tumor evasion and strategies for breaking tolerance. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004, 22, 1136–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Sitkovsky, M.; Lukashev, D.; Deaglio, S.; Dwyer, K.; Robson, S.C.; Ohta, A. Adenosine A2A receptor antagonists: Blockade of adenosinergic effects and T regulatory cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 153 (Suppl. S1), S457–S464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Gabrilovich, D.I.; Chen, H.L.; Girgis, K.R.; Cunningham, H.T.; Meny, G.M.; Nadaf, S.; Kavanaugh, D.; Carbone, D.P. Production of vascular endothelial growth factor by human tumors inhibits the functional maturation of dendritic cells. Nat. Med. 1996, 2, 1096–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Antonioli, L.; Lucarini, E.; Lambertucci, C.; Fornai, M.; Pellegrini, C.; Benvenuti, L.; Di Cesare Mannelli, L.; Spinaci, A.; Marucci, G.; Blandizzi, C.; et al. The Anti-Inflammatory and Pain-Relieving Effects of AR170, an Adenosine A3 Receptor Agonist, in a Rat Model of Colitis. Cells 2020, 9, 1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Litchfield, K.; Reading, J.L.; Puttick, C.; Thakkar, K.; Abbosh, C.; Bentham, R.; Watkins, T.B.K.; Rosenthal, R.; Biswas, D.; Rowan, A.; et al. Meta-analysis of tumor- and T cell-intrinsic mechanisms of sensitization to checkpoint inhibition. Cell 2021, 184, 596–614.e514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Boison, D. Adenosine kinase: Exploitation for therapeutic gain. Pharmacol. Rev. 2013, 65, 906–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Reisser, D.; Martin, F. CD4+ T cells recovered from a mixed immune lymphocyte-tumor cell culture induce thymidine incorporation by naive rat lymphocytes in response to tumor cells. Int. J. Cancer 1994, 57, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mediavilla-Varela, M.; Luddy, K.; Noyes, D.; Khalil, F.K.; Neuger, A.M.; Soliman, H.; Antonia, S.J. Antagonism of adenosine A2A receptor expressed by lung adenocarcinoma tumor cells and cancer associated fibroblasts inhibits their growth. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2013, 14, 860–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Torres, A.; Erices, J.I.; Sanchez, F.; Ehrenfeld, P.; Turchi, L.; Virolle, T.; Uribe, D.; Niechi, I.; Spichiger, C.; Rocha, J.D.; et al. Extracellular adenosine promotes cell migration/invasion of Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells through A3 Adenosine Receptor activation under hypoxia. Cancer Lett. 2019, 446, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Waickman, A.T.; Alme, A.; Senaldi, L.; Zarek, P.E.; Horton, M.; Powell, J.D. Enhancement of tumor immunotherapy by deletion of the A2A adenosine receptor. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2012, 61, 917–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Sun, Y.; Huang, P. Adenosine A2B Receptor: From Cell Biology to Human Diseases. Front. Chem. 2016, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Vigano, S.; Alatzoglou, D.; Irving, M.; Menetrier-Caux, C.; Caux, C.; Romero, P.; Coukos, G. Targeting Adenosine in Cancer Immunotherapy to Enhance T-Cell Function. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Vijayan, D.; Young, A.; Teng, M.W.L.; Smyth, M.J. Targeting immunosuppressive adenosine in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2017, 17, 709–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hatfield, S.M.; Kjaergaard, J.; Lukashev, D.; Belikoff, B.; Schreiber, T.H.; Sethumadhavan, S.; Abbott, R.; Philbrook, P.; Thayer, M.; Shujia, D.; et al. Systemic oxygenation weakens the hypoxia and hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha-dependent and extracellular adenosine-mediated tumor protection. J. Mol. Med. 2014, 92, 1283–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Yan, A.; Joachims, M.L.; Thompson, L.F.; Miller, A.D.; Canoll, P.D.; Bynoe, M.S. CD73 Promotes Glioblastoma Pathogenesis and Enhances Its Chemoresistance via A2B Adenosine Receptor Signaling. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 4387–4402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Daniele, S.; Zappelli, E.; Natali, L.; Martini, C.; Trincavelli, M.L. Modulation of A1 and A2B adenosine receptor activity: A new strategy to sensitise glioblastoma stem cells to chemotherapy. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Wink, M.R.; Lenz, G.; Braganhol, E.; Tamajusuku, A.S.; Schwartsmann, G.; Sarkis, J.J.; Battastini, A.M. Altered extracellular ATP, ADP and AMP catabolism in glioma cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2003, 198, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Cascalheira, J.F.; Goncalves, M.; Barroso, M.; Castro, R.; Palmeira, M.; Serpa, A.; Dias-Cabral, A.C.; Domingues, F.C.; Almeida, S. Association of the transcobalamin II gene 776C → G polymorphism with Alzheimer’s type dementia: Dependence on the 5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 1298A → C polymorphism genotype. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 2015, 52, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  122. Semmler, A.; Simon, M.; Moskau, S.; Linnebank, M. The methionine synthase polymorphism c.2756A>G alters susceptibility to glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2006, 15, 2314–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Carmeliet, P.; Dor, Y.; Herbert, J.M.; Fukumura, D.; Brusselmans, K.; Dewerchin, M.; Neeman, M.; Bono, F.; Abramovitch, R.; Maxwell, P.; et al. Role of HIF-1alpha in hypoxia-mediated apoptosis, cell proliferation and tumour angiogenesis. Nature 1998, 394, 485–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kust, B.M.; Biber, K.; van Calker, D.; Gebicke-Haerter, P.J. Regulation of K+ channel mRNA expression by stimulation of adenosine A2a-receptors in cultured rat microglia. Glia 1999, 25, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Heese, K.; Fiebich, B.L.; Bauer, J.; Otten, U. Nerve growth factor (NGF) expression in rat microglia is induced by adenosine A2a-receptors. Neurosci. Lett. 1997, 231, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Fiebich, B.L.; Biber, K.; Lieb, K.; van Calker, D.; Berger, M.; Bauer, J.; Gebicke-Haerter, P.J. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in rat microglia is induced by adenosine A2a-receptors. Glia 1996, 18, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ma, S.R.; Deng, W.W.; Liu, J.F.; Mao, L.; Yu, G.T.; Bu, L.L.; Kulkarni, A.B.; Zhang, W.F.; Sun, Z.J. Blockade of adenosine A2A receptor enhances CD8(+) T cells response and decreases regulatory T cells in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Liu, T.Z.; Wang, X.; Bai, Y.F.; Liao, H.Z.; Qiu, S.C.; Yang, Y.Q.; Yan, X.H.; Chen, J.; Guo, H.B.; Zhang, S.Z. The HIF-2alpha dependent induction of PAP and adenosine synthesis regulates glioblastoma stem cell function through the A2B adenosine receptor. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 49, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wrensch, M.; Jenkins, R.B.; Chang, J.S.; Yeh, R.F.; Xiao, Y.; Decker, P.A.; Ballman, K.V.; Berger, M.; Buckner, J.C.; Chang, S.; et al. Variants in the CDKN2B and RTEL1 regions are associated with high-grade glioma susceptibility. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41, 905–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Jacobson, K.A.; Nikodijevic, O.; Padgett, W.L.; Gallo-Rodriguez, C.; Maillard, M.; Daly, J.W. 8-(3-Chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC) is a selective A2-adenosine antagonist in vitro and in vivo. FEBS Lett. 1993, 323, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Borodovsky, A.; Barbon, C.M.; Wang, Y.; Ye, M.; Prickett, L.; Chandra, D.; Shaw, J.; Deng, N.; Sachsenmeier, K.; Clarke, J.D.; et al. Small molecule AZD4635 inhibitor of A2AR signaling rescues immune cell function including CD103(+) dendritic cells enhancing anti-tumor immunity. J. Immunother. Cancer 2020, 8, e000417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Harmse, R.; van der Walt, M.M.; Petzer, J.P.; Terre’Blanche, G. Discovery of 1,3-diethyl-7-methyl-8-(phenoxymethyl)-xanthine derivatives as novel adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonists. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2016, 26, 5951–5955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Schwabe, U.; Ukena, D.; Lohse, M.J. Xanthine derivatives as antagonists at A1 and A2 adenosine receptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 1985, 330, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Chen, J.F.; Xu, K.; Petzer, J.P.; Staal, R.; Xu, Y.H.; Beilstein, M.; Sonsalla, P.K.; Castagnoli, K.; Castagnoli, N., Jr.; Schwarzschild, M.A. Neuroprotection by caffeine and A(2A) adenosine receptor inactivation in a model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, RC143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Szopa, A.; Bogatko, K.; Serefko, A.; Wyska, E.; Wosko, S.; Swiader, K.; Doboszewska, U.; Wlaz, A.; Wrobel, A.; Wlaz, P.; et al. Agomelatine and tianeptine antidepressant activity in mice behavioral despair tests is enhanced by DMPX, a selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, but not DPCPX, a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist. Pharmacol. Rep. 2019, 71, 676–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Masjedi, A.; Ahmadi, A.; Ghani, S.; Malakotikhah, F.; Nabi Afjadi, M.; Irandoust, M.; Karoon Kiani, F.; Heydarzadeh Asl, S.; Atyabi, F.; Hassannia, H.; et al. Silencing adenosine A2a receptor enhances dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapy. Nanomedicine 2020, 29, 102240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Pollack, A.E.; Fink, J.S. Adenosine antagonists potentiate D2 dopamine-dependent activation of Fos in the striatopallidal pathway. Neuroscience 1995, 68, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Fong, L.; Hotson, A.; Powderly, J.D.; Sznol, M.; Heist, R.S.; Choueiri, T.K.; George, S.; Hughes, B.G.M.; Hellmann, M.D.; Shepard, D.R.; et al. Adenosine 2A Receptor Blockade as an Immunotherapy for Treatment-Refractory Renal Cell Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2020, 10, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Chiappori, A.A.; Creelan, B.; Tanvetyanon, T.; Gray, J.E.; Haura, E.B.; Thapa, R.; Barlow, M.L.; Chen, Z.; Chen, D.T.; Beg, A.A.; et al. Phase I Study of Taminadenant (PBF509/NIR178), an Adenosine 2A Receptor Antagonist, with or without Spartalizumab (PDR001), in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 28, 2313–2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Yu, J.; Zhong, Y.; Shen, X.; Cheng, Y.; Qi, J.; Wang, J. In vitro effect of adenosine A2A receptor antagonist SCH 442416 on the expression of glutamine synthetase and glutamate aspartate transporter in rat retinal Muller cells at elevated hydrostatic pressure. Oncol. Rep. 2012, 27, 748–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Poucher, S.M.; Keddie, J.R.; Brooks, R.; Shaw, G.R.; McKillop, D. Pharmacodynamics of ZM 241385, a potent A2a adenosine receptor antagonist, after enteric administration in rat, cat and dog. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1996, 48, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Poucher, S.M.; Keddie, J.R.; Singh, P.; Stoggall, S.M.; Caulkett, P.W.; Jones, G.; Coll, M.G. The in vitro pharmacology of ZM 241385, a potent, non-xanthine A2a selective adenosine receptor antagonist. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1995, 115, 1096–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Todde, S.; Moresco, R.M.; Simonelli, P.; Baraldi, P.G.; Cacciari, B.; Spalluto, G.; Varani, K.; Monopoli, A.; Matarrese, M.; Carpinelli, A.; et al. Design, radiosynthesis, and biodistribution of a new potent and selective ligand for in vivo imaging of the adenosine A(2A) receptor system using positron emission tomography. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4359–4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Gillespie, R.J.; Cliffe, I.A.; Dawson, C.E.; Dourish, C.T.; Gaur, S.; Jordan, A.M.; Knight, A.R.; Lerpiniere, J.; Misra, A.; Pratt, R.M.; et al. Antagonists of the human adenosine A2A receptor. Part 3: Design and synthesis of pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines, pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidines and 6-arylpurines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 2924–2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Willingham, S.B.; Hotson, A.N.; Miller, R.A. Targeting the A2AR in cancer; early lessons from the clinic. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2020, 53, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Gnad, T.; Navarro, G.; Lahesmaa, M.; Reverte-Salisa, L.; Copperi, F.; Cordomi, A.; Naumann, J.; Hochhauser, A.; Haufs-Brusberg, S.; Wenzel, D.; et al. Adenosine/A2B Receptor Signaling Ameliorates the Effects of Aging and Counteracts Obesity. Cell Metab. 2020, 32, 56–70.e57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Hinz, S.; Navarro, G.; Borroto-Escuela, D.; Seibt, B.F.; Ammon, Y.C.; de Filippo, E.; Danish, A.; Lacher, S.K.; Cervinkova, B.; Rafehi, M.; et al. Adenosine A2A receptor ligand recognition and signaling is blocked by A2B receptors. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 13593–13611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cancers 14 04032 g001 550
Figure 1. Figure created with Biorender.com. Classification of brain tumors (A). Main symptoms of brain tumors (B).
Figure 1. Figure created with Biorender.com. Classification of brain tumors (A). Main symptoms of brain tumors (B).
Cancers 14 04032 g001
Cancers 14 04032 g002 550
Figure 2. Figure created with Biorender.com. Production of adenosine starts from its precursors ATP, ADP, and AMP and subsequent binding of the nucleoside with the respective receptors A1, A2A, A2B, and A3.
Figure 2. Figure created with Biorender.com. Production of adenosine starts from its precursors ATP, ADP, and AMP and subsequent binding of the nucleoside with the respective receptors A1, A2A, A2B, and A3.
Cancers 14 04032 g002
Cancers 14 04032 g003 550
Figure 3. Figure created with Biorender.com. Right: induction of the immune response by antigen presenting by APC, with consequent activation of effector CD8+ T cells and recruitment of immune cells, with the elimination of the tumor cell. Left: lack of immune response, following antigen presentation by non-professional APC cells. The tumor microenvironment, characterized by hypoxia and the presence of inhibitory cytokines and cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β, leads to inactivation and/or tolerance of effector T cells with the consequent escape of the tumor from the immune response.
Figure 3. Figure created with Biorender.com. Right: induction of the immune response by antigen presenting by APC, with consequent activation of effector CD8+ T cells and recruitment of immune cells, with the elimination of the tumor cell. Left: lack of immune response, following antigen presentation by non-professional APC cells. The tumor microenvironment, characterized by hypoxia and the presence of inhibitory cytokines and cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β, leads to inactivation and/or tolerance of effector T cells with the consequent escape of the tumor from the immune response.
Cancers 14 04032 g003
Cancers 14 04032 g004 550
Figure 4. The main adenosine receptor antagonists divided into xanthine derivatives and non-xanthine derivatives.
Figure 4. The main adenosine receptor antagonists divided into xanthine derivatives and non-xanthine derivatives.
Cancers 14 04032 g004
Table
Table 1. Summary of the binding selectivity of adenosine receptor antagonists.
Table 1. Summary of the binding selectivity of adenosine receptor antagonists.
Summary of Adenosine Receptor Antagonists
Adenosine Receptor AntagonistsA1A2AA2BA3References
Xanthine derivates
Caffeine++++[132]
Theophylline++++[132]
DMPX+++++++[135]
Istradefylline++++++[130]
Taminadenant++++++[139]
Non-Xanthine derivates
Ciforadenant+++++++++[138]
Imaradenant+++++++[131]
SCH442416+++++++[140]
ZM241385++++++++[141]
+ Low selectivity for adenosine ++ Halfway selectivity for adenosine +++ High selectivity for adenosine.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bova, V.; Filippone, A.; Casili, G.; Lanza, M.; Campolo, M.; Capra, A.P.; Repici, A.; Crupi, L.; Motta, G.; Colarossi, C.; et al. Adenosine Targeting as a New Strategy to Decrease Glioblastoma Aggressiveness. Cancers 2022, 14, 4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164032

AMA Style

Bova V, Filippone A, Casili G, Lanza M, Campolo M, Capra AP, Repici A, Crupi L, Motta G, Colarossi C, et al. Adenosine Targeting as a New Strategy to Decrease Glioblastoma Aggressiveness. Cancers. 2022; 14(16):4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bova, Valentina, Alessia Filippone, Giovanna Casili, Marika Lanza, Michela Campolo, Anna Paola Capra, Alberto Repici, Lelio Crupi, Gianmarco Motta, Cristina Colarossi, and et al. 2022. "Adenosine Targeting as a New Strategy to Decrease Glioblastoma Aggressiveness" Cancers 14, no. 16: 4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164032

APA Style

Bova, V., Filippone, A., Casili, G., Lanza, M., Campolo, M., Capra, A. P., Repici, A., Crupi, L., Motta, G., Colarossi, C., Chisari, G., Cuzzocrea, S., Esposito, E., & Paterniti, I. (2022). Adenosine Targeting as a New Strategy to Decrease Glioblastoma Aggressiveness. Cancers, 14(16), 4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14164032

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop