Next Article in Journal
Scanning Micromirror Calibration Method Based on PSO-LSSVM Algorithm Prediction
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Deposition Technique for Fabricating Films with Customized Thickness Profiles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Editorial for the Micro/Nanoscale Electrokinetics Section

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
Micromachines 2024, 15(12), 1414; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15121414
Submission received: 6 November 2024 / Accepted: 11 November 2024 / Published: 25 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section C1: Micro/Nanoscale Electrokinetics)
Electrokinetics is the study of fluid flow and particle motion driven by electricity [1]. The most prominent electrokinetic phenomena are electroosmosis, electrophoresis, streaming potential and sedimentation potential, where a liquid moves tangentially to a charged solid surface in the presence of an electric field [2]. All these phenomena are associated with the electric double layer (EDL) that is spontaneously formed near a charged solid surface [3]. Electrokinetics is often the method of choice in micro/nanofluidic devices because of its favored downscaling as well as the ease, precision, and autonomy of operation compared to the traditional hydrodynamic method [4]. It has been extensively used to transport and manipulate fluids and various types of particles to achieve lab-on-a-chip applications in many areas such as biomedical, chemical, environmental and forensic etc. [5,6].
In recognizing the significance and relevance of electrokinetics, I am pleased to announce a new section, Micro/Nanoscale Electrokinetics, in the journal of Micromachines. This section welcomes original research and review articles on either a fundamental investigation or an applicational exploration of any electrokinetic phenomena in micro/nanofluidic devices. The electrokinetic phenomena of interest include, but are not necessarily limited to, electroosmosis, electrophoresis, induced-charge electrokinetics, dielectrophoresis, electro-rotation, electro-hydrodynamics, electrothermal flow, diffusioosmosis, diffusiophoresis, streaming potential/current, and electrokinetic energy conversion etc. in both Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids.
In this Editorial, I aim to highlight a few trending research directions in the field of micro/nanoscale electrokinetics, which hopefully will pave the way to stimulate further studies in these directions and as well more new directions.

1. Nonlinear Electroosmosis and Electrophoresis in Newtonian Fluids

In classical electrokinetics with Newtonian fluids, electroosmosis and electrophoresis are both proportional and parallel to the imposed electric field regardless of DC or AC [7]. These linear dependences, however, break down around curved solid surfaces because of surface conduction in the EDL [8,9]. Concentration–polarization electroosmosis [10] is induced around stationary dielectric surfaces under low-frequency AC electric fields. This nonlinear electroosmosis also occurs around dielectric particles and has been utilized for particle focusing [11] and separation [12]. Nonlinear electrophoresis has been predicted and observed for highly charged dielectric particles under large DC electric fields because of the non-uniformity of surface conduction over curved particle surfaces [13,14]. Its velocity depends on the particle size, charge, and shape [15,16,17,18], which plays a significant role in characterizing and separating particles in electrokinetic systems [19,20,21,22].

2. Nonlinear Electroosmosis and Electrophoresis in Non-Newtonian Fluids

As many of the chemical and biological samples in micro/nanofluidic applications are complex fluids exhibiting non-Newtonian characteristics [23], there have been extensive theoretical and/or numerical studies on electroosmosis and electrophoresis in non-Newtonian fluids over the past two decades [24,25,26]. Both nonlinear electroosmosis and nonlinear electrophoresis have been predicted to occur because of fluid shear thinning and/or elasticity effects [24,27,28]. A recent experiment in shear thinning xanthan gum solutions [29] confirmed these nonlinear electric field dependences, where the nonlinear index values of electroosmotic, electrophoretic, and electrokinetic velocities all increase with increasing polymer or buffer concentration. In another experimental study with viscoelastic poly(ethylene oxide) solutions [30], the fluid elasticity effect was demonstrated to induce the particle size dependence of electrophoretic velocity.

3. Dielectrophoresis-Enabled Single Cell Analysis

Dielectrophoresis (DEP) has been extensively used to manipulate particles ranging from microscopic cells through mesoscopic viruses to nanoscopic molecules [31,32]. It has the capability to capture and/or release individual objects for single cell analysis. Positive DEP has been demonstrated to guide and position single cells within lithographically defined wells on both glassy carbon and gold microelectrodes [33]. It take a much longer time to attract suspended cells into the wells than precipitated cells because of the quickly decayed DEP force away from the electrode. This issue can be resolved by using 3D electrodes that are the same height as the microchannel [34]. Droplets have also been demonstrated for potential single cell analysis, where cell-encapsulated droplets can be hydrodynamically trapped into different pockets and then selectively extracted from the pockets by the DEP force [35].

4. Protein Dielectrophoresis

Protein DEP has the potential to make a strong impact both as an enrichment method in bioanalysis and as a manipulation tool for bionanotechnological applications [36]. The responses of protein DEP can be quantified through either fluorescent probes or electrical measurements such as impedance spectroscopy [37]. However, the reported DEP data for over twenty different globular proteins cannot be explained using the standard DEP theory, where the calculated DEP force is too small to overcome the Brown motion of proteins [38]. A molecular dynamics simulation-supported empirical theory has been proposed to consider both the induced and permanent dipole moments of proteins, yielding a molecular version of the traditional Clausius–Mossotti function that is derived from macroscopic electrostatics [39,40]. Another theoretical attempt in this direction is looking at DEP from the system’s point of view [41,42,43].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Masliyah, J.H.; Bhattacharjee, S. Electrokinetic and Colloid Transport Phenomena; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wall, S. The history of electrokinetic phenomena. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 15, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hunter, R.J. Zeta Potential in Colloid Science; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chang, H.C.; Yeo, L.Y. Electrokinetically Driven Microfluidics and Nanofluidics; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  5. Qian, S.; Ai, Y. Electrokinetic Particle Transport in Micro-/Nanofluidics: Direct Numerical Simulation Analysis; CRC Press: Cleveland, OH, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. Xuan, X. Recent Advances in Direct Current Electrokinetic Manipulation of Particles for Microfluidic Applications. Electrophoresis 2019, 40, 2484–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Li, D. Electrokinetics in Microfluidics; Elsevier Academic Press: Burlington, MA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mishchuk, N.A. Concentration Polarization of Interface and Nonlinear Electrokinetic Phenomena. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 160, 16–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Khair, A.S. Nonlinear Electrophoresis of Colloidal Particles. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 59, 101587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fernández-Mateo, R.; Calero, V.; Morgan, H.; Ramos, A.; García-Sánchez, P. Concentration−Polarization Electroosmosis near Insulating Constrictions within Microfluidic Channels. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 14667–14674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fernández-Mateo, R.; Calero, V.; Morgan, H.; García-Sánchez, P.; Ramos, A. Wall Repulsion of Charged Colloidal Particles during Electrophoresis in Microfluidic Channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 074501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fernández-Mateo, R.; García-Sánchez, P.; Ramos, A.; Morgan, H. Concentration–polarization electroosmosis for particle fractionation. Lab Chip 2024, 24, 2968–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schnitzer, O.; Yariv, E. Nonlinear Electrophoresis at Arbitrary Field Strengths: Small-Dukhin-Number Analysis. Phys. Fluids 2014, 26, 122002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tottori, S.; Misiunas, K.; Keyser, U.F.; Bonthuis, D.J. Nonlinear Electrophoresis of Highly Charged Nonpolarizable Particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 14502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bentor, J.; Dort, H.; Chitrao, R.A.; Zhang, Y.; Xuan, X. Nonlinear Electrophoresis of Dielectric Particles in Newtonian Fluids. Electrophoresis 2023, 44, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bentor, J.; Xuan, X. Nonlinear Electrophoresis of Nonspherical Particles in a Rectangular Microchannel. Electrophoresis 2024, 45, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ernst, O.D.; Vaghef-Koodehi, A.; Dillis, C.; Lomeli-Martin, A.; Lapizco-Encinas, B.H. Dependence of Nonlinear Electrophoresis on Particle Size and Electrical Charge. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 6595–6602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kasarabada, V.; Ernst, O.D.; Vaghef-Koodehi, A.; Lapizco-Encinas, B.H. Effect of Cell Shape on Nonlinear Electrophoresis Migration. J. Chromatogr. A 2024, 1717, 464685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nihaar, N.; Ahamed, N.; Mendiola-Escobedo, C.A.; Ernst, O.D.; Perez-Gonzalez, V.H.; Lapizco-Encinas, B.H. Fine-Tuning the Characteristic of the Applied Potential to Improve AC-IEK Separations of Microparticles. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 9914–9923. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lomeli-Martin, A.; Ernst, O.D.; Cardenas-Benitez, B.; Cobos, R.; Khair, A.S.; Lapizco-Encinas, B.H. Characterization of the Nonlinear Electrophoretic Behavior of Colloidal Particles in a Microfluidic Channel. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 6740–6747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ahamed, N.N.N.; Mendiola-Escobedo, C.A.; Perez-Gonzalez, V.H.; Blanca, H. Lapizco-Encinas. Assessing the Discriminatory Capabilities of iEK Devices under DC and DC-Biased AC Stimulation Potentials. Micromachines 2023, 14, 2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lomeli-Martin, A.; Azad, Z.; Thomas, J.A.; Lapizco-Encinas, B.H. Assessment of the Nonlinear Electrophoretic Migration of Nanoparticles and Bacteriophages. Micromachines 2024, 15, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lu, X.; Liu, C.; Hu, G.; Xuan, X. Particle Manipulations in Non-Newtonian Microfluidics: A Review. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 500, 182–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, C.; Yang, C. Electrokinetics of Non-Newtonian Fluids: A Review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 201−202, 94–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ji, J.; Qian, S.; Parker, A.M.; Zhang, X. Numerical Study of the Time-Periodic Electroosmotic Flow of Viscoelastic Fluid through a Short Constriction Microchannel. Micromachines 2023, 14, 2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chang, L.; Zhao, G.; Buren, M.; Sun, Y.; Jian, Y. Alternating Current Electroosmotic Flow of Maxwell Fluid in a Parallel Plate Microchannel with Sinusoidal Roughness. Micromachines 2024, 15, 1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khair, A.S.; Posluszny, D.E.; Walker, L.M. Coupling Electrokinetics and Rheology: Electrophoresis in Non-Newtonian Fluids. Phys. Rev. E 2012, 85, 016320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, G.; Koch, D.L. Electrophoresis in Dilute Polymer Solutions. J. Fluid Mech. 2020, 884, A9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bentor, J.; Gabbard, C.; Bostwick, J.B.; Xuan, X. Nonlinear Electrophoresis of Microparticles in Shear Thinning Fluids. Langmuir 2024, 40, 20113–20119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bentor, J.; Xuan, X. Particle Size-Dependent Electrophoresis in Polymer Solutions. Anal. Chem. 2024, 96, 3186–3191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mantri, D.; Wymenga, L.; van Turnhout, J.; van Zeijl, H.; Zhang, G. Manipulation, Sampling and Inactivation of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Using Nonuniform Electric Fields on Micro-Fabricated Platforms: A Review. Micromachines 2023, 14, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. O‘Donnell, M.C.; Kepper, M.; Pesch, G.R. A Brief History and Future Directions of Dielectrophoretic Filtration: A Review. Electrophoresis 2024, 45. in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yan, S.; Rajestari, Z.; Morse, T.C.; Li, H.; Kulinsky, L. Electrokinetic Manipulation of Biological Cells towards Biotechnology Applications. Micromachines 2024, 15, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.; Tong, N.; Li, F.; Zhao, K.; Wang, D.; Niu, Y.; Xu, F.; Cheng, J.; Wang, J. Trapping of a Single Microparticle Using AC Dielectrophoresis Forces in a Microfluidic Chip. Micromachines 2023, 14, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shijo, S.; Tanaka, D.; Sekiguchi, T.; Ishihara, J.; Takahashi, H.; Kobayashi, M.; Shoji, S. Dielectrophoresis-Based Selective Droplet Extraction Microfluidic Device for Single-Cell Analysis. Micromachines 2023, 14, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nakano, A.; Ros, A. Protein Dielectrophoresis: Advances, Challenges and Applications. Electrophoresis 2013, 34, 1085–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Abdul Nasir, N.S.; Deivasigamani, R.; Mohd Razip Wee, M.F.; Hamzah, A.A.; Mat Zaid, M.H.; Abdul Rahim, M.K.; Kayani, A.A.; Abdulhameed, A.; Buyong, M.R. Protein Albumin Manipulation and Electrical Quantification of Molecular Dielectrophoresis Responses for Biomedical Applications. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pethig, R. Limitations of the Clausius-Mossotti function used in dielectrophoresis and electrical impedance studies of biomacromolecules. Electrophoresis 2019, 40, 2575–2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pethig, R. Protein Dielectrophoresis: A Tale of Two Clausius-Mossottis—Or Something Else? Micromachines 2022, 13, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hölzel, R.; Pethig, R. Protein Dielectrophoresis: I. Status of Experiments and an Empirical Theory. Micromachines 2020, 11, 533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gimsa, J.; Radai, M.M. Dielectrophoresis from the System’s Point of View: A Tale of Inhomogeneous Object Polarization, Mirror Charges, High Repelling and Snap-to-Surface Forces and Complex Trajectories Featuring Bifurcation Points and Watersheds. Micromachines 2022, 13, 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gimsa, J.; Radai, M.M. The System’s Point of View Applied to Dielectrophoresis in Plate Capacitor and Pointed-versus-Pointed Electrode Chambers. Micromachines 2023, 14, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gimsa, J.; Radai, M.M. Trajectories and Forces in Four-Electrode Chambers Operated in Object-Shift, Dielectrophoresis and Field-Cage Modes—Considerations from the System’s Point of View. Micromachines 2023, 14, 2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xuan, X. Editorial for the Micro/Nanoscale Electrokinetics Section. Micromachines 2024, 15, 1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15121414

AMA Style

Xuan X. Editorial for the Micro/Nanoscale Electrokinetics Section. Micromachines. 2024; 15(12):1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15121414

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xuan, Xiangchun. 2024. "Editorial for the Micro/Nanoscale Electrokinetics Section" Micromachines 15, no. 12: 1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15121414

APA Style

Xuan, X. (2024). Editorial for the Micro/Nanoscale Electrokinetics Section. Micromachines, 15(12), 1414. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi15121414

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop