Next Article in Journal
ST-Producing E. coli Oppose Carcinogen-Induced Colorectal Tumorigenesis in Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
The Fungal bZIP Transcription Factor AtfB Controls Virulence-Associated Processes in Aspergillus parasiticus
Previous Article in Journal
Bordetella Adenylate Cyclase-Hemolysin Toxins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Talaromyces marneffei Genomic, Transcriptomic, Proteomic and Metabolomic Studies Reveal Mechanisms for Environmental Adaptations and Virulence
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/toxins9090280
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Does the Host Contribute to Modulation of Mycotoxin Production by Fruit Pathogens?

by
Dilip Kumar
1,
Shiri Barad
1,
Edward Sionov
2,
Nancy P. Keller
3,4 and
Dov B. Prusky
1,*
1
Department of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
2
Department of Food Quality and Safety Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
3
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1550 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706-1598, USA
4
Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1550 Linden Dr., Madison, WI 53706-1598, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2017, 9(9), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090280
Submission received: 3 August 2017 / Revised: 2 September 2017 / Accepted: 7 September 2017 / Published: 12 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Collection Evolutionary/Phylogenetic Studies of Mycotoxin Biosynthetic Pathways)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Storage of freshly harvested fruit is a key factor in modulating their supply for several months after harvest; however, their quality can be reduced by pathogen attack. Fruit pathogens may infect their host through damaged surfaces, such as mechanical injuries occurring during growing, harvesting, and packing, leading to increased colonization as the fruit ripens. Of particular concern are fungal pathogens that not only macerate the host tissue but also secrete significant amounts of mycotoxins. Many studies have described the importance of physiological factors, including stage of fruit development, biochemical factors (ripening, C and N content), and environmental factors (humidity, temperature, water deficit) on the occurrence of mycotoxins. However, those factors usually show a correlative effect on fungal growth and mycotoxin accumulation. Recent reports have suggested that host factors can induce fungal metabolism, leading to the synthesis and accumulation of mycotoxins. This review describes the new vision of host-factor impact on the regulation of mycotoxin biosynthetic gene clusters underlying the complex regulation of mycotoxin accumulation in ripening fruit.

1. Introduction

Fruit spoilage by fungi causes not only substantial economic losses but also health risks upon mycotoxin consumption. Mycotoxins are toxic low-molecular-weight secondary metabolites produced mainly by filamentous fungi belonging to the genera Aspergillus, Penicillium, Alternaria, and Fusarium. Mycotoxins, which are secreted with only minor effects on fungal growth onto various foods and feeds, can cause diseases collectively known as mycotoxicoses in humans and animals upon ingestion [1]. The consumed metabolites can affect single or multiple target organs, leading to cytogenic, mutagenic, carcinogenic, teratogenic, or immunosuppressive effects [2]. Hence, in many countries, mycotoxin levels in foods are regulated, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration limits mycotoxin levels in fruit products [3,4]. This review analyzes the recently discovered factors modulating the occurrence and regulation of mycotoxins in postharvest fruit and provides examples of how the fruit host might modulate the induction of mycotoxin production.
Fruits may become infected with mycotoxigenic fungi through damaged surfaces—mechanical injuries, insect wounds, cuts, and splits—that occur during growing, harvesting, packing, transporting, postharvest storage, and marketing. Toxin production is dependent on a variety of complex interactions between internal and environmental factors, including the geographical location where the fruit is grown and harvested, the humidity, temperature, pathogen load on the fruit, fungal strain, fruit type and cultivar, ripening, and fruit physiological properties [5,6]. Fruit maturity at harvest is believed to be an important factor in susceptibility to infection by pathogenic fungi during postharvest storage, due to high sugar content, water activity (aw), changes in pH, decreased firmness, and weakening defense systems [7,8,9].
There are large numbers of known mycotoxins but only a few are commonly found in fruit: aflatoxins in dried figs (Aspergillus flavus), ochratoxin A in grapes, peaches, cherries, strawberries, apples, and dried figs (Penicillium and Aspergillus species), patulin in deciduous fruits (Penicillium and Aspergillus species), alternariol in tomatoes, apples, tangerines, and mandarins (Alternaria species), citrinin in deciduous fruits (Penicillium species) and trichothecenes in sweet pepper (Fusarium and Trichothecium species) [6,10,11,12]. However, few studies have examined the importance of fruit metabolic changes during ripening in mycotoxin production. Since the infection by mycotoxigenic fungi in fruit occurs in the field, during harvesting, postharvest, and during storage, the physiological changes inducing ripening occurring in the host after infection and their contribution to mycotoxin accumulation are likely of great importance.

2. Mycotoxins Commonly Found in Fruit

2.1. Patulin

Patulin is a low-molecular-weight α, β-unsaturated γ-lactone found in fruit. This toxin causes severe toxicosis due to neurotoxic, nephrotoxic, mutagenic, teratogenic, or hepatotoxic effects, which can result in nausea, vomiting, kidney damage, and gastrointestinal disorders [13,14,15]. Penicillium expansum, an airborne fungus, is the major species contributing to patulin accumulation in apple products [16]. Several other fungi can produce patulin, including Aspergillus clavatus, A. giganteus, A. terreus, Byssochlamys fulva, B. nivea, and several Penicillium species [17,18,19,20]. Patulin can be found in several types of mold-colonized fruit, including pears, plums, berries, and tomatoes, but the major source of patulin contamination is apples and its juice products [21,22,23].

Factors Affecting Patulin Production

Various factors are known to affect patulin production in apple, including cultivar type, geographical location, climate, mechanical injury, storage conditions, and pre- and post-harvest conditions.
Fruit development conditions—As it matures, the fruit undergoes physiological changes, such as increases in pH and total soluble solids (TSS), decreases in firmness and acidity, and weakening of the defense system, which can increase its susceptibility to pathogen and patulin production [8,9]. Moreover, patulin accumulation in apples is affected by environmental conditions, fungicide residues, pesticide treatments, microbial load, harvest method, and postharvest treatments [24]. Foliar spray of chemicals on apple trees during fruit development results in significant reductions in P. expansum infection and consequently, in mycotoxin accumulation [25,26,27].
Fruit cultivar—Several reports concluded that fruit cultivars differ in their susceptibility to pathogen attack and patulin accumulation in apples [28,29,30,31,32,33]. Fruit cultivars differ in their physical and chemical properties, such as skin thickness, pH, TSS, acidity, firmness, and defense systems, which may affect patulin production [29,32,34]. A study of four apple varieties showed that patulin accumulation is significantly higher in ‘Red Delicious’ and ‘Golden Delicious’ than in ‘Granny Smith’ and ‘Fuji’, and is negatively correlated with the acidity of the fruit [35,36,37]. In other studies with ‘Red Delicious’, ‘Golden Supreme’, ‘Gala’, ‘Fuji’, ‘Empire’, and ‘McIntosh’, the varieties that showed the highest patulin accumulation were ‘Golden Supreme’ (54.2 μg kg−1) and ‘McIntosh’ (52.1 µg kg−1) [38]. More recent indications by Snini et al. [39] suggest that patulin is not indispensable for the initiation of the disease, but it acted as a cultivar-dependent aggressiveness factor for P. expansum in 13 different cultivars tested. This conclusion was strengthened by the fact that the addition of patulin to apples infected by the PeΔpatL mutant lacking one of the genes of the patulin production in the cluster required for patulin synthesis restored normal P. expansum colonization in the apples [39].
When colonization of P. expansum was compared in pears and apples, its growth was higher in the former; however, the latter tended to accumulate more patulin [32], suggesting that internal compounds may contribute to differential patulin accumulation. The effect of pH was also evaluated in apples: patulin production increased from pH 2.5 to 3.5 and then remained constant to pH 5.5. Other factors, such as fruit organic acid content and degree of ripeness, may play important roles in patulin accumulation [40,41].
Storage temperature—Optimal patulin production has been reported in the temperature range of 23–25 °C [30,32]. As the temperature decreased during storage (0–4 °C), patulin production declined but was not completely inhibited [29,30,40,42].
Environmental factors—Zong and co-workers [43] reported that environmental factors such as pH, and chemical factors such as carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) sources have large effects on patulin production in P. expansum strains. They found glutamic acid to be the best N source and sucrose, maltose, and glucose the best C sources in the promotion of patulin production, and the optimal pH was 5 in different P. expansum strains.

2.2. Ochratoxin

Ochratoxins are a group of pentaketide mycotoxins found in fruit that are produced mainly by Aspergillus and Penicillium species [44,45]. The most important and most toxic ochratoxin found naturally in foods is ochratoxin A (OTA), which shows hepatotoxicity, teratogenicity, carcinogenicity, cytotoxicity, neurotoxicity, and immunosuppressive properties [46,47,48,49,50,51]. Two other forms of ochratoxin—B and C—are less toxic and less common [52,53]. OTA is generally produced by Aspergillus ochraceus [54] and Aspergillus carbonarius, which typically infect wine grapes, and Aspergillus alliaceus, which contaminates nuts and figs [55,56].

Factors Affecting OTA Production

Temperature and aw—These factors are likely to affect the rate of growth and OTA production in Aspergillus species in grapes. The optimal temperature for OTA production is in the reported range of 25–30 °C for A. carbonarius, and 30–37 °C for A. niger and A. ochraceus [57,58,59,60]. The optimal aw for toxin production is 0.95–0.99 for A. carbonarius and 0.90–0.95 for A. niger [61]. OTA production is also strongly influenced by culture pH, with large amounts of OTA being produced at pH < 7.0 and reduced amounts at higher pH values in A. ochraceus [62,63].
Fruit development conditions—OTA accumulates to high levels during Aspergillus colonization of grapes with high sugar content (16–20% TSS). When grapes’ sugar content increases, they are more susceptible to infection by A. carbonarius and are also capable of supporting OTA production [64,65,66]. Delayed harvest of mature berries also increases the risk of OTA contamination [66,67]. Hot weather coupled with increased humidity and rainfall increased Aspergillus incidence and OTA contamination in some studies [68,69]. OTA production was correlated with severity of infection for certain varieties of grapes but not others. Nevertheless, differences in OTA contamination among varieties were often associated more strongly with seasonal variations in climate and time of ripening than with inherent characteristics of the variety [64,70].
Storage conditions—OTA is concentrated in berries displaying visible disease damage [65,71]. Cold storage of table grapes (0 °C) with sulfur dioxide-generating pads reduced the incidence of black Aspergillus species [72]. In addition, rapid drying of grapes above 30 °C to a safe aw reduced the potential for OTA production [73].
Nutritional factors—The type of C source also influences OTA accumulation: glucose, sucrose, maltose, galactose, xylose and glycerol repressed OTA production, whereas the presence of lactose resulted in a ca. 7-fold increase in OTA production by A. ochraceus [56]. Addition of other C sources, such as arabinose, to fungal media increased OTA accumulation by A. ochraceus, A. carbonarius, and A. tubingensis [74]. N sources, specifically ammonium nitrate and acetate, also enhanced OTA production [75] compared to ammonium sulfate and chloride [56,63]. Abbas et al. [56] also indicated that other organic N sources, such as urea and glutamine, enhance OTA synthesis by A. ochraceus, and phenylalanine specifically favored OTA production in A. ochraceus, A. carbonarius, and A. tubingensis [74].
In a recent work, systematic expression analysis of OTA mycotoxin biosynthesis genes was performed to examine the relationship between growth and general expression patterns in relation to single environmental factors, such as temperature, aw, and pH, and aw–temperature interactions [76]. Abiotic factors such as temperature, aw and pH were found to have a strong influence on the expression of mycotoxin biosynthesis genes, in agreement with the findings of several other studies [77,78,79,80]. The expression profile pattern was more pronounced in relation to changes in temperature and aw than to changes in pH.

2.3. Alternaria Toxins

Alternaria species are saprophytic in nature, and widely distributed in the soil and on plant surfaces. Several species are known to grow well at low temperatures and are responsible for fruit spoilage during refrigerated transport and postharvest storage, causing severe postharvest economic losses [23,81]. Alternaria species have been reported to produce mycotoxins in fruit [82,83,84,85] such as apples, berries, oranges, tomatoes, lemons, and grapes [81,86,87]. Alternaria species are also common pathogens of tomatoes, peppers, and eggplant, in which fungal infection is generally initiated by wounds at the calyx scar [88,89]. The most important Alternaria mycotoxins can be grouped into three different structural classes: alternariol (AOH) and its monomethyl ether (AME), as well as altenuene, all dibenzopyrone derivatives; tenuazonic acid (TeA), a tetramic acid derivative, and altertoxins I, II, and III, which are perylene derivatives. The possibility that A. alternata may be a factor in several types of cancer was confirmed in several studies [90], where it was indicated that those toxins may cause cell mutagenicity and in combination with human fetal esophageal epithelium DNA, activate oncogenes [90].

Factors Affecting Alternaria Toxins

Alternaria mycotoxin production in host fruit depends upon fungal strain, host species, cultivar, and fruit maturity.
Fruit development and wounding conditions—Temperature is one of the important factors affecting the rate of colonization of Alternaria. Apples can be infected by Alternaria alternata through wounds occurring during fruit development, harvesting and storage, leading to tissue colonization and toxin accumulation. Mild temperatures (10–25 °C), relative humidity higher than 80%, and tissue susceptibility are the most strongly determinant factors for infection [6,91]. For example, Alternaria brown spot disease in citrus and persimmon fruit is more severe during conditions of rainfall and high relative humidity [92,93]. In tomatoes, host nutritional deficiencies and skin burn, together with warm and rainy weather, also enhance Alternaria infection. In naturally infected tomato fruit in Italy, the Alternaria mycotoxin TeA may reach up to 7200 µg kg−1 [94].
Storage conditions—Ozcelik et al. [95] reported the inhibitory effects of high-density polyethylene film packaging on Alternaria alternata colonization compared to on unpackaged tomatoes, showing a simultaneous reduction in AOH and AME and partial inhibition of fungal growth. These results indicated that differential levels of CO2 and O2, which affect fungal development, may modulate mycotoxin production. Toxin production in synthetic media by Alternaria alternata was optimal (depending upon the type of toxin—AOH, AME, or TeA) in a temperature range of 14–28 °C [96,97]. Pose et al. [97] suggested that the most favorable temperature for AOH synthesis is 21 °C over the aw range of ca. 0.922–0.982, whereas maximum AME production was at aw = 0.954 and 35 °C. This could explain Hasan’s [96] finding that postharvest storage of tomato fruit at low temperature (7 °C) reduces fungal growth and toxin production.

3. Fungal and Host Regulation of Mycotoxin Synthesis in Fruit

3.1. Environmental Effects on Gene-Biosynthesis Pathways of the Fungus

As we have seen, the biosynthesis of mycotoxins is highly regulated, and substrate [98], temperature [57,99], aw [100], and pH [101] can have profound effects. However, aside from the wide description of factors that have been reported to modulate mycotoxin production, few reports have shown the effects of environmental profiles on optimal gene activation and concurrent mycotoxin synthesis. This has been determined for OTA biosynthesis by Penicillium verrucosum [101,102,103], trichothecene biosynthesis by Fusarium [104,105,106], and aflatoxin biosynthesis by Aspergillus [107,108]. The recent systematic investigation of these parameters’ influence on the expression of mycotoxin biosynthesis genes [62,76,78,80,109,110] has clarified the mechanism governing external factors’ influence on the transcript expression of genes for mycotoxin biosynthesis [76]. Several other factors, such as the positive influence of oxygenic stress described on aflatoxin biosynthesis by Aspergillus parasiticus [111] or the application of suboptimal concentrations of some fungicides, e.g., strobilurins, can have a strong effect on mycotoxin biosynthesis [112]. Furthermore, for P. verrucosum, suboptimal concentrations of preservatives, such as calcium propionate and potassium sorbate, have been shown to lead to an increase in OTA biosynthesis. In parallel, it was shown that the otapksPV gene (encoding OTA polyketide synthase), a key gene in the OTA biosynthesis pathway, is activated under these stress conditions. This demonstrated, for the first time, that environmental factors modulate gene biosynthesis pathways [110]. Stress activation was also demonstrated for the fum1 gene of Fusarium verticillioides [80].

Host Effects on the Fungus

Fruits are fresh products that undergo significant biochemical and chemical changes during postharvest storage. Fruit nutritional components that undergo changes during fruit maturation and ripening include sugars (levels may increase from 5 to 20%) and organic acids, coupled with an increase in fruit pH [79]. This raises the question of whether such changes in the host can modulate the expression of fungal mycotoxin biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs).
With respect to host-produced metabolites, Barkai-Golan, Paster, Jackson, and Al-Taher [113,114] claimed that the high content of carbohydrates in figs, dates, citrus fruit, and raisins probably enhances aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus; however, no modulatory mechanism for cluster activation was indicated.
On the other hand, recent studies of patulin synthesis suggest that several host factors are involved in the inhibition of mycotoxin accumulation in apples. Patulin accumulation during colonization of apples by Penicillium expansum was inhibited by the addition of extracts of the mushroom Lentinula edodes and of the antioxidants quercetin and umbelliferone [115,116] suggesting that metabolites—produced by the host or other organisms—can alter patulin synthesis in vivo.
We envision two possible mechanisms that might modulate fungal mycotoxin cluster activation and the accumulation of mycotoxins: (1) pathogen-modified nutritional factors present in the host that become precursors for activation of the mechanism of mycotoxin production; and (2) natural chemical factors present in the host that directly modulate the transcription factors that induce mycotoxin production.
Pathogen-modified factors present in the host—Accumulation of patulin by P. expansum was found to be strongly dependent on the secretion of D-gluconic acid (GLA) resulting from the oxidation of host sugars by the pathogen [117]. While the acidification of host tissue contributes to the activation of pathogenicity factors and colonization, it was also found that GLA accumulation may contribute both to pH reduction of the host tissue and as a precursor for patulin [118].
Downregulation of glucose oxidase (gox2) in P. expansum was accompanied by impairment in its ability to produce GLA, patulin accumulation and apple colonization. Using Δgox2 mutants, it was observed that the higher the impairment in GLA accumulation, the higher the inhibition of relative expression of the patulin BGC gene idh and patulin accumulation [118,119].
Ammonia produced by the pathogen and detected on the edge of P. expansum-colonized tissues under host conditions of lower sucrose level led to enhanced patulin accumulation [120]. This type of response is probably the result of reduced free sucrose levels at the leading edge of the colonized tissue inducing amino acid metabolism, in contrast to the free sugar presence at the center of the decay, where macerated tissue provides a sufficient carbon source [120]. This host effect was confirmed by direct NH4Cl treatments to P. expansum colonizing fruits, where ammonia treatment induced patulin accumulation in the colonized tissue. Interestingly, ammonia induced patulin accumulation concurrently with transcript activation of pacC and patulin BCG genes, indicating the regulatory effect of ammonia on pacC transcript expression under acidic conditions [120]. These findings indicate not only that external factors affect fungal growth, but also that intrinsic metabolic changes lead to different levels of sugar availability occurring in the fruit during ripening and pathogenesis, which may affect first and secondary fungal metabolism and mycotoxin accumulation.
Another pathogen not present in fruits, for which sugar impacted toxin production, is Stagonospora nodorum. Deletion of the transcription factor gene SnStuA played a key role in regulating central C metabolism, with glycolysis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and amino acid synthesis in the mutants positively regulating the synthesis of the mycotoxin alternariol [121]. These data suggest that the metabolism of fermentable C sources negatively affects mycotoxin production in some cases. This study also uncovered a multitude of regulatory targets of fungal genes in plants, suggesting the possibility that other fungal–host interactions affect mycotoxin accumulation.
Natural host factors affecting the pathogen—Efforts to identify host factors that are potentially involved in patulin regulation have centered on the role of sucrose in impacting patulin levels. Kumar et al. [117] demonstrated that sucrose, the main sugar usually present in fruit, modulates patulin accumulation in a dose-responsive pattern by directly regulating the expression of the global regulator of secondary metabolism, laeA. An increase in sucrose culture amendment from 15 to 175 mM decreased both patulin accumulation and laeA expression by 175- and 5-fold, respectively. These results may tie into the ammonia levels, since the highest patulin accumulation was observed in the presence of low sucrose level, conditions that induce ammonia accumulation by the pathogen [122]. This suggests that limiting sugar levels, probably resulting from intact cells in unripe fruit, may be a mechanism for activating mycotoxin synthesis that differs from that in cell walls from mature ripe cells, which activates different processes of fungal metabolism. Interestingly, negative regulation of creA compared to laeA was observed at different sucrose levels, also indicating the importance of sugar regulation in these transcription factors. These data support the view that host nutritional factors, as a result of fruit maturity, may differentially contribute to regulation of the patulin BGC.
Using freshly harvested fruit sampled at increasing stages of maturity, the ability of P. expansum to colonize fruit and accumulate patulin was analyzed in apple fruit at increasing maturity. The wild-type strain of P. expansum (WT) showed increasing patulin accumulation, from 0.2 to 1.5 mg g−1 fresh weight as the fruit matured, and the total soluble solids of the fruits (TSS) increased from 12.5% and 13.5% to 13.96% in the first, second, and third harvests, respectively. Thus the WT Pe-21 strain showed an increasing trend for patulin accumulation in apples in progressive harvests with progressive aggressiveness of the pathogen. The differential levels of sugar, found both in vitro and in vivo, suggest that internal metabolic factors may further contribute to the regulation of the metabolic cluster and patulin accumulation.

4. Conclusions

Changes in fruit maturity and ripening are accompanied by significant nutritional factors that determine the quality of the fruit. While many reports indicate that mycotoxin accumulation is dependent on a variety of environmental factors [5,123], there are few examples showing how changes in natural host metabolites during ripening affect fungal metabolites and the global regulation of mycotoxin synthesis. This is important given the differential levels of mycotoxin accumulation during maturation and ripening. Interestingly, until now, there have been few reports indicating the importance of changes in the level of organic acids and other natural fruit compounds, such as phenols. In Aspergillus, the phenolic antioxidants gallic acid, vanillic acid, protocatechuic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, catechin, caffeic acid, and chlorogenic acid, which are present in fruit, were studied for their effects on OTA production. Whereas Aspergillus ochraceus was not inhibited by any of these compound, the effects of each compound on OTA production were variable, suggesting that species-specific OTA production and response to phenolic compounds may be influenced by different and as yet unreported mechanisms affecting OTA accumulation [120].
A similar approach should be taken for organic acids, such as malic and citric acids, which are present in ripening fruit. A recent report indicates that organic acids may have antifungal activity against mycotoxigenic pathogens and an inhibitory effect on aflatoxin B1 accumulation [124]. If we take into account the dynamic changes in those natural fruit compounds and possible synergistic effects, natural host factors may regulate mycotoxin production by affecting its biosynthetic activation. Future research should focus on understanding how these natural host factors impact BGC expression and mycotoxin production during fruit colonization.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge funding for the research by the US/Israel Binational Agricultural Research Fund (BARD), grant No. IS-4773-14 granted to D.B.P. and N.P.K., and the Israel Science Foundation granted to D.B.P., used to hire S.B., D.K., D.K. and E.S. drafted the chapter and D.B.P. and N.P.K. further contributed to specific paragraphs. The founding agencies did not have any involved in the design of the studies or in their analysis or interpretations.

Author Contributions

D.K. drafted the manuscript. S.B. and E.S. specifically contributed to improve the manuscript. D.B.P. and N.P.K. conceived and supervised the project, and corrected the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ueno, Y. Mode of action of trichothecenes. Pure Appl. Chem. 1977, 49, 1737–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ueno, Y.; Hsieh, D.P. The toxicology of mycotoxins. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1985, 14, 99–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. European Commission. Commission regulation (EC) No. 1425/2003 of 11 August 2003 amending regulation (EC) No. 466/2001 as regards patulin. Off. J. Eur. Union L 2003, 203, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Action Levels for Poisonous or Deleterious Substances in Human Food and Animal Feed. Industry Activities Staff Booklet. Food and Drug Administration August 2000. Available online: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/_lrd/fdaact.html (accessed on 30 August 2000).
  5. Drusch, S.; Ragab, W. Mycotoxins in fruits, fruit juices, and dried fruits. J. Food Prot. 2003, 66, 1514–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sanchis, V.; Magan, N. Environmental conditions affecting mycotoxins. In Mycotoxins in Food: Detection and Control; Elsevier Science: Burlington, ON, Canada, 2004; Volume 103, pp. 174–189. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tournas, V.; Katsoudas, E. Mould and yeast flora in fresh berries, grapes and citrus fruits. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 105, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Aziz, N.H.; Moussa, L.A. Influence of gamma-radiation on mycotoxin producing moulds and mycotoxins in fruits. Food Control 2002, 13, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Torres, R.; Valentines, M.; Usall, J.; Vinas, I.; Larrigaudiere, C. Possible involvement of hydrogen peroxide in the development of resistance mechanisms in ‘Golden Delicious’ apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2003, 27, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Monbaliu, S.; Van Poucke, C.; Van Peteghem, C.; Van Poucke, K.; Heungens, K.; De Saeger, S. Development of a multi-mycotoxin liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for sweet pepper analysis. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 23, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Engelhardt, G.; Ruhland, M.; Wallnöfer, P. Metabolism of mycotoxins in plants. Adv. Food Sci. 1999, 21, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh, Y.P.; Sumbali, G. Aflatoxin B1 contamination in commercial varieties of apple and pear fruits infected with Aspergillus flavus Link ex Fries. Indian Phytopathol. 2011, 64, 100–101. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ciegler, A.; Vesonder, R.; Jackson, L.K. Produciton and biological activity of patulin and citrinin from Penicillium expansum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1977, 33, 1004–1006. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Brackett, R.; Marth, E. A Research Note: Patulin in Apple Juice from Roadside Stands in Wisconsin. J. Food Prot. 1979, 42, 862–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hopkins, J. The toxicological hazards of patulin. Food Chem. Toxicol. Int. J. Publ. Br. Ind. Biol. Res. Assoc. 1993, 31, 455–456. [Google Scholar]
  16. Puel, O.; Galtier, P.; Oswald, I.P. Biosynthesis and toxicological effects of patulin. Toxins 2010, 2, 613–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Scott, P.M. Collaborative study of a chromatographic method for determination of patulin in apple juice. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1974, 57, 621–625. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bullerman, L. Significance of mycotoxins to food safety and human health. J. Food Prot. 1979, 42, 65–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Palmgren, M.; Ciegler, A. Toxicity and carcinogenicity of fungal lactones: Patulin and penicillic acid. Handb. Nat. Toxins 1983, 1, 325–341. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hasan, H. Patulin and aflatoxin in brown rot lesion of apple fruits and their regulation. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 16, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Snowdon, A.L. General introduction and fruits. In A Colour Atlas of Post-Harvest Diseases and Disorders of Fruits and Vegetables; Wolfe Scientific Ltd.: London, UK, 1990; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  22. Larsen, T.O.; Frisvad, J.C.; Ravn, G.; Skaaning, T. Mycotoxin production by Penicillium expansum on blackcurrant and cherry juice. Food Addit. Contam. 1998, 15, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Barkai-Golan, R. Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables: Development and Control; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  24. Doores, S.; Splittstoesser, D.F. The microbiology of apples and apple products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1983, 19, 133–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Conway, W. Effect of postharvest calcium treatment on decay of Delicious apples. Plant Dis. 1982, 66, 402–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nunes, C.; Usall, J.; Teixido, N.; Eribe, X.O.D.; Vinas, I. Control of post-harvest decay of apples by pre-harvest and post-harvest application of ammonium molybdate. Pest Manag. Sci. 2001, 57, 1093–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sholberg, P.L.; Conway, W.S. Postharvest pathology. The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks. In USDA-ARS Agriculture Handbook; United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilson, D.; Nuovo, G. Patulin production in apples decayed by Penicillium expansum. Appl. Microbiol. 1973, 26, 124–125. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Beer, S.; Amand, J. Production of the mycotoxin patulin in mature fruits of five apple cultivars infected by Penicillium expansum. Proc. Am. Phytopathol. Soc. 1974, 1, 104–110. [Google Scholar]
  30. Paster, N.; Huppert, D.; Barkai-Golan, R. Production of patulin by different strains of Penicillium expansum in pear and apple cultivars stored at different temperatures and modified atmospheres. Food Addit. Contam. 1995, 12, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Martins, M.; Gimeno, A.; Martins, H.; Bernardo, F. Co-occurrence of patulin and citrinin in Portuguese apples with rotten spots. Food Addit. Contam. 2002, 19, 568–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. McCallum, J.; Tsao, R.; Zhou, T. Factors affecting patulin production by Penicillium expansum. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 1937–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jackson, L.S.; Beacham-Bowden, T.; Keller, S.E.; Adhikari, C.; Taylor, K.T.; Chirtel, S.J.; Merker, R.I. Apple quality, storage, and washing treatments affect patulin levels in apple cider. J. Food Prot. 2003, 66, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Damoglou, A.P.; Campbell, D.S.; Button, J.E. Some factors governing the production of patulin in apples. Food Microbiol. 1985, 2, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Konstantinou, S.; Karaoglanidis, G.; Bardas, G.; Minas, I.; Doukas, E.; Markoglou, A.N. Postharvest fruit rots of apple in Greece: Pathogen incidence and relationships between fruit quality parameters, cultivar susceptibility, and patulin production. Plant Dis. 2011, 95, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Salomão, B.C.; Aragão, G.M.; Churey, J.J.; Padilla-Zakour, O.I.; Worobo, R.W. Influence of storage temperature and apple variety on patulin production by Penicillium expansum. J. Food Prot. 2009, 72, 1030–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Marin, S.; Morales, H.; Hasan, H.; Ramos, A.; Sanchis, V. Patulin distribution in Fuji and Golden apples contaminated with Penicillium expansum. Food Addit. Contam. 2006, 23, 1316–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pepeljnjak, S.; Šegvic, M.; Ozegovic, L. Citrininotoxinogenicity of Penicillium spp. isolated from decaying apples. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2002, 33, 134–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Snini, S.P.; Tannous, J.; Heuillard, P.; Bailly, S.; Lippi, Y.; Zehraoui, E.; Barreau, C.; Oswald, I.P.; Puel, O. The patulin is a cultivar dependent aggressiveness factor favoring the colonization of apples by Penicillium expansum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 920–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Morales, H.; Marín, S.; Rovira, A.; Ramos, A.; Sanchis, V. Patulin accumulation in apples by Penicillium expansum during postharvest stages. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 44, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Morales, H.; Barros, G.; Marín, S.; Chulze, S.; Ramos, A.J.; Sanchis, V. Effects of apple and pear varieties and pH on patulin accumulation by Penicillium expansum. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 2738–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Barkai-Golan, R. Postharvest disease suppression by atmospheric modifications. In Food Preservation by Modified Atmospheres; Calderon, M., Barkai-Golan, R., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1990; pp. 237–264. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zong, Y.; Li, B.; Tian, S. Effects of carbon, nitrogen and ambient pH on patulin production and related gene expression in Penicillium expansum. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 206, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bayman, P.; Baker, J.L. Ochratoxins: A global perspective. Mycopathologia 2006, 162, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cabañes, F.J.; Bragulat, M.R.; Castellá, G. Ochratoxin A producing species in the genus Penicillium. Toxins 2010, 2, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar]
  46. Woo, C.S.J.; Partanen, H.; Myllynen, P.; Vähäkangas, K.; El-Nezami, H. Fate of the teratogenic and carcinogenic ochratoxin A in human perfused placenta. Toxicol. Lett. 2012, 208, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Stachurska, A.; Ciesla, M.; Kozakowska, M.; Wolffram, S.; Boesch-Saadatmandi, C.; Rimbach, G.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J.; Loboda, A. Cross-talk between microRNAs, nuclear factor E2-related factor 2, and heme oxygenase-1 in ochratoxin A-induced toxic effects in renal proximal tubular epithelial cells. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013, 57, 504–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Solcan, C.; Floristean, V.; Pavel, G.; Solcan, G. Induced malabsorbtion in chickens by experimental administration of ochratoxin A. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24, S105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Von Tobel, J.S.; Antinori, P.; Zurich, M-G.; Rosset, R.; Aschner, M.; Glück, F.; Scherl, A.; Monnet-Tschudi, F. Repeated exposure to Ochratoxin A generates a neuroinflammatory response, characterized by neurodegenerative M1 microglial phenotype. Neurotoxicology 2014, 44, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Gayathri, L.; Dhivya, R.; Dhanasekaran, D.; Periasamy, V.S.; Alshatwi, A.A.; Akbarsha, M.A. Hepatotoxic effect of ochratoxin A and citrinin, alone and in combination, and protective effect of vitamin E: In vitro study in HepG2 cell. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 83, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Calado, T.; Verde, S.C.; Abrunhosa, L.; Fernández-Cruz, M.; Venâncio, A. Cytotoxicity of mycotoxins after gamma irradiation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Food Contaminants: Challenges in Chemical Mixtures, Lisbon, Portugal, 13–14 April 2015; pp. 149–150. [Google Scholar]
  52. Stormer, F. Ochratoxin A: A mycotoxin of concern. In Handbook of Applied Mycology; Elsevier Ireland limited: Dublin, Ireland, 1992; Volume 5, pp. 403–432. [Google Scholar]
  53. Heussner, A.H.; Bingle, L.E. Comparative ochratoxin toxicity: A review of the available data. Toxins 2015, 7, 4253–4282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sweeney, M.J.; Dobson, A.D. Mycotoxin production by Aspergillus, Fusarium and Penicillium species. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998, 43, 141–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bayman, P.; Baker, J.L.; Doster, M.A.; Michailides, T.J.; Mahoney, N.E. Ochratoxin production by the Aspergillus ochraceus group and Aspergillus alliaceus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 2326–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Abbas, A.; Valez, H.; Dobson, A.D. Analysis of the effect of nutritional factors on OTA and OTB biosynthesis and polyketide synthase gene expression in Aspergillus ochraceus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 135, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bellı, N.; Marın, S.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A. Influence of water activity and temperature on growth of isolates of Aspergillus section Nigri obtained from grapes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 96, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ayerst, G. The effects of moisture and temperature on growth and spore germination in some fungi. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1969, 5, 127–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Marın, S.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.; Magan, N. Environmental factors, interspecific interactions, and niche overlap between Fusarium moniliforme and F. proliferatum and Fusarium graminearum, Aspergillus and Penicillium spp. isolated from maize. Mycol. Res. 1998, 102, 831–837. [Google Scholar]
  60. Su-lin, L.L.; Hocking, A.D.; Scott, E.S. Effect of temperature and water activity on growth and ochratoxin A production by Australian Aspergillus carbonarius and A. niger isolates on a simulated grape juice medium. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 110, 209–216. [Google Scholar]
  61. Selouane, A.; Bouya, D.; Lebrihi, A.; Decock, C.; Bouseta, A. Impact of some environmental factors on growth and production of ochratoxin A of/by Aspergillus tubingensis, A. niger, and A. carbonarius isolated from Moroccan grapes. J. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. O’Callaghan, J.; Stapleton, P.C.; Dobson, A.D. Ochratoxin A biosynthetic genes in Aspergillus ochraceus are differentially regulated by pH and nutritional stimuli. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2006, 43, 213–221. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mühlencoert, E.; Mayer, I.; Zapf, M.W.; Vogel, R.F.; Niessen, L. Production of ochratoxin A by Aspergillus ochraceus. In Molecular Diversity and PCR-Detection of Toxigenic Fusarium Species and Ochratoxigenic Fungi; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 651–659. [Google Scholar]
  64. Battilani, P.; Barbano, C.; Marin, S.; Sanchis, V.; Kozakiewicz, Z.; Magan, N. Mapping of Aspergillus section Nigri in Southern Europe and Israel based on geostatistical analysis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 111, S72–S82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Leong, S.L.; Hien, L.T.; An, T.V.; Trang, N.T.; Hocking, A.D.; Scott, E.S. Ochratoxin A-producing Aspergilli in Vietnamese green coffee beans. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Roset, M. Quality control. Survey on ochratoxin a in grape juice. Fruit processing. J. Fruit Process. Juice Prod. Eur. Overseas Ind. 2003, 13, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  67. Gambuti, A.; Strollo, D.; Genovese, A.; Ugliano, M.; Ritieni, A.; Moio, L.; Vitic, A.J.E. Influence of enological practices on ochratoxin A concentration in wine. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2005, 56, 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  68. Battilani, P.; Giorni, P.; Pietri, A. Epidemiology of toxin-producing fungi and ochratoxin A occurrence in grape. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2003, 109, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bellí, N.; Mitchell, D.; Marín, S.; Alegre, I.; Ramos, A.J.; Magan, N.; Sanchis, V. Ochratoxin A-producing fungi in Spanish wine grapes and their relationship with meteorological conditions. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2005, 113, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Leong, S.L.; Hocking, A.D.; Pitt, J.I.; Kazi, B.A.; Emmett, R.W.; Scott, E.S. Australian research on ochratoxigenic fungi and ochratoxin A. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 111, S10–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Guzev, L.; Danshin, A.; Ziv, S.; Lichter, A. Occurrence of ochratoxin A producing fungi in wine and table grapes in Israel. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 111, S67–S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Lichter, A.; Danshin, A.; Zahavi, T.; Ovadia, A.; Cuzev, L. Survival of OTA producing fungi during storage of table grapes. Abstracts, Ochratoxin A in Grapes and Wine: Prevention and Control 2005. [Google Scholar]
  73. Hocking, A.D.; Su-lin, L.L.; Kazi, B.A.; Emmett, R.W.; Scott, E.S. Fungi and mycotoxins in vineyards and grape products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 119, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Medina, Á.; Mateo, E.M.; Valle-Algarra, F.M.; Mateo, F.; Mateo, R.; Jiménez, M. Influence of nitrogen and carbon sources on the production of Ochratoxin A by ochratoxigenic strains of Aspergillus spp. isolated from grapes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 122, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ferreira, N.; Pitout, M. Biogenesis of ochratoxin. J. S. Afr. Chem. Inst. 1969, 22, S1. [Google Scholar]
  76. Schmidt-Heydt, M.; Magan, N.; Geisen, R. Stress induction of mycotoxin biosynthesis genes by abiotic factors. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 284, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Keller, N.P.; Hohn, T.M. Metabolic pathway gene clusters in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 1997, 21, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Geisen, R.; Mayer, Z.; Karolewiez, A.; Färber, P. Development of a real time PCR system for detection of Penicillium nordicum and for monitoring ochratoxin A production in foods by targeting the ochratoxin polyketide synthase gene. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 27, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Price, M.S.; Conners, S.B.; Tachdjian, S.; Kelly, R.M.; Payne, G.A. Aflatoxin conducive and non-conducive growth conditions reveal new gene associations with aflatoxin production. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 506–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Jurado, M.; Marín, P.; Magan, N.; González-Jaén, M.T. Relationship between oolute and matric potential stress, temperature, growth, and FUM1 gene expression in two Fusarium verticillioides Strains from Spain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2032–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Stinson, E.E.; Bills, D.D.; Osman, S.F.; Siciliano, J.; Ceponis, M.J.; Heisler, E.G. Mycotoxin production by Alternaria species grown on apples, tomatoes, and blueberries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1980, 28, 960–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Scott, P.; Kanhere, S. Liquid chromatographic determination of tenuazonic acids in tomato paste. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1980, 63, 612–621. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Stack, M.E.; Mislivec, P.B.; Roach, J.; Pohland, A.E. Liquid chromatographic determination of tenuazonic acid and alternariol methyl ether in tomatoes and tomato products. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1984, 68, 640–642. [Google Scholar]
  84. Fente, C.; Jaimez, J.; Vázquez, B.; Franco, C.; Cepeda, A. Determination of alternariol in tomato paste using solid phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Analyst 1998, 123, 2277–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Da Motta, S.; Valente Soares, L.M. Survey of Brazilian tomato products for alternariol, alternariol monomethyl ether, tenuazonic acid and cyclopiazonic acid. Food Addit. Contam. 2001, 18, 630–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Stinson, E.E.; Osman, S.F.; Heisler, E.G.; Siciliano, J.; Bills, D.D. Mycotoxin production in whole tomatoes, apples, oranges, and lemons. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1981, 29, 790–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Tournas, V.; Stack, M.E. Production of alternariol and alternariol methyl ether by Alternaria alternata grown on fruits at various temperatures. J. Food Prot. 2001, 64, 528–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Dennis, C. Post-Harvest Pathology of Fruits and Vegetables: JSTOR; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  89. Fallik, E.; Aharoni, Y.; Grinberg, S.; Copel, A.; Klein, J. Postharvest hydrogen peroxide treatment inhibits decay in eggplant and sweet red pepper. Crop Prot. 1994, 13, 451–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ostry, V. Alternaria mycotoxins: An overview of chemical characterization, producers, toxicity, analysis and occurrence in foodstuffs. World Mycotoxin J. 2008, 1, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Reuveni, M.; Sheglov, D.; Sheglov, N.; Ben-Arie, R.; Prusky, D. Sensitivity of Red Delicious apple fruit at various phenologic stages to infection by Alternaria alternata and moldy-core control. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2002, 108, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Timmer, L.; Solel, Z.; Gottwald, T.; Ibanez, A.; Zitko, S. Environmental factors affecting production, release, and field populations of conidia of Alternaria alternata, the cause of brown spot of citrus. Phytopathology 1998, 88, 1218–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Prusky, D.; Fuchs, Y.; Yanko, U. Assessment of latent infections as a basis for control of postharvest disease of mango. Plant Dis. 1983, 67, 816–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Panigrahi, S. Alternaria Toxins. Handbook of Plant and Fungal Toxicants; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997; pp. 319–337. [Google Scholar]
  95. Ozcelik, S.; Ozcelik, N.; Beuchat, L.R. Toxin production by Alternaria alternata in tomatoes and apples stored under various conditions and quantitation of the toxins by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1990, 11, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hassan, H. Alternaria mycotoxins in Black rot lesion of tomato fruits: Conditions and regulations of their productions. Acta Immunol. Hung. 1996, 43, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pose, G.; Patriarca, A.; Kyanko, V.; Pardo, A.; Pinto, V.F. Water activity and temperature effects on mycotoxin production by Alternaria alternata on a synthetic tomato medium. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 142, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Skrinjar, M.; Dimic, G. Ochratoxigenicity of Aspergillus ochraceus group and Penicillium verrucosum var. cyclopium strains on various media. Acta Microbiol. Hung. 1992, 39, 257–261. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  99. Mitchell, D.; Parra, R.; Aldred, D.; Magan, N. Water and temperature relations of growth and ochratoxin A production by Aspergillus carbonarius strains from grapes in Europe and Israel. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Valero, A.; Farré, J.R.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A.J.; Marín, S. Effects of fungal interaction on ochratoxin A production by A. carbonarius at different temperatures and aw. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 110, 160–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Arroyo, M.; Aldred, D.; Magan, N. Environmental factors and weak organic acid interactions have differential effects on control of growth and ochratoxin A production by Penicillium verrucosum isolates in bread. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 98, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Cairns-Fuller, V.; Aldred, D.; Magan, N. Water, temperature and gas composition interactions affect growth and ochratoxin A production by isolates of Penicillium verrucosum on wheat grain. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 99, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Pardo, E.; Malet, M.; Marín, S.; Sanchis, V.; Ramos, A. Effects of water activity and temperature on germination and growth profiles of ochratoxigenic Penicillium verrucosum isolates on barley meal extract agar. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 106, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Llorens, A.; Mateo, R.; Hinojo, M.; Valle-Algarra, F.; Jiménez, M. Influence of environmental factors on the biosynthesis of type B trichothecenes by isolates of Fusarium spp. from Spanish crops. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Hope, R.; Aldred, D.; Magan, N. Comparison of environmental profiles for growth and deoxynivalenol production by Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum on wheat grain. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2005, 40, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ramirez, M.L.; Chulze, S.; Magan, N. Temperature and water activity effects on growth and temporal deoxynivalenol production by two Argentinean strains of Fusarium graminearum on irradiated wheat grain. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 106, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Nesci, A.; Rodriguez, M.; Etcheverry, M. Control of Aspergillus growth and aflatoxin production using antioxidants at different conditions of water activity and pH. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 95, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Ribeiro, J.M.M.; Cavaglieri, L.R.; Fraga, M.E.; Direito, G.M.; Dalcero, A.M.; Rosa, C.A.R. Influence of water activity, temperature and time on mycotoxins production on barley rootlets. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 42, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Feng, G.H.; Leonard, T.J. Culture conditions control expression of the genes for aflatoxin and sterigmatocystin biosynthesis in Aspergillus parasiticus and A. nidulans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 2275–2277. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  110. Schmidt-Heydt, M.; Geisen, R. A microarray for monitoring the production of mycotoxins in food. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 117, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Jayashree, T.; Subramanyam, C. Oxidative stress as a prerequisite for aflatoxin production by Aspergillus parasiticus. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2000, 29, 981–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ellner, F. Results of long-term field studies into the effect of strobilurin containing fungicides on the production of mycotoxins in several winter wheat varieties. Mycotoxin Res. 2005, 21, 112–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Barkai-Golan, R.; Paster, N. Mouldy fruits and vegetables as a source of mycotoxins: Part 1. World Mycotoxin J. 2008, 1, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jackson, L.S.; Al-Taher, F. Factors Affecting Mycotoxin Production in Fruits; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  115. Sanzani, S.M.; Schena, L.; Nigro, F.; De Girolamo, A.; Ippolito, A. Effect of quercetin and umbelliferone on the transcript level of Penicillium expansum genes involved in patulin biosynthesis. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2009, 125, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Tolaini, V.; Zjalic, S.; Reverberi, M.; Fanelli, C.; Fabbri, A.A.; Fiore, A.D.; Rossi, P.D.; Ricelli, A. Lentinula edodes enhances the biocontrol activity of Cryptococcus laurentii against Penicillium expansum contamination and patulin production in apple fruits. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 138, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Kumar, D.; Barad, S.; Chen, Y.; Luo, X.; Tannous, J.; Dubey, A.; Matana, N.G.; Tian, S.; Li, B.; Keller, N.; et al. LaeA regulation of secondary metabolism modulates virulence in Penicillium expansum and is mediated by sucrose. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Barad, S.; Horowitz, S.B.; Kobiler, I.; Sherman, A.; Prusky, D. Accumulation of the mycotoxin patulin in the presence of gluconic acid contributes to pathogenicity of Penicillium expansum. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2014, 27, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Barad, S.; Horowitz, S.B.; Moscovitz, O.; Lichter, A.; Sherman, A.; Prusky, D. A Penicillium expansum glucose oxidase–encoding gene, GOX2, is essential for gluconic acid production and acidification during colonization of deciduous fruit. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Palumbo, J.D.; O’Keeffe, T.L.; Mahoney, N.E. Inhibition of ochratoxin A production and growth of Aspergillus species by phenolic antioxidant compounds. Mycopathologia 2007, 164, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Chooi, Y.H.; Muria-Gonzalez, M.J.; Mead, O.L.; Solomon, P.S. SnPKS19 encodes the polyketide synthase for alternariol mycotoxin biosynthesis in the wheat pathogen Parastagonospora nodorum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 5309–5317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Barad, S.; Espeso, E.A.; Sherman, A.; Prusky, D. Ammonia activates pacC and patulin accumulation in an acidic environment during apple colonization by Penicillium expansum. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2016, 17, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Magan, N.; Cayley, G.R.; Lacey, J. Effect of water activity and temperature on mycotoxin production by Alternaria alternata in culture and on wheat grain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1984, 47, 1113–1117. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  124. Hassan, A.M.; Abdel-Aziem, S.H.; El-Nekeety, A.A.; Abdel-Wahhab, M.A. Panax ginseng extract modulates oxidative stress, DNA fragmentation and up-regulate gene expression in rats sub chronically treated with aflatoxin B1 and fumonisin B1. Cytotechnology 2015, 67, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, D.; Barad, S.; Sionov, E.; Keller, N.P.; Prusky, D.B. Does the Host Contribute to Modulation of Mycotoxin Production by Fruit Pathogens? Toxins 2017, 9, 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090280

AMA Style

Kumar D, Barad S, Sionov E, Keller NP, Prusky DB. Does the Host Contribute to Modulation of Mycotoxin Production by Fruit Pathogens? Toxins. 2017; 9(9):280. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090280

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Dilip, Shiri Barad, Edward Sionov, Nancy P. Keller, and Dov B. Prusky. 2017. "Does the Host Contribute to Modulation of Mycotoxin Production by Fruit Pathogens?" Toxins 9, no. 9: 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090280

APA Style

Kumar, D., Barad, S., Sionov, E., Keller, N. P., & Prusky, D. B. (2017). Does the Host Contribute to Modulation of Mycotoxin Production by Fruit Pathogens? Toxins, 9(9), 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9090280

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop