Next Article in Journal
Dual Proteomics Strategies to Dissect and Quantify the Components of Nine Medically Important African Snake Venoms
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Quantification of Total and Toxigenic Microcystis Using Digital-Droplet-Polymerase-Chain-Reaction-Based Multiplex Assay
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Elias University Hospital Approach: A Visual Guide to Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection in Spasticity: Part III—Proximal Lower Limb Muscles

by
Marius Nicolae Popescu
1,2,
Claudiu Căpeț
2,
Cristina Beiu
3,* and
Mihai Berteanu
1,2
1
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Clinic of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Elias Emergency University Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
3
Department of Oncologic Dermatology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2025, 17(5), 240; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050240
Submission received: 3 April 2025 / Revised: 6 May 2025 / Accepted: 8 May 2025 / Published: 13 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Toxins)

Abstract

:
Ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections have become an essential tool in the management of lower limb spasticity. Following our previous work, which focused on upper limb muscles, this third part provides a detailed visual guide to the identification and injection of proximal lower limb muscles frequently involved in spastic gait and posture disorders. This guide presents the ultrasound anatomy, clinical relevance, and injection strategies for eleven key muscles: gluteus maximus, piriformis, psoas majorrectus femoris, sartoriusgracilis, adductor longus, adductor magnus, semimembranosus, semitendinosus, and biceps femoris. For each muscle, the Elias University Hospital (EUH) model is applied, highlighting the zones of maximum thickness and motor point density to ensure precise and effective BoNT-A delivery. Enhanced with high-resolution ultrasound images and dynamic scanning techniques, this visual guide supports clinicians in performing safe, targeted injections. It serves as both an educational and practical reference for the ultrasound-guided treatment of spasticity in the proximal lower limb, completing the series and offering a standardized framework for comprehensive BoNT-A management. By promoting accurate toxin delivery, this approach is expected to improve functional mobility, reduce spasticity-related complications, and optimize patient-centered outcomes in rehabilitation settings.
Key Contribution: The key contribution of this paper is the establishment of a detailed ultrasound-guided approach for botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) injections in proximal lower limb muscles to manage post-stroke spasticity.

1. Introduction

Lower limb spasticity is a major contributor to impaired posture, mobility, and gait in patients with upper motor neuron syndromes, including those resulting from stroke, cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, or traumatic brain injury. It affects over 30% of stroke survivors and a significant proportion of individuals with cerebral palsy or traumatic brain injuries, contributing substantially to long-term disability and reduced mobility, which underscores the clinical importance of targeted interventions like BoNT-A [1]. Addressing focal muscle overactivity through targeted botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections has become a central component of personalized rehabilitation strategies, aiming to improve functional outcomes and enhance quality of life [2,3].
In our previous work, we provided a comprehensive guide to ultrasound-guided BoNT-A injections for upper limb muscles [4]. With this paper, we now shift focus to the lower limb, specifically targeting its proximal muscles. These muscles play a critical role in postural control, gait stability, and pelvic–lumbar alignment and are commonly involved in spastic gait patterns such as stiff knee gait, excessive knee flexion, hip retraction, or impaired limb advancement [5].
This guide presents a structured, ultrasound-based approach for identifying and injecting key proximal lower limb muscles, including the gluteus maximus, piriformis, psoas major, rectus femoris, sartorius, gracilis, adductor longus, adductor magnus, semimembranosus, semitendinosus, and biceps femoris. For each muscle, we describe its clinical relevance, scanning landmarks, dynamic features, zones of intramuscular neural arborization, and ultrasound-guided injection techniques, combining the literature-based knowledge with the practical insights gained from our daily work using the Elias University Hospital (EUH) model.
To enhance the practical value of this guide, we include high-resolution ultrasound images, clinical diagrams, and step-by-step video demonstrations. Together, these resources support clinicians in refining their technique and promoting standardized, evidence-based approaches to BoNT-A administration in spasticity management.
Among existing approaches to ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injection in spasticity, the EUROMUSCULUS/USPRM Spasticity Approach stands out for offering a concise overview of target muscles in the lower limb [6]. However, it includes only a limited number of schematic illustrations and lacks dynamic ultrasound guidance or clinical photographic references. In contrast, the Elias University Hospital (EUH) model introduced in this series aims to fill that gap by offering a systematic, muscle-by-muscle visual approach. Each target muscle is presented with clinical positioning photos, high-resolution ultrasound images, key anatomical landmarks, and dynamic scanning guidance, creating a reproducible and educational model suited to real-world clinical applications and training.

2. General Methodology

In our clinical practice, ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin injections were performed using a GE Venue Go system equipped with a linear 12 L transducer. A 21 G needle was used for all injections.
Patient positioning was adapted based on the anatomical region being evaluated. In most cases, the standard position can be inferred from the clinical photographs provided alongside the corresponding ultrasound images. Specific positioning details are explicitly described in cases requiring non-standard setups—for instance, supine positioning with hip abduction and external rotation for injections targeting the adductor magnus and gracilis muscles.

3. Proximal Lower Limb Muscles Implicated in Post-Stroke Spasticity

3.1. Gluteus Maximus (Gmax)

3.1.1. Overview

The gluteus maximus (Gmax) is a muscle targeted in the spastic patterns of the lower limb that involve resistance to passive movement during hip flexion and the internal rotation of the thigh at the hip joint [7,8,9].

3.1.2. Ultrasound Identification

In our clinical practice, the Gmax can be identified via musculoskeletal ultrasound by placing the transducer at a 45-degree angle toward the sacrum on the posterior surface of the hip joint, in the upper quadrant of the gluteal region, approximately 8 cm lateral to the sacrum. Superficial to the iliac cortex, three muscle masses can be visualized: the gluteus minimus (deepest), the gluteus medius, and the gluteus maximus (most superficial).

3.1.3. Key Ultrasound Landmarks

The key ultrasound landmarks include the following (Figure 1) [7,8,9]:
  • Muscle morphology: It is the strongest and most superficial muscle in the gluteal group.
  • Muscle position: It represents the most superficial muscle mass at this level. It lies superficial to both the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus.
  • External fascia: It is enclosed by a pronounced fascia, which separates it from the subcutaneous tissue and the gluteus medius, facilitating botulinum toxin injection.
  • Dynamic evaluation: During dynamic evaluation, scanning laterally toward the hip joint reveals an increase in muscle thickness of the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus. Muscle contraction is visible during hip extension and external rotation maneuvers.

3.1.4. Clinical Implications and Strategy

The Gmax is involved in spastic patterns that limit hip flexion and impair swing limb advancement during gait [10].
Studies have shown that BoNT-A injections into the Gmax not only reduce spasticity but also improve ulcerative lesions in the gluteal and intergluteal regions [10,11,12].
In cases of localized contracture following total hip arthroplasty, BoNT-A injections into the gluteus maximus have led to complete pain relief and contributed to gait improvement during rehabilitation [13,14].
A 2024 study aimed at identifying the zones with the highest intramuscular neural arborization divided the gluteus maximus using three reference lines [15]:
  • Line (a): from the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) to the greater trochanter (GT) of the femur;
  • Line (c): from the coccyx (CO) to the ischial tuberosity (IT);
  • Line (b): drawn midway between lines a and c.
The areas with the highest nerve arborization were found at 40–70% along the cranial segment (line a), 30–60% along the middle segment (line b), and 40–70% along the caudal segment (line c).
These findings suggest the need for three injection points when targeting this muscle [15].
In our clinical practice, the preferred injection sites for BoNT-A are determined by maximum muscle thickness identified via ultrasound:
For the cranial segment, the transducer is positioned at a 45-degree angle toward the sacrum on the posterior surface of the hip joint, in the upper quadrant of the gluteal region, approximately 8 cm lateral to the sacrum.
From this position, scanning is continued distally along the posterior thigh, with injections administered to the middle and caudal segments of the gluteus maximus.

3.2. Piriformis

3.2.1. Overview

The piriformis is a muscle targeted in the spastic patterns of the lower limb that involve resistance to passive movement during the internal rotation and adduction of the thigh at the hip joint [16,17].

3.2.2. Ultrasound Identification

In our clinical practice, the piriformis muscle can be identified using musculoskeletal ultrasound by placing the transducer transversely on the posterior surface of the hip joint, angled approximately 20 degrees laterally toward the sacrum, about 8 cm lateral to the sacrum and 10 cm proximal to the ischial tuberosity. From deep to superficial, the following structures can be visualized: the acetabular cortex, the piriformis muscle, and the gluteus maximus, which lies superficial to the piriformis.

3.2.3. Key Ultrasound Landmarks

The key ultrasound features include the following (Figure 2) [16,17]:
  • Muscle morphology: It is part of the deep gluteal muscle group, along with the obturator internus, obturatorus externus, superior gemellus, inferior gemellus, and quadratus femoris.
  • Muscle position: At this level, it appears as the first muscle mass superficial to the acetabular cortex. The sciatic nerve lies in close proximity, located deep to the piriformis.
  • External fascia: It presents a well-defined fascia separating it from the gluteus maximus, which is important during botulinum toxin injection.
  • Dynamic evaluation: During dynamic evaluation, scanning 2–3 cm distally toward the ischial tuberosity, the piriformis muscle tapers and disappears, and the obturator internus muscle becomes visible. Superficial to the obturator internus, the gluteus maximus and the sciatic nerve (within the intermuscular fascia) can be observed. Muscle contraction is visible during the external rotation and abduction of the femur at the hip joint.

3.2.4. Clinical Implications and Injection Strategy

BoNT-A injections into the piriformis muscle are used both to reduce muscle spasms and to relieve pain in piriformis syndrome, a condition where the muscle compresses the sciatic nerve [18,19,20,21].
The region with the highest intramuscular nerve arborization has been identified between three-fifths and four-fifths of the distance from the greater trochanter to the sacrum, along the muscle [22].
In our clinical practice, the preferred injection site for BoNT-A is the point of maximum muscle thickness, identified via ultrasound, with the transducer placed transversely on the posterior surface of the hip joint, angled approximately 20 degrees toward the sacrum, about 8 cm lateral to the sacrum and 10 cm proximal to the ischial tuberosity.
The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in approaching the piriformis allows for the accurate targeting of the injection site and prevents nerve injury, especially to the nearby sciatic nerve.

3.3. Psoas Major

3.3.1. Overview

The psoas major is a muscle targeted in the spastic patterns of the lower limb that involve resistance to passive movement during hip extension and extension or medial inflection at the lumbar spine [8,23].

3.3.2. Ultrasound Identification

In our clinical practice, the psoas major can be identified using musculoskeletal ultrasound by placing the transducer transversely on the posterior surface of the trunk, approximately 2 cm lateral to the spinous process of the L4 vertebra and 1 cm proximal to the iliac crest. Lateral to the L4 spinous process, the following structures are observed, from superficial to deep: the erector spinae muscles, immediately adjacent to the spinous process, the quadratus lumborum, lateral and superficial to the psoas, the psoas major, located deeper, and the intraperitoneal space, situated deep to the psoas.

3.3.3. Key Ultrasound Landmarks

The key ultrasound features include the following (Figure 3 and Figure 4) [7,8,23]:
  • Muscle position: It is the deepest muscle mass at this level.
  • External fascia: It presents a pronounced fascia that separates it from the erector spinae and quadratus lumborum, aiding in safe botulinum toxin injection.
  • Dynamic evaluation: During dynamic evaluation, when scanning proximo-medially toward the costal arch, its origin is visualized from the T12 to L5 vertebrae.
  • Contraction is visible during hip flexion, as well as lumbar spine flexion and lateral inflection maneuvers.
  • The psoas major can also be visualized using a longitudinal transducer position, placed superior to the iliac crest and 2 cm lateral to the L4 spinous process. In this view, both the psoas major and the overlying quadratus lumborum are seen superficial to the intraperitoneal space.

3.3.4. Clinical Implications and Injection Strategy

In ambulatory patients, the psoas muscle contributes to spastic patterns that impede physiological hip extension during the mid-stance and terminal stance phases of gait.
In non-ambulatory patients, the spasticity of the psoas muscle leads to incorrect sitting posture and myotendinous retractions while seated in a wheelchair, which can also complicate nursing care [24].
The region with the highest intramuscular nerve arborization is located at approximately 50% along the reference line drawn from the T12 vertebra to the midpoint of the inguinal ligament [25].
In our clinical practice, the preferred injection site for BoNT-A is at the point of maximum muscle thickness identified via ultrasound, using either a transverse or longitudinal transducer orientation on the posterior trunk, approximately 2 cm lateral to the L4 spinous process and 1 cm proximal to the iliac crest.
The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in approaching the psoas major allows for the precise targeting of the muscle while avoiding the intraperitoneal space.

3.4. Rectus Femoris (RF)

3.4.1. Overview

The rectus femoris (RF) is a muscle frequently targeted in the spastic patterns of the lower limb that involve resistance to passive movement during hip extension and knee flexion maneuvers [16].

3.4.2. Ultrasound Identification

In our clinical practice, the RF can be identified using musculoskeletal ultrasound with the transducer placed transversely at the proximal third of the anterior thigh, along the midline. Superficial to the femoral cortex, two muscle masses are visualized: the vastus intermedius (deep) and the rectus femoris (superficial and oval-shaped).

3.4.3. Key Ultrasound Landmarks

The key ultrasound features include the following (Figure 5) [8,16]:
  • Muscle morphology: The RF is a bipennate muscle, characterized by a central septum, with muscle fibers attached on both sides and continuing into a central tendon. These two fiber regions should be individually targeted during injection
  • Muscle position: It is the most superficial muscle mass at this level. Lateral to the rectus femoris lies the vastus lateralis, and medial to it, the vastus medialis.
  • External fascia: A pronounced fascia separates the rectus femoris from the subcutaneous plane and adjacent muscles: vastus intermedius, vastus lateralis, and vastus medialis.
  • Dynamic evaluation: During dynamic evaluation, scanning distally toward the knee joint, the muscle bulk of the RF decreases, but its central tendon remains visible until the distal third of the thigh (Video S1). Muscle contraction is visible during hip flexion and knee extension maneuvers.

3.4.4. Clinical Implications and Injection Strategy

The RF is involved in the stiff knee gait spastic pattern. According to the literature, BoNT-A injections in this muscle can reduce spasticity and improve gait pattern [26,27,28,29,30].
In patients with spastic hemiparesis, studies have shown that BoNT-A injections into the RF result in improved muscular kinematics during gait, including greater maximal muscle lengthening and improved muscle stretch capacity [31,32].
The zones with the highest concentration of motor points in the RF are located at approximately 40% and 60% along a reference line connecting the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) to the superior edge of the patella [33,34].
In our clinical practice, the preferred injection sites are the areas of maximum muscle thickness, identified via ultrasound, with the transducer placed transversely approximately 2 cm proximal and 2 cm distal to the mid-thigh level on the anterior midline.

3.5. Sartorius (Sart)

3.5.1. Overview

The sartorius (Sart) is a muscle targeted in the spastic patterns of the lower limb that involve resistance to passive movement during hip extension, adduction, and internal rotation, as well as knee extension [23].

3.5.2. Ultrasound Identification

In our clinical practice, the Sart can be identified using musculoskeletal ultrasound with the transducer placed transversely on the middle third of the medial thigh. Superficial to the femoral cortex, the adductor magnus is visualized, over which lie the adductor longus and vastus medialis, and the most superficial structure is the Sart muscle.

3.5.3. Key Ultrasound Landmarks

The key ultrasound features include the following (Figure 6) [16,23,34,35]:
  • Muscle position: It is the most superficial muscle in the anterior compartment of the thigh. Deep and lateral to the sartorius lies the vastus medialis; deep and medial to the sartorius lies the adductor longus. At this level, the adductor canal is visualized beneath the Sart, containing the femoral artery, femoral vein, saphenous nerve, and nerve to vastus medialis.
  • External fascia: A pronounced fascia separates the Sart from the subcutaneous plane, vastus medialis, adductor longus, and adductor magnus, aiding in precise botulinum toxin injection.
  • Dynamic evaluation: During dynamic evaluation, scanning proximally toward the hip joint, at the proximal third of the anterior thigh, the adductor longus thickens medial and deep to the Sart, while the rectus femoris appears deep and lateral. At this level, the adductor canal shifts to lie medial to the Sart and lateral to the adductor longus. During distal scanning toward the knee joint, in the distal third of the anterior thigh, the gracilis is seen medial to the Sart, and the vastus medialis lies deep and lateral to it. Muscle contraction is visible during hip flexion, abduction, and internal rotation, as well as knee flexion maneuvers.

3.5.4. Clinical Implications and Injection Strategy

The zones with the highest intramuscular nerve arborization in the Sart are located at 20–40% and 60–80% along a reference line from the most prominent point of the anterior superior iliac spine (0%) to the medial femoral condyle (100%) [36].
In our clinical practice, the preferred injection sites are the areas of maximum muscle thickness, identified via ultrasound, with the transducer placed transversely on the proximal third of the anterior medial thigh and on the distal third of the anterior medial thigh.
The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound for targeting the Sart muscle allows for the precise delivery of the injection and helps to avoid neurovascular injury.

3.6. Gracilis (G)

3.6.1. Overview

The gracilis (G) muscle is commonly targeted in spastic patterns involving resistance to passive movement during hip abduction, knee extension, and the external rotation of the leg [8,16].

3.6.2. Ultrasound Identification

In our clinical practice, the G can be identified using musculoskeletal ultrasound with the lower limb positioned in supine, with the hip abducted, externally rotated, and semi-flexed, and the knee in semi-flexion. The transducer is placed transversely on the proximal third of the medial thigh. Superficial to the femoral cortex, two muscle masses are visualized: the adductor magnus and the semimembranosus, and the gracilis lies superficial to both.

3.6.3. Key Ultrasound Landmarks

The key ultrasound landmarks include the following (Figure 7) [8,16,23]:
  • Muscle position: It is the most superficial and medial muscle mass of the thigh. Lateral and deep to the G lies the adductor longus, while medial and deep to the G lies the semimembranosus.
  • External fascia: It presents a well-defined fascia that separates it from the subcutaneous plane and from the adductor magnus, adductor longus, and semimembranosus, which is relevant for BoNT-A injections.
  • Dynamic evaluation: During dynamic evaluation, scanning toward the distal third of the medial thigh, the following are observed: the relationship between the G and adductor magnus remains consistent, the adductor longus disappears from view, the Sart muscle appears, joining the gracilis, and the adductor canal becomes visible, located deep and lateral to the gracilis. In the distal third of the medial thigh, the G is positioned lateral to the semitendinosus. Scanning further distally beyond the knee joint, the tendons of the G, sartorius, and semitendinosus converge to form the pes anserinus on the medial aspect of the proximal tibia. Muscle contraction is visible during hip adduction, knee flexion, and internal rotation maneuvers.

3.6.4. Clinical Implications and Injection Strategy

Reducing spasticity in the gracilis muscle through BoNT-A injection can lead to several clinically meaningful improvements. These include enhanced hip abduction and knee extension, reduced scissoring during gait, improved hygiene and seating posture, and better tolerance for orthotic devices. In pediatric patients with cerebral palsy, such injections may also prevent hip dislocation and delay or reduce gait deterioration [36]. Overall, this intervention contributes to improved mobility, functional independence, and quality of life.
According to a study by Won et al., the area with the highest intramuscular nerve arborization of the gracilis is located between 25 and 35% along a reference line drawn from the pubic tubercle to the line connecting the center of the patella and the medial femoral condyle [37,38].
In our clinical practice, the preferred injection site for BoNT-A is the area of maximum muscle thickness, identified via ultrasound, with the transducer placed transversely on the proximal third of the medial thigh.

3.7. Adductor Longus (AL)

3.7.1. Overview

The adductor longus is a muscle targeted in the spastic patterns of the lower limb that involve resistance to passive movement during hip abduction and the external rotation of the thigh [16].

3.7.2. Ultrasound Identification

In our clinical practice, the adductor longus can be identified using musculoskeletal ultrasound by placing the transducer transversely on the proximal third of the medial thigh. From deep to superficial, the following structures are visualized: the femoral cortex and three muscle layers: adductor magnus, adductor brevis, and adductor longus.

3.7.3. Key Ultrasound Landmarks

The key ultrasound landmarks include the following (Figure 8) [16]:
  • Muscle position: It is the most superficial muscle mass at this level. Lateral to it lies the sartorius muscle, and medially, the gracilis muscle. The adductor canal is also visualized laterally.
  • External fascia: It presents a pronounced fascia that separates it from the adductor magnus, adductor brevis, sartorius, and gracilis muscles during botulinum toxin injection.
  • Dynamic evaluation: During dynamic evaluation, scanning proximally toward the hip joint, the adductor brevis, which lies deep to the adductor longus, becomes more prominent. Scanning distally toward the distal third of the medial thigh, the adductor longus gradually decreases in thickness until it disappears from view, at which point the gracilis and sartorius muscles become adjacent (Video S2). Contraction is visible during hip adduction and internal rotation maneuvers.

3.7.4. Clinical Implications and Injection Strategy

The region with the highest density of motor points in the adductor longus is located at 40–50% of the muscle length, corresponding to approximately three-fifths of the muscle’s total length [39].
In our clinical practice, the preferred injection site for BoNT-A is at the point of maximum muscle thickness, identified via ultrasound, with the transducer placed transversely on the proximal third of the medial thigh.
The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in targeting the adductor longus allows for the precise placement of the toxin while avoiding neurovascular injury.

3.8. Adductor Magnus (AM)

3.8.1. Overview

The adductor magnus (AM) is a muscle targeted in the spastic patterns of the lower limb that involve resistance to passive movement during hip abduction and hip extension [2].

3.8.2. Ultrasound Identification

In our clinical practice, the AM can be identified using musculoskeletal ultrasound with the lower limb positioned supine, the hip abducted, externally rotated, and in semi-flexion, and the knee also in semi-flexion. The transducer is placed transversely on the proximal third of the medial thigh. Superficial to the femoral cortex, two muscle masses are visualized: the AM and the semimembranosus, and the gracilis lies superficial to both.

3.8.3. Key Ultrasound Landmarks

The key ultrasound landmarks include the following (Figure 9) [8]:
  • Muscle morphology: It is the largest and deepest muscle of the adductor group.
  • Muscle position: It is the first muscle mass superficial to the femoral cortex at this level. It is covered superficially by the gracilis muscle; medial to it lies the semimembranosus.
  • External fascia: It has a well-defined fascia separating it from the gracilis and semimembranosus, supporting safe BoNT-A injections.
  • Dynamic evaluation: During dynamic evaluation, scanning distally toward the knee joint, a reduction in muscle bulk is observed in both the AM and gracilis. Muscle contraction is visible during hip adduction and hip flexion maneuvers.

3.8.4. Clinical Implications and Injection Strategy

In the pediatric population with cerebral palsy, BoNT-A injections into the AM have been shown to significantly reduce spasticity and help prevent hip dislocation [40].
According to a study by Santamato et al., BoNT-A injections into the AM following total hip arthroplasty led to a significant reduction in pain—as measured on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)—and contributed to gait improvement during rehabilitation [41].
The area with the highest concentration of motor points in the AM is located at 40% along a reference line drawn from the pubic symphysis to the medial knee joint line, corresponding to the middle third of the thigh [42].
In our clinical practice, the preferred injection site for BoNT-A is at the point of maximum muscle thickness, identified via ultrasound, with the transducer placed transversely on the middle third of the medial thigh.

3.9. Semimembranosus (SM)

3.9.1. Overview

The semimembranosus (SM) is a muscle targeted in the spastic patterns of the lower limb that involve resistance to passive movement during hip flexion, knee extension, and the external rotation of the leg [8,16].

3.9.2. Ultrasound Identification

In our clinical practice, the SM can be identified using musculoskeletal ultrasound with the transducer placed transversely on the distal third of the posterior thigh, in the medial portion. Superficial to the femoral cortex, the adductor magnus is visualized, and superficial to it, two muscle masses appear: SM (medial) and semitendinosus (lateral).

3.9.3. Key Ultrasound Landmarks

The key ultrasound features include the following (Figure 10) [8,16,43]:
  • Muscle position: It is a superficial muscle mass at this level. It is the first muscle seen from medial to lateral on the posterior surface of the thigh. Deep and medial to it lies the adductor magnus, while laterally to it lie the semitendinosus and biceps femoris muscles. The sciatic nerve is located deep and lateral to the SM and semitendinosus and deep to the biceps femoris. The popliteal vascular bundle is visualized deep to the muscle in the distal third of the posterior thigh.
  • External fascia: It has a pronounced fascia that separates it from the subcutaneous tissue, semitendinosus, and adductor magnus, aiding in safe botulinum toxin injection.
  • Dynamic evaluation: During dynamic evaluation, scanning proximally toward the hip joint, the SM decreases in thickness, while the semitendinosus increases; the sciatic nerve remains lateral and deep to the semitendinosus. Contraction is visible during hip extension, knee flexion, and the internal rotation of the leg.

3.9.4. Clinical Implications and Injection Strategy

The SM contributes to excessive knee flexion during gait in patients with spasticity [5].
BoNT-A injections into this muscle can improve gait mechanics by enhancing knee extension, anterior pelvic tilt, and increasing the rate of muscle lengthening in the semimembranosus [44].
The region with the highest intramuscular nerve arborization is located at 20–40% along a reference line from the medial and lateral femoral condyles (0%) to the ischial tuberosity (100%) [45].
In our clinical practice, the preferred injection site for BoNT-A is the point of maximum muscle thickness, identified via ultrasound, with the transducer placed transversely on the distal third of the posterior medial thigh.
The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound for targeting the SM ensures the accurate delivery of the substance while minimizing the risk of neurovascular injury.

3.10. Semitendinosus (ST)

3.10.1. Overview

The semitendinosus (ST) is a muscle commonly targeted in the spastic patterns of the lower limb that involve resistance to passive movement during hip flexion, knee extension, and the external rotation of the leg [8,16].

3.10.2. Ultrasound Identification

In our clinical practice, the ST can be identified using musculoskeletal ultrasound with the transducer placed transversely on the proximal third of the posterior thigh, in the medial portion. Superficial to the femoral cortex, three muscle masses are observed: the adductor magnus, the semimembranosus (medial), and the ST (lateral).

3.10.3. Key Ultrasound Landmarks

The key ultrasound features include the following (Figure 11 and Figure 12) [43,46,47,48,49]:
  • Muscle position: It appears as a superficial muscle mass at this level. It is the second muscle from medial to lateral in the proximal third of the posterior thigh. It is bordered medially by the semimembranosus and laterally by the biceps femoris. The sciatic nerve lies deep and lateral to the ST and deep to the biceps femoris.
  • Muscle morphology: The “Mercedes-Benz sign” may be seen—an ultrasound pattern created by the intersection of the fascial planes of the ST, biceps femoris, and adductor magnus, with the sciatic nerve centered between them. A characteristic “Venetian blind” appearance can be observed—this refers to the vertical intramuscular fascia traversing the muscle’s width. It appears as alternating hyperechoic and hypoechoic bands resembling the slats of a Venetian blind, resulting from the regular alignment of muscle fibers and connective septa reflecting ultrasound waves (Video S3).
  • External fascia: It features a pronounced fascia that separates it from the subcutaneous layer, adductor magnus, semimembranosus, and biceps femoris, which is crucial for safe BoNT-A injection.
  • Dynamic evaluation: During dynamic scanning distally toward the knee joint, the ST decreases in thickness, while the semimembranosus increases. The sciatic nerve maintains its course deep and lateral to the semitendinosus. Muscle contraction is visible during hip extension, knee flexion, and the internal rotation of the leg.

3.10.4. Clinical Implications and Injection Strategy

The ST contributes to excessive knee flexion during gait in patients with lower limb spasticity [5].
The areas with the highest intramuscular nerve arborization are located at 25–40% and 60–80% along a reference line drawn from the medial and lateral femoral condyles (0%) to the ischial tuberosity (100%) [45].
In our clinical practice, the preferred injection sites for BoNT-A are the regions of maximum muscle thickness, identified via ultrasound, with the transducer placed transversely on the proximal and distal thirds of the medial posterior thigh.
The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in targeting the ST allows for precise placement and helps avoid nerve injury.

3.11. Biceps Femoris (BF)

3.11.1. Overview

The biceps femoris (BF) is a muscle targeted in the spastic patterns of the lower limb that involve resistance to passive movement during hip flexion and internal rotation, as well as knee extension and the internal rotation of the leg [7,8,50].

3.11.2. Ultrasound Identification

In our clinical practice, the BF can be identified using musculoskeletal ultrasound with the transducer placed transversely on the distal third of the posterior thigh, in the lateral portion. Superficial to the femoral cortex, the BF muscle is visualized.

3.11.3. Key Ultrasound Landmarks

The key ultrasound features include the following (Figure 13) [7,8,35,43,50]:
  • Muscle morphology: It has two heads: the long head (medial) and the short head (lateral), which can be approached individually, separated by an intramuscular fascia.
  • Muscle position: It appears as a superficial muscle mass and is the most lateral muscle in the posterior (flexor) compartment of the thigh at this level. The long head lies adjacent to the sciatic nerve, which runs underneath the muscle.
  • External fascia: A pronounced fascia separates the BF from the subcutaneous plane, and from the vastus lateralis and semitendinosus, which is relevant during BoNT-A injections.
  • Dynamic evaluation: During dynamic evaluation, scanning proximally toward the hip joint, the long head increases in thickness while the short head decreases. At the mid-thigh, the short head disappears, and the long head reaches its maximum thickness. Scanning distally toward the knee joint, the short head increases in thickness, and the long head decreases. Muscle contraction is visible during hip extension, external rotation, knee flexion, and the external rotation of the leg.

3.11.4. Clinical Implications and Injection Strategy

The BF is implicated in spastic gait patterns characterized by excessive knee flexion during walking [5].
The highest density of intramuscular nerve arborization is located at the following:
  • 15–30% of the reference line for the short head;
  • 50–60% of the reference line for the long head.
This is measured along a line drawn from the medial and lateral femoral condyles (0%) to the ischial tuberosity (100%) [45].
In our clinical practice, the preferred injection sites for BoNT-A injections are the points of maximum muscle thickness, identified via ultrasound:
  • For the short head, the transducer is placed transversely on the distal third of the posterior-lateral thigh;
  • For the long head, the transducer is placed transversely at mid-thigh level on the posterior-lateral thigh.
The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in targeting the BF allows for accurate substance placement while avoiding nerve injury.
Table 1 captures the key tips and precautions for BoNT-A injections in each lower limb muscle.

4. Conclusions

This paper is the third part of the series The Elias University Hospital Approach: A Visual Guide to Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection in Spasticity and focuses on the practical application of musculoskeletal ultrasound for guiding BoNT-A injections into the proximal lower limb muscles in patients with post-stroke or neurologically induced spasticity.
By placing ultrasound at the core of the injection strategy, this guide provides clinicians with a reliable, evidence-based, and reproducible approach to safely target key muscles such as the gluteus maximus, piriformis, psoas major, rectus femoris, sartorius, gracilis, adductor longus, adductor magnus, semimembranosus, semitendinosus, and biceps femoris. For each muscle, we have described essential anatomical landmarks, dynamic sonographic features, neural arborization zones, and precise injection techniques informed by both the current literature and our clinical experience at Elias University Hospital.
Together with the previously published upper limb volumes, this paper contributes to a unified and standardized framework for ultrasound-guided spasticity management across major muscle groups. In the next part, we will continue with the lower limb, addressing distal muscles.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15126622, Video S1: dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the rectus femoris (RF) muscle; Video S2: dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the adductor longus (AL) muscle; Video S3: dynamic ultrasound evaluation of the semitendinosus (ST) muscle.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.N.P., M.B. and C.B.; methodology, M.N.P. and M.B.; software, M.N.P., M.B. and C.C.; data curation, M.N.P., M.B. and C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.N.P., M.B. and C.C.; writing—review and editing, M.N.P., M.B., C.C. and C.B.; visualization, M.N.P., M.B. and C.C.; supervision, M.N.P., M.B. and C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived as this is a descriptive review including only clinical images and videos from routine practice, with no experimental interventions.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Andreea Racoviță for editing the photos and Albert Cristian Buchsbaum for editing the videos, which significantly enhanced the visual quality of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AceAcetabulum
AMAdductor magnus (muscle)
ABAdductor brevis (muscle)
ALAdductor longus (muscle)
ASISAnterior superior iliac spine
aartery
BFBiceps femoris (muscle)
BFsBiceps femoris (muscle) short head
BFIBiceps femoris (muscle) long head
BoNT-ABotulinum toxin type-A
COCoccyx (bone)
EUHElias University Hospital
ESErector spinae (muscle)
FVFemoral (vein)
FFemur (bone)
GmaxGluteus maximus (muscle)
GmedGluteus medius (muscle)
GminGluteus minimus (muscle)
GGracilis (muscle)
GTGreater trochanter (bone)
IIliac (bone)
IMFIntramuscular fascia
ITIschial tuberosity
NtVM(Nerve) to vastus medialis muscle
PSISPosterior superior iliac spine
PMPsoas major (muscle)
QLQuadratus lumborum (muscle)
RFRectus femoris (muscle)
SNSaphenous (nerve)
SartSartorius (muscle)
SSciatic (nerve)
SMSemimembranosus (muscle)
STSemitendinosus (muscle)
VMVastus medialis (muscle)
vvein

References

  1. Zeng, H.; Chen, J.; Guo, Y.; Tan, S. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Spasticity After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Neurol. 2021, 11, 616097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Schnitzler, A.; Dince, C.; Freitag, A.; Iheanacho, I.; Fahrbach, K.; Lavoie, L.; Loze, J.-Y.; Forestier, A.; Gasq, D. Abobotulinumtoxin A Doses in Upper and Lower Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Literature Review. Toxins 2022, 14, 734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Popescu, M.N.; Petca, R.C.; Beiu, C.; Dumitrascu, M.C.; Petca, A.; Mehedintu, C.; Farcasanu, P.D.; Sandru, F. Efficiency of Different Preparations of Botulinum Toxin Type A, Xeomin and Dysport, in the Management of Spastic Upper Limb After Stroke. Revista de Chimie 2019, 70, 3490–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Popescu, M.N.; Căpeț, C.; Beiu, C.; Berteanu, M. The Elias University Hospital Approach: A Visual Guide to Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection in Spasticity: Part I—Distal Upper Limb Muscles. Toxins 2025, 17, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Faccioli, S.; Cavalagli, A.; Falocci, N.; Mangano, G.; Sanfilippo, I.; Sassi, S. Gait Analysis Patterns and Rehabilitative Interventions to Improve Gait in Persons with Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Neurol. 2023, 14, 1256392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kaymak, B.; Kara, M.; Tok, F.; Ulaşli, A.M.; Öztürk, G.T.; Chang, K.-V.; Hsiao, M.-Y.; Hung, C.-Y.; Yağiz On, A.; Özçakar, L. Sonographic Guide for Botulinum Toxin Injections of the Lower Limb: EUROMUSCULUS/USPRM Spasticity Approach. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2018, 54, 486–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sinnatamby, C.S. Last’s Anatomy: Regional and Applied, 12th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Palastanga, N.; Soames, R. Anatomy and Human Movement Structure and Function, 7th ed.; Elsevier: Warsaw, Poland, 2019; ISBN 978-0-7020-7226-0. [Google Scholar]
  9. Elzanie, A.; Borger, J. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb, Gluteus Maximus Muscle. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jankovic, J.; Albanese, A.; Atassi, M.Z.; Dolly, J.O.; Hallett, M.; Mayer, N.H. Botulinum Toxin E-Book: Therapeutic Clinical Practice and Science; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  11. Intiso, D.; Basciani, M. Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Healing of a Chronic Buttock Ulcer in a Patient with Spastic Paraplegia after Spinal Cord Injury. J. Rehabil. Med. 2009, 41, 1100–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cigna, E.; Maruccia, M.; Fanelli, B.; Scuderi, N. Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Healing of Chronic Lesion Following Bilateral Spasticity of Gluteus Muscle. Int. Wound J. 2014, 11, 412–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bhave, A.; Zywiel, M.G.; Ulrich, S.D.; McGrath, M.S.; Seyler, T.M.; Marker, D.R.; Delanois, R.E.; Mont, M.A. Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections for the Management of Muscle Tightness Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Series. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2009, 4, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bertoni, M.; Castagna, A.; Baricich, A.; Berti, G.; Lazzaretti, S.; Morandi, C. Administration of Type A Botulinum Toxin after Total Hip Replacement. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2008, 44, 461–465. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yi, K.-H.; Kim, D.C.; Lee, S.; Lee, H.-J.; Lee, J.-H. Intramuscular Neural Distribution of the Gluteus Maximus Muscle: Diagnostic Electromyography and Injective Treatments. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Drake, R.L.; Vogl, A.W.; Mitchell, A.W.M. Gray’s Anatomy for Students; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chang, C.; Jeno, S.H.; Varacallo, M.A. Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb: Piriformis Muscle. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lang, A.M. Botulinum Toxin Type B in Piriformis Syndrome. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004, 83, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yoon, S.J.; Ho, J.; Kang, H.Y.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, K.I.; Shin, W.G.; Oh, J.M. Low-Dose Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Refractory Piriformis Syndrome. Pharmacother. J. Hum. Pharmacol. Drug Ther. 2007, 27, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yan, K.; Xi, Y.; Hlis, R.; Chhabra, A. Piriformis Syndrome: Pain Response Outcomes Following CT-Guided Injection and Incremental Value of Botulinum Toxin Injection. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2021, 27, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Al-Al-Shaikh, M.; Michel, F.; Parratte, B.; Kastler, B.; Vidal, C.; Aubry, S. An MRI Evaluation of Changes in Piriformis Muscle Morphology Induced by Botulinum Toxin Injections in the Treatment of Piriformis Syndrome. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2015, 96, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yi, K.-H.; Lee, K.-L.; Lee, J.-H.; Hu, H.-W.; Lee, K.; Seo, K.K.; Kim, H.-J. Guidelines for Botulinum Neurotoxin Injections in Piriformis Syndrome. Clin. Anat. 2021, 34, 1028–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Moore, K.L.; Agur, A.M.R.; Dalley, A.F. Clinically Oriented Anatomy, 8th ed.; Keith, L.M., Arthur, F.D., II, Anne, M.R.A., Eds.; Wolters Kluwer: Albany, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sconfienza, L.M.; Perrone, N.; Lacelli, F.; Lentino, C.; Serafini, G. Ultrasound-Guided Injection of Botulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Iliopsoas Spasticity. J. Ultrasound 2008, 11, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Campenhout, A.V.; Hubens, G.; Fagard, K.; Molenaers, G. Localization of Motor Nerve Branches of the Human Psoas Muscle. Muscle Nerve 2010, 42, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Boudarham, J.; Hameau, S.; Pradon, D.; Bensmail, D.; Roche, N.; Zory, R. Changes in Electromyographic Activity after Botulinum Toxin Injection of the Rectus Femoris in Patients with Hemiparesis Walking with a Stiff-Knee Gait. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2013, 23, 1036–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Santamato, A.; Cinone, N.; Panza, F.; Letizia, S.; Santoro, L.; Lozupone, M.; Daniele, A.; Picelli, A.; Baricich, A.; Intiso, D.; et al. Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Lower Limb Spasticity after Stroke. Drugs 2019, 79, 143–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stoquart, G.G.; Detrembleur, C.; Palumbo, S.; Deltombe, T.; Lejeune, T.M. Effect of Botulinum Toxin Injection in the Rectus Femoris on Stiff-Knee Gait in People With Stroke: A Prospective Observational Study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2008, 89, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Robertson, J.V.G.; Pradon, D.; Bensmail, D.; Fermanian, C.; Bussel, B.; Roche, N. Relevance of Botulinum Toxin Injection and Nerve Block of Rectus Femoris to Kinematic and Functional Parameters of Stiff Knee Gait in Hemiplegic Adults. Gait Posture 2009, 29, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Tok, F.; Balaban, B.; Yaşar, E.; Alaca, R.; Tan, A.K. The Effects of Onabotulinum Toxin A Injection into Rectus Femoris Muscle in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients with Stiff-Knee Gait. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2012, 91, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lampire, N.; Roche, N.; Carne, P.; Cheze, L.; Pradon, D. Effect of Botulinum Toxin Injection on Length and Lengthening Velocity of Rectus Femoris during Gait in Hemiparetic Patients. Clin. Biomech. 2013, 28, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Supiot, A.; Geiger, M.; Bensmail, D.; Aegerter, P.; Pradon, D.; Roche, N. Effect of Botulinum Toxin Injection on Length and Force of the Rectus Femoris and Triceps Surae Muscles during Locomotion in Patients with Chronic Hemiparesis (FOLOTOX). BMC Neurol. 2018, 18, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Botter, A.; Oprandi, G.; Lanfranco, F.; Allasia, S.; Maffiuletti, N.A.; Minetto, M.A. Atlas of the Muscle Motor Points for the Lower Limb: Implications for Electrical Stimulation Procedures and Electrode Positioning. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011, 111, 2461–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Andersen, H.L.; Andersen, S.L.; Tranum-Jensen, J. The Spread of Injectate during Saphenous Nerve Block at the Adductor Canal: A Cadaver Study. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2015, 59, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Netter, F.H. Atlas of Human Anatomy, 6th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yi, K.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Lee, D.K.; Hu, H.-W.; Seo, K.K.; Kim, H.-J. Anatomical Locations of the Motor Endplates of Sartorius Muscle for Botulinum Toxin Injections in Treatment of Muscle Spasticity. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2021, 43, 2025–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Campenhout, A.V.; Bar-On, L.; Desloovere, K.; Huenaerts, C.; Molenaers, G. Motor Endplate-targeted Botulinum Toxin Injections of the Gracilis Muscle in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2015, 57, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Won, S.-Y.; Rha, D.-W.; Kim, H.-S.; Jung, S.-H.; Park, E.S.; Hu, K.-S.; Kim, H.-J. Intramuscular Nerve Distribution Pattern of the Adductor Longus and Gracilis Muscles Demonstrated with Sihler Staining: Guidance for Botulinum Toxin Injection. Muscle Nerve 2012, 46, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Albert, A.M.; Magimairaj, H.P.; Lakshmanan, J.; Holla, S.J.; Prithishkumar, I.J. Localizing Motor Entry Points of Adductor Muscles of Thigh for Motor Point Procedures in the Treatment of Adductor Spasticity. Anat. Cell Biol. 2024, 57, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lee, Y.; Lee, S.; Jang, J.; Lim, J.; Ryu, J.S. Effect of Botulinum Toxin Injection on the Progression of Hip Dislocation in Patients with Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Pilot Study. Toxins 2021, 13, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Santamato, A.; Ranieri, M.; Panza, F.; Solfrizzi, V.; Frisardi, V.; Lapenna, L.M.; Moretti, B.; Fiore, P. Botulinum Toxin Type a in the Treatment of Painful Adductor Muscle Contracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2009, 32, 774–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Campenhout, A.V.; Molenaers, G. Localization of the Motor Endplate Zone in Human Skeletal Muscles of the Lower Limb: Anatomical Guidelines for Injection with Botulinum Toxin. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2011, 53, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Giuffre, B.A.; Black, A.C.; Jeanmonod, R. Anatomy, Sciatic Nerve; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim, S.K.; Rha, D.W.; Park, E.S. Botulinum Toxin Type A Injections Impact Hamstring Muscles and Gait Parameters in Children with Flexed Knee Gait. Toxins 2020, 12, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rha, D.-W.; Yi, K.-H.; Park, E.S.; Park, C.; Kim, H.-J. Intramuscular Nerve Distribution of the Hamstring Muscles: Application to Treating Spasticity. Clin. Anat. 2016, 29, 746–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Jačisko, J.; Mezian, K.; Güvener, O.; Ricci, V.; Kobesová, A.; Özçakar, L. Mnemonics and Metaphorical Videos for Teaching/Learning Musculoskeletal Sonoanatomy. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2022, 101, e189–e193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wu, W.-T.; Chang, K.-V. A 42-Year-Old Man with Posterior Thigh Pain: Injury of the Long Head of the Biceps Femoris Muscle. J. Med. Ultrasound 2023, 31, 256–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Oremuš, K. Ultrasound Skills in Lower Extremity Traumatology and Orthopedics—Regional Anesthesia and Beyond. Acta Clin. Croat. 2019, 58 (Suppl. S1), 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mezian, K.; Ricci, V.; Güvener, O.; Jačisko, J.; Novotný, T.; Kara, M.; Chang, K.-V.; Naňka, O.; Pirri, C.; Stecco, C.; et al. EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM Dynamic Ultrasound Protocols for (Adult) Hip. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2022, 101, e162–e168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Saladin, K.S. Anatomy Physiology: The Unity of Form and Function, 9th ed.; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Ultrasound anatomy of gluteus maximus (Gmax) with key landmarks: Gmax—gluteus maximus; Gmed—gluteus medius; Gmin—gluteus minimus; I—iliac bone.
Figure 1. Ultrasound anatomy of gluteus maximus (Gmax) with key landmarks: Gmax—gluteus maximus; Gmed—gluteus medius; Gmin—gluteus minimus; I—iliac bone.
Toxins 17 00240 g001
Figure 2. Ultrasound anatomy of piriformis with key landmarks: Gmax—gluteus maximus; Ace—acetabulum; S—sciatic nerve.
Figure 2. Ultrasound anatomy of piriformis with key landmarks: Gmax—gluteus maximus; Ace—acetabulum; S—sciatic nerve.
Toxins 17 00240 g002
Figure 3. Ultrasound anatomy of psoas major (PM) (with the transducer transversely) with key landmarks: PM—psoas major; L4—spinous process of the L4 vertebra; ES—erector spinae; QL—quadratus lumborum.
Figure 3. Ultrasound anatomy of psoas major (PM) (with the transducer transversely) with key landmarks: PM—psoas major; L4—spinous process of the L4 vertebra; ES—erector spinae; QL—quadratus lumborum.
Toxins 17 00240 g003
Figure 4. Ultrasound anatomy of psoas major (PM) (with the transducer longitudinally) with key landmarks: QL—quadratus lumborum; PM—psoas major.
Figure 4. Ultrasound anatomy of psoas major (PM) (with the transducer longitudinally) with key landmarks: QL—quadratus lumborum; PM—psoas major.
Toxins 17 00240 g004
Figure 5. Ultrasound anatomy of rectus femoris (RF) with key landmarks: RF—rectus femoris; RFt—rectus femoris tendon; VI—vastus intermedius; F—femur.
Figure 5. Ultrasound anatomy of rectus femoris (RF) with key landmarks: RF—rectus femoris; RFt—rectus femoris tendon; VI—vastus intermedius; F—femur.
Toxins 17 00240 g005
Figure 6. Ultrasound anatomy of sartorius (Sart) with key landmarks: Sart—sartorius; FV—femoral vein; FA—femoral artery; SN—saphenous nerve; NtVM—nerve to vastus medialis; AL—adductor longus; VM—vastus medialis; AM—adductor magnus; F—femur.
Figure 6. Ultrasound anatomy of sartorius (Sart) with key landmarks: Sart—sartorius; FV—femoral vein; FA—femoral artery; SN—saphenous nerve; NtVM—nerve to vastus medialis; AL—adductor longus; VM—vastus medialis; AM—adductor magnus; F—femur.
Toxins 17 00240 g006
Figure 7. Ultrasound anatomy of gracilis (G) with key landmarks: G—gracilis; AM—adductor magnus; SM—semimembranosus; F—femur.
Figure 7. Ultrasound anatomy of gracilis (G) with key landmarks: G—gracilis; AM—adductor magnus; SM—semimembranosus; F—femur.
Toxins 17 00240 g007
Figure 8. Ultrasound anatomy of adductor longus (AL) with key landmarks: AL—adductor longus; AB—adductor brevis; AM—adductor magnus; F—femur.
Figure 8. Ultrasound anatomy of adductor longus (AL) with key landmarks: AL—adductor longus; AB—adductor brevis; AM—adductor magnus; F—femur.
Toxins 17 00240 g008
Figure 9. Ultrasound anatomy of adductor magnus (AM) with key landmarks: G—gracilis; AM—adductor magnus; SM—semimembranosus; F—femur.
Figure 9. Ultrasound anatomy of adductor magnus (AM) with key landmarks: G—gracilis; AM—adductor magnus; SM—semimembranosus; F—femur.
Toxins 17 00240 g009
Figure 10. Ultrasound anatomy of semimembranosus (SM) with key landmarks: SM—semimembranosus; ST—semitendinosus; AM—adductor magnus; v—vein, a—artery, F—femur.
Figure 10. Ultrasound anatomy of semimembranosus (SM) with key landmarks: SM—semimembranosus; ST—semitendinosus; AM—adductor magnus; v—vein, a—artery, F—femur.
Toxins 17 00240 g010
Figure 11. Ultrasound anatomy of semitendinosus (ST) with key landmarks: ST—semitendinosus; SM—semimembranosus; AM—adductor magnus; F—femur.
Figure 11. Ultrasound anatomy of semitendinosus (ST) with key landmarks: ST—semitendinosus; SM—semimembranosus; AM—adductor magnus; F—femur.
Toxins 17 00240 g011
Figure 12. Mercedes-Benz sign: ST—semitendinosus; BF—biceps femoris, S—sciatic nerve; AM—adductor magnus; F—femur.
Figure 12. Mercedes-Benz sign: ST—semitendinosus; BF—biceps femoris, S—sciatic nerve; AM—adductor magnus; F—femur.
Toxins 17 00240 g012
Figure 13. Ultrasound anatomy of biceps femoris (BF) with key landmarks: BFl—biceps femoris long head; IMF—intramuscular fascia; BFs—biceps femoris short head; S—sciatic nerve; F—femur.
Figure 13. Ultrasound anatomy of biceps femoris (BF) with key landmarks: BFl—biceps femoris long head; IMF—intramuscular fascia; BFs—biceps femoris short head; S—sciatic nerve; F—femur.
Toxins 17 00240 g013
Table 1. Key safety considerations for ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections into lower limb muscles.
Table 1. Key safety considerations for ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections into lower limb muscles.
MuscleKey Anatomical LandmarksNearby Structures at RiskUltrasound Technique TipInjection Precautions
Gluteus MaximusUpper gluteal region; 8 cm lateral to sacrumGluteus medius and minimus (deep); sciatic nerve (potentially)Scan angled at 45° toward the sacrum Avoid sciatic nerve injury
Piriformis8 cm lateral to sacrum; 10 cm proximal to the ischial tuberosityGluteus maximus (superficial); sciatic nerve (deep to muscle)Transverse scan angled ~20° laterally toward the sacrumVisualize piriformis and sciatic nerve; avoid nerve injury
Psoas Major2 cm lateral to L4 spinous process; 1 cm proximal to the iliac crestErector spinae muscles; quadratus lumborum (superficial); intraperitoneal space (deep to the muscle)Transverse or longitudinal scan on posterior trunkAvoid intraperitoneal space; inject only when muscle is clearly visualized
Rectus FemorisProximal third of anterior thigh; midlineVastus intermedius (deep)Transverse scan on anterior thighAvoid central tendon
SartoriusMiddle third of medial thighAdductor canal (deep)—femoral artery, vein, saphenous nerve, and nerve to vastus medialis; vastus medialis (deep and lateral) and adductor longus (deep and medial)Transverse scan on medial thighAvoid structures in adductor canal
GracilisProximal third of medial thighAdductor longus (deep and lateral), adductor magnus (deep), and semimembranosus (deep and medial)Transverse scan with the hip abducted, externally rotated, and semi-flexed and the knee in semi-flexionVisualize gracilis as most superficial medial muscle
Adductor LongusProximal third of medial thighGracilis (medial), sartorius (lateral), adductor canal (lateral), and adductor brevis (deep)Transverse scan on upper medial thighConfirm muscle position and relations, avoid structures in adductor canal
Adductor MagnusProximal third of medial thighGracilis (superficial) and semimembranosus (medial)Transverse scan with the hip abducted, externally rotated, and semi-flexed and the knee in semi-flexionIdentify deep muscle mass below gracilis
SemimembranosusDistal third of posterior medial thighSemitendinosus (lateral), adductor magnus (deep and medial), sciatic nerve (deep and lateral), and popliteal bundle (deep)Transverse scan on posterior medial thighAvoid neurovascular structures in distal thigh
SemitendinosusProximal third of posterior medial thighSemimembranosus (medial), biceps femoris (lateral), adductor magnus (deep), and sciatic nerve (deep and lateral)Transverse scan on posterior thighVisualize characteristic ’Mercedes-Benz’ and ’Venetian blind’ signs, avoid nerve injury
Biceps FemorisDistal third of posterior-lateral thigh (short head); mid-thigh for long headSciatic nerve (under long head)Transverse scan at two levels on posterior thighIdentify and differentiate long and short heads and avoid nerve injury
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Popescu, M.N.; Căpeț, C.; Beiu, C.; Berteanu, M. The Elias University Hospital Approach: A Visual Guide to Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection in Spasticity: Part III—Proximal Lower Limb Muscles. Toxins 2025, 17, 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050240

AMA Style

Popescu MN, Căpeț C, Beiu C, Berteanu M. The Elias University Hospital Approach: A Visual Guide to Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection in Spasticity: Part III—Proximal Lower Limb Muscles. Toxins. 2025; 17(5):240. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050240

Chicago/Turabian Style

Popescu, Marius Nicolae, Claudiu Căpeț, Cristina Beiu, and Mihai Berteanu. 2025. "The Elias University Hospital Approach: A Visual Guide to Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection in Spasticity: Part III—Proximal Lower Limb Muscles" Toxins 17, no. 5: 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050240

APA Style

Popescu, M. N., Căpeț, C., Beiu, C., & Berteanu, M. (2025). The Elias University Hospital Approach: A Visual Guide to Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin Injection in Spasticity: Part III—Proximal Lower Limb Muscles. Toxins, 17(5), 240. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050240

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop