Next Article in Journal
Structure of the Diphtheria Toxin at Acidic pH: Implications for the Conformational Switching of the Translocation Domain
Previous Article in Journal
Toxicological Characterization and Phospholipase D Activity of the Venom of the Spider Sicarius thomisoides
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/toxins12110703
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gastric Ulceration and Immune Suppression in Weaned Piglets Associated with Feed-Borne Bacillus cereus and Aspergillus fumigatus

by
Xiaohui Li
1,2,
Qiang Li
2,
Yihui Wang
2,
Zhenhai Han
1,
Guanggang Qu
3,
Zhiqiang Shen
3,
Shujian Huang
1 and
Cheng He
1,2,*
1
College of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528531, China
2
Key Lab of Animal Epidemiology and Zoonoses, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
3
Binzhou Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine Academy of Shandong Province, Binzhou 256600, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2020, 12(11), 703; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110703
Submission received: 12 October 2020 / Revised: 3 November 2020 / Accepted: 5 November 2020 / Published: 7 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Toxins)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
As a multifactorial cause, gastric ulceration-mediated diarrhea is widely prevalent in the weaned piglets, impairing pig health and economic benefits. With full implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs in China, Bacillus cereus (B. cereus) and Aspergillus fumigatus (A. fumigatus) were identified frequently in porcine feedstuffs and feeds of the animal industry. Association between feed-borne B. cereus and frequent diarrhea remains unclear. In the present study, we conducted a survey of B. cereus and A. fumigatus from feeds and feedstuffs in pig farms during hot season. Interestingly, B. cereus, B. subtilis, B. licheniformis and B. thuringinesis were isolated and identified from piglets’ starter meals to sow feeds, accounting for 56.1%, 23.7%, 13.7% and 6.5%, respectively. Obviously, both B. cereus and B. subtili were dominant contaminants in the survey. In an in vitro study, Deoxynivalenol (DON) contents were determined in a dose-dependent manner post fermentation with B. cereus (405 and DawuC). Subsequently, 36 weaned piglets were randomly assigned to four groups and the piglets simultaneously received the combination of virulent B. cereus (Dawu C) and A. fumigatus while animals were inoculated with B. cereus (Dawu C), A. fumigatus or PBS as the control group. Clinically, piglets developed yellow diarrhea on day 5 and significant reductions of relative body weight were observed in the B. cereus group, and co-infection group. More importantly, IgG titers against Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) and Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) were reduced dramatically during 14-day observation in co-infection group, the B. cereus (Dawu C) group or the A. fumigatus group. However, lower Foot and mouth disease (FMD) -specific antibodies were reduced on day 7 compared to those of the control group. Additionally, lower lymphocyte proliferations were found in the B. cereus group and the co-infection group compared to the control group. Postmortem, higher lesions of gastric ulceration were observed in the B. cereus group and the co-infection group from day 7 to day 14 compared with those of the A. fumigatus group and the control group. Compared to the A. fumigatus group, higher DON contents were detected in the stomach inoculated with B. cereus and the co-infection with A. fumigatus. In conclusion, our data support the hypothesis that B. cereus might be associated with severe diarrhea by inducing gastric ulcerations and A. fumigatus might aggravate immune suppression, threating a sustainable swine industry. It is urgently needed to control feed-borne B. cereus contamination.
Keywords:
Bacillus cerues; Aspergillus fumigatus; DON; gastric ulcerations; immune responses; piglets
Key Contribution: Bacillus cereus and Aspergillus fumigatus are novel contaminations in swine feed and feedstuff, contributing to piglet diarrhea and vaccine failure by gastric ulceration and immune suppression.It is urgently needed to control the origination and to lay down maximal tolerable limitation of Bacillus cereus in animal feed.

1. Introduction

Diarrhea induced by gastric ulceration has been observed frequently both in poultry flock and livestock in the past decades. Although gastric ulceration is associated with multiple factors, such as malnutrition, viral invasion, bacterial infection and mycotoxin contamination, mild or severe diarrhea is manifested as a clinical consequence, causing poor productivity, sudden death and economic losses for swine industry [1,2,3].
Bacillus cerues (B. cereus), an aerobic or facultative anaerobic bacteria that is spore-forming and that offers the ability to survive in most extreme conditions, spreads in the surroundings during agricultural/farming processes and can easily contaminate food and feed [4]. As a common opportunistic pathogen involved in food poisoning, B. cereus causes vomiting and diarrhea in humans frequently, which seriously leads to death [5,6]. In addition to gastrointestinal tract, B. cereus causes a number of systemic and local infections in both immunologically compromised and immunocompetent individuals [7]. Extensive research confirms that the intoxicated emetic syndrome is caused by an emetic toxin, termed cereulide, meanwhile the diarrheal syndrome is associated with pore-forming cytotoxins hemolysin HBL (Hbl), nonhaemolytic enterotoxin (Nhe) and cytotoxin K (CytK) [8]. Although it is known as a pathogen, B. cereus is licensed as a pesticide for agricultural plants and probiotics for animal additives. Particularly, B. cereus is reported to maintain the balance of gastrointestinal microflora, to improve nutrient utilization ratio and to protect healthy digestive function [9]. However, the lack of maximal tolerable limitation (MTL) of B. cereus in probiotic products facilities high contamination of B.cereus from animal feeds to human food chains [10,11]. B. cereus isolates in bedding, feces, feed, liquid manure and raw milk was found to be 93.3%, 78.9%, 41.2%, 100.0% and 9.8%, respectively, in 10 local dairy farms [12]. Milk-borne B. cereus might represent a potential hazard to consumers due to it being inactivated during milk manufacturing [12,13]. The national survey in China recently found that 33.7% of animal-used probiotics were contaminated with human-risk pathogens, and also human intestinal anthrax toxin gene cya was transmitted from a nearby chicken and fish farm [14]. Therefore, the virulent Bacillus spp and other emerging pathogens in animal-used probiotics pose an emerging threat to food safety.
Aspergillus fumigatus (A. fumigatus) is one of the most common species of Aspergillus and possesses the ability of a causative agent invasive pathogen, contributing to infectious risks, such as asthma, chronic pulmonary infection or toxic effects [15,16]. Also, A. fumigatus is reported to induce immunosuppression by inhibiting the proliferation of T and B cells, leading to secondary infection [17]. In the previous report, 63 isolates out of 105 feed were A. fumigatus, and the other isolates were 21 A. niger and 11 A. candidus, respectively, indicating that the A. fumigatus isolate was a dominant agent in poultry diets [18].
Regarding the wide prevalence of diarrhea in weaned piglets, the association between gastric ulceration and feed-borne B. cereus or A. fumigatus is unknown. Our hypothesis is that A. fumigatus aggravates gastric ulceration and the immune suppression triggered by feed-borne B. cereus. Our investigation will shed light on understanding the pathogenesis of gastric ulceration and maintaining a sustainable swine industry.

2. Results

2.1. B. cereus and B. subtilis Were Highly Contaminated in Swine Feed

During sampling period from June to August 2018, B. cereus, B. subtilis, B. licheniformis and B. thuringinesis were isolated from piglets’ starter meals to pregnant sow’s meals; 78 strains (56.1%) of B. cereus, 33 strains (23.7%) of B. subtilis, 19 strains (13.7%) of B. licheniformis and 9 strains (6.5%) of B. thuringinesis out of 139 isolates were identified by biochemical test and Polymerase chain reaction(PCR) assay. Obviously, both B. cereus and B. subtilis were dominant distributions in the swine feeds, accounting for 111 isolates (79.9%) (Table 1). Regarding the enumeration of B. cereus, 62.8% samples were found to contaminate with above 10,000 CFU/g, while 27.9% samples were arranged from 1000 to 10,000 CFU/g in swine meals (Table 2).

2.2. Increasing DON Production Post Fermentation with B. cereus Isolates

Both B. cereus strain (Dawu C) from the diseased layer and B. cereus isolate (405) from swine feeds produced DON in a dose-dependent manner from day 0 to day 9. Afterwards, DON productions were reduced gradually in the feeds fermented with the B. cereus isolate (DaWu C). However, the B. cereus isolate (13) from swine feedstuff yielded lowly to DON production and no difference was detected compared to the control group during the observation (Figure 1).

2.3. B. cereus, A. fumigatus and co-infection Exacerbated Diarrhea and Piglets’ Growth

After inoculation with different pathogens, 3 piglets from the B. cereus group and 2 piglets from the co-infection group developed mild diarrhea on day 5. Afterwards, 5 piglets and 2 animals from above two groups were observed to have severe diarrhea with poor activity and low appetite. However, no mortality occurred until last observation in all the groups. As for body weight, no difference of body weight was found among the groups before treatment. On day 7, the relative average body weight gain was reduced extremely significantly in the B. cereus group (p < 0.01), A. fumigatus group (p < 0.01) and co-infection group (p < 0.01) compared to the control group. Later on, the significant reduction of body weight gain was observed in the B. cereus group (p < 0.05) and co-infection group (p < 0.01) compared to the control group or the A. fumigatus group. Also, the co-infection group exhibited a significant decrease compared to the control group or the A. fumigatus group on day 14 (p < 0.01) (Figure 2).

2.4. B. cereus and A. fumigatus Reduced CSFV-, FMD- and PED-Specific Antibodies

Compared to the control group, Classical swine fever virus (CSFV) antibodies were dramatically reduced in the B. cereus group, the A. fumigatus group and the co-infection group from day 7 (p < 0.01) to day 14 (p < 0.05). Afterwards, obviously lower CSFV antibodies were found in the A. fumigatus group compared to the other groups on day 14 (p < 0.01), but no statistical difference was detected among the B. cereus group and the co-infected group at the two time points (Figure 3). Similarly, lower Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED)-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were detected in all treatment groups compared to the control group from day 7 (p < 0.01) to day 14 (p < 0.05). However, no statistical difference was detected between the B. cereus group and the co-infection group on day 14. Thus, no statistic difference was found among the B. cereus group, the A. fumigatus group and the co-infection group on day 14 (Figure 4). As for Foot and mouth disease (FMD)-specific antibodies, a statistically significant decline of FMD specific antibodies in the B. cereus group (p < 0.05) and the co-infection group(p < 0.01) was compared to that of the control group on day 7 and no statistical difference was found on day 14 (Figure 5). A statistically significant decline of FMD specific antibodies in the B. cereus group and the co-infection group was compared to the control group on day 7 (p < 0.05) and no statistical difference was found on day 14 (Figure 5).

2.5. B. cereus and Co-Infection Reduced Lymphocyte Proliferation

For the lymphocyte stimulation level, there was a comparable trend in all group at two points. Lower proliferations were determined in the B. cereus group (p < 0.05) and co-infection group (p < 0.01) compared to the control group from day 7 to day 14. However, no significant difference was found among B. cereus group, A. fumigatus group and co-infection group (Figure 6).

2.6. Both B. cereus and co-infection Induced Typic Gastric Ulcerations in Piglets

In the postmortem on day 7 (n = 3), typic gastric ulceration and hemorrhagic erosions were observed both in the B. cereus group and the co-infection group (Figure 7). Later on, severe gastric erosions and hemorrhagic inflammations in the lungs were observed in both the B. cereus group and the co-infection group, but massive hemorrhagic lungs were characterized in the co-infection group (Figure 8). The higher lesions of gastric ulcerations were found in the B. cereus group and the co-infection group compared to the A. fumigatus group and the control group (Figure 9). The remaining 6 piglets developed severe gastric ulcerations with hemorrhagic lungs in the co-infection group, while 3 out of 6 piglets were observed with gastric ulcerations and 1 piglet developed hemorrhagic ulceration in the B. cereus group.

2.7. B. cereus and co-infection Induced DON Production in Piglets’ Gastric Ulcers

On day 7, lower DON contents were determined among B. cereus group, A. fumigatus group and co-infection group. However, no significant difference was found compared to the control group. Later on, higher DON contents were detected in the B. cereus group (p < 0.01) and the co-infection group (p < 0.01) compared to the control group on day 14. Compared to the A. fumigatus group, significant increasing DON contents were found in the B. cereus group (p < 0.01) and co-infection group (p < 0.05) (Figure 10).

3. Discussion

Ulceration of the stomach is a common disease, amounting to 93% prevalence in the pig industry. The exact mechanism of gastric ulcers remains unclear due to multifactorial agents, such as diet size, management and infectious agents. Severe respiratory infections have been associated with gastric lesions, such as porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), post-weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS), swine influenza, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae or porcine circovirus type 2, and the Ascaris suum infestation or Mycoplasma vaccination [3,20]. Lactobacillus-elicited score was significantly greater in the antrum and corpus of stomachs without ulcers when compared with stomachs with ulcers in gnotobiotic pigs [21]. Helicobacter suis (H. suis) has been associated with development of gastric ulcers in the non-glandular part of the porcine stomach by decreasing the H. suis-binding ability of the mucins and impairing the mucus barrier. More recently, Fusobacterium gastrosuis (F. gastrosuis) is identified based on 16S rRNA and gyrase B genes, and it was hypothesized that this micro-organism could play a role in the development of gastric ulceration because most Fusobacterium spp can aggravate necrosis [22]. H. suis-infected pigs showed a significantly higher colonization rate of F. gastrosuis in the non-glandular gastric region compared to non-infected pigs [23]. A previous study has demonstrated an association between gastric lesions and a carbohydrate-enriched liquid diet when mono-infected with Lactobacillus sp. and Bacillus sp., from which the source of these contaminations was not determined [24]. However, association of feed-borne B. cereus and gastric ulcerations has not been illustrated so far.
In the present study, both B. cereus and B. subtilis contamination were dominated in pig meals, while 62.8% feed samples accounted for 10,000 colonies of B. cereus, and B. cereus contamination would amount to 3 × 106 CFU/g (average 300 g feed intake per day). Moreover, DON production showed a dose-dependent manner post fermentation with two B. cereus isolates, contributing to one of main resources of DON contamination in animal feed. In vivo study, the animal’s relative body weight gain, lymphocyte proliferations and antibodies against CSFV, FMD and PED were reduced significantly post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or combination of two pathogens. More important, typic diarrhea and gastric ulcerations were observed in the piglets that received B. cereus or combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus. Later on, both increasing gastric ulceration and hemorrhagic inflammations in the lungs were observed postmortem in comparison with the A. fumigatus group and the control group. Our study supports our hypothesis that feed-borne B. cereus triggers diarrhea and respiratory distress by inducing gastric ulceration and hemorrhagic lesions in the lungs. Afterwards, the secondary A. fumigatus infection and DON poisoning exacerbate clinical maldigestion and vaccine failure, leading to a high risk for the piglet’s survival and growth.
Although typic gastric ulcerations were evident both in the piglets who received B. cereus or a combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus, the correlation between B. cereus and the development of gastric ulcers remains unclear. In our preliminary investigation, piglets’ diarrhea is prevalent in the hot season from June to September in Northern China. Particularly, increasing gastric ulcers are reported in pig farms in summer. In this sense, gastric ulcerations are associated with hot climate. In early infection, B. cereus may adhere to keratinized epithelia of the pars esophagea, contributing to total gastric acid concentration by the production and release of lipid-soluble acidic metabolites such as lactic, acetic and propionic acids, ethanol and hydrogen peroxide. Piglets experimentally infected with B. cereus were reduced in body weight gain due to pain and inflammation in stomach, leading to a more fluid gastric content, breakdown of the pH gradient and irritation of the pars oesophagea [25]. Erosions and gastroesophageal ulcers were observed in the pars esophagea of young gnotobiotic swine fed a carbohydrate-enriched liquid diet and mono-infected with Lactobacillus sp. and Bacillus sp. [24]. In our previous study, feed-borne B. cereus co-infection with avian influenza virus (H9N2) has produced significant gizzard erosions and ulceration(GEU) in all bird groups by damaging to the epithelium of the digestive tract, which facilitates other susceptible pathogens [19]. More recently, chickens exposed to the B. cereus co-infection with Chlamydia psittaci developed a severe GEU syndrome suggesting that injury to the koilin layer of the gizzard with B. cereus toxins could directly affect the gizzard membrane, while the intraesophageal C. psittaci infection also promotes the development of the GEU [26]. These data suggest that feed-borne B. cereus is an important interactive factor for development of GEU in piglets. In addition, several toxic genes, such as nhA, nhB, nhC, Hbl and Cytk, were identified in B. cereus (Dawu-C) [26], which may contribute to the diarrhea by disrupting the epithelial layer [27]. Some of these toxins appear to play a major role in pathogenesis during B. cereus gastroenteritis and opportunistic infections, although no direct connection has been shown. After fermentation with the B. cereus Dawu C strain, DON production was in a dose-dependent manner within two weeks, leading to long term diarrhea by inducing pores in epithelial cells, necrosis and mucosal damage. In time, significant increasing DON contents were determined both in the piglets with B. cereus or a combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus, indicating that the combination of B. cereus and DON might contribute to the development of gastric lesions. DON is reported to reduce body weight, feed conversion and immunosuppression by inhibiting protein synthesis, disrupting signal transmission and eventually causing cell death [28].
Regarding immunosuppression post inoculation with B. cereus or a combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus, it might be associated with dysfunction of macrophages post infection with B. cereus. B. cereus can escape immune surveillance and transport through the whole body with macrophages by impairing innate immunity, leading to immune inhibition [29]. On other hand, A. fumigatus is the predominant mold agent of the immunosuppressed animals. Once the immune system is comprised, the fungus conidia is able to germinate into hyphae and establish a focal infection within lungs. Also, A. fumigatus is involved in disrupting the antigen processing and inhibiting the proliferation of T and B cells [17,30]. In the study, co-inoculation with B. cereus and A. fumigatus reduced the humoral immune response, characterized as lower lymphocyte proliferation and poor antibodies against CSFV or FMD and PED. More important, the B. cereus co-infection with A. fumigatus contributed to severe hemorrhagic inflammations in the lungs except for gastric ulcerations in piglets.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, our pioneer study indicated that birds orally administered B. cereus exhibited the GEU and hemorrhagic inflammations in the lungs of chickens. In the present study, feed-borne B. cereus initiated diarrhea by inducing gastric ulceration and hemorrhagic lungs, and secondary A. fumigatus infections exacerbated gastric lesions and immunosuppression by inducing low lymphocyte proliferation and poor humoral immune response. Therefore, feed-borne B. cereus and its secondary metabolites are urgently needed for further investigation for combating the high incidence of diarrhea and for maintaining a sustainable porcine industry. Most important, it is the first report that gastric ulceration has been induced by B. cereus alone in piglets and it might be a good animal for understanding human gastric ulceration.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. Bacillus Spp Isolation, Identification and Contamination Status

Both B. cereus and A. fumigatus used in the trial were isolated from feeds and feedstuffs in breeding pig flock (Daxing, Beijing, China). Pellets or powders (10 g) were mixed with sterile distilled water (90 mL) and plated for enumeration. The most probable number (MPN) method was recommended for routine surveillance of swine feeds and feedstuffs. Briefly, samples were inoculated into trypticase soy-polymyxin broth by preparation of 10−1, 10−2 and 10−3 dilutions. The tubes were incubated for 48 ± 2 h at 30 °C and observed for turbid growth. Afterwards, positive tubes were streaked onto Mannitol Yolk Polymyxine Agar (MYP) (Oxoid, Beijing, China), and then colonies were grown for 18–24 h at 30 °C. Typical colonies grown on MYP were confirmed with a biochemical test as described previously [31]. Furthermore, isolates of Bacillus spp were identified by molecular analysis using the 16s rRNA gene, nheA gene, nheB gene, nheC gene, Em1gene and CytK gene as previously described [19]. The MPN of B. cereus was detected based on the number of tubes at each dilution in which the presence of B. cereus was noted [32]. Meanwhile, the same diet was diluted to grow onto the Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) (Oxoid, Beijing, China) following the protocol, and identification was confirmed by PCR [18].

5.2. Determination of Deoxynivalenol (DON) Post Fermentation with Bacillus cereus Isolates

Roughly 1000 g of feeds were pretreated with Co60 to avoid additional microbial contamination and to ensure low DON contents (less than 100 ppb); then the samples were mixed with 3 B. cereus isolates (405, Dawa C, 13) and fermented at 25 °C and 60% humidity for two weeks. After fermentation, 100 g feed samples were collected on day 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15, respectively, and DON concentrations were determined by the DON plate kit following the protocols (Beacon Analytical System Inc).

5.3. Animals and Ethics Statement

The weaned piglets aged 32 days were purchased from the Daxing Breeder Animal Company, Beijing, China. All the animals were given food and water ad libitum. The experimental protocols were approved by an Ethical Reviewing Board at China Agricultural University on Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee(IACUC) (code: IACUC20170701). The date of approval was 1 July 2017 by IACUC at CAU. This protocol follows humane protocols that minimize pain in the animals. Briefly, any potential pain, distress or discomfort should be minimized or alleviated by choosing the earliest endpoint that is compatible with the scientific objectives of the research. Selection of this endpoint should involve consultation with the laboratory animal veterinarian and the animal care committee [33]. Prior to treatment, all suckling piglets received a vaccination program, such as the attenuated vaccine against Classic swine fever virus (CSFV) on day 1, the live vaccine against Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) on day 7 and the inactivated vaccine against Foot and mouth disease (FMD) on day 30. Thirty six weaned piglets were randomly assigned to four groups, and Group 1 animals were inoculated with PBS daily as a negative control. Group 2 piglets received orally 1 × 108 MPN/mL of B. cereus for 14 days, and Group 3 animals were administered orally 1 × 108 CFU/mL of A. fumigatus for 14 days. Group 4 piglets were orally inoculated with 1 × 108 MPN/mL of B. cereus and 1 × 108 CFU/mL of A. fumigatus at the same time and this lasted for 14 days. All the animals were raised separately and fed twice a day with commercial pellet diets and had access to drinking water freely all day. All groups were weighed weekly. Clinical signs were recorded a minimum of twice daily for 14 days, including depression, inappetence, coughing, respiratory distress and diarrhea.

5.4. Detecting Antibodies against CSFV, PED and FMD

Serum samples were collected by venipuncture before inoculation (9 animals per group) on day 7 (9 animals per group) and day 14 (6 piglets per group). The sera were prepared by centrifuging at 3500 rpm/min for 10 min and stored at −20 °C until use. CSFV-specific antibodies, PEDV-specific antibodies and FMD-specific antibodies were measured using the specific commercial kit (IDEXX, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

5.5. Lymphocyte Proliferation Assay

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were prepared, and lymphocyte proliferation was determined using the BrdU Cell Proliferation ELISA Kit (Abcam, Beijing, China). Briefly, PBMCs were stimulated with inactivated whole B. cereus at 5 µg/well as specific antigens while Concanavalin A (ConA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MS, USA) was added at 5 μg/well as a positive control and the medium was used as a negative control. All experiments were performed in triplicate following the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were expressed as the stimulation index (SI), calculated as the mean of the stimulation index for antigen-stimulated wells divided by the stimulation index for medium control wells with the background subtracted.

5.6. Pathological Evaluation

Piglets were sacrificed on day 7 (3 animals per group) and day 14 (6 animals per group) post inoculation. The stomachs were exteriorized, ligated at the esophagus and duodenum, removed and aseptically opened along the greater and less curvatures. Each stomach was dissected along the large curvature and all of the gastric contents were removed at room temperature. Gastric ulcers were assessed immediately on a scale between 1 and 9 [34] (1 = normal stomach; 2 = slight hyperkeratosis of stomach epithelium; 3 = moderate hyperkeratosis; 4 = severe hyperkeratosis; 5 = erosions and ulcer covering less than 2 cm2; 6 = ulcer 2–8 cm2; 7 = ulcer 8–16 cm2; 8 = ulcer greater than 16 cm2 and scar; 9 = death due to ulcer). Meanwhile, occurrence rates of ulceration were summed up in accordance with the relative area.

5.7. Quantitative DON in Stomach

Gastric contents were collected from the distal esophagus and pars esophagea, and roughly 10 g of contents were homogenized with 200 mL deionized water and then centrifugated at 4000 rpm/min for 5 min. Finally, 5 mL supernatants were collected for DON testing using the above ELISA kit (Beacon Analytical System Inc., Saco, ME, USA).

5.8. Statistical Analysis

Relative weight gain, antibody levels, lymphocyte proliferation and lesion evaluation were statistically analyzed using SPSS 25.0 version to perform the one-way ANOVA with the Least Significance Difference (LSD) post hoc test on at least three independent replicates. p-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant for each test, and when p < 0.01, the results were extremely significant.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.H.; Data curation, X.L.; Funding acquisition, S.H.; Investigation, Q.L. and Y.W.; Methodology, G.Q. and C.H.; Project administration, Z.H.; Resources, Z.S. and C.H.; Software, X.L.; Supervision, C.H.; Writing–original draft, X.L. and Z.S.; Writing–review & editing, C.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province under Grant [No. ts201511084], High-level Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talent of Jiangsu Province.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amory, J.R.; Mackenzie, A.M.; Pearce, G.P. Factors in the housing environment of finisher pigs associated with the development of gastric ulcers of the article. Vet. Rec. 2006, 158, 260–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Friendship, R.M. Gastric ulcers. In Diseases of Swine, 9th ed.; Straw, B.E., Zimmerman, J.J., D’Allaire, S., Taylor, D.J., Eds.; Blackwell Professional Publishing: Ames, IA, USA, 2006; pp. 891–899. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gottardo, F.; Scollo, A.; Contiero, B.; Bottacini, M.; Mazzoni, C.; Edwards, S.A. Prevalence and risk factors for gastric ulceration in pigs slaughtered at 170 kg of the article. Animal 2017, 11, 2010–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tsilia, V.; Uyttendaele, M.; Kerckhof, F.M.; Rajkovic, A.; Heyndrickx, M.; van de Wiele, T. Bacillus cereus adhesion to simulated intestinal mucus is determined by its growth on mucin, rather than intestinal environmental parameters of the article. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2015, 12, 904–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lund, T.; De Buyser, M.-L.; Granum, P.E. A new cytotoxin from bacillus cereus that may cause necrotic enteritis of the article. Mol. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dietrich, R.; Moravek, M.; Burk, C.; Granum, P.E.; Martlbauer, E. Production and characterization of antibodies against each of the three subunits of the bacillus cereus nonhemolytic enterotoxin complex of the article. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 8214–8220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Bottone, J.E. Bacillus cereus, a volatile human pathogen of the article. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 23, 382–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Jessberger, N.; Dietrich, R.; Bock, S.; Didier, A.; Martlbauer, E. Bacillus cereus enterotoxins act as major virulence factors and exhibit distinct cytotoxicity to different human cell lines of the article. Toxicon 2014, 77, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sequoia, T.W.J. Probiotics for gastrointestinal conditions: A summary of the evidence of the article. Am. Fam. Physician 2017, 96, 170–178. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kota, R.; Ambati, R.; Yalakurthi, A.; Srirama, K.; Reddy, P. Recent advances in probiotics as live biotherapeutics against gastrointestinal diseases of the article. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018, 24, 3162–3171. [Google Scholar]
  11. Haque, M.A.; Quan, H.; Zuo, Z.; Khan, A.; Siddique, N.; He, C. Pathogenicity of feed-borne bacillus cereus and its implication on food safety. Agrobiol. Rec. 2020, 3, 1–16, 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cui, Y.; Liu, X.; Dietrich, R.; Martlbauer, E.; Cao, J.; Ding, S.; Zhu, K. Characterization of bacillus cereus isolates from local dairy farms in china of the article. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2016, 363, fnw096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Liu, X.Y.; Hu, Q.; Xu, F.; Ding, S.Y.; Zhu, K. Characterization of bacillus cereus in dairy products in china of the article. Toxins 2020, 12, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fu, S.; Yang, Q.; He, F.; Lan, R.; Hao, J.; Ni, P.; Liu, Y.; Li, R. National safety survey of animal-use commercial probiotics and their spillover effects from farm to humans: An emerging threat to public health of the article. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 70, 2386–2395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cordonnier, C.; Ribaud, P.; Herbrecht, R.; Milpied, N.; Valteau-Couanet, D.; Morgan, C.; Wade, A.; Cellulaire, S.F.d.G.d.M.e.d.T. Prognostic factors for death due to invasive aspergillosis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A 1-year retrospective study of consecutive patients at french transplantation centers of the article. Aspergillosis Stem Cell Transplant. 2006, 42, 955–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Farnell, E.; Rousseau, K.; Thornton, D.J.; Bowyer, P.; Herrick, S.E. Expression and secretion of aspergillus fumigatus proteases are regulated in response to different protein substrates of the article. Fungal Biol. 2012, 116, 1003–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. de Oca, V.M.; Valdes, S.E.; Segundo, C.; Gomez, G.G.; Ramirez, J.; Cervantes, R.A. Aspergillosis, a natural infection in poultry: Mycological and molecular characterization and determination of gliotoxin in aspergillus fumigatus isolates of the article. Avian Dis. 2017, 61, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Zuo, Z.; El-Ashram, S.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, P.; Huang, S.; He, C.; Khan, A. Co-infection of chlamydia psittaci with h9n2, ort and aspergillus fumigatus contributes to severe pneumonia and high mortality in spf chickens of the article. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Q.; Zuo, Z.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, T.; Han, Z.; Huang, S.; Karama, M.; Saleemi, M.K.; Khan, A.; He, C. Contaminated feed-borne bacillus cereus aggravates respiratory distress post avian influenza virus h9n2 infection by inducing pneumonia of the article. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Witte, C.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F. The role of infectious agents in the development of porcine gastric ulceration of the article. Vet. J. 2018, 236, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Almeida, L.R.; Costa, P.S.; Nascimento, A.M.A.; Reis, M.d.P.; Barros, K.O.; Alvim, L.B.; Nunes, Á.C.; Queiroz, D.M.M.; Rocha, G.A.; Nicoli, J.R. Porcine stomachs with and without gastric ulcer differ in lactobacillus load and strain characteristics of the article. Can. J. Microbiol. 2018, 64, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. De Witte, C.; Flahou, B.; Ducatelle, R.; Smet, A.; De Bruyne, E.; Cnockaert, M.; Taminiau, B.; Daube, G.; Vandamme, P.; Haesebrouck, F. Detection, isolation and characterization of fusobacterium gastrosuis sp. Nov. Colonizing the stomach of pigs of the article. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 40, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Witte, C.; Demeyere, K.; De Bruyckere, S.; Taminiau, B.; Daube, G.; Ducatelle, R.; Meyer, E.; Haesebrouck, F. Characterization of the non-glandular gastric region microbiota in helicobacter suis-infected versus non-infected pigs identifies a potential role for fusobacterium gastrosuis in gastric ulceration of the article. Vet. Res. 2019, 50, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Krakowka, S.E.K.; Rings, D.M.; Argenzio, R.A. Production of gastroesophageal erosions and ulcers (geu) in gnotobiotic swine monoinfected with fermentative commensal bacteria and fed high-carbohydrate diet of the article. Vet. Pathol. 1998, 35, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Thomson, J.R.; Friendship, R.M. Digestive system. In Diseases of Swine, 10th ed.; Zimmerman, J., Karriker, L., Ramirez, A., Schwartz, K., Stevenson, G., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 199–226. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zuo, Z.; Li, Q.; Guo, Y.; Li, X.; Huang, S.; Hegemann, J.H.; He, C. Feed-borne bacillus cereus exacerbates respiratory distress in chickens infected with chlamydia psittaci by inducing haemorrhagic pneumonia of the article. Avian Pathol. 2020, 49, 251–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ehling-Schulz, M.; Koehler, T.M.; Lereclus, D. The bacillus cereus group: Bacillus species with pathogenic potential of the article. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Mccormick, S. The role of don in pathogenicity of the article. In Fusarium Head Blight of Wheat & Barley Name; Alberta Ag-Info Centre: Red Deer, AB, Canada, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ramarao, N.; Lereclus, D. The inha1 metalloprotease allows spores of the b. Cereus group to escape macrophages of the article. Cell Microbiol. 2005, 7, 1357–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kroll, M.; Seisdedos, F.A.; Bachelerie, F.o.; Thomas, D.; Friguet, B.; Conconi, M. The secondary fungal metabolite gliotoxin targets proteolytic activities of the proteasome of the article. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, 689–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Tallent, S.M.; Hait, J.M.; Ferguson, M. Comparative study of tempo bc automated mpn for the enumeration of bacillus cereus group in food of the article. J. Food Saf. 2018, 102, 1080–1090. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tallent, S.M.; Kotewicz, K.M.; Strain, E.; Bennett, R.W. Efficient isolation and identification of bacillus cereus group of the article. J. AOAC Int. 2012, 95, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Olfert, E.D.; Godson, D.L. Humane endpoints for infectious disease animal models of the article. Ilar J. 2000, 41, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Baustad, B.; Nafstad, I. Gastric ulcers in swine. Effects of dietary particle size and crude fiber contents on ulceration of the article. Pathol. Vet. 1969, 6, 546–556. [Google Scholar]
Toxins 12 00703 g001 550
Figure 1. DON production in a dose-dependent manner post fermentation with B. cereus isolates for 15 days. B. cereus-13 and B. cereus-405 were isolated from pig meals, while B. cereus Dawu C was isolated from the lungs of the diseased layers. DON concentrations were determined by commercial ELISA kits (Beacon Analytical System Inc, Saco, ME, USA).
Figure 1. DON production in a dose-dependent manner post fermentation with B. cereus isolates for 15 days. B. cereus-13 and B. cereus-405 were isolated from pig meals, while B. cereus Dawu C was isolated from the lungs of the diseased layers. DON concentrations were determined by commercial ELISA kits (Beacon Analytical System Inc, Saco, ME, USA).
Toxins 12 00703 g001
Toxins 12 00703 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative body weight gains post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination. Average relative body weight gain was significantly reduced in the all-inoculated groups compared to the control group from day 7 to day 14. Compared to the A. fumigatus group, the B. cereus group preferred to induce lower body weight gain on both day 7 and day 14 while the co-infection group induced a significant reduction of body weight gain on day 14. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Figure 2. Relative body weight gains post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination. Average relative body weight gain was significantly reduced in the all-inoculated groups compared to the control group from day 7 to day 14. Compared to the A. fumigatus group, the B. cereus group preferred to induce lower body weight gain on both day 7 and day 14 while the co-infection group induced a significant reduction of body weight gain on day 14. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Toxins 12 00703 g002
Toxins 12 00703 g003 550
Figure 3. Detecting Classical swine fever virus (CSFV)-specific antibodies post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus. Compared to the control group, CSFV antibodies were reduced dramatically in the B. cereus group, the A. fumigatus group and the co-infection group from day 7 (p < 0.01) to day 14 (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found among the B. cereus group, the A. fumigatus group and the co-infection group from day 7 to day 14. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Figure 3. Detecting Classical swine fever virus (CSFV)-specific antibodies post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus. Compared to the control group, CSFV antibodies were reduced dramatically in the B. cereus group, the A. fumigatus group and the co-infection group from day 7 (p < 0.01) to day 14 (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found among the B. cereus group, the A. fumigatus group and the co-infection group from day 7 to day 14. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Toxins 12 00703 g003
Toxins 12 00703 g004 550
Figure 4. Detecting Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED)-specific antibodies post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus. In comparison with the control group, lower PED-specific IgG antibodies were detected in the B. cereus group, the A. fumigatus group and the co-infection group than those of the control group from day 7 (p < 0.01) to day 14 (p < 0.05). A significant difference was found between the B. cereus group and the A. fumigatus group on day 7 (p < 0.05), and no statistic difference was found among the B. cereus group, the A. fumigatus group and the co-infection group on day 14. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Figure 4. Detecting Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED)-specific antibodies post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus. In comparison with the control group, lower PED-specific IgG antibodies were detected in the B. cereus group, the A. fumigatus group and the co-infection group than those of the control group from day 7 (p < 0.01) to day 14 (p < 0.05). A significant difference was found between the B. cereus group and the A. fumigatus group on day 7 (p < 0.05), and no statistic difference was found among the B. cereus group, the A. fumigatus group and the co-infection group on day 14. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Toxins 12 00703 g004
Toxins 12 00703 g005 550
Figure 5. Detecting Foot and mouth disease (FMD)-specific antibodies post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus. As for FMD-specific antibodies, a statistically significant decline was found in the B. cereus group compared to the control group on day 7 (p < 0.05). However, no statistical difference was found among three treated groups on day 14. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Figure 5. Detecting Foot and mouth disease (FMD)-specific antibodies post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus. As for FMD-specific antibodies, a statistically significant decline was found in the B. cereus group compared to the control group on day 7 (p < 0.05). However, no statistical difference was found among three treated groups on day 14. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Toxins 12 00703 g005
Toxins 12 00703 g006 550
Figure 6. Stimulation index of peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) post inoculation with B. cereus, or A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus. Lower proliferations were determined in the B. cereus group (p < 0.05) and the co-infection group (p < 0.01) compared to the control group from day 7 to day 14. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD.*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Figure 6. Stimulation index of peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) post inoculation with B. cereus, or A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus. Lower proliferations were determined in the B. cereus group (p < 0.05) and the co-infection group (p < 0.01) compared to the control group from day 7 to day 14. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD.*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Toxins 12 00703 g006
Toxins 12 00703 g007 550
Figure 7. Gastric lesions post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus on day 7. Gastric ulcerations were observed both in the B. cereus group and the co-infection group. Severe ulcerations were evident in the B. cereus group on day 7.
Figure 7. Gastric lesions post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus on day 7. Gastric ulcerations were observed both in the B. cereus group and the co-infection group. Severe ulcerations were evident in the B. cereus group on day 7.
Toxins 12 00703 g007
Toxins 12 00703 g008 550
Figure 8. Gastric lesions and hemorrhagic lungs post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus on day 14. Gastric ulcerations and hemorrhagic inflammations were observed both in the B. cereus group and the co-infection group, but severe hemorrhagic lungs were developed in the co-infection group on day 14.
Figure 8. Gastric lesions and hemorrhagic lungs post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination of B. cereus and A. fumigatus on day 14. Gastric ulcerations and hemorrhagic inflammations were observed both in the B. cereus group and the co-infection group, but severe hemorrhagic lungs were developed in the co-infection group on day 14.
Toxins 12 00703 g008
Toxins 12 00703 g009 550
Figure 9. Lesion scores of gastric ulcers post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination B. cereus and A. fumigatus. Postmortem on day 7 and day 14, typic gastric ulceration was observed both in the B. cereus group and the co-infection group. Severe lesions of gastric ulcerations were found in the B. cereus group (p < 0.01) and the co-infection group (p < 0.01) compared to the control group and the A. fumigatus group at two-time points. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Figure 9. Lesion scores of gastric ulcers post inoculation with B. cereus, A. fumigatus or the combination B. cereus and A. fumigatus. Postmortem on day 7 and day 14, typic gastric ulceration was observed both in the B. cereus group and the co-infection group. Severe lesions of gastric ulcerations were found in the B. cereus group (p < 0.01) and the co-infection group (p < 0.01) compared to the control group and the A. fumigatus group at two-time points. The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Toxins 12 00703 g009
Toxins 12 00703 g010 550
Figure 10. B. cereus, A. fumigatus and co-infection induced DON production in piglets’ gastric ulcers. Lower DON contents were determined among the B. cereus group, A. fumigatus group and co-infection group on day 7. Later on, higher DON productions were detected in the B. cereus group (p < 0.01) and co-infection group (p < 0.01) compared to the control group. Compared to the A. fumigatus group, significant increasing DON contents were found in the B. cereus group (p < 0.01) and co-infection group (p < 0.05). The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Figure 10. B. cereus, A. fumigatus and co-infection induced DON production in piglets’ gastric ulcers. Lower DON contents were determined among the B. cereus group, A. fumigatus group and co-infection group on day 7. Later on, higher DON productions were detected in the B. cereus group (p < 0.01) and co-infection group (p < 0.01) compared to the control group. Compared to the A. fumigatus group, significant increasing DON contents were found in the B. cereus group (p < 0.01) and co-infection group (p < 0.05). The data were expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 9; n = 6). *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01.
Toxins 12 00703 g010
Table
Table 1. Positive Bacillus spp were isolated and identified in feed and feed stuff in pig meals.
Table 1. Positive Bacillus spp were isolated and identified in feed and feed stuff in pig meals.
FeedstuffsSamplesPositive
B. cereusB. subtitisB. licheniformisB. thuringiensis
Started meals3418(52.9)9 (26.5)5 (14.7)2 (5.9)
Growing meals36 23 (63.9)8 (22.2)3 (8.3)2 (5.6)
Finished meals3522(62.9)6 (17.1)4 (11.4)3 (8.6)
Sow’s meals3415 (44.1)10 (29.4)7 (20.6)2 (5.9)
Total13978 (56.1)33 (23.7)19 (13.7)9 (6.5)
Notes: 139 samples were collected during June to August 2018 in summer in Daxing District, Beijing, China. B. cereus, B. subtitis, B. licheniformis and B. thuringiensis were identified by biochemical test and Polymerase chain reaction(PCR) assay [19].
Table
Table 2. Enumeration of B. cereus in porcine meals.
Table 2. Enumeration of B. cereus in porcine meals.
FeedstuffsSamplesB. cereus (CFU/g)
<1010–10001000–10,000>104
Started meals101 (10.0)1 (10.0)3 (30.0)6 (60.0)
Growing meals110 (0.0)1 (9.1)3 (27.3)7 (63.6)
Finished meals120 (0.0)1 (8.3)3 (25.0)8 (66.7)
Sow meals101 (2.3)1 (10.0)3 (30.0)6 (60.0)
Totals431 (2.3)4 (9.3)12 (27.9)27 (62.8)
Notes: Conies of B. cereus determined on Mannitol Yolk Polymyxine (MYP) agar after serial dilutions and inoculation at 30 °C.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Han, Z.; Qu, G.; Shen, Z.; Huang, S.; He, C. Gastric Ulceration and Immune Suppression in Weaned Piglets Associated with Feed-Borne Bacillus cereus and Aspergillus fumigatus. Toxins 2020, 12, 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110703

AMA Style

Li X, Li Q, Wang Y, Han Z, Qu G, Shen Z, Huang S, He C. Gastric Ulceration and Immune Suppression in Weaned Piglets Associated with Feed-Borne Bacillus cereus and Aspergillus fumigatus. Toxins. 2020; 12(11):703. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110703

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiaohui, Qiang Li, Yihui Wang, Zhenhai Han, Guanggang Qu, Zhiqiang Shen, Shujian Huang, and Cheng He. 2020. "Gastric Ulceration and Immune Suppression in Weaned Piglets Associated with Feed-Borne Bacillus cereus and Aspergillus fumigatus" Toxins 12, no. 11: 703. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12110703

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop