Next Article in Journal
Botulinum Toxin A for Sialorrhoea Associated with Neurological Disorders: Evaluation of the Relationship between Effect of Treatment and the Number of Glands Treated
Next Article in Special Issue
Interacting Environmental Stress Factors Affects Targeted Metabolomic Profiles in Stored Natural Wheat and That Inoculated with F. graminearum
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Trace Elements in Augmentation of Statin-Induced Cytotoxicity in Uremic Serum-Exposed Human Rhabdomyosarcoma Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chronic Dietary Intake of Enniatin B in Broiler Chickens Has Low Impact on Intestinal Morphometry and Hepatic Histology, and Shows Limited Transfer to Liver Tissue
Open AccessArticle

Data Analyses and Modelling for Risk Based Monitoring of Mycotoxins in Animal Feed

RIKILT Wageningen Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB Wageningen, The Netherlands
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2018, 10(2), 54;
Received: 20 December 2017 / Revised: 17 January 2018 / Accepted: 22 January 2018 / Published: 26 January 2018
Following legislation, European Member States should have multi-annual control programs for contaminants, such as for mycotoxins, in feed and food. These programs need to be risk based implying the checks are regular and proportional to the estimated risk for animal and human health. This study aimed to prioritize feed products in the Netherlands for deoxynivalenol and aflatoxin B1 monitoring. Historical mycotoxin monitoring results from the period 2007–2016 were combined with data from other sources. Based on occurrence, groundnuts had high priority for aflatoxin B1 monitoring; some feed materials (maize and maize products and several oil seed products) and complete/complementary feed excluding dairy cattle and young animals had medium priority; and all other animal feeds and feed materials had low priority. For deoxynivalenol, maize by-products had a high priority, complete and complementary feed for pigs had a medium priority and all other feed and feed materials a low priority. Also including health consequence estimations showed that feed materials that ranked highest for aflatoxin B1 included sunflower seed and palmkernel expeller/extracts and maize. For deoxynivalenol, maize products were ranked highest, followed by various small grain cereals (products); all other feed materials were of lower concern. Results of this study have proven to be useful in setting up the annual risk based control program for mycotoxins in animal feed and feed materials. View Full-Text
Keywords: contaminant; aflatoxin B1; deoxynivalenol; feed; trend analyses; risk; model contaminant; aflatoxin B1; deoxynivalenol; feed; trend analyses; risk; model
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Van der Fels-Klerx, H.I.; Adamse, P.; Punt, A.; Van Asselt, E.D. Data Analyses and Modelling for Risk Based Monitoring of Mycotoxins in Animal Feed. Toxins 2018, 10, 54.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop