Next Article in Journal
Replacing American Breakfast Foods with Ready-To-Eat (RTE) Cereals Increases Consumption of Key Food Groups and Nutrients among US Children and Adults: Results of an NHANES Modeling Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Intended or Unintended Doping? A Review of the Presence of Doping Substances in Dietary Supplements Used in Sports
Previous Article in Journal
Higher Protein Intake Does Not Improve Lean Mass Gain When Compared with RDA Recommendation in Postmenopausal Women Following Resistance Exercise Protocol: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Special Issue
Developmental Outcomes at 24 Months of Age in Toddlers Supplemented with Arachidonic Acid and Docosahexaenoic Acid: Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Trial
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Nutrients 2017, 9(9), 1008;

Iron Absorption from Three Commercially Available Supplements in Gastrointestinal Cell Lines

Laboratory of Physiology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, via Solaroli 17, 28100 Novara, Italy
noiVita s.r.l.s. Spin-Off of University of Eastern Piedmont, via A. Canobio 4/6, 28100 Novara, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17 July 2017 / Revised: 4 September 2017 / Accepted: 9 September 2017 / Published: 13 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Supplements)
Full-Text   |   PDF [8555 KB, uploaded 13 September 2017]   |  


This study compares the absorption characteristics of two iron-based dietary supplements and their biocompatibility to bisglycinate iron, a common chelated iron form. The Caco-2 cell line—a model of human intestinal absorption—and GTL-16 cell line—a model of gastric epithelial cells—were used to perform the experiments; in the first experiments, the kinetics of absorption have been evaluated analyzing the divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) expression. Three different iron combinations containing 50 µM iron (named Fisioeme®, Sideral® and bisglycinate) were used for different stimulation times (1–24 h). After this, the effects of the three iron formulations were assessed in both a short and a long time, in order to understand the extrusion mechanisms. The effects of the three different formulations were also analyzed at the end of stimulation period immediately after iron removal, and after some time in order to clarify whether the mechanisms were irreversibly activated. Findings obtained in this study demonstrate that Fisioeme® was able to maintain a significant beneficial effect on cell viability compared to control, to Sideral®, and to iron bisglycinate. This observation indicates that Fisioeme® formulation is the most suitable for gastric and intestinal epithelial cells. View Full-Text
Keywords: iron metabolism; iron mechanisms; Caco-2 permeability; GTL-16 permeability; DMT1 receptor iron metabolism; iron mechanisms; Caco-2 permeability; GTL-16 permeability; DMT1 receptor

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Uberti, F.; Morsanuto, V.; Ghirlanda, S.; Molinari, C. Iron Absorption from Three Commercially Available Supplements in Gastrointestinal Cell Lines. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1008.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Nutrients EISSN 2072-6643 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top