Next Article in Journal
Multiscale Union Regions Adaptive Sparse Representation for Hyperspectral Image Classification
Next Article in Special Issue
Environmental Variability and Oceanographic Dynamics of the Central and Southern Coastal Zone of Sonora in the Gulf of California
Previous Article in Journal
Mapping Vulnerable Urban Areas Affected by Slow-Moving Landslides Using Sentinel-1 InSAR Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of the Multi-Scale Ultra-High Resolution (MUR) Analysis of Lake Surface Temperature
Open AccessArticle

Determining the Pixel-to-Pixel Uncertainty in Satellite-Derived SST Fields

by Fan Wu 1,2,3,4, Peter Cornillon 2,*, Brahim Boussidi 2 and Lei Guan 1,4
Department of Marine Technology, College of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, 238 Songling Road, Qingdao 266100, China
Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, 215 South Ferry Road, Narragansett, RI 02882, USA
Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology, China Academy of Space Technology, 104 Youyi Road, Beijing 100094, China
Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modeling, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, 1 Wenhai Road, Qingdao 266237, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2017, 9(9), 877;
Received: 18 July 2017 / Revised: 21 August 2017 / Accepted: 22 August 2017 / Published: 23 August 2017
(This article belongs to the Collection Sea Surface Temperature Retrievals from Remote Sensing)
The primary measure of the quality of sea surface temperature (SST) fields obtained from satellite-borne infrared sensors has been the bias and variance of matchups with co-located in-situ values. Because such matchups tend to be widely separated, these bias and variance estimates are not necessarily a good measure of small scale (several pixels) gradients in these fields because one of the primary contributors to the uncertainty in satellite retrievals is atmospheric contamination, which tends to have large spatial scales compared with the pixel separation of infrared sensors. Hence, there is not a good measure to use in selecting SST fields appropriate for the study of submesoscale processes and, in particular, of processes associated with near-surface fronts, both of which have recently seen a rapid increase in interest. In this study, two methods are examined to address this problem, one based on spectra of the SST data and the other on their variograms. To evaluate the methods, instrument noise was estimated in Level-2 Visible-Infrared Imager-Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) SST fields of the Sargasso Sea. The two methods provided very nearly identical results for AVHRR: along-scan values of approximately 0.18 K for both day and night and along-track values of 0.21 K for day and night. By contrast, the instrument noise estimated for VIIRS varied by method, scan geometry and day-night. Specifically, daytime, along-scan (along-track), spectral estimates were found to be approximately 0.05 K (0.08 K) and the corresponding nighttime values of 0.02 K (0.03 K). Daytime estimates based on the variogram were found to be 0.08 K (0.10 K) with the corresponding nighttime values of 0.04 K (0.06 K). Taken together, AVHRR instrument noise is significantly larger than VIIRS instrument noise, along-track noise is larger than along-scan noise and daytime levels are higher than nighttime levels. Given the similarity of results and the less stringent preprocessing requirements, the variogram is the preferred method, although there is a suggestion that this approach overestimates the noise for high quality data in dynamically quiet regions. Finally, simulations of the impact of noise on the determination of SST gradients show that on average the gradient magnitude for typical ocean gradients will be accurately estimated with VIIRS but substantially overestimated with AVHRR. View Full-Text
Keywords: spatial precision; sea surface temperature; VIIRS; AVHRR spatial precision; sea surface temperature; VIIRS; AVHRR
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, F.; Cornillon, P.; Boussidi, B.; Guan, L. Determining the Pixel-to-Pixel Uncertainty in Satellite-Derived SST Fields. Remote Sens. 2017, 9, 877.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop