Next Article in Journal
Improved Early Crop Type Identification By Joint Use of High Temporal Resolution SAR And Optical Image Time Series
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of MODIS LAI/FPAR Product Collection 6. Part 2: Validation and Intercomparison
Previous Article in Journal
Designing an Experiment to Investigate Subpixel Mapping as an Alternative Method to Obtain Land Use/Land Cover Maps
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of MODIS LAI/FPAR Product Collection 6. Part 1: Consistency and Improvements
Open AccessArticle

Discriminating between Native Norway Spruce and Invasive Sitka Spruce—A Comparison of Multitemporal Landsat 8 Imagery, Aerial Images and Airborne Laser Scanner Data

Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.o. Box 5001, Ås 1432, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Sangram Ganguly, Compton Tucker, Nicolas Baghdadi and Prasad S. Thenkabail
Remote Sens. 2016, 8(5), 363; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8050363
Received: 19 January 2016 / Revised: 15 April 2016 / Accepted: 20 April 2016 / Published: 26 April 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Vegetation Structure and Dynamics)
Invasive species can be considered a threat to biodiversity, and remote sensing has been proposed as a tool for detection and monitoring of invasive species. In this study, we test the ability to discriminate between two tree species of the same genera, using data from Landsat 8 satellite imagery, aerial images, and airborne laser scanning. Ground observations from forest stands dominated by either Norway spruce (Picea abies) or Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) were coupled with variables derived from each of the three sets of remote sensing data. Random forest, support vector machine, and logistic regression classification models were fit to the data, and the classification accuracy tested by performing a cross-validation. Classification accuracies were compared for different combinations of remote sensing data and classification methods. The overall classification accuracy varied from 0.53 to 0.79, with the highest accuracy obtained using logistic regression with a combination of data derived from Landsat imagery and aerial images. The corresponding kappa value was 0.58. The contribution to the classification accuracy from using airborne data in addition to Landsat imagery was not substantial in this study. The classification accuracy varied between models using data from individual Landsat images. View Full-Text
Keywords: tree species classification; invasive species tree species classification; invasive species
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Hauglin, M.; Ørka, H.O. Discriminating between Native Norway Spruce and Invasive Sitka Spruce—A Comparison of Multitemporal Landsat 8 Imagery, Aerial Images and Airborne Laser Scanner Data. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 363.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop