Next Article in Journal
Temporal Dependency of Yield and Quality Estimation through Spectral Vegetation Indices in Pear Orchards
Previous Article in Journal
Reconstruction of Satellite-Retrieved Land-Surface Reflectance Based on Temporally-Continuous Vegetation Indices
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2015, 7(8), 9865-9885;

Relative Efficiency of ALS and InSAR for Biomass Estimation in a Tanzanian Rainforest

Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Ås, Norway
Norwegian Forest and Landscape Institute, P.O. Box 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Parth Sarathi Roy and Prasad S. Thenkabail
Received: 22 April 2015 / Revised: 30 June 2015 / Accepted: 27 July 2015 / Published: 4 August 2015
Full-Text   |   PDF [1259 KB, uploaded 4 August 2015]   |  


Forest inventories based on field sample surveys, supported by auxiliary remotely sensed data, have the potential to provide transparent and confident estimates of forest carbon stocks required in climate change mitigation schemes such as the REDD+ mechanism. The field plot size is of importance for the precision of carbon stock estimates, and better information of the relationship between plot size and precision can be useful in designing future inventories. Precision estimates of forest biomass estimates developed from 30 concentric field plots with sizes of 700, 900, …, 1900 m2, sampled in a Tanzanian rainforest, were assessed in a model-based inference framework. Remotely sensed data from airborne laser scanning (ALS) and interferometric synthetic aperture radio detection and ranging (InSAR) were used as auxiliary information. The findings indicate that larger field plots are relatively more efficient for inventories supported by remotely sensed ALS and InSAR data. A simulation showed that a pure field-based inventory would have to comprise 3.5–6.0 times as many observations for plot sizes of 700–1900 m2 to achieve the same precision as an inventory supported by ALS data. View Full-Text
Keywords: ALS; airborne laser scanning; LiDAR; relative efficiency; tropical rainforest ALS; airborne laser scanning; LiDAR; relative efficiency; tropical rainforest

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hansen, E.H.; Gobakken, T.; Solberg, S.; Kangas, A.; Ene, L.; Mauya, E.; Næsset, E. Relative Efficiency of ALS and InSAR for Biomass Estimation in a Tanzanian Rainforest. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 9865-9885.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top