Evaluation of the Mid-Latitude Ionospheric trough Using GRACE Data
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Database and Method
2.1. Data Sources
2.2. Data Processing
- 1.
- We treated Ne data of one satellite passing from the geomagnetic equator to the pole or vice versa as one Ne profile. As previously mentioned, we only considered Ne profile data in the 40–70° magnetic latitude regions in both hemispheres. Data from other latitude regions (i.e., 40°S−40°N magnetic latitude) were removed from the database. Blue curved lines indicate the MIT search regions in the left plots of Figure 2 for the northern (see top left plot) and southern hemispheres. For geographic to magnetic latitude conversion, we used the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) model [25]. The red line curves show the where the GRACE satellites pass over the Northern and Southern hemispheres (see Figure 2, left panel plots).
- 2.
- The background electron density is calculated as a running average of the Ne in a sliding window of 48 data points. The window size is adapted according to a data resolution equivalent to a horizontal distance of ~1800 km. This window size was proven to most optimal. A smaller window size detects some minor irregularities, and a larger window does not properly identify troughs. In Figure 2 (see right panel plots), the background electron density is represented by the black dashed line.
- 3.
- We considered −0.2 detrended log10 (Ne) as a threshold value, so if any Ne profile data values fall below the −0.2 level, the profile is identified as an MIT profile. The trough was detected within the detrended logarithmic electron density. The formula is:We examined all profiles for negative peaks below the −0.2 level of detrended logarithmic electron density, representing a decrease of about 37% in background electron density. The threshold level was chosen as the most optimal to provide a reliable quality and quantity of detections.
- 4.
- If an MIT occurrence is detected in a profile, the next step is to determine the MIT characteristics. Using the Ne profile data, we determined different points/locations, such as the minimum density location or trough minimum (Tm), the equatorward breakpoint (Be), the poleward breakpoint (Bp), the equatorward half point (He), and the poleward half point (Hp) (see Figure 2). The corresponding definitions are provided later in this manuscript.
- 5.
- The trough identification quality was verified by applying a trough width filter. The threshold of this criterion was established in a range between 1° and 17° [6]. Moreover, in assessing the depth of the trough, the range of electron density was assumed to be between 103 and 105 cm3 to improve the quality of the detection technique, and Ne values outside this limit were considered outliers. Trough width and depth were calculated using the detected Ne values of trough breakpoints and trough minima.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Geographical Distribution
3.2. Solar Cycle Dependence
3.3. Seasonal Variation
3.4. Diurnal Variation
3.5. Dependence on Solar Wind; Flow Pressure; and IMF Bx, Bz, and By Components
3.6. Dependence on the SYM-H Index
3.7. Dependence on the Hp30 Index
3.8. Trough Occurrence Dependence on Space Weather Indices
4. Conclusions
- The trough minimum location is distributed around the magnetic north and south poles, forming an ellipsoid;
- The trough location moves poleward under low-solar-activity conditions and equatorward under high-solar-activity conditions in both hemispheres;
- The occurrence probability of the MIT depends on solar activity. The occurrence of the trough increases with increased F10.7 values. Furthermore, the position of the MIT changes depending on solar activity, moving poleward under low-solar-activity conditions and equatorward under high-solar-activity conditions in both hemispheres; however, this dependency is more prominent in the northern hemisphere than in the southern hemisphere. The trough depth increases with increased in F10.7 values;
- Seasonal dependency of MIT is more pronounced in the northern hemisphere than in the southern hemisphere. The MIT occurs more often in winter months (Nov–Feb) and equinoxes than in summer (May–Aug) months. The trough is deeper during local winter months in the southern hemisphere compared to summer months, whereas the trough width exhibits opposite behavior in the northern hemisphere. The MIT width varies from 8 to 10° in the northern hemisphere and from 5 to 7° in the southern hemisphere. The trough minimum moves poleward during winter months and equatorward during summer months;
- The mean trough widths are smaller in the poleward direction, indicating a sharper slope. The mean trough width is larger in the equatorward direction, showing a less sharp slope;
- The MIT shows a clear correlation with the SYM-H index. In the northern hemisphere, this dependence is more prominent than in the southern hemisphere. With decreasing SYM-H index values (indicating storm conditions), the trough moves equatorward narrows and deepens with decreasing SYM-H index values;
- A comparison with the high-cadence Hp30 index shows a correlation with the MIT location, moving equatorward with increased HP30 values. In the northern hemisphere, this dependence is more prominent than in the southern hemisphere. Furthermore, the trough widens with decreasing Hp30 index values, whereas depth shows an opposite dependence, i.e., the trough deepens increasing Hp30 index values;
- Trough occurrences increase with decreasing geomagnetic disturbance index SYM-H values;
- MIT occurrences positively correlate with Hp30, f10.7, flow pressure, and solar wind plasma speed indices.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Muldrew, D.B. F-Layer Ionization Troughs Deduced from Alouette Data. J. Geophys. Res. 1965, 70, 2635–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilitza, D. IRI the International Standard for the Ionosphere. Adv. Radio Sci. 2018, 16, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OS SIS ICD. European GNSS Galileo Open Service Signal in Space Interface Control Document; SISICD-2006, Issue 1.1; European Space Agency: Paris, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Nava, B.; Coïsson, P.; Radicella, S.M. A New Version of the NeQuick Ionosphere Electron Density Model. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2008, 70, 1856–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoque, M.M.; Jakowski, N.; Orús-Pérez, R. Fast Ionospheric Correction Using Galileo Az Coefficients and the NTCM Model. GPS Solut. 2019, 23, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karpachev, A. The Dependence of the Main Ionospheric Trough Shape on Longitude, Altitude, Season, Local Time, and Solar and Magnetic Activity. Geomagn. Aeron. 2003, 43, 239–251. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Xiong, C. Morphology Evolution of the Midlatitude Ionospheric Trough in Nighttime under Geomagnetic Quiet Conditions. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2020, 125, e2019JA027361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodger, A. The Mid-Latitude Trough—Revisited. In Midlatitude Ionospheric Dynamics and Disturbances; American Geophysical Union (AGU): Washington, DC, USA, 2008; pp. 25–33. ISBN 978-1-118-66655-5. [Google Scholar]
- Rodger, A.S.; Moffett, R.J.; Quegan, S. The Role of Ion Drift in the Formation of Ionisation Troughs in the Mid- and High-Latitude Ionosphere—A Review. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 1992, 54, 1–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, S.; Moldwin, M.B.; Coster, A.; Lyons, L.R.; Nicolls, M.J. GPS TEC Observations of Dynamics of the Mid-Latitude Trough during Substorms. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2011, 38, L14109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heilig, B.; Stolle, C.; Kervalishvili, G.; Rauberg, J.; Miyoshi, Y.; Tsuchiya, F.; Kumamoto, A.; Kasahara, Y.; Shoji, M.; Nakamura, S.; et al. Relation of the Plasmapause to the Midlatitude Ionospheric Trough, the Sub-Auroral Temperature Enhancement and the Distribution of Small-Scale Field Aligned Currents as Observed in the Magnetosphere by THEMIS, RBSP, and Arase, and in the Topside Ionosphere by Swarm. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2022, 127, e2021JA029646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, K. Ionospheric Radio; IET Digital Library: London, UK, 1990; ISBN 978-1-84919-387-0. [Google Scholar]
- Werner, S.; Prölss, G.W. The Position of the Ionospheric Trough as a Function of Local Time and Magnetic Activity. Adv. Space Res. 1997, 20, 1717–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, M.; Liu, L.; Wan, W.; Zhao, B. A Study on the Nighttime Midlatitude Ionospheric Trough. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2011, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishida, T.; Ogawa, Y.; Kadokura, A.; Hiraki, Y.; Häggström, I. Seasonal Variation and Solar Activity Dependence of the Quiet-Time Ionospheric Trough. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2014, 119, 6774–6783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voiculescu, M.; Virtanen, I.; Nygrén, T. The F-Region Trough: Seasonal Morphology and Relation to Interplanetary Magnetic Field. Ann. Geophys. 2006, 24, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, N.; Le, H.; Liu, L. Statistical Analysis of Ionospheric Mid-Latitude Trough over the Northern Hemisphere Derived from GPS Total Electron Content Data. Earth Planets Space 2015, 67, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aa, E.; Zou, S.; Erickson, P.J.; Zhang, S.-R.; Liu, S. Statistical Analysis of the Main Ionospheric Trough Using Swarm in Situ Measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2020, 125, e2019JA027583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, N.; Le, H.; Liu, L. Statistical Analysis of the Mid-Latitude Trough Position during Different Categories of Magnetic Storms and Different Storm Intensities. Earth Planets Space 2016, 68, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, C.; Lühr, H.; Stolle, C. GRACE Electron Density Derived from the K-Band Ranging System (KBR); GFZ Data Services: Potsdam, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, C.; Lühr, H.; Ma, S.; Schlegel, K. Validation of GRACE Electron Densities by Incoherent Scatter Radar Data and Estimation of Plasma Scale Height in the Topside Ionosphere. Adv. Space Res. 2015, 55, 2048–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OMNIWeb Data Explorer. Available online: https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/form/dx1.html (accessed on 22 February 2022).
- OMNIWeb: High Resolution OMNI. Available online: https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/form/omni_min.html (accessed on 22 February 2022).
- Yamazaki, Y.; Matzka, J.; Stolle, C.; Kervalishvili, G.; Rauberg, J.; Bronkalla, O.; Morschhauser, A.; Bruinsma, S.; Shprits, Y.Y.; Jackson, D.R. Geomagnetic Activity Index Hpo. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2022, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alken, P.; Thébault, E.; Beggan, C.D.; Amit, H.; Aubert, J.; Baerenzung, J.; Bondar, T.N.; Brown, W.J.; Califf, S.; Chambodut, A.; et al. International Geomagnetic Reference Field: The Thirteenth Generation. Earth Planets Space 2021, 73, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karpachev, A.; Klimenko, M.; Klimenko, V.; Poustovalova, L. Empirical Model of the Main Ionospheric Trough for the Nighttime Winter Conditions. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 2016, 146, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamal, S.; Jakowski, N.; Hoque, M.M.; Wickert, J. E Layer Dominated Ionosphere Occurrences as a Function of Geophysical and Space Weather Conditions. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanliss, J.A.; Showalter, K.M. High-Resolution Global Storm Index: Dst versus SYM-H. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2006, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deminov, M.G.; Shubin, V.N. Empirical Model of the Location of the Main Ionospheric Trough. Geomagn. Aeron. 2018, 58, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Index | Time Resolution |
---|---|
F10.7 | 1 h |
Solar Wind | 1 h |
Bx, By, Bz | 1 h |
Flow pressure | 1 h |
Hp30 | 30 min |
SYM-H | 1 min |
Northern Hemisphere | Southern Hemisphere | |
---|---|---|
December solstice | 60.59 ± 4.05 | −55.8 ± 6.02 |
Equinoxes | 60.23 ± 4.14 | −55.72 ± 6.21 |
June solstice | 59.08 ± 4.09 | −56.8 ± 5.97 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lubyk, K.; Hoque, M.M.; Stolle, C. Evaluation of the Mid-Latitude Ionospheric trough Using GRACE Data. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4384. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174384
Lubyk K, Hoque MM, Stolle C. Evaluation of the Mid-Latitude Ionospheric trough Using GRACE Data. Remote Sensing. 2022; 14(17):4384. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174384
Chicago/Turabian StyleLubyk, Kateryna, Mohammed Mainul Hoque, and Claudia Stolle. 2022. "Evaluation of the Mid-Latitude Ionospheric trough Using GRACE Data" Remote Sensing 14, no. 17: 4384. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174384
APA StyleLubyk, K., Hoque, M. M., & Stolle, C. (2022). Evaluation of the Mid-Latitude Ionospheric trough Using GRACE Data. Remote Sensing, 14(17), 4384. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14174384