Next Article in Journal
Assessing Typhoon-Induced Canopy Damage Using Vegetation Indices in the Fushan Experimental Forest, Taiwan
Next Article in Special Issue
Accuracies of Soil Moisture Estimations Using a Semi-Empirical Model over Bare Soil Agricultural Croplands from Sentinel-1 SAR Data
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Methods for Under-Canopy Unmanned Aircraft System Based Photogrammetry in Complex Forests for Tree Diameter Measurement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Applications of UAV Thermal Imagery in Precision Agriculture: State of the Art and Future Research Outlook
Open AccessArticle

To Blend or Not to Blend? A Framework for Nationwide Landsat–MODIS Data Selection for Crop Yield Prediction

CSIRO Data61, Goods Shed North, 34 Village St, Docklands, VIC 3008, Australia
CSIRO Land and Water, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2061, Australia
CSIRO Agriculture and Food, 306 Carmody Rd, St Lucia, QLD 4067, Australia
CSIRO Agriculture and Food, 147 Underwood Ave, Floreat, WA 6014, Australia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2020, 12(10), 1653;
Received: 1 May 2020 / Revised: 19 May 2020 / Accepted: 19 May 2020 / Published: 21 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing in Agriculture: State-of-the-Art)
The onus for monitoring crop growth from space is its ability to be applied anytime and anywhere, to produce crop yield estimates that are consistent at both the subfield scale for farming management strategies and the country level for national crop yield assessment. Historically, the requirements for satellites to successfully monitor crop growth and yield differed depending on the extent of the area being monitored. Diverging imaging capabilities can be reconciled by blending images from high-temporal-frequency (HTF) and high-spatial-resolution (HSR) sensors to produce images that possess both HTF and HSR characteristics across large areas. We evaluated the relative performance of Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), Landsat, and blended imagery for crop yield estimates (2009–2015) using a carbon-turnover yield model deployed across the Australian cropping area. Based on the fraction of missing Landsat observations, we further developed a parsimonious framework to inform when and where blending is beneficial for nationwide crop yield prediction at a finer scale (i.e., the 25-m pixel resolution). Landsat provided the best yield predictions when no observations were missing, which occurred in 17% of the cropping area of Australia. Blending was preferred when <42% of Landsat observations were missing, which occurred in 33% of the cropping area of Australia. MODIS produced a lower prediction error when ≥42% of the Landsat images were missing (~50% of the cropping area). By identifying when and where blending outperforms predictions from either Landsat or MODIS, the proposed framework enables more accurate monitoring of biophysical processes and yields, while keeping computational costs low. View Full-Text
Keywords: MODIS; Landsat; data blending; crop yield prediction; gap-filling MODIS; Landsat; data blending; crop yield prediction; gap-filling
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; McVicar, T.R.; Donohue, R.J.; Garg, N.; Waldner, F.; Ota, N.; Li, L.; Lawes, R. To Blend or Not to Blend? A Framework for Nationwide Landsat–MODIS Data Selection for Crop Yield Prediction. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1653.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop