Next Article in Journal
Generalized-Capon Method for Diff-Tomo SAR Analyses of Decorrelating Scatterers
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation and Validation of the Time-Varying Characteristic for the GPS Differential Code Bias
Previous Article in Journal
UAV-Based High Throughput Phenotyping in Citrus Utilizing Multispectral Imaging and Artificial Intelligence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improved PPP Ambiguity Resolution with the Assistance of Multiple LEO Constellations and Signals
Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of Orbit, Clock and Ionospheric Corrections from Five Currently Available SBAS L1 Services: Methodology and Analysis

1
School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China
2
Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(4), 411; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11040411
Received: 28 December 2018 / Revised: 5 February 2019 / Accepted: 5 February 2019 / Published: 17 February 2019
To meet the demands of civil aviation and other precise navigation applications, several satellite-based augmentation systems (SBASs) have been developed around the world, such as the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) for North America, the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) for Europe, the Multi-functional Satellite Augmentation System (MSAS) for Japan, the GPS (Global Positioning System) Aided GEO Augmented Navigation (GAGAN) for India, and the System for Differential Corrections and Monitoring (SDCM) for Russia. The SBASs broadcast messages to correct satellite orbit, clock, and ionosphere errors to augment the GPS positioning performance. In this paper, SBAS orbit, clock and ionospheric corrections are evaluated. Specifically, the orbit, clock and ionospheric corrections derived from SBAS messages are comprehensively evaluated using data collected from the above mentioned systems over 181 consective days. The evaluation indicates that the EGNOS outperforms other systems with signal-in-space range error (SISRE) at 0.645 m and ionospheric correction accuracy at 0.491 m, respectively. Meanwhile, the accuracy of SDCM is comparable to EGNOS with SISRE of 0.650 m and ionospheric correction accuracy of 0.523 m. For WAAS, the SISRE is 0.954 m and the accuracy of ionospheric correction is 0.505 m. The accuracies of the SBAS corrections from the MSAS and GAGAN systems, however, are significantly worse than those of others. The SISREs are 1.931 and 1.325 m and the accuracies of ionospheric corrections are 0.795 and 0.858 m, for MSAS and GAGAN, respectively. At the same time, GPS broadcast orbit, clock and ionospheric corrections are also evaluated. The results show that there are no significant improvements in the SISRE of the broadcast navigation data by applying SBAS corrections. On the other hand, the accuracy of SBAS ionospheric corrections is still much better than GPS broadcast ionospheric corrections, which could still be beneficial for single-frequency users. View Full-Text
Keywords: SBAS; WAAS; EGNOS; MSAS; GAGAN; SDCM; orbit correction; clock correction; ionospheric correction SBAS; WAAS; EGNOS; MSAS; GAGAN; SDCM; orbit correction; clock correction; ionospheric correction
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Nie, Z.; Zhou, P.; Liu, F.; Wang, Z.; Gao, Y. Evaluation of Orbit, Clock and Ionospheric Corrections from Five Currently Available SBAS L1 Services: Methodology and Analysis. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 411.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop