Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Mineral Sediments on Satellite Chlorophyll-a Retrievals from Line-Height Algorithms Using Red and Near-Infrared Bands
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of TsHARP Utility for Thermal Sharpening of Sentinel-3 Satellite Images Using Sentinel-2 Visual Imagery
Open AccessArticle

Trends in Remote Sensing Accuracy Assessment Approaches in the Context of Natural Resources

1
Remote Sensing Research Centre, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia
2
Department of Environment and Science, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Park QLD 4102, Australia
3
Joint Remote Sensing Research Program, School of Environment and Earth Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4067, Australia
4
Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(19), 2305; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11192305
Received: 22 August 2019 / Revised: 27 September 2019 / Accepted: 30 September 2019 / Published: 3 October 2019
The utility of land cover maps for natural resources management relies on knowing the uncertainty associated with each map. The continuous advances typical of remote sensing, including the increasing availability of higher spatial and temporal resolution satellite data and data analysis capabilities, have created both opportunities and challenges for improving the application of accuracy assessment. There are well established accuracy assessment methods, but their underlying assumptions have not changed much in the last couple decades. Consequently, revisiting how map error and accuracy have been performed and reported over the last two decades is timely, to highlight areas where there is scope for better utilization of emerging opportunities. We conducted a quantitative literature review on accuracy assessment practices for mapping via remote sensing classification methods, in both terrestrial and marine environments. We performed a structured search for land and benthic cover mapping, limiting our search to journals within the remote sensing field, and papers published between 1998–2017. After an initial screening process, we assembled a database of 282 papers, and extracted and standardized information on various components of their reported accuracy assessments. We discovered that only 56% of the papers explicitly included an error matrix, and a very limited number (14%) reported overall accuracy with confidence intervals. The use of kappa continues to be standard practice, being reported in 50.4% of the literature published on or after 2012. Reference datasets used for validation were collected using a probability sampling design in 54% of the papers. For approximately 11% of the studies, the sampling design used could not be determined. No association was found between classification complexity (i.e. number of classes) and measured accuracy, independent from the size of the study area. Overall, only 32% of papers included an accuracy assessment that could be considered reproducible; that is, they included a probability-based sampling scheme to collect the reference dataset, a complete error matrix, and provided sufficient characterization of the reference datasets and sampling unit. Our findings indicate that considerable work remains to identify and adopt more statistically rigorous accuracy assessment practices to achieve transparent and comparable land and benthic cover maps. View Full-Text
Keywords: land cover mapping; benthic cover; sampling design; validation; remote sensing; error matrix land cover mapping; benthic cover; sampling design; validation; remote sensing; error matrix
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Morales-Barquero, L.; Lyons, M.B.; Phinn, S.R.; Roelfsema, C.M. Trends in Remote Sensing Accuracy Assessment Approaches in the Context of Natural Resources. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2305.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop