Next Article in Journal
Performance of Selected Ionospheric Models in Multi-Global Navigation Satellite System Single-Frequency Positioning over China
Next Article in Special Issue
Monitoring Soil Surface Mineralogy at Different Moisture Conditions Using Visible Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Data
Previous Article in Journal
Remote Sensing Estimation of Lake Total Phosphorus Concentration Based on MODIS: A Case Study of Lake Hongze
Previous Article in Special Issue
Remote Sensing Techniques for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation: A Review
 
 
Article

Integrating SEBAL with in-Field Crop Water Status Measurement for Precision Irrigation Applications—A Case Study

1
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), Università degli Studi di Padova, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
2
Centrale Valutativa Srl, 00131 Roma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(17), 2069; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11172069
Received: 31 July 2019 / Revised: 25 August 2019 / Accepted: 30 August 2019 / Published: 3 September 2019
The surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL) has been demonstrated to provide accurate estimates of crop evapotranspiration (ET) and yield at different spatial scales even under highly heterogeneous conditions. However, validation of the SEBAL using in-field direct and indirect measurements of plant water status is a necessary step before deploying the algorithm as an irrigation scheduling tool. To this end, a study was conducted in a maize field located near the Venice Lagoon area in Italy. The experimental area was irrigated using a 274 m long variable rate irrigation (VRI) system with 25-m sections. Three irrigation management zones (IMZs; high, medium and low irrigation requirement zones) were defined combining soil texture and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data. Soil moisture sensors were installed in the different IMZs and used to schedule irrigation. In addition, SEBAL-based actual evapotranspiration (ETr) and biomass estimates were calculated throughout the season. VRI management allowed crop water demand to be matched, saving up to 42 mm (−16%) of water when compared to uniform irrigation rates. The high irrigation amounts applied during the growing season to avoid water stress resulted in no significant differences among the IMZs. SEBAL-based biomass estimates agreed with in-season measurements at 72, 105 and 112 days after planting (DAP; r2 = 0.87). Seasonal ET matched the spatial variability observed in the measured yield map at harvest. Moreover, the SEBAL-derived yield map largely agreed with the measured yield map with relative errors of 0.3% among the IMZs and of 1% (0.21 t ha−1) for the whole field. While the FAO method-based stress coefficient (Ks) never dropped below the optimum condition (Ks = 1) for all the IMZs and the uniform zone, SEBAL Ks was sensitive to changes in water status and remained below 1 during most of the growing season. Using SEBAL to capture the daily spatial variation in crop water needs and growth would enable the definition of transient, dynamic IMZs. This allows farmers to apply proper irrigation amounts increasing water use efficiency. View Full-Text
Keywords: SEBAL; variable rate irrigation; evapotranspiration; water use efficiency SEBAL; variable rate irrigation; evapotranspiration; water use efficiency
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gobbo, S.; Lo Presti, S.; Martello, M.; Panunzi, L.; Berti, A.; Morari, F. Integrating SEBAL with in-Field Crop Water Status Measurement for Precision Irrigation Applications—A Case Study. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11172069

AMA Style

Gobbo S, Lo Presti S, Martello M, Panunzi L, Berti A, Morari F. Integrating SEBAL with in-Field Crop Water Status Measurement for Precision Irrigation Applications—A Case Study. Remote Sensing. 2019; 11(17):2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11172069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gobbo, Stefano, Stefano Lo Presti, Marco Martello, Lorenza Panunzi, Antonio Berti, and Francesco Morari. 2019. "Integrating SEBAL with in-Field Crop Water Status Measurement for Precision Irrigation Applications—A Case Study" Remote Sensing 11, no. 17: 2069. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11172069

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop