Next Article in Journal
Flood Hazard Mapping and Assessment on the Angkor World Heritage Site, Cambodia
Previous Article in Journal
Studies of Internal Waves in the Strait of Georgia Based on Remote Sensing Images
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January-1) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(1), 97;

Estimating Tree Volume Distributions in Subtropical Forests Using Airborne LiDAR Data

Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
School of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 6 November 2018 / Revised: 12 December 2018 / Accepted: 30 December 2018 / Published: 8 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Remote Sensing)
Full-Text   |   PDF [13666 KB, uploaded 8 January 2019]   |  


Accurate and reliable information on tree volume distributions, which describe tree frequencies in volume classes, plays a key role in guiding timber harvest, managing carbon budgets, and supplying ecosystem services. Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) has the capability of offering reliable estimates of the distributions of structure attributes in forests. In this study, we predicted individual tree volume distributions over a subtropical forest of southeast China using airborne LiDAR data and field measurements. We first estimated the plot-level total volume by LiDAR-derived standard and canopy metrics. Then the performances of three Weibull parameter prediction methods, i.e., parameter prediction method (PPM), percentile-based parameter recover method (PPRM), and moment-based parameter recover method (MPRM) were assessed to estimate the Weibull scale and shape parameters. Stem density for each plot was calculated by dividing the estimated plot total volume using mean tree volume (i.e., mean value of distributions) derived from the LiDAR-estimated Weibull parameters. Finally, the individual tree volume distributions were generated by the predicted scale and shape parameters, and then scaled by the predicted stem density. The results demonstrated that, compared with the general models, the forest type-specific (i.e., coniferous forests, broadleaved forests, and mixed forests) models had relatively higher accuracies for estimating total volume and stem density, as well as predicting Weibull parameters, percentiles, and raw moments. The relationship between the predicted and reference volume distributions showed a relatively high agreement when the predicted frequencies were scaled to the LiDAR-predicted stem density (mean Reynolds error index eR = 31.47–54.07, mean Packalén error index eP = 0.14–0.21). In addition, the predicted individual tree volume distributions predicted by PPRM of (average mean eR = 37.75) performed the best, followed by MPRM (average mean eR = 40.43) and PPM (average mean eR = 41.22). This study demonstrated that the LiDAR can potentially offer improved estimates of the distributions of tree volume in subtropical forests. View Full-Text
Keywords: volume distribution; LiDAR; Weibull; subtropical forests; forest structure volume distribution; LiDAR; Weibull; subtropical forests; forest structure

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cao, L.; Zhang, Z.; Yun, T.; Wang, G.; Ruan, H.; She, G. Estimating Tree Volume Distributions in Subtropical Forests Using Airborne LiDAR Data. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 97.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top