Next Article in Journal
Crop Classification Based on Temporal Information Using Sentinel-1 SAR Time-Series Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Super-Resolution Restoration of MISR Images Using the UCL MAGiGAN System
Previous Article in Journal
Earth Observation Actionable Information Supporting Disaster Risk Reduction Efforts in a Sustainable Development Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
ENSO and Teleconnections Observed Using MISR Cloud Height Anomalies
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January-1) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessTechnical Note
Remote Sens. 2019, 11(1), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11010050

Arctic Sea Ice Surface Roughness Estimated from Multi-Angular Reflectance Satellite Imagery

1,* and 2,†
1
Department of Geography, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA
2
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-5503, USA
Retired.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 October 2018 / Revised: 12 December 2018 / Accepted: 14 December 2018 / Published: 29 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MISR)
Full-Text   |   PDF [4303 KB, uploaded 29 December 2018]   |  
  |   Review Reports

Abstract

Sea ice surface roughness affects ice-atmosphere interactions, serves as an indicator of ice age, shows patterns of ice convergence and divergence, affects the spatial extent of summer meltponds, and affects ice albedo. We have developed a method for mapping sea ice surface roughness using angular reflectance data from the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) and lidar-derived roughness measurements from the Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM). Using an empirical data modeling approach, we derived estimates of Arctic sea ice roughness ranging from centimeters to decimeters within the MISR 275-m pixel size. Using independent ATM data for validation, we find that histograms of lidar and multi-angular roughness values were nearly identical for areas with a roughness < 20 cm, but for rougher regions, the MISR-estimated roughness had a narrower range of values than the ATM data. The algorithm was able to accurately identify areas that transition between smooth and rough ice. Because of its coarser spatial scale, MISR-estimated roughness data have a variance about half that of ATM roughness data. View Full-Text
Keywords: sea ice; surface roughness; remote sensing; MISR sea ice; surface roughness; remote sensing; MISR
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Nolin, A.W.; Mar, E. Arctic Sea Ice Surface Roughness Estimated from Multi-Angular Reflectance Satellite Imagery. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 50.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top