Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Monitoring and Vibration Analysis of Ancient Bridges by Ground-Based Microwave Interferometry and the ESMD Method
Previous Article in Journal
Unveiling 25 Years of Planetary Urbanization with Remote Sensing: Perspectives from the Global Human Settlement Layer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Erratum

Erratum: Heo, J.-H.; et al. Optimal Interpolation of Precipitable Water Using Low Earth Orbit and Numerical Weather Prediction Data. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 436.

by
Remote Sensing Editorial Office
MDPI AG, St. Alban-Anlage 66, CH-4052 Basel, Switzerland
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(5), 769; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050769
Submission received: 8 May 2018 / Revised: 8 May 2018 / Accepted: 15 May 2018 / Published: 16 May 2018
The Editorial Office of Remote Sensing wish to report an error in the aforementioned published paper [1]. The titles of Figures 5 and 6 as well as Table 3 were incorrect, which were originally:
Figure 5. For OI time period of 7 December 2016 00:00–03:00 UTC, (ad) are background fields for four PW (TPW, BL, ML, and HL); (eh) are observation data for four PW; and (il) are four OI PW fields.
Figure 6. Qualitative validation for OI time period of 7 December 2016 00:00—03:00 UTC. (ad) are four OI-B PW fields; and (eh) are four O-B PW data.
Table 3. Quantitative validation over the period 7 January 2016 00:00—8 January 2016 00:00 UTC. (Left) PW RMSE; (Right) PW bias. The percentages in brackets indicate improvements made over background through the application of OI.
The correct titles of the figures and table are as follows:
Figure 5. For OI time period of 12 July 2016 00:00—03:00 UTC: (ad) are background fields for four PW (TPW, BL, ML, and HL); (eh) are observation data for four PW; and (il) are four OI PW fields.
Figure 6. Qualitative validation for OI time period of 12 July 2016 00:00—03:00 UTC: (ad) are four OI-B PW fields; and (eh) are four O-B PW data.
Table 3. Quantitative validation over the period of 1 July 2016 00:00—1 August 2016 00:00 UTC: (Left) PW RMSE; and (Right) PW bias. The percentages in the brackets indicate improvements made over the background through the application of OI.
We apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by this change. The change does not affect the scientific results. The manuscript will be updated and the original version will remain available on the article webpage.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declare no conflicts of interest.

Reference

  1. Heo, J.-H.; Ryu, G.-H.; Jang, J.-D. Optimal Interpolation of Precipitable Water Using Low Earth Orbit and Numerical Weather Prediction Data. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Remote Sensing Editorial Office. Erratum: Heo, J.-H.; et al. Optimal Interpolation of Precipitable Water Using Low Earth Orbit and Numerical Weather Prediction Data. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 436. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050769

AMA Style

Remote Sensing Editorial Office. Erratum: Heo, J.-H.; et al. Optimal Interpolation of Precipitable Water Using Low Earth Orbit and Numerical Weather Prediction Data. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 436. Remote Sensing. 2018; 10(5):769. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050769

Chicago/Turabian Style

Remote Sensing Editorial Office. 2018. "Erratum: Heo, J.-H.; et al. Optimal Interpolation of Precipitable Water Using Low Earth Orbit and Numerical Weather Prediction Data. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 436." Remote Sensing 10, no. 5: 769. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050769

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop