Next Article in Journal
Comparisons of Spatially Downscaling TMPA and IMERG over the Tibetan Plateau
Next Article in Special Issue
MISR-GOES 3D Winds: Implications for Future LEO-GEO and LEO-LEO Winds
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation and Hydrologic Validation of Three Satellite-Based Precipitation Products in the Upper Catchment of the Red River Basin, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
MISR Radiance Anomalies Induced by Stratospheric Volcanic Aerosols

Instantaneous Top-of-Atmosphere Albedo Comparison between CERES and MISR over the Arctic

Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
Department of Physics, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(12), 1882;
Received: 9 October 2018 / Revised: 15 November 2018 / Accepted: 21 November 2018 / Published: 25 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MISR)
The top-of-atmosphere (TOA) albedo is one of the key parameters in determining the Arctic radiation budget, with continued validation of its retrieval accuracy still required. Based on three years (2007, 2015, 2016) of summertime (May–September) observations from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) and the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR), collocated instantaneous albedos for overcast ocean and snow/ice scenes were compared within the Arctic. For samples where both instruments classified the scene as overcast, the relative root-mean-square (RMS) difference between the sample albedos grew as the solar zenith angle (SZA) increased. The RMS differences that were purely due to differential Bidirectional Reflectance Factor (BRF) anisotropic corrections ( σ A D M ) were estimated to be less than 4% for overcast ocean and overcast snow/ice when the SZA ≤ 70°. The significant agreement between the CERES and MISR strongly increased our confidence in using the instruments overcast cloud albedos in Arctic studies. Nevertheless, there was less agreement in the cloud albedos for larger solar zenith angles, where the RMS differences of σ A D M reached 13.5% for overcast ocean scenes when the SZA > 80°. Additionally, inconsistencies between the CERES and MISR scene identifications were examined, resulting in an overall recommendation for improvements to the MISR snow/ice mask and a rework of the MISR Albedo Cloud Designation (ACD) field by incorporating known strengths of the standard MISR cloud masks. View Full-Text
Keywords: Arctic; top-of-atmosphere albedo; CERES; MISR Arctic; top-of-atmosphere albedo; CERES; MISR
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhan, Y.; Di Girolamo, L.; Davies, R.; Moroney, C. Instantaneous Top-of-Atmosphere Albedo Comparison between CERES and MISR over the Arctic. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1882.

AMA Style

Zhan Y, Di Girolamo L, Davies R, Moroney C. Instantaneous Top-of-Atmosphere Albedo Comparison between CERES and MISR over the Arctic. Remote Sensing. 2018; 10(12):1882.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhan, Yizhe, Larry Di Girolamo, Roger Davies, and Catherine Moroney. 2018. "Instantaneous Top-of-Atmosphere Albedo Comparison between CERES and MISR over the Arctic" Remote Sensing 10, no. 12: 1882.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop