Next Article in Journal
An Overview of Innovative Heritage Deliverables Based on Remote Sensing Techniques
Next Article in Special Issue
Automated Aerial Triangulation for UAV-Based Mapping
Previous Article in Journal
Typhoon/Hurricane-Generated Wind Waves Inferred from SAR Imagery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient SfM for Oblique UAV Images: From Match Pair Selection to Geometrical Verification
Open AccessArticle

Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used

1
Grupo de Investigación en Geomática e Ingeniería Cartográfica (GEOINCA), Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain
2
School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering at Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
3
Grupo de Investigación en Geomática y Computación Gráfica (GEOGRAPH), Universidad de Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Remote Sens. 2018, 10(10), 1606; https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10101606
Received: 21 August 2018 / Revised: 27 September 2018 / Accepted: 1 October 2018 / Published: 9 October 2018
The geometrical accuracy of georeferenced digital surface models (DTM) obtained from images captured by micro-UAVs and processed by using structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry depends on several factors, including flight design, camera quality, camera calibration, SfM algorithms and georeferencing strategy. This paper focusses on the critical role of the number and location of ground control points (GCP) used during the georeferencing stage. A challenging case study involving an area of 1200+ ha, 100+ GCP and 2500+ photos was used. Three thousand, four hundred and sixty-five different combinations of control points were introduced in the bundle adjustment, whilst the accuracy of the model was evaluated using both control points and independent check points. The analysis demonstrates how much the accuracy improves as the number of GCP points increases, as well as the importance of an even distribution, how much the accuracy is overestimated when it is quantified only using control points rather than independent check points, and how the ground sample distance (GSD) of a project relates to the maximum accuracy that can be achieved. View Full-Text
Keywords: ground control points; Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV); structure from motion; accuracy ground control points; Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV); structure from motion; accuracy
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanz-Ablanedo, E.; Chandler, J.H.; Rodríguez-Pérez, J.R.; Ordóñez, C. Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1606.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop