Next Article in Journal
Canscan — An Algorithm for Automatic Extraction of Canyons
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling Net Ecosystem Exchange for Grassland in Central Kazakhstan by Combining Remote Sensing and Field Data
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Remote Sens. 2009, 1(3), 184-196;

Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods

DLR – German Aerospace Center, D-82234 Wessling, Germany
Federal Office of Topography swisstopo, Seftigenstr. 264, CH-3084 Wabern, Switzerland
GFZ – GeoResearchCenter Potsdam, Telegraphenberg, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 June 2009 / Revised: 30 June 2009 / Accepted: 3 July 2009 / Published: 6 July 2009
Full-Text   |   PDF [1300 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]   |  


A comparison of topographic correction methods is conducted for Landsat-5 TM, Landsat-7 ETM+, and SPOT-5 imagery from different geographic areas and seasons. Three successful and known methods are compared: the semi-empirical C correction, the Gamma correction depending on the incidence and exitance angles, and a modified Minnaert approach. In the majority of cases the modified Minnaert approach performed best, but no method is superior in all cases. View Full-Text
Keywords: topography; C; Gamma; and modified Minnaert methods; multi-sensor imagery topography; C; Gamma; and modified Minnaert methods; multi-sensor imagery

Graphical abstract

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Richter, R.; Kellenberger, T.; Kaufmann, H. Comparison of Topographic Correction Methods. Remote Sens. 2009, 1, 184-196.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Remote Sens. EISSN 2072-4292 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top