Next Article in Journal
Agroecological and Social Transformations for Coexistence with Semi-Aridity in Brazil
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental Analysis of the Effect of Geometry and Façade Materials on Urban District’s Equivalent Albedo
Previous Article in Journal
Visualization of Chinese CBM Research: A Scientometrics Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Addressing Large-Scale Energy Retrofit of a Building Stock via Representative Building Samples: Public and Private Perspectives
 
 
Article

A Multi-Step Approach to Assess the Lifecycle Economic Impact of Seismic Risk on Optimal Energy Retrofit

1
Department of Industrial Engineering, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Naples, Italy
3
Department of Medicine, Università degli studi del Molise, Via Cesare Gazzani 47, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Andrea Nicolini
Sustainability 2017, 9(6), 989; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060989
Received: 10 May 2017 / Revised: 30 May 2017 / Accepted: 31 May 2017 / Published: 8 June 2017
Most European buildings built before 1980s were constructed without any design concern for energy efficiency and environmental sustainability. In addition to this issue, over the last decades, the essential need of safer buildings has progressively attracted the interest of scientific community and government institutions. However, the strong interaction between energy and structural aspects in building retrofit design has never been handled via robust and reliable approaches. The present study explores this knowledge gap by introducing a novel multi-step approach that addresses the retrofit of existing buildings by integrating energy, structural and economic aspects. To this end, a multi-stage energy optimization is carried out by implementing a genetic algorithm and a smart research strategy. Thus, the cost-optimal energy retrofit solution is identified and the impact of the expected economic losses due to seismic damage is assessed throughout the building lifecycle. The methodology is applied to a multi-story residential building, considering the effects of two different building locations, namely Milan and Norcia. These latter are characterized by similar climatic conditions but by a different level of seismic risk, which is higher for Norcia. The outcomes show that the estimated seismic economic losses associated with the energy retrofit solutions are strongly affected by the building location. Thus, the selection of the optimal energy retrofit measures should be related to the building structural behavior in order to achieve reliable economic and sustainability benefits. View Full-Text
Keywords: building simulation; building retrofit; expected economic loss; seismic risk; energy retrofit measures; multi-objective optimization; cost-optimal analysis; lifecycle; sustainability building simulation; building retrofit; expected economic loss; seismic risk; energy retrofit measures; multi-objective optimization; cost-optimal analysis; lifecycle; sustainability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mauro, G.M.; Menna, C.; Vitiello, U.; Asprone, D.; Ascione, F.; Bianco, N.; Prota, A.; Vanoli, G.P. A Multi-Step Approach to Assess the Lifecycle Economic Impact of Seismic Risk on Optimal Energy Retrofit. Sustainability 2017, 9, 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060989

AMA Style

Mauro GM, Menna C, Vitiello U, Asprone D, Ascione F, Bianco N, Prota A, Vanoli GP. A Multi-Step Approach to Assess the Lifecycle Economic Impact of Seismic Risk on Optimal Energy Retrofit. Sustainability. 2017; 9(6):989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060989

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mauro, Gerardo Maria, Costantino Menna, Umberto Vitiello, Domenico Asprone, Fabrizio Ascione, Nicola Bianco, Andrea Prota, and Giuseppe Peter Vanoli. 2017. "A Multi-Step Approach to Assess the Lifecycle Economic Impact of Seismic Risk on Optimal Energy Retrofit" Sustainability 9, no. 6: 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060989

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop