Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intentions to Participate in a Formal E-Waste Collection System: A Case Study of Onitsha, Nigeria
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Electrical and Electronic Waste in Nigeria
2.1. Electronic Waste Generation in Nigeria
2.2. Electronic Waste Collection and Recycling in Nigeria
2.3. Laws and Regulations on E-Waste in Nigeria
- Harmful Waste (special criminal provisions) Act, 1988 and updated in 2004. This act bans the conveying, depositing and disposal of hazardous waste [21].
- Environmental Impact Assessment Act, 2004. It guarantees that environmental considerations are made during planning to identify and minimize environmental impacts [21].
- National Environmental (sanitation and waste control) Regulations, 2009. It regulates the transportation, storage, and treatment of hazardous wastes into and within the country [21].
- In 2011, NESREA established a set of guidelines for importers as measures to checkmate the importation of end-of-life electrical/electronic products [21].
- National Environmental (electrical/electronic sector) Regulations, 2011. This regulation adopts a life cycle approach and incorporates all aspects of the electrical/electronic sector from manufacture to disposal, outlining stakeholder responsibilities [21].
2.4. Challenges to Effective Electronic Waste Recycling and Management
- There are few environmental laws/regulations in place that encourage e-waste collection and recycling.
- There exists the problem of no and/or lax enforcement of existing legislation on the trans-boundary movement of e-waste resulting in a huge burden of e-waste imported from developed countries which are highly uncoordinated.
- There are no mandatory or voluntary take-back programs in place for e-waste.
- Consumers, collectors, and crude recyclers lack awareness and/or possess less knowledge of the toxicity of e-waste and the hazards posed by unsuitable recycling methods.
- There is a lack of funding towards financing advances in e-waste recycling.
- The multinational ICT companies pay little or no attention to e-waste management in the developing countries.
- There is the reluctance of individuals and companies to dispose of obsolete EEE or even pay for recycling, especially because of the economic value and emotional attachment placed on obsolete EEE.
3. Theoretical Framework
4. Research Methodology
4.1. Questionnaire Development
4.2. Data Collection and Sampling Distribution
5. Results
5.1. Factor Analysis
5.2. Correlation Analysis
5.3. Hierarchical Moderated Regression Analysis
6. Discussion
6.1. Results Discussion and Implications
6.2. Recommendations for Improving Factors Influencing Consumer’s Intentions
6.3. Recommendations for Developing an E-Waste Collection Infrastructure
7. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Osibanjo, O.; Nnorom, I.C. The challenge of electronic waste (e-waste) management in developing countries. Waste Manag. Res. 2007, 25, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schluep, M.; Hagelueken, C.; Kuehr, R.; Magalini, F.; Maurer, C.; Meskers, C.; Mueller, E.; Wang, F. Recycling—From E-Waste to Resources; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Nnorom, I.C.; Ohakwe, J.; Osibanjo, O. Survey of willingness of residents to participate in electronic waste recycling in Nigeria—A case study of mobile phone recycling. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17, 1629–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogungbuyi, O.; Nnorom, I.; Osibanjo, O.; Schluep, M. e-Waste Country Assessment Nigeria; Basel Convention: Basel, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Mundada, M.N.; Kumar, S.; Shekdar, A.V. E-WASTE: A New Challenge for Waste Management in India. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 2004, 61, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furter, L. E-waste has dawned: Feature. ReSource 2004, 6, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
- Nnorom, I.C.; Osibanjo, O. Electronic waste (e-waste): Material flows and management practices in Nigeria. Waste Manag. 2008, 28, 1472–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pakpour, A.H.; Zeidi, I.M.; Emamjomeh, M.M.; Asefzadeh, S.; Pearson, H. Household waste behaviours among a community sample in Iran: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 980–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taylor, S.; Todd, P. An Integrated Model of Waste Management Behavior. Environ. Behav. 1995, 27, 603–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karim Ghan, W.A.; Rusli, I.F.; Biak, D.R.A.; Idris, A. An application of the theory of planned behaviour to study the influencing factors of participation in source separation of food waste. Waste Manag. 2013, 33, 1276–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tonglet, M.; Phillips, P.S.; Read, A.D. Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: A case study from Brixworth, UK. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2004, 41, 191–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osibanjo, O.; Nnorom, I.C. Material flows of mobile phones and accessories in Nigeria: Environmental implications and sound end-of-life management options. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2008, 28, 198–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldé, C.P.; Wang, F.; Kuehr, R.; Huisman, J. Global E-Waste Monitor 2014; United Nations University, IAS-SYCLE: Bonn, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Tanaka, M.; Matsui, Y. Electrical and electronic waste management in China: Progress and the barriers to overcome. Waste Manag. Res. 2006, 24, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Puckett, J.; Byster, L.; Westervelt, S.; Gutierrez, R.; Davis, S.; Hussain, A.; Dutta, M.; Coalition, S.V.T.; Network, B.A.; Smith, T. Exporting Harm: The High-Tech Trashing of Asia; The Basel Action Network: Seattle, WA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Roman, L.; Puckett, J. E-scrap exportation: Challenges and considerations. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–9 May 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Badiane, A.; Falade, J.B.; Okpala, D.; Onweluzo, F.; Ajayi, M.O.; Ejindu, C.F.; Okojie, C.C.; Udeaja, C.I. United Nations Habitat Onitsha Urban Profile. 2012. Available online: http://mirror.unhabitat.org/pmss/getElectronicVersion.aspx?nr=3409&alt=1 (accessed on 29 March 2017).
- Okorhi, O.; Amadi-Echendu, J. Technology Paradigm for E-Waste Management in South-Eastern Nigeria; Intrenational Association for Management of Techonology: Coral Gables, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 802–823. [Google Scholar]
- Okoye, A.; Odoh, C. Assessment of the Level of Awareness of E-Waste Management and Concern for the Environment amongst the Populace in Onitsha, Southeastern Nigeria. J. Environ. Prot. (Irvine Calif.) 2014, 5, 120–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ladan, M. Review of NESREA act 2007 and regulations 2009–2011: A new dawn in environmental compliance and enforcement in Nigeria. Law Environ. Dev. J. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amachree, M. NESREA. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Global E-Waste Management Network (GEM3), San Francisco, CA, USA, 15–19 July 2013. [Google Scholar]
- UNEP, International Environmental Technology Centre. E-Waste Volume II E-waste Management Manual; UNEP, International Environmental Technology Centre: Nairobi, Kenya, 2007; p. 128. [Google Scholar]
- Darby, L.; Obara, L. Household recycling behaviour and attitudes towards the disposal of small electrical and electronic equipment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2005, 44, 17–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finlay, A. E-Waste Challenges in Developing Countries: South African Case Study; APC Issue Pap. Ser.; Association for Progressive Communications (APC): Nairobi, Kenya, 2005; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Nnorom, I.C.; Osibanjo, O. Overview of electronic waste (e-waste) management practices and legislations, and their poor applications in the developing countries. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2008, 52, 843–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walton, S.V.; Handfield, R.B. The Green Supply Chain: Integrating Suppliers into Environmental Management Processes. Int. J. Purch. Mater. Manag. 1998, 34, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action Control; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1985; pp. 11–39. [Google Scholar]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. Residual Effects of Past on Later Behavior: Habituation and Reasoned Action Perspectives. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2002, 6, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weigel, F.K.; Hazen, B.T.; Cegielski, C.G. Diffusion of Innovations and the Theory of Planned Behavior in Information Systems Research: A Metaanalysis. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2014, 31, 619–636. [Google Scholar]
- Boldero, J. The Prediction of Household Recycling of Newspapers: The Role of Attitudes, Intentions, and Situational Factors. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1995, 25, 440–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, J.; Foxall, G.; Pallister, J. Beyond the intention-behaviour mythology: An integrated model of recycling. Mark. Theory 2002, 2, 29–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, F.; Wang, X.; Sun, X.; Abdullah, A.T.M. Influencing factors and moderating factors of consumers’ intentions to participate in e-waste recycling. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), Beijing, China, 25–27 June 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Qu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, Y. Motivating small-displacement car purchasing in China. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2014, 67, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ittiravivongs, A. Household Waste Recycling Behavior in Thailand: The Role of Responsibility. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Future Environment and Energy, Singapore, 26 Fuberary 2012; Volume 28, pp. 21–26. [Google Scholar]
- Aung, M.; Arias, M.L. Examining waste management in San Pablo del Lago, Ecuador: A behavioral framework. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2006, 17, 740–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lansana, F. A comparative analysis of curbside recycling behaviour in urban and suburban communities. Profr. Geogr. 1993, 45, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Yin, J.; Zhang, X. Willingness and behavior towards e-waste recycling for residents in Beijing city, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, P.; Lyas, J.; Maynard, S.; Van Vugt, M. On the relationship between set-out rates and participation ratios as a tool for enhancement of kerbside household waste recycling. J. Environ. 2007, 83, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bezzina, F.H.; Dimech, S. Investigating the determinants of recycling behaviour in Malta. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2011, 22, 463–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Jor, N. Policy and Institutional Assessment of Solid Waste Management in Five Countries: Cyprus, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Tunisia: Regional Synthesis. Available online: https://planbleu.org/sites/default/files/publications/gestion_dechets_synthese_regionale_en.pdf (accessed on 18 May 2017).
- Chu, P.-Y.; Chiu, J.-F. Factors Influencing Household Waste Recycling Behavior: Test of an integrated Model. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 33, 604–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demographia. “Demographia World Urban Areas” (13th ed.). Available online: www.demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf (accessed on 28 March 2017).
- Cochran, W.G. Sampling Techniques; John Wiley Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1977; Volume 428. [Google Scholar]
- Erdos, P.L.; Morgan, A.J. Professional Mail Surveys; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Lefever, S.; Dal, M.; Matthiasdottir, A. Online data collection in academic research: Advantages and limitations. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2007, 38, 574–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Purcell, M.; Magette, W.L. Attitudes and behaviour towards waste management in the Dublin, Ireland region. Waste Manag. 2010, 30, 1997–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ott, R.; Longnecker, M.; Ott, L. A First Course in Statistical Methods; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, J.Y.; He, X.H. SPSS Statistical Data Analysis and Application; Posts & Telecommunications Press: Beijing, China, 2004; pp. 237–249. [Google Scholar]
- Pearson, K. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1895, 58, 240–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, Y.; Zhu, Q. The Effect of Situational Factors on the Relationship between Behavior Intention and Behavior for Source Separation of Household Waste—Management Review. Manag. Rev. 2010, 22, 121–128. [Google Scholar]
- Jaccard, J.; Wan, C.; Turrisi, R. The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behav. Res. 1990, 25, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dean, J.; Snell, S. Integrated manufacturing and job design: Moderating effects of organizational inertia. Acad. Manag. J. 1991, 34, 776–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J. Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing. J. Oper. Manag. 2004, 22, 265–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Q.; Li, Y.; Geng, Y.; Qi, Y. Green food consumption intention, behaviors and influencing factors among Chinese consumers. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 28, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afshartous, D.; Preston, R. Key result of interaction models with centering. J. Stat. Educ. 2011, 19, 1–24. [Google Scholar]
- Cronbach, L.J. Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychol. Bull. 1987, 102, 414–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knussen, C.; Yule, F.; MacKenzie, J.; Wells, M. An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: The roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities. J. Environ. Psychol. 2004, 24, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, H.; Schoenung, J. Used consumer electronics: A comparative analysis of materials recycling technologies. Electron. Environ. 2004, 226, 230. [Google Scholar]
- Barr, S. Factors Influencing Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: A U.K. Case Study of Household Waste Management. Available online: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0013916505283421 (accessed on 18 May 2017).
Demographic Attribute | Frequency, n | Percent, % |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 209 | 57% |
Female | 175 | 43% |
Age | ||
18–30 | 111 | 29% |
31–40 | 104 | 27% |
41–50 | 91 | 24% |
50> | 78 | 20% |
Education | ||
Primary School | 69 | 18% |
Secondary School | 89 | 23% |
Technical/Vocational Training | 101 | 26% |
University/Higher Institution | 125 | 33% |
Monthly Income | ||
<18,000 Naira | 52 | 14% |
18,100–49,000 Naira | 65 | 17% |
50,000–99,000 Naira | 70 | 18% |
100,000–299,000 Naira | 119 | 31% |
300,000–500,000 Naira | 45 | 12% |
500,000 Naira > | 33 | 9% |
Frequency, n | Percent, % | |
---|---|---|
a Level of Awareness | ||
High awareness | 73 | 19% |
Low awareness | 124 | 32% |
No idea | 187 | 49% |
b Informal Disposal Behavior | ||
Ignore or do nothing/Store at home | 82 | 33% |
Dispose along with household waste | 156 | 57% |
Re-sell to informal collectors/Scavengers | 95 | 38% |
Abandon with technician/repairer | 83 | 27% |
Donate to family/friends/charity | 50 | 18% |
Open burning/incineration | 39 | 7% |
Items | Main Factor 1 | |
---|---|---|
Intention | I intend to drop-off my e-waste at collection centers to create space in the house. | 0.828 |
I am willing to participate in environmental programs by the government. | 0.815 | |
I intend to participate in a formal e-waste collection if I am satisfied with the collection measures by the government. | 0.761 | |
I intend to drop-off my e-waste if there are formal collection systems. | 0.749 | |
I am willing to engage in formal e-waste management methods. | 0.733 |
Items | Main Factors | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||
Environmental Knowledge | I know that recycling preserves natural resources for the benefit of present and future generations. | 0.851 | 0.154 | 0.085 |
I know that proper management of e-waste reduces the use of landfills and emissions of greenhouse gasses. | 0.791 | 0.186 | 0.176 | |
I know that e-wastes should be disposed separately from general household wastes. | 0.738 | 0.058 | 0.277 | |
E-waste can be a resource if properly managed. | 0.603 | 0.084 | 0.396 | |
I know that e-waste contains toxic & hazardous substances that are harmful to human health & deteriorates the Environment. | 0.543 | 0.099 | 0.260 | |
Subjective Norm | My friends would influence me to participate in e-waste collections | 0.075 | 0.877 | 0.223 |
The community where I live would influence me to participate. | 0.188 | 0.875 | 0.002 | |
My family would influence me to participate in e-waste collections. | −0.028 | 0.797 | 0.226 | |
Government regulations would influence me to participate. | 0.342 | 0.654 | 0.053 | |
Attitude | The e-waste stored at home should be dropped off for recycling. | 0.165 | 0.130 | 0.819 |
Dropping off my household e-waste for recycling is rewarding. | 0.200 | 0.112 | 0.700 | |
I have a strong interest in the well-being of my community. | 0.299 | 0.063 | 0.729 | |
Citizens should be concerned about proper e-waste management. | 0.289 | 0.281 | 0.682 |
Items | Main Factors | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | ||
Infrastructure | The collection centers have to be properly managed. | 0.833 | 0.075 |
I will drop-off my e-waste if the government provides adequate infrastructure. | 0.826 | 0.069 | |
E-waste collection centers have to be situated close to the community. | 0.767 | 0.154 | |
The collection centers ought to be a sustainable establishment. | 0.622 | −0.396 | |
Economic Incentive | I am more likely to participate if collection schemes are linked with financial incentives. | −0.001 | 0.889 |
Governments financial incentives will encourage me to drop off my e-waste at a collection center. | 0.133 | 0.854 |
Variables | KMO | Main Factors | No. of Items | Cronbach’s Alpha | % of Variance | Mean | S.D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Influencing Factors | 0.84 | Attitude | 4 | 0.801 | 22.60 | 4.281 | 0.641 |
Subjective Norm | 4 | 0.836 | 21.01 | 3.796 | 0.736 | ||
Environmental Knowledge | 5 | 0.820 | 20.99 | 4.202 | 0.593 | ||
Total 64.54 | |||||||
Moderating factors | 0.78 | Economic Incentive | 2 | 0.751 | 39.48 | 3.719 | 0.950 |
Infrastructure | 4 | 0.750 | 28.25 | 4.158 | 0.609 | ||
Total 67.74 | |||||||
Intention | 0.78 | Intention | 5 | 0.828 | 62.91 | 4.115 | 0.575 |
Attitude | Subjective Norm | Environmental Knowledge | Infrastructure | Economic Incentive | Intention | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Attitude | 1 | |||||
Subjective Norm | 0.392 ** | 1 | ||||
Environmental Knowledge | 0.578 ** | 0.353 ** | 1 | |||
Infrastructure | 0.500 ** | 0.311 ** | 0.528 ** | 1 | ||
Economic Incentive | 0.090 | 0.290 ** | 0.063 | 0.044 | 1 | |
Intention | 0.502 ** | 0.420 ** | 0.507 ** | 0.728 ** | 0.174 ** | 1 |
Variable Entered | Dependent Variable | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | ||
Demographic Variables | Gender | −0.040 | −0.054 | −0.035 | −0.038 |
Age | 0.168 * | 0.100 | 0.073 + | 0.087 * | |
Education | 0.094 | 0.063 | 0.024 | 0.035 | |
Income | −0.094 | −0.124 ** | −0.076 * | −0.072 * | |
Independent Variable | Attitude | 0.495 *** | 0.184 *** | 0.148 *** | |
Moderator | Infrastructure | 0.626 *** | 0.671 *** | ||
Interaction Variable | Attitude × Infrastructure | −0.123 *** | |||
F for the Regression | 3.364 | 28.498 *** | 81.363 ** | 73.125 *** | |
F for the Step | 3.364 | 124.657 *** | 251.502 *** | 10.907 *** | |
Adjusted R2 | 0.012 | 0.281 | 0.607 | 0.635 |
Variable Entered | Dependent Variable | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | ||
Demographic Variables | Gender | −0.040 | −0.057 | −0.038 | −0.045 |
Age | 0.168 ** | 0.104 * | 0.062 + | 0.066 + | |
Education | 0.094 * | 0.030 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
Income | −0.099 * | −0.098 + | −0.065 + | −0.058 + | |
Independent variable | Subjective Norm | 0.407 *** | 0.212 *** | 0.221 *** | |
Moderator | Infrastructure | 0.655 *** | 0.631 *** | ||
Interaction variable | Subjective Norm × Infrastructure | −0.088 ** | |||
F for the regression | 3.364 | 8.143 *** | 86.248 *** | 75.937 *** | |
F for the step | 3.364 | 74.648 *** | 44.546 *** | 6.518 ** | |
Adjusted R2 | 0.012 | 0.173 | 0.611 | 0.628 |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nduneseokwu, C.K.; Qu, Y.; Appolloni, A. Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intentions to Participate in a Formal E-Waste Collection System: A Case Study of Onitsha, Nigeria. Sustainability 2017, 9, 881. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060881
Nduneseokwu CK, Qu Y, Appolloni A. Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intentions to Participate in a Formal E-Waste Collection System: A Case Study of Onitsha, Nigeria. Sustainability. 2017; 9(6):881. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060881
Chicago/Turabian StyleNduneseokwu, Chibuike Kingsley, Ying Qu, and Andrea Appolloni. 2017. "Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intentions to Participate in a Formal E-Waste Collection System: A Case Study of Onitsha, Nigeria" Sustainability 9, no. 6: 881. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060881
APA StyleNduneseokwu, C. K., Qu, Y., & Appolloni, A. (2017). Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intentions to Participate in a Formal E-Waste Collection System: A Case Study of Onitsha, Nigeria. Sustainability, 9(6), 881. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060881