Next Article in Journal
A Framework for Building Efficient Environmental Permitting Processes
Next Article in Special Issue
Modifying Bananas: From Transgenics to Organics?
Previous Article in Journal
Providing Appropriate Technology for Emerging Markets: Case Study on China’s Solar Thermal Industry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mass Releases of Genetically Modified Insects in Area-Wide Pest Control Programs and Their Impact on Organic Farmers
Review

Why Organic Farming Should Embrace Co-Existence with Cisgenic Late Blight–Resistant Potato

1
Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
2
VIB, Rijvisschestraat 120, 9052 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Gerhart U. Ryffel
Sustainability 2017, 9(2), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020172
Received: 20 July 2016 / Revised: 13 January 2017 / Accepted: 18 January 2017 / Published: 25 January 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Organic Farming and Gene Manipulation)
The EU regulation on organic farming does not allow the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) which are subject to Directive 2001/18/EC. Mutagenesis using irradiation or chemicals is genetic modification, but the organisms obtained through these techniques are not subject to the provisions of the GMO directive. Such mutants can therefore be used in organic agriculture. Derived from its basic principles, organic farming can only use natural substances to control disease and crops should be resilient, which, in the case of disease resistance, means that durable (horizontal) resistance is preferred to vertical (single gene) resistance. Cisgenesis can achieve such a durable resistance by introducing multiple resistance genes in one step. These multiple-resistant plants only contain natural genes that can also be introduced by breeding. In case cisgenic plants are not subject to the provisions of the GMO legislation, they can even be legally used in organic agriculture. In case they are not exempted from the GMO regulation, the question is: why obstruct a cisgenic potato crop that can hardly be distinguished from a potato crop that is the result of conventional breeding? Among the reasons why organic agriculture does not allow the use of GMOs it is mentioned that genetic engineering is unpredictable, it causes genome disruption and it is unnatural. However, our knowledge of plant genome evolution and breeding has increased dramatically. We now know that breeding is more unpredictable and causes more genome disruption than genetic engineering. Recent field trials have shown the efficacy of cisgenic late blight–resistant potatoes carrying multiple resistance genes. Large-scale growing of such durably resistant potatoes would not only be environmentally beneficial by it would strongly reducing the need for fungicide sprays in conventional potato cultivation and it would also reduce the disease pressure in organic potato cultivation. View Full-Text
Keywords: cisgenesis; late blight resistance; new breeding technologies; organic farming cisgenesis; late blight resistance; new breeding technologies; organic farming
MDPI and ACS Style

Gheysen, G.; Custers, R. Why Organic Farming Should Embrace Co-Existence with Cisgenic Late Blight–Resistant Potato. Sustainability 2017, 9, 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020172

AMA Style

Gheysen G, Custers R. Why Organic Farming Should Embrace Co-Existence with Cisgenic Late Blight–Resistant Potato. Sustainability. 2017; 9(2):172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020172

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gheysen, Godelieve, and René Custers. 2017. "Why Organic Farming Should Embrace Co-Existence with Cisgenic Late Blight–Resistant Potato" Sustainability 9, no. 2: 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020172

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop