Next Article in Journal
Can Precision Agriculture Increase the Profitability and Sustainability of the Production of Potatoes and Olives?
Next Article in Special Issue
A Values-Based Approach to Exploring Synergies between Livestock Farming and Landscape Conservation in Galicia (Spain)
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Criteria Analyses of Urban Planning for City Expansion: A Case Study of Zamora, Spain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing Tourists’ Preferences for Recreational Trips in National and Natural Parks as a Premise for Long-Term Sustainable Management Plans
Article

Natural Resource Economics, Planetary Boundaries and Strong Sustainability

Department of Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1771, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2017, 9(10), 1858; https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101858
Received: 29 September 2017 / Revised: 13 October 2017 / Accepted: 15 October 2017 / Published: 17 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Resources Economics)
Earth systems science maintains that there are nine “planetary boundaries” that demarcate a sustainable, safe operating space for humankind for essential global sinks and resources. Respecting these planetary boundaries represents the “strong sustainability” perspective in economics, which argues that some natural capital may not be substituted and are inviolate. In addition, the safe operating space defined by these boundaries can be considered a depletable stock. We show that standard tools of natural resource economics for an exhaustible resource can thus be applied, which has implications for optimal use, price paths, technological innovation, and stock externalities. These consequences in turn affect the choice of policies that may be adopted to manage and allocate the safe operating space available for humankind. View Full-Text
Keywords: natural capital; natural resource economics; ecological economics; planetary boundaries; strong sustainability; weak sustainability; sustainable development natural capital; natural resource economics; ecological economics; planetary boundaries; strong sustainability; weak sustainability; sustainable development
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Barbier, E.B.; Burgess, J.C. Natural Resource Economics, Planetary Boundaries and Strong Sustainability. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101858

AMA Style

Barbier EB, Burgess JC. Natural Resource Economics, Planetary Boundaries and Strong Sustainability. Sustainability. 2017; 9(10):1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101858

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barbier, Edward B., and Joanne C. Burgess 2017. "Natural Resource Economics, Planetary Boundaries and Strong Sustainability" Sustainability 9, no. 10: 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101858

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop