Next Article in Journal
A Performance Evaluation of the BIM-Based Object-Oriented Physical Modeling Technique for Building Thermal Simulations: A Comparative Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Paradigm Analysis in the Development of Policies for a Resource Efficient Economy
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2016, 8(7), 651;

Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Urban Systems in China during Rapid Urbanization

Collaborative Innovation Center for China Economy, School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development & Collaborative Innovation Center on Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Henan University, Kaifeng 475001, China
Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9155, USA
Centre for Modern Chinese City Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Vida Maliene
Received: 17 January 2016 / Revised: 17 April 2016 / Accepted: 20 April 2016 / Published: 8 July 2016
Full-Text   |   PDF [2607 KB, uploaded 8 July 2016]   |  


The structure of urban hierarchy and the role of cities of different sizes have drawn considerable scholarly interests and societal concerns. This paper analyzes the evolution and underlying mechanisms of urban hierarchy in China during the recent period of rapid urbanization. By comparing scale changes of seven types of cities (megacity, large city, Type I big city, Type II big city, medium-sized city, type I small city and type II small city), we find that allometry is the main characteristic of urban hierarchical evolution in China. We also test the validity of Zipf’s law and Gibrat’s law, which broaden the scope of existing studies by including county-level cities. We find that urban hierarchical distribution is lognormal, rather than Pareto. The result also shows that city size growth rates are constant across cities of different types. For better understanding of the mechanisms of urban hierarchical formation, we measure the optimal city size and resource allocation by the Pareto optimality criterion and non-parametric frontier method. The main findings are as follows: (1) scale efficiency is still at a relatively low level among the seven types of cities; (2) the economic efficiency of megacities and large cities is overestimated when compared to economic-environmental efficiency. Hence, this paper has two policy implications: (1) to correct factor market (land, labor and infrastructure investment) distortions among different types of cities for the improvement of efficiency; (2) to strengthen rural property rights to improve social equity, as well as land use intensity. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban hierarchy; Zipf’s law; Gibrat’s law; total-factor productivity; China urban hierarchy; Zipf’s law; Gibrat’s law; total-factor productivity; China

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Wei, Y.D.; Ning, Y. Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Urban Systems in China during Rapid Urbanization. Sustainability 2016, 8, 651.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top