Characteristics of Urban Sustainability in the Cases of Multi Commercial Complexes from the Perspective of the “Ground”
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Study
2.1. Analogical Inference of Neo-Rationalism Architecture
2.2. Image of the City and Figure-Ground Theory
3. Analytical Framework
3.1. Elements of Contemporary Cities
3.2. Analysis Methodology: Figure-Ground Approach
3.3. Urban Sustainability from the Perspective of the “Ground”
3.3.1. Passive Circulation
3.3.2. Amenity
3.3.3. Mobility
3.3.4. Flexibility
4. Case Analysis Based on the Urban Sustainability
4.1. Canal City (Fukuoka, Japan, 1996)
4.1.1. Contextual Inference and Figure-Ground Design Process
4.1.2. Urban Sustainability: Responding Communication
4.2. Sony Center (Berlin, Germany, 2000)
4.2.1. Contextual Inference and Figure-Ground Design Process
4.2.2. Urban Sustainability: Contextual Approach
4.3. Zlota Taracy (Warsaw, Poland, 2007)
4.3.1. Contextual Inference and Figure-Ground Design Process
4.3.2. Urban Sustainability: Historical Context
4.4. Namba Park (Fukuoka Japan, 2007)
4.4.1. Contextual Inference and Figure-Ground Design Process
4.4.2. Urban Sustainability: Co-Existing Flow
4.5. Linked Hybrid (Beijing, China, 2009)
4.5.1. Contextual Inference and Figure-Ground Design Process
4.5.2. Urban Sustainability: Hybrid Urban Scape
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Domique, G.M. Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Germany; Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; pp. 34–35, 92–121. [Google Scholar]
- Netzband, M.; Stefanov, W.L.; Redman, C. Applied Remote Sensing for Urban Planning, Governance and Sustainability; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Germany; Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Beniamino, M.; Giuseppe, B.; Alessandra, L. Geocomputation, Sustainability and Environmental Planning; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany; Berlin, Germany, 2011; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Wortham-Galvin, B.D. The Woof and the Warp of Architecture: The Figure-Ground in Urban Design. Delft Archit. Theory J. 2010, 7, 69–73. [Google Scholar]
- Vojnovic, I. Urban Sustainability: A Global Perspective; Michigan State University Press: East Lansing, MI, USA, 2012; pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
- Van Der Heijden, J. Governance for Urban Sustainability and Resilience: Responding to Climate Change and the Relevance of the Built Environment; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2015; pp. 124–152. [Google Scholar]
- James, P. Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability; Taylor and Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2014; pp. 22–24. [Google Scholar]
- Thwaites, K. Urban Sustainability through Environmental Design: Approaches to Time, People, and Place Responsive Urban Spaces; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2007; pp. 27–52. [Google Scholar]
- Baofu, P. The Future of Post-Human Urban Planning: A Preface to a New Theory of Density, Void, and Sustainability; Cambridge Scholars Publishing: England, UK, 2009; pp. 169–223. [Google Scholar]
- Manzi, T.; Lucas, K.; Jones, T.L. Social Sustainability in Urban Areas: Communities, Connectivity and the Urban Fabric; Taylor and Francis: Oxfordshire, UK, 2010; pp. 105–159. [Google Scholar]
- Bovill, C. Sustainability in Architecture and Urban Design; Routledge Tayer & Francis group: Abingdon, UK, 2015; pp. 199–216. [Google Scholar]
- Colantonio, A.; Dixon, T. Urban Regeneration and Social Sustainability: Best Practice from European Cities; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 54–80. [Google Scholar]
- Nadarajah, M.; Yamamoto, A. Urban Crisis: Culture and the Sustainability of Cities; Wiley-Blacjwell: Hoboken, NL, USA, 2006; pp. 1–79. [Google Scholar]
- Aldo, R. L’architettura Della Citta; The Institute for Architecture and Urban Studies and The Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1982; pp. 9–13. [Google Scholar]
- Roelfsema, P.; Lamme, V.; Spekreijse, H.; Bosch, H. Figure-Ground Segregation in a Recurrent Network Architecture. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2002, 14, 525–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Linch, K. The Image of the City; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1960. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.H.; Song, D.H. A study and the urban characteristics in Architecture of Neo-Rationalism. Proc. Archit. Inst. Korea 2012, 8, 301–304. [Google Scholar]
- Vanderhoeven, F.; Rosemann, H.J. Urban Transformations and Sustainability; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2006; pp. 57–66. [Google Scholar]
- Dixon, T.; Eames, M.; Hunt, M.; Lannon, S. Urban Retrofitting for Sustainability: Mapping the Transition to 2050; Taylor and Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2014; pp. 333–374. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, E. Urban design and notional changes in the concept of publicness over time. J. Digit. Design. 2008, 1, 478–486. [Google Scholar]
- Woo, J.H.; Kim, U. A Study on the public space planning based on figure & ground theory in urban image. Proc. Archit. Inst. Korea 2008, 52, 237–240. [Google Scholar]
- Matthew, I.S. Sustainability in America’s Cities; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Metzger, J.; Rader Olsson, A. Sustainable Stockholm: Exploring Urban Sustainability in Europe’s Greenest City; Taylor and Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2013; pp. 71–101. [Google Scholar]
- Pavel, M.P. Breakthrough Communities: Sustainability and Justice in the Next American Metropolis; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 1–106. [Google Scholar]
- Boone, C.; Fragkias, M. Urbanization and Sustainability; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 18–20. [Google Scholar]
- Sanders, J.C. Seattle and the Roots of Urban Sustainability: Inventing Ecotopia; Pittsburgh History of the Urban Environment; University of Pittsburgh Press: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2010; pp. 99–130. [Google Scholar]
- Birch, E.L.; Wachter, S.M. City in the Twenty-First Century: Growing Greener Cities: Urban Sustainability in the Twenty-first Century; University of Pennsylvania Press: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 2008; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Vollmer, D. Pathways to Urban Sustainability: Lessons from the Atlanta Metropolitan Region; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; pp. 24–26. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, D.E. Sustainable Design: Ecology, Architecture, and Planning; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2007; pp. 18–19, 69–79. [Google Scholar]
- Henn, R.L.; Hoffman, A.J.; Biggart, N.W. Urban and Industrial Environments: Constructing Green: The Social Structures of Sustainability; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; pp. 197–217. [Google Scholar]
- Schröpfer, T. Ecological Urban Architecture: Qualitative Approaches to Sustainability; Birkhauser-Publisher for Architecture: Berlin, Germany, 2012; pp. 80–119. [Google Scholar]
- Bradbury, R. You Are Here: The Jerde Partnership International; Phaidon Press Limited: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Werner, B. Helmut Jahn Architecture Engineering; Birkhauser-Publisher for Architecture: Berlin, Germany, 2002; pp. 40–59, 40–42. [Google Scholar]
- Cecilia, F.M.; Levene, R. Steven Holl Architects_Selected Works 2003/2008; El Croquis Editorial: Madrid, Spain, 2008; pp. 226–247, 478–486. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, S. Steven Holl’s Approaches and Planning Characteristics Based on Urban Porosity in the Multi Complexes. J. Archit. Inst. Korea 2014, 319, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinstein, M.P.; Turner, R.E. Sustainability Science: The Emerging Paradigm and the Urban Environment; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 64–65. [Google Scholar]
Canal City | Sony Center | Zlota Taracy | Namba Park | Linked Hybrid | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contextual inference for the ground concept | Canal | Fuji mountain | Pearl necklace | Canyon | Porosity | ||||||
Parallel direction with the flow of river | Semi-outdoor space with a membrane roof | Waved form curved atrium with glittering face | Large park with a natural hill | Public spaces placed vertically in the high story buildings | |||||||
Infusion from urban surrounding | |||||||||||
Reaction with Figure-Ground | |||||||||||
Index | Ground | Ground | Ground | Ground | Ground | ||||||
Figure | Figure | Figure | Figure | Figure | |||||||
Flow of the river | Extending street | Neighboring historical park | Entry direction | Unbalanced publicity | |||||||
Sense of place | Diverse directions | ||||||||||
Design priority | G ↓ | Canal, square | G ↓ | Extended street | F ↓ | Building Function | F ↓ | Building function | F ↓ | Several towers | |
F ↓ | Buildings | G ↓ | Square | G ↓ | Diverse entry | G ↓ | Covering green roof | G ↓ | Public area on the basic ground | ||
G | Path through the building | F | Surrounding towers | G | Covering transparent roof | G/F | Porous voids Among the building | F/G | Sky bridge connecting the towers | ||
Sectional image of ground | |||||||||||
Physical | |||||||||||
Visual |
Canal City | Sony Center | Zlota Taracy | Namba Park | Linked Hybrid | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ground concept | ||||||||||
Inner Ground | Extended Ground | Ground within the atrium | Ground through the roof | Basic Ground | ||||||
Outer Ground | Open ground | Hanging Ground | ||||||||
A. Passive circulation | Externalized corridor | Theroof of a membrane | Waved atrium | Natural formed roof | Emptied 1st floor | |||||
Outdoor environment | Pleasant indirect lighting from | Natural ventilation | Commercial area as a park | Natural environment | ||||||
B. Amenity | Guest seating area in a waterside | Semi outdoor square | Communication with neighboring contexts | Park with natural form | Towers connected via bridges | |||||
Cooperative stage | Historical memory | A new urban image | Resting or gathering | Hybrid urbanscape | ||||||
C. Mobility | Water routes | Active movement | Emptied atrium | Open structures with various levels | Hanging ground on the 20th floor | |||||
Easy access from the city | Square open to the city | Leading the active movement | Access from each levels | Convenient common services | ||||||
D. Flexibility | Diverse experiences upon the situations | Extended streets + paths + framing void | Expanded facility toward the atrium | Outdoor roof as a park | Sky bridge and Emptied 1st floor | |||||
Cognitive | Physical/Visual | Functional | Physical | Cognitive/Physical |
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Kim, S.; Han, J. Characteristics of Urban Sustainability in the Cases of Multi Commercial Complexes from the Perspective of the “Ground”. Sustainability 2016, 8, 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050439
Kim S, Han J. Characteristics of Urban Sustainability in the Cases of Multi Commercial Complexes from the Perspective of the “Ground”. Sustainability. 2016; 8(5):439. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050439
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Soomi, and Jiae Han. 2016. "Characteristics of Urban Sustainability in the Cases of Multi Commercial Complexes from the Perspective of the “Ground”" Sustainability 8, no. 5: 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050439
APA StyleKim, S., & Han, J. (2016). Characteristics of Urban Sustainability in the Cases of Multi Commercial Complexes from the Perspective of the “Ground”. Sustainability, 8(5), 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050439