Next Article in Journal
Spatio-Temporal Variations of Rain-Use Efficiency in the West of Songliao Plain, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Sense and Non-Sense of Local–Global Food Chain Comparison, Empirical Evidence from Dutch and Italian Pork Case Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Opportunities for Underutilised Crops in Southern Africa’s Post–2015 Development Agenda
Previous Article in Special Issue
Addressing Policy Challenges for More Sustainable Local–Global Food Chains: Policy Frameworks and Possible Food “Futures”
Open AccessArticle

Handling Diversity of Visions and Priorities in Food Chain Sustainability Assessment

Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, Pisa 56124, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Iain Gordon
Sustainability 2016, 8(4), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040305
Received: 26 December 2015 / Revised: 10 March 2016 / Accepted: 21 March 2016 / Published: 25 March 2016
Food chain sustainability assessment is challenging on several grounds. Handling knowledge and information on sustainability performance and coping with the diversity of visions around “what counts as sustainable food” are two key issues addressed by this study. By developing a comparative case study on local, regional and global wheat-to-bread chains, and confronting the multidimensionality of sustainability, this work focuses on the differing visions and perspectives of stakeholders. We integrate qualitative and quantitative data, stakeholder consultation and multi-criteria analysis to align the visions and the multiple meanings of sustainability. Because of the complexity and the dynamicity of the food system, the multidimensionality of the sustainability concept and its pliability to stakeholders priorities, sustainability is an object of competition for firms in the agro-food sector and has major implications in the governance of food chains. Results identify key propositions in relation to: (i) the value of combining science-led evidence with socio-cultural values; (ii) multidimensional sustainability assessment as a self diagnosis tool; and (iii) the need to identify shared assessment criteria by communities of reference. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainability assessment; multi-criteria analysis; food chain; bread; Italy sustainability assessment; multi-criteria analysis; food chain; bread; Italy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Galli, F.; Bartolini, F.; Brunori, G. Handling Diversity of Visions and Priorities in Food Chain Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability 2016, 8, 305.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop