Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Urban Development Calls for Responsibility through Life Cycle Management
Previous Article in Journal
The Customer Citizenship Behaviors of Food Blog Users
Open AccessArticle

Application of a Decision Support Tool in Three Renovation Projects

by Linus Malmgren 1,*,† and Kristina Mjörnell 1,2,†
1
SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, P.O. Box 857, Borås S-501 15, Sweden
2
Department of Building Physics, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, Lund S-221 00, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Academic Editor: Marc A. Rosen
Sustainability 2015, 7(9), 12521-12538; https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912521
Received: 26 June 2015 / Revised: 21 August 2015 / Accepted: 9 September 2015 / Published: 11 September 2015
Building owners are encouraged to reduce energy use in order to both contribute to national energy-saving goals and reduce the costs of heating and operation. It is important to choose the most optimal renovation measures available so as to achieve cost-effective energy use while maintaining excellent indoor environments, without sacrificing architectural quality or negatively affecting the environment. Building owners and managers often have neither the time nor the expertise required to properly evaluate the available renovation options before making a final decision. Renovation measures are often calculated to repay investments in a short time, rather than taking into account life-cycle costs (LCC), despite the fact that a thoughtful, comprehensive renovation is often more cost-effective in the long run. This paper presents a systematic approach for evaluating different renovation alternatives based on a number of sustainability criteria. The methodology has been verified using three multi-family apartment buildings in Sweden. The benefit of using the proposed methodology is made clear through a comparison between the different renovation alternatives from a sustainability perspective, and will hopefully serve as encouragement to choose renovation measures which involve marginally increased investments but lead to significant environmental and social benefits in the long-term. View Full-Text
Keywords: case study; sustainable renovation; decision-making; life-cycle cost; life-cycle assessment; social indicators case study; sustainable renovation; decision-making; life-cycle cost; life-cycle assessment; social indicators
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Malmgren, L.; Mjörnell, K. Application of a Decision Support Tool in Three Renovation Projects. Sustainability 2015, 7, 12521-12538.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop