Next Article in Journal
Measuring Compact Urban Form: A Case of Nagpur City, India
Previous Article in Journal
Social Life Cycle Assessment Revisited
Article

A Tool to Evaluate Different Renovation Alternatives with Regard to Sustainability

by 1,2,*, 1,†, 1,† and 1,†
1
SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, Box 857, S-501 15 Borås, Sweden
2
Department of Building Physics, Lund University, Box 118, S-221 00 Lund, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sustainability 2014, 6(7), 4227-4245; https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074227
Received: 30 March 2014 / Revised: 26 June 2014 / Accepted: 27 June 2014 / Published: 8 July 2014
In Sweden and in other countries, building owners are encouraged to help reduce energy consumption, both in order to contribute to national energy saving goals and, in terms of their own interests, to reduce the costs of heating and operation of the building. However, it is important to pursue the most optimal strategy available so as to achieve cost-effective energy usage while simultaneously maintaining excellent indoor environments, without sacrificing the architectural quality or negatively affecting the environment. Building managers often do not have the time or expertise required to make a proper evaluation of the available options before making a final decision. Renovation measures are often considered in the light of repaying investments in a short time rather than taking into account life cycle costs, despite the fact that a thoughtful, comprehensive renovation is often more cost-effective in the long run. This article presents a systematic approach for evaluating different renovation alternatives based on sustainability criteria. A methodology has been developed to evaluate different renovation alternatives from environmental, economic, and social perspectives. The benefit of using the proposed methodology is that building managers who face a major renovation work are provided with a clear comparison between the different renovation options, viewed from a sustainability perspective, this may facilitate, in the long run, a culture in which renovation measures which involve marginally increased costs, but are seen to lead to significant environmental and social benefits, will be considered and carried out. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable renovation; decision-making; life cycle cost; life cycle assessment; social indicators sustainable renovation; decision-making; life cycle cost; life cycle assessment; social indicators
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Mjörnell, K.; Boss, A.; Lindahl, M.; Molnar, S. A Tool to Evaluate Different Renovation Alternatives with Regard to Sustainability. Sustainability 2014, 6, 4227-4245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074227

AMA Style

Mjörnell K, Boss A, Lindahl M, Molnar S. A Tool to Evaluate Different Renovation Alternatives with Regard to Sustainability. Sustainability. 2014; 6(7):4227-4245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mjörnell, Kristina; Boss, Anna; Lindahl, Markus; Molnar, Stefan. 2014. "A Tool to Evaluate Different Renovation Alternatives with Regard to Sustainability" Sustainability 6, no. 7: 4227-4245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074227

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop