Next Article in Journal
Can China’s Industrial SO2 Emissions Trading Pilot Scheme Reduce Pollution Abatement Costs?
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating Impacts of Industrial Transformation on Water Consumption in the Heihe River Basin of Northwest China
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Modeling the Impacts of Urbanization and Industrial Transformation on Water Resources in China: An Integrated Hydro-Economic CGE Analysis
Open AccessArticle

Pricing or Quota? A Solution to Water Scarcity in Oasis Regions in China: A Case Study in the Heihe River Basin

by 1,2,*, 1,2, 3 and 4
1
School of Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
2
Research Centre on Fictitious Economy & Data Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
3
Swiss Federal institute for Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), Ueberlandstrasse 133, Duebendorf 8600, Switzerland
4
Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2014, 6(11), 7601-7620; https://doi.org/10.3390/su6117601
Received: 10 August 2014 / Revised: 14 October 2014 / Accepted: 20 October 2014 / Published: 29 October 2014
The conflict between increasing water demand and limited water resources has become a serious threat to oasis regions in China. Solutions to water scarcity have to curb overall water demands, especially reducing agricultural water use. Price control and quantitative control are the two most commonly applied policy instruments for water demand management. This paper used a bio-economic model (BEM) to examine the shadow price of water resources and to investigate farmers’ response to water demand management policies in water scarce regions based on a study in the Heihe River Basin in northwest China. The results indicate that farmers are not very responsive to changes in water price, because it is currently far below the shadow price of water resources in most irrigation zones. A reduction of agricultural water demand could occur only with a large rise in the water price. In comparison, a quantitative control measure is more effective at reducing water use. Concerning the effects on farm income, a price control will cost much more than a quantitative control to save the same volume of water. Hence, a water quota is a more suitable choice for the purpose of reducing agricultural water use, while minimizing farm income loss in the region of this case study. View Full-Text
Keywords: agricultural water use; bio-economic model; water demand management; water price control; water quota agricultural water use; bio-economic model; water demand management; water price control; water quota
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shi, M.; Wang, X.; Yang, H.; Wang, T. Pricing or Quota? A Solution to Water Scarcity in Oasis Regions in China: A Case Study in the Heihe River Basin. Sustainability 2014, 6, 7601-7620.

AMA Style

Shi M, Wang X, Yang H, Wang T. Pricing or Quota? A Solution to Water Scarcity in Oasis Regions in China: A Case Study in the Heihe River Basin. Sustainability. 2014; 6(11):7601-7620.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shi, Minjun; Wang, Xiaojun; Yang, Hong; Wang, Tao. 2014. "Pricing or Quota? A Solution to Water Scarcity in Oasis Regions in China: A Case Study in the Heihe River Basin" Sustainability 6, no. 11: 7601-7620.

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop