Next Article in Journal
The Environmental Impacts of Sprawl: Emergent Themes from the Past Decade of Planning Research
Next Article in Special Issue
Performance Analysis of the Capability Assessment Tool for Sustainable Manufacturing
Previous Article in Journal
Social Life Cycle Assessment as a Management Tool: Methodology for Application in Tourism
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Physical-Chemical Drinking Water Quality in the Logone Valley (Chad-Cameroon)
Article

Remotely Accessible Instrumented Monitoring of Global Development Programs: Technology Development and Validation

1
Portland State University, Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department, 1930 SW 4th Ave, Suite 400, Portland, OR 97201, USA
2
Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 777 Atlantic Drive Northwest, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
3
University of Colorado at Boulder, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, UCB 401, Boulder, CO 80301, USA
4
Stevens Water Monitoring Inc., 12067 NE Glenn Widing Dr. #106, Portland, OR 97220, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2013, 5(8), 3288-3301; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083288
Received: 17 February 2013 / Revised: 3 July 2013 / Accepted: 23 July 2013 / Published: 2 August 2013
Many global development agencies self-report their project outcomes, often relying on subjective data that is collected sporadically and communicated months later. These reports often highlight successes and downplay challenges. Instrumented monitoring via distributed data collection platforms may provide crucial evidence to help inform the sector and public on the effectiveness of aid, and the on-going challenges. This paper presents the process of designing and validating an integrated sensor platform with cellular-to-internet reporting purposely targeted at global development programs. The integrated hardware platform has been applied to water, sanitation, energy and infrastructure interventions and validated through laboratory calibration and field observations. Presented here are two examples: a water pump and a household water filter, wherein field observations agreed with the data algorithm with a linear fit slope of between 0.91 and 1, and an r-squared of between 0.36 and 0.39, indicating a wide confidence interval but with low overall error (i.e., less than 0.5% in the case of structured field observations of water volume added to a household water filter) and few false negatives or false positives. View Full-Text
Keywords: instrumentation; monitoring; evaluation; analytics; internet; data instrumentation; monitoring; evaluation; analytics; internet; data
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Thomas, E.A.; Zumr, Z.; Graf, J.; Wick, C.A.; McCellan, J.H.; Imam, Z.; Barstow, C.; Spiller, K.; Fleming, M. Remotely Accessible Instrumented Monitoring of Global Development Programs: Technology Development and Validation. Sustainability 2013, 5, 3288-3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083288

AMA Style

Thomas EA, Zumr Z, Graf J, Wick CA, McCellan JH, Imam Z, Barstow C, Spiller K, Fleming M. Remotely Accessible Instrumented Monitoring of Global Development Programs: Technology Development and Validation. Sustainability. 2013; 5(8):3288-3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083288

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thomas, Evan A., Zdenek Zumr, Jodi Graf, Carson A. Wick, James H. McCellan, Zachary Imam, Christina Barstow, Kelly Spiller, and Michael Fleming. 2013. "Remotely Accessible Instrumented Monitoring of Global Development Programs: Technology Development and Validation" Sustainability 5, no. 8: 3288-3301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5083288

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop