Next Article in Journal
The World is Yours: “Degrowth”, Racial Inequality and Sustainability
Next Article in Special Issue
Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour can both Thwart and Foster Well-Being
Previous Article in Journal
Choice of Domestic Air-Sourced Solar Photovoltaic Thermal Systems through the Operational Energy Cost Implications in Scotland
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Attitudes-Action Gap in Household Resource Consumption: Does “Environmental Lifestyle” Segmentation Align with Consumer Behaviour?
Article

Conservation Psychology: A Gap in Current Australian Undergraduate Psychology Education?

School of Psychology, Social Work & Social Policy, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia
Sustainability 2013, 5(3), 1266-1281; https://doi.org/10.3390/su5031266
Received: 20 December 2012 / Revised: 7 March 2013 / Accepted: 7 March 2013 / Published: 19 March 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Sustainability)
Human actions have contributed to numerous environmental challenges, including climate change and a significant loss of the world’s biodiversity. As the scientific study of human thought and behaviour, psychology has much to offer in better understanding these issues, as well as fostering greater sustainability in human actions. Yet, despite this recognition, and increasing calls from leaders in psychology education to produce graduates capable of applying their disciplinary knowledge to such real-world issues to solve worldwide behaviourally-based problems; this may not be adequately addressed in current psychology training. The present study assessed the content of all APAC (Australian Psychology Accreditation Council) approved psychology programs within Australia to determine the proportion which offered a psychology-focused course (unit) specifically in conservation or sustainability. Based on the data advertised through each university website, it appears that only one of 39 programs currently offers such a course, with one other university implementing a conservation psychology course in 2013. Thus 95% of current APAC-accredited programs in Australia do not have a strong focus on training psychology graduates to contribute to addressing these important issues. The need for greater integration of conservation psychology content into undergraduate psychology education in Australia and beyond is discussed. View Full-Text
Keywords: conservation psychology; psychology education; environmental problems conservation psychology; psychology education; environmental problems
MDPI and ACS Style

Pearson, E. Conservation Psychology: A Gap in Current Australian Undergraduate Psychology Education? Sustainability 2013, 5, 1266-1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5031266

AMA Style

Pearson E. Conservation Psychology: A Gap in Current Australian Undergraduate Psychology Education? Sustainability. 2013; 5(3):1266-1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5031266

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pearson, Elissa. 2013. "Conservation Psychology: A Gap in Current Australian Undergraduate Psychology Education?" Sustainability 5, no. 3: 1266-1281. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5031266

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop