1. The Crises of the Planetary Environment and the Emergence of the Sustainability Paradigm 
2. Paradigm Shifts and Societal Transformations: Meta-Power and Social Structuring
3. Mechanisms of Social Order Formation and Transformation
3.1. Dominant Power (Autocracy) Combined with a Shift in the Agent’s Cognitive-Normative Framework 
3.2. Power Shifts
3.3. A New Order Is Established Through Multi-Agent Negotiation (Possibly with Mediation or Some Arbitration in Relation to Conflicting Parties)
3.4. Paradigm Shift Through Diffusion and Emulation (“Organic” Transformation)
4. Organic Transformations: The Case of Sustainability
4.1. Early Industrial Revolution (Toward the End of the Eighteenth Century) 
4.2. The Emerging Sustainability Revolution
- The increasing stress on green values: that is, articulation and development of new values, norms, standards, in a word, the “green” normative perspective.
- An ever-growing generalized judgment that “green” patterns of action and developments are “good.” And patterns and developments which are “non-green” or “anti-green” (use of high gas consumption vehicles, overuse or wastage of water or other critical resources, etc.) are “bad”.
- New practices, for instance new accounting conceptions and standards such as “triple bottom line”.
- The growing role of “green thinking, conceptions, standards and practices” in many areas of social life; there are also increasing narratives about green ideas, values, and standards, which circulate in wider and wider circles.
- The growing role of “green” entrepreneurs (for whatever reasons, they initiate projects—beliefs in a green future, profitability, pressures of competition, or combinations of such motivators).
- Green governance; new regulatory mechanisms: distinguishing “good” (green) versus “bad” (non-green) innovations and developments.
- Institutionalization of green standards and considerations in decision and policymaking settings in government agencies, corporations, and associations.
- Increasing stakeholder involvement in the corridors of economic and policymaking power (Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, WWF).
- Greening of consumption.
- Massive experimentation (accompanied by failures, of course) with “green” initiatives. These concern not only businesses but NGOs, other private agents, government agencies, etc.
- New alertness and readiness to experiment or innovate with green ideas, designs, technologies and practices.
- continuing environmental crises (that will not go away)
- continual outpouring of critical analyses and prognoses about the current failings and hazards
- normative ethos and collective pressures
- sustained creative challenge; the excitement of innovating, experiencing the new, its opportunities as well as exhilarating risks and uncertainties
- the paradigm shift itself entails new ways to frame, think, judge, and act that are challenges to be mastered and developed
- diffusion and imitation mechanisms through diverse social networks
- Complexity: sustainalization is taking place in a much more developed and complicated world in terms of institutions, cultures, and technologies including of course communications; for instance, the infrastructures of agriculture, manufacturing, government, science, education, etc. are very different.
- The numbers and diversity of stakeholders and regulatory and governance systems that must be taken into account is much greater (partly a result of democratization and partly learning to deal with modern complexity).
- Our modern world has its established expectations about consumption levels, lifestyles and welfare (this is also increasingly the case in developing countries).
- There are greater explicit concerns about issues of general welfare, justice, human rights (see Stockholm Memorandum ).
- because of the resources and capabilities of modern science and technology
- because of the availability of more rapid and widespread advanced communications (scientific and technical associations, the WWW, twitter, facebook, blogs linking people concerned about environment and sustainability and facilitating the spread of sustainability ideas and accelerating rates of innovation and application).
- because of the large numbers of people and collective agents already mobilized and acting to drive sustainability improvements and transformations.
References and Notes 
- Earlier versions of this article were presented at Plenary Sessions of the International Sociological Association’s Forum of Sociology, Barcelona, September 2008, and The International Sociological Association’s World Congress, Gothenburg, July 2010. During the preparations of this article, Burns has been a Visiting Scholar at the Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University; he has also been partially funded by CERES21 at the Center for Development and Environment (SUM), University of Oslo, Norway.
- Rosa, E.; Diekmann, A.; Dietz, T.; Jaeger, C. Human Footprints on the Global Environment: Threats to Sustainability; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010; pp. 1–45. [Google Scholar]
- The Greenhouse effect is transforming global and local weather patterns, 100 year floods become frequent events, as do the frequency of powerful hurricanes, continental forest fires, and other disasters; all of these draw down the reserves of insurance companies and the emergency funds of even the most prosperous states. The poor states suffer their fates or receive some relief through international aid.
- Edwards, A.R. The Sustainability Revolution: Portrait of a Paradigm Shift; New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island, Canada, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Burns, T.R.; Flam, H. The Shaping of Social Organization: Social Rule System Theory With Applications; Sage Publications: London, UK, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Carson, M.; Burns, T.R.; Gomez Calvo, D. Public Policy Paradigms: The Theory and Practice of Paradigm Shifts in the EU; Peter Lang Publishers: Frankfurt and Berlin, Germany and New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Burns, T.R.; Hall, P. The Meta-Power Paradigm: Causalities, Mechanisms, & Constructions; Peter Lang: Frankfurt and Berlin, Germany and Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Burns, T.R.; Dietz, T. Revolution: An evolutionary perspective. Int. Sociol. 2001, 16, 531–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baker, S. The Evolution of EU Environmental Policy: From Growth to Sustainable Development. In The Politics of Sustainable Development: Theory, Policy and Practice Within the European Union; Baker, S., Kousis, M., Richardson, D., Young, S.C., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Baker, S. Between Commitment and Implementation: Tensions in Sustainable Development Policy of the European Union. In The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology; Redclift, M., Woodgate, G., Eds.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Capra, F. The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Rising Culture; Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Burns, T.R.; Stöhr, C. Power, knowledge, and conflict in the shaping of commons governance: The case of EU baltic fisheries. Int. J. Commons 2011, 5, 233–258. [Google Scholar]
- Burns, T.R.; Stohr, C. The architecture and transformation of governance systems: Power, knowledge, and conflict. Hum. Syst. Manag. 2011, 30, 173–194. [Google Scholar]
- Steffen, W.; Sanderson, R.A.; Tyson, P.; Jäger, J.; Matson, P.; Moore, B., III; Oldfield, F.; Richardson, K.; Schellnhuber, H.J.; Turner, B.; Wasson, R. Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet under Pressure; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germnay, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Burns, T.R.; Carson, M. Actors, Paradigms, and Institutional Dynamics. In Advancing Socio-Economics: An Institutionalist Perspective; Hollingsworth, R., Muller, K.H., Hollingsworth, E.J., Eds.; Rowman and Littlefield: Oxford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Burns, T.R. System Theories. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology; Blackwell Publishing: Oxford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Burns, T.R.; DeVille, P. Dynamic Systems Theory. In The Handbook of 21st Century Sociology; Bryant, C., Peck, D., Eds.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- The domination may be based on administrative power, coercion, wealth, charismatic authority, etc. Of course, the resources and control activities differ significantly with the different modalities of power. Their limitations and vulnerabilities to erosion or collapse differ as well.
- The paradigm(s) of modernization has been imposed selectively—a recurrent pattern of social transformation since the Industrial Revolution: Among others, the Meiji revolution in Japan (1868), Haile Selassie's transformation of Ethiopia (1930-1974), Pahlavis Shahs (1925-1979) restructuring of Iran, and Gorbachev's initiatives launching glasnost (opening) and perestroika (restructuring). Transformations characterized by re-orientation of a ruling elite entail then processes of learning, conversion, and entrepreneurship. Under the direction of the elite adhering to a new paradigm, a new institutional order is launched and unfolds. A major structural feature of such transformations is the more or less intact domination by a ruling elite, at least initially (unintended developments take place, including erosion of elite power as an unintended consequence of some promising innovations).
- Stinchombe, A. Constructing Social Theories; Harcourt, Brace & World: New York, NY, USA, 1968. [Google Scholar]
- Coleman, W.E. From protected development to market liberalism: Paradigm change in agriculture. J. Eur. Public Policy 1998, 5, 632–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikoloyuk, J.; Burns, T.R.; de Man, R. The promise and limitations of partnered governance: The case of sustainable palm oil. Corp. Gov. 2010, 10, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Industrialization became a "development" concept which was more than a description. It became as well a metaphor of progress and advancement and a powerful normative idea (to be “developed”, “industrialized” was good, to be undeveloped or underdeveloped was backward, a failure).
- The USA's greatest dam-builder, Floyd E. Dominy, was involved in many of the initiatives in the Western U.S. that led to 472 dams. He aptly represented the "spirit of the times". In 1966, he called a Colorado River without dams "useless to anyone… I've seen all the wild rivers I ever want to see". (cited in New York Times (NYT) Obituary. F.E. Dominy, who harnessed water in the American West, is dead at 100. Page B 13, April 29, 2010).
- Carson, R. The Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin: Boston, Mass, 1962. [Google Scholar]
- The World Commision on Enviornment and Development, Our Common Future; Oxford University Press: London, UK, 1989.
- Another important outcome of this conference was the agreement to create a new programme for global environmental protection under the United Nations: Then United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP).
- This Convention concerned the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (from Gilbraltar to northern Norway and Russia).
- Lind, G. REACH: The Only Planet Guide to the Secrets of Chemicals Policy in the EU; Affarstryckeriet: Norrtalje, Sweden, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- There has been growing and widespread concern with conservation, environmental pollution and degradation long before there emerged a "sustainability" concept, as suggested above.
- Lafferty, W.M. The Implementation of Sustainable Development in the European Union. In Contemporary Political Studies. Proceedings of the Political Studies Association; Lovenduski, J., Stanyer, J., Eds.; Political Studies Association: Belfast, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, R.B. International Environmental Agreements Database Project (Version 2007.1). 2002–2009. Available online: http://iea.uoregon.edu/ (accessed on 7 August 2009).
- Baumgartner, T.; Burns, T.R. Transitions to Alternative Energy Systems: Entrepreneurs, Strategies and Social Change; Westview Press: Boulder, CO, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
- Woodward, A.; Ellig, J.; Burns, T.R. Municipal Entrepreneurship and Energy Policy: A Five Nation Study of Politics, Innovation, and Social Change; Gordon and Breach: New York, NY, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- A subsequent article will specify and analyze several of the key mechanisms in organic transformation such as innovation, imitation processes, influence mechanisms, collective learning, and communication processes and their technologies.
- But the ongoing sustainability revolution is much more than a “Third Industrial Revolution” to which Jeremy Rifkin refers in a book (The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power Is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World) that has recently (2011) appeared. But significantly Rifkin recognizes the organic character of the transformative processes.
- The Earth System Governance (ESG) Project ( http://www.earthsystemgovernance.org/. ) is the largest social science research network in the area of governance and global environmental change. It is a core project of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change (IHDP).
- Stockholm Memorandum 2011. Tipping the scales toward sustainability. Available online: http://globalsymposium2011.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/memorandum-signed.pdf (accessed on 23 May 2012).
- Diamond, J. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed; Viking-Penguin: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- The reference list does not do justice to the many researchers whose work has contributed to the theoretical and empirical underpinnings of this article. This will be accomplished in a book to appear in 2013.
© 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).