Next Article in Journal
Linking Energy- and Land-Use Systems: Energy Potentials and Environmental Risks of Using Agricultural Residues in Tanzania
Previous Article in Journal
Bioenergy Villages and Regions in Germany: An Interview Study with Initiators of Communal Bioenergy Projects on the Success Factors for Restructuring the Energy Supply of the Community
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2012, 4(2), 257-277;

Problems with Reporting and Evaluating Mining Industry Community Development Projects: A Case Study from Tanzania

Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, MA 01610, USA
Towson University, 8000 York Rd., Baltimore, MD 21252, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 November 2011 / Revised: 7 February 2012 / Accepted: 15 February 2012 / Published: 20 February 2012
PDF [473 KB, uploaded 24 February 2015]


Reporting on contributions to community development is one way gold mining companies communicate the expanse and depth of their commitment to social responsibility. These projects are intended to provide the mine-proximate communities with some of the wealth and other benefits generated by mine development in their locales. We raise questions about reporting and evaluation of community development projects undertaken by AngloGold Ashanti in the two communities of Nyakabale and Nyamalembo, near its Geita mining projects in the Lake Victoria goldfields of Tanzania. We use archival data and data obtained from field research conducted during different periods throughout 2005, 2007 and 2010 to compare what the company reports to have done with what is found on the ground. Our findings revealed that the corporate reporting is misleading, ambiguous, and omissive. Much of the effort labeled “community development” benefited the companies directly via infrastructure development, food supplies to the mine cafeteria, and worker health. We argue that, if Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) projects are to be the primary way local people directly benefit from mine development, the relationship between the value of those projects and the wealth taken from the location should be considered, community projects should be well defined and differentiated from company-oriented projects, and community representatives should participate in monitoring the success and impact of community development projects. View Full-Text
Keywords: corporate social responsibility; community development; gold mining; Tanzania corporate social responsibility; community development; gold mining; Tanzania

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Emel, J.; Makene, M.H.; Wangari, E. Problems with Reporting and Evaluating Mining Industry Community Development Projects: A Case Study from Tanzania. Sustainability 2012, 4, 257-277.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top