This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Resilience and Vulnerability to Sustainable Urban Innovation: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge and Technology Networks in China
by
Jie Liu
Jie Liu 1,2 and
Tianxing Zhu
Tianxing Zhu 3,*
1
The Faculty of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2
School of Culture and Art, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610103, China
3
Jinan University—University of Birmingham Joint Institute, Jinan University, Guangzhou 511443, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2026, 18(1), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010317 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 September 2025
/
Revised: 13 December 2025
/
Accepted: 22 December 2025
/
Published: 28 December 2025
Abstract
This study examines the structural evolution of Knowledge Innovation Networks (KINs) and Technology Innovation Networks (TINs) across Chinese cities (2015–2024). Using SCI/SSCI co-authorship and prefecture-level patent data, we construct dual-layer networks and assess their resilience through metrics such as average clustering coefficient, path length, global efficiency, and largest-component ratio. Our framework clarifies how network structure, spatial proximity, and urban hierarchy jointly shape innovation dynamics and opportunity distribution. Three main findings emerge. First, KINs have moved toward polycentricity yet remain hierarchically rigid, with persistent core–periphery gaps despite improved connectivity in tier 2–4 cities. TINs show greater cross-tier adaptability, creating new innovation gateways while intensifying intra-tier polarization. Second, under simulated disruptions, KINs are vulnerable to targeted attacks and exhibit path-dependent degradation, whereas TINs maintain efficiency until a critical threshold, then collapse abruptly. Third, MRQAP analysis reveals that economic and geographic proximity facilitate collaboration in KIN but constrain linkages in TINs, with spatial proximity exerting a stronger influence on knowledge flows. These results demonstrate how innovation networks mediate urban–rural interactions, affect spatial inequality, and shape regional resilience. We argue for differentiated policies that strengthen core–periphery connectivity while mitigating proximity-induced lock-in, fostering more inclusive, resilient, and sustainable urban innovation systems.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Liu, J.; Zhu, T.
Resilience and Vulnerability to Sustainable Urban Innovation: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge and Technology Networks in China. Sustainability 2026, 18, 317.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010317
AMA Style
Liu J, Zhu T.
Resilience and Vulnerability to Sustainable Urban Innovation: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge and Technology Networks in China. Sustainability. 2026; 18(1):317.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010317
Chicago/Turabian Style
Liu, Jie, and Tianxing Zhu.
2026. "Resilience and Vulnerability to Sustainable Urban Innovation: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge and Technology Networks in China" Sustainability 18, no. 1: 317.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010317
APA Style
Liu, J., & Zhu, T.
(2026). Resilience and Vulnerability to Sustainable Urban Innovation: A Comparative Analysis of Knowledge and Technology Networks in China. Sustainability, 18(1), 317.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18010317
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.