The Impact Mechanism of Video Maturity and Content Empowerment on Purchase Intentions: A Case Study of Agricultural Tourism in Taiwan
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Research Hypotheses
2.1. Video Maturity
2.1.1. Clarity
2.1.2. Coherence
2.2. Trustworthiness
2.3. Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) and Video-Based Persuasion
2.4. Flow Experience
2.5. Content Empowerment in Videos
- Emotionality
- 2.
- Knowledgeability
- 3.
- Practicality
- 4.
- Entertainment
- 5.
- Flow Experience and Trust
2.6. Purchase Intention
3. Research Methods
3.1. Research Subjects and Data Collection
- Age: Participants had to be 18 years or older to ensure informed consent.
- Residency: Only individuals residing in Taiwan were included to maintain cultural and contextual relevance.
- Video consumption Experience: Participants must have watched at least one agricultural tourism-related video featuring Taiwanese rural destinations, farms, or agritourism activities within the last six months.
- Online activity: Respondents needed to be active users of online platforms (e.g., YouTube, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram) to ensure familiarity with digital video content consumption.
- Survey completion: Only fully completed questionnaires were included in the final dataset to maintain data reliability.
3.2. Questionnaire Desig
3.2.1. Video Sophistication
- Clarity
- 2.
- Coherence
3.2.2. Content Empowerment of Videos
- Emotionally
- 2.
- Knowledge
- 3.
- Politicality
- 4.
- Entertainment
3.2.3. Trustworthiness
3.2.4. Flow Experience
3.2.5. Purchase Intention
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Research Results
4.1. Analysis of Demographic Information
- Gender: Predominantly female, with 290 individuals accounting for 55.0%.
- Age: The majority were aged 21–30 years, with 196 individuals representing 37.2%.
- Education: Most respondents held a university degree, with 290 individuals comprising 55.0%.
- Marital status: The majority were unmarried, with 270 individuals making up 51.2%.
- Source of questionnaire collection: The survey was distributed through social media platforms, with respondents sourced from Facebook (157), Instagram (133), LINE (106), Twitter (80), and YouTube (51) to ensure a diverse sample.
4.2. Convergent Validity
4.3. Discriminant Validity
4.4. Goodness of Fit (GOF)
- 0.1 = Weak fit;
- 0.25 = Moderate fit;
- 0.36 = Strong fit.
4.5. Path Analysis
- 1.
- Effects Related to Trustworthiness
- The path coefficient of Clarity to Trustworthiness is 0.105 and is significant (t = 2.516, p = 0.012), indicating that Clarity has a significant positive effect on Trustworthiness.
- The path coefficient of Coherence to Trustworthiness is 0.163 and is significant (t = 2.835, p = 0.005), suggesting that Coherence has a significant positive effect on Trustworthiness.
- The path coefficient of Flow Experience to Trustworthiness is 0.372 and is significant (t = 6.580, p < 0.001), demonstrating that Flow Experience effectively enhances Trustworthiness.
- 2.
- Effects Related to Flow Experience
- The path coefficient of Emotionality to Flow Experience is 0.182 and is significant (t = 2.269, p = 0.023), indicating that Emotionality has a positive effect on Flow Experience.
- The path coefficient of Knowledge to Flow Experience is the highest at 0.440 and is significant (t = 7.048, p < 0.001), suggesting that Knowledge has the strongest positive effect on Flow Experience.
- The path coefficient of Practicality to Flow Experience is 0.123 and is significant (t = 2.104, p = 0.035), indicating that Practicality positively influences Flow Experience.
- The path coefficient of Entertainment to Flow Experience is 0.162 and is significant (t = 2.115, p = 0.034), showing that Entertainment contributes to improving Flow Experience.
- 3.
- Effects Related to Purchase Intention
- The path coefficient of Trustworthiness to Purchase Intention is 0.177 and is significant (t = 4.092, p < 0.001), demonstrating that Trustworthiness has a positive effect on Purchase Intention.
- The path coefficient of Flow Experience to Purchase Intention is 0.240 and is significant (t = 6.223, p < 0.001), indicating that Flow Experience significantly enhances Purchase Intention.
5. Conclusion and Discussion
5.1. Research Conclusions
5.1.1. The Impact of Video Maturity on Trust
5.1.2. The Impact of Video Content Empowerment on Flow Experience
- The Impact of Emotionality on Flow Experience
- 2.
- The Impact of Entertainment on Flow Experience
- 3.
- The Impact of Knowledge on Flow Experience
- 4.
- The Impact of Practicality on Flow Experience
5.1.3. The Impact of Trustworthiness and Flow Experience on Purchase Intention
- The Impact of Trustworthiness on Purchase Intention
- 2.
- The Impact of Flow Experience on Purchase Intention
- 3.
- The Combined Effect of Trustworthiness and Flow Experience
5.2. Discussion and Recommendations
- (1)
- Video Clarity, Coherence, and Trustworthiness
- (2)
- The Role of Emotionality, Entertainment, Knowledge, and Practicality in Enhancing Flow Experience
- (3)
- The Impact of Trustworthiness and Flow Experience on Purchase Intention
- High Clarity and Coherent Narrative
- 2.
- Knowledge-Based Content
- 3.
- Emotional and Entertaining Elements
- 4.
- Practical Content
5.3. Research Limitations and Future Directions
- 1.
- Lack of Audience-Specific Analysis
- 2.
- Emotional State Interactions
- 3.
- Multi-Channel Marketing Strategies
- 4.
- Response Bias and Cultural Generalizability
- 5.
- Product- and Service-Specific Video Effectiveness
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lim, S.; Ng, Y.; Lam, T.H.; Soon, M.; Tan, S. Communication in the 21st Century: The Effect of Internet Celebrity as the Communication Source in Influencing Generation Z Purchase Intention. J. Komun. Malays. J. Commun. 2023, 39, 507–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandean, S.; Saerang, D.P.E.; Saerang, R.T. THE EFFECT OF INTEGRATED VALUE ON STUDENT PURCHASE INTENTION ITEMS IN THE PUBGM GAME IN BONTANG. J. EMBA J. Ris. Ekon. Manaj. Bisnis Dan Akunt. 2023, 11, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, A.; Dima, A.F.; Norvadewi, N.; Sutaguna, I.N.T.; Sumarni, S. Social Media on Consumer Purchase Intention in Shopee Marketplace. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Res. 2023, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jingga, F.; Wiryawan, R.R.; Rahmanita, M.; Adani, F.Z. User Behavior Analysis of Short-form Video Prolonging Usage towards Purchase Intention on social media using SEM Method. In Proceedings of the 2023 27th International Conference on Information Technology (IT), Zabljak, Montenegro, 15–18 February 2023; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Juszka, D.; Papir, Z. Impact of Content on Subjective Quality of Experience Assessment for 3D Video. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Quality of Experience in Visual Multimedia Applications, Lisboa, Portugal, 14 October 2022; pp. 29–38. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; An, P.; Meng, C.; Yang, C.; Huang, X. Multiscale WS-SSIM for panoramic video quality assessment. In Proceedings of the Optoelectronic Imaging and Multimedia Technology VII, Online, 11–16 October 2020; pp. 96–101. [Google Scholar]
- Lemon, K.N.; Verhoef, P.C. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. J. Mark. 2016, 80, 69–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bart, Y.; Shankar, V.; Sultan, F.; Urban, G.L. Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study. J. Mark. 2005, 69, 133–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goh, K.-Y.; Heng, C.-S.; Lin, Z. Social media brand community and consumer behavior: Quantifying the relative impact of user-and marketer-generated content. Inf. Syst. Res. 2013, 24, 88–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.-S.; Fu, H.; Sorkine, O.; Lee, T.-Y.; Seidel, H.-P. Motion-aware temporal coherence for video resizing. In ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2009 Papers; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Hudson, S.; Huang, L.; Roth, M.S.; Madden, T.J. The influence of social media interactions on consumer–brand relationships: A three-country study of brand perceptions and marketing behaviors. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2016, 33, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barua, A. Methods for decision-making in survey questionnaires based on Likert scale. J. Asian Sci. Res. 2013, 3, 35–38. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, B.Q.; Goodhue, D.L. Two worlds of trust for potential e-commerce users: Humans as cognitive misers. Inf. Syst. Res. 2012, 23, 1246–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vonglao, P. Application of fuzzy logic to improve the Likert scale to measure latent variables. Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci. 2017, 38, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toubia, O.; Stephen, A.T. Intrinsic vs. image-related utility in social media: Why do people contribute content to twitter? Mark. Sci. 2013, 32, 368–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rieser, D.C.; Bernhard, O. Measuring trust: The simpler the better? In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 7–12 May 2016; pp. 2940–2946. [Google Scholar]
- Procci, K.; Singer, A.R.; Levy, K.R.; Bowers, C. Measuring the flow experience of gamers: An evaluation of the DFS-2. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 2306–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, C. Unveiling the Impact of Short Videos: Consumption Behavior and Decision-Making in the Digital Age. Highlights Bus. Econ. Manag. 2023, 21, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, C.; Yang, J. The Influence of Mobile Short Video Content Marketing on Consumers’ Purchase Intention: A Test of Two-Mediation Model. Acad. J. Bus. Manag. 2023, 5, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, L. Exploring The Influence of Video Forms on Consumer Behavior-Taking Unpacking Video as An Example. Highlights In Business. Econ. Manag. 2023, 9, 406–411. [Google Scholar]
- Cassandra, C.; Koo, G.A.A. The Impact of Video Advertising’s Information Quality Content and Risk on Customer Trust and Intention to Buy during the Covid. In Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Seminar on Research of Information Technology and Intelligent Systems (ISRITI), Virtually, 8–9 December 2022; pp. 19–23. [Google Scholar]
- Petty, R.E.; Cacioppo, J.T.; Petty, R.E.; Cacioppo, J.T. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Mayer, R.E. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Petty, R.E.; Barden, J.; Wheeler, S.C. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: Developing health promotions for sustained behavioral change. Emerg. Theor. Health Promot. Pract. Res. 2009, 2, 185–214. [Google Scholar]
- Gefen, D.; Karahanna, E.; Straub, D.W. Trust and tam in online shopping: An integrated model1. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 51–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffman, D.L.; Novak, T.P. Flow online: Lessons learned and future prospects. J. Interact. Mark. 2009, 23, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, C.; Ling, S.; Cho, D.; Kim, Y. How social presence influences engagement in short video-embedded advertisements: The serial mediation effect of flow experience and advertising avoidance. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2024, 19, 705–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, Q.; Chu, D.; Chen, T.; Chen, X. Consumer behavior based on the SOR model: How do short video advertisements affect furniture consumers’ purchase intentions? BioResources 2024, 19, 2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alghizzawi, M.; Alzghoul, A.; Alhanatleh, H.; Omeish, F.; Abdrabbo, T.; Ezmigna, I. Short video marketing and consumer engagement: Mediation effect of social sharing. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 2024, 8, 1379–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience; Harper & Row: New York, NY, USA, 1990; Volume 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Wingdes, I.; Luwuk, Y.M. Short video application usage and flow effect on impulse buy. Klabat J. Manag. 2023, 4, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, B.; Yoo, M.; Yang, W. Online engagement among restaurant customers: The importance of enhancing flow for social media users. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2020, 44, 252–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Tchernev, J.M.; Solloway, T. A dynamic longitudinal examination of social media use, needs, and gratifications among college students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 1829–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csikszentmihalhi, M. Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life; Hachette UK: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.J.; Minor, M.S.; Wei, J. Aesthetics and the online shopping environment: Understanding consumer responses. J. Retail. 2011, 87, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lim, Y.J.; Osman, A.; Salahuddin, S.N.; Romle, A.R.; Abdullah, S. Factors influencing online shopping behavior: The mediating role of purchase intention. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2016, 35, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlou, P.A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2003, 7, 101–134. [Google Scholar]
- Hansen, T.; Jensen, J.M.; Solgaard, H.S. Predicting online grocery buying intention: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2004, 24, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics; Sage Publications Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1981. [Google Scholar]
- Vinzi, V.E.; Trinchera, L.; Amato, S. PLS path modeling: From foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 47–82. [Google Scholar]
- Green, M.C.; Brock, T.C. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 79, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Appel, M.; Richter, T. Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time. Media Psychol. 2007, 10, 113–134. [Google Scholar]
- Obiegbu, C.J.; Larsen, G. Algorithmic personalization and brand loyalty: An experiential perspective. Mark. Theory 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Z. Personalized Marketing and Recommendation Systems on TikTok. Adv. Econ. Manag. Political Sci. 2024, 88, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, W.; Liu, H.; Zheng, K.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, S.; Yu, E.; Ou, W.; Song, Y. Beyond Relevance: Improving User Engagement by Personalization for Short-Video Search. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2409.11281. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Zhang, R. Research on the influencing factors of the user information cocoon effect of short video platforms based on personalized recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Big Data Engineering and Education (BDEE), Chengdu, China, 5–7 August 2022; pp. 53–60. [Google Scholar]
- Rafieian, O.; Kapoor, A.; Sharma, A. Multi-objective personalization of the length and skippability of video advertisements. SSRN Electronic J. 2023, p. 4394969. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4394969 (accessed on 9 March 2025).
Category | Group | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 237 | 45.0 |
Female | 290 | 55.0 | |
Age | Under 20 | 67 | 12.7 |
21–30 | 196 | 37.2 | |
31–40 | 153 | 29.0 | |
41–50 | 69 | 13.1 | |
Over 50 | 42 | 8.0 | |
Education Level | High school/vocational school or below | 139 | 26.4 |
University | 290 | 55.0 | |
Graduate school or above | 98 | 18.6 | |
Marital Status | Unmarried | 270 | 51.2 |
Married | 257 | 48.8 | |
Source of Questionnaire Collection | 157 | 39.8 | |
133 | 25.2 | ||
LINE | 106 | 20.2 | |
80 | 15.2 | ||
YouTube | 51 | 9.6 |
Construct | Item | Factor Loading | Cronbach’s Alpha | Composite Reliability | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clarity | CLA1 | 0.936 | 0.907 | 0.942 | 0.844 |
CLA2 | 0.913 | ||||
CLA3 | 0.906 | ||||
Coherence | COH1 | 0.912 | 0.855 | 0.912 | 0.775 |
COH2 | 0.889 | ||||
COH3 | 0.839 | ||||
Emotionality | EMO1 | 0.959 | 0.944 | 0.964 | 0.899 |
EMO2 | 0.941 | ||||
EMO3 | 0.945 | ||||
Entertainment | ENT1 | 0.928 | 0.922 | 0.951 | 0.865 |
ENT2 | 0.933 | ||||
ENT3 | 0.930 | ||||
Flow Experience | FLO1 | 0.941 | 0.940 | 0.961 | 0.892 |
FLO2 | 0.956 | ||||
FLO3 | 0.936 | ||||
Knowledge | KNO1 | 0.918 | 0.888 | 0.931 | 0.819 |
KNO2 | 0.948 | ||||
KNO3 | 0.845 | ||||
Practicality | PRA1 | 0.926 | 0.922 | 0.951 | 0.865 |
PRA2 | 0.926 | ||||
PRA3 | 0.938 | ||||
Purchase Intention | PUR1 | 0.939 | 0.935 | 0.959 | 0.885 |
PUR2 | 0.955 | ||||
PUR3 | 0.928 | ||||
Trustworthiness | TRU1 | 0.874 | 0.885 | 0.929 | 0.813 |
TRU2 | 0.921 | ||||
TRU3 | 0.909 |
Clarity | Coherence | Emotionality | Entertainment | Flow Experience | Knowledge | Practicality | Purchase Intention | Trustworthiness | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clarity | 0.919 | ||||||||
Coherence | 0.138 | 0.880 | |||||||
Emotionality | 0.204 | 0.399 | 0.948 | ||||||
Entertainment | 0.233 | 0.387 | 0.673 | 0.930 | |||||
Flow Experience | 0.178 | 0.515 | 0.595 | 0.568 | 0.945 | ||||
Knowledge | 0.228 | 0.466 | 0.530 | 0.468 | 0.667 | 0.905 | |||
Practicality | 0.310 | 0.353 | 0.576 | 0.631 | 0.526 | 0.445 | 0.930 | ||
Purchase Intention | 0.110 | 0.228 | 0.071 | 0.180 | 0.324 | 0.251 | 0.226 | 0.941 | |
Trustworthiness | 0.193 | 0.369 | 0.364 | 0.446 | 0.475 | 0.427 | 0.430 | 0.291 | 0.902 |
Path Relationship | Original Sample (O) | Standard Deviation (STDEV) | t Statistics (|O/STDEV|) | p Values |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clarity → Trustworthiness | 0.105 | 0.042 | 2.516 | 0.012 |
Coherence → Trustworthiness | 0.163 | 0.058 | 2.835 | 0.005 |
Emotionality → Flow Experience | 0.182 | 0.080 | 2.269 | 0.023 |
Entertainment → Flow Experience | 0.162 | 0.077 | 2.115 | 0.034 |
Flow Experience → Purchase Intention | 0.240 | 0.039 | 6.223 | 0.000 |
Flow Experience → Trustworthiness | 0.372 | 0.057 | 6.580 | 0.000 |
Knowledge → Flow Experience | 0.440 | 0.062 | 7.048 | 0.000 |
Practicality → Flow Experience | 0.123 | 0.059 | 2.104 | 0.035 |
Trustworthiness → Purchase Intention | 0.177 | 0.043 | 4.092 | 0.000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Hu, T.-L.; Chao, C.-M.; Hsieh, W.-K.; Lin, C.-H. The Impact Mechanism of Video Maturity and Content Empowerment on Purchase Intentions: A Case Study of Agricultural Tourism in Taiwan. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073195
Hu T-L, Chao C-M, Hsieh W-K, Lin C-H. The Impact Mechanism of Video Maturity and Content Empowerment on Purchase Intentions: A Case Study of Agricultural Tourism in Taiwan. Sustainability. 2025; 17(7):3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073195
Chicago/Turabian StyleHu, Tung-Lai, Chuang-Min Chao, Wen-Kai Hsieh, and Chia-Hung Lin. 2025. "The Impact Mechanism of Video Maturity and Content Empowerment on Purchase Intentions: A Case Study of Agricultural Tourism in Taiwan" Sustainability 17, no. 7: 3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073195
APA StyleHu, T.-L., Chao, C.-M., Hsieh, W.-K., & Lin, C.-H. (2025). The Impact Mechanism of Video Maturity and Content Empowerment on Purchase Intentions: A Case Study of Agricultural Tourism in Taiwan. Sustainability, 17(7), 3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073195