Green Financial Technology and Institutional Quality as Pathways to Environmental Sustainability in Southern African Countries Facing Severe Ecological Pressures
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Gaps
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Model and Data
3.2. Method
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
6.1. Policy Recommendations
6.2. Limitations and Future Study Recommendations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| Statistic | p-Value | Statistic | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pesaran (2004) [41] | Friedman | 45.435 *** | 0.000 | ||
| LCF | 9.41 *** | 0.000 | Frees | 0.388 *** | |
| TI | 20.93 *** | 0.000 | Pesaran | 4.073 *** | 0.000 |
| IQ | 2.08 ** | 0.037 | |||
| FD | 14.61 *** | 0.000 | Heterogeneity | ||
| lnGF | 8.83 *** | 0.000 | Δ | 3.574 | 0.000 |
| RE | 10.40 *** | 0.000 | Δ-adjusted | 4.285 | 0.000 |
| Level | 1st D | |
|---|---|---|
| LCF | −3.154 *** | |
| TI | −2.772 *** | |
| IQ | −1.905 | −5.142 *** |
| FD | −3.021 *** | |
| lnGF | −3.688 *** | |
| RE | −2.243 * | −4.305 *** |
| Variable | VIF | 1/VIF |
|---|---|---|
| FD | 8.82 | 0.1134 |
| RE | 5.37 | 0.1864 |
| IQ | 3.02 | 0.3313 |
| lnGF | 1.26 | 0.7906 |
| TI | 1.17 | 0.8576 |
| Mean VIF | 3.93 |
| Statistic | p-Value | Statistic | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kao | Pedroni | ||||
| MDF | −2.4969 *** | 0.0063 | MPF | 1.7052 ** | 0.0441 |
| DF | −5.0016 *** | 0.0000 | PP | −3.2505 *** | 0.0006 |
| ADF | −1.7080 ** | 0.0438 | ADF | −4.5815 *** | 0.0000 |
| Unadjusted MDF | −8.6078 *** | 0.0000 | |||
| Unadjusted DF | 7.3438 *** | 0.0000 |
References
- Mousa, N.A. The role of green finance in attaining environmental sustainability within a country’s ESG performance. J. Bus. Res. 2025; Advance online publication. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, Y.; Yin, Y. Research on the Impact of the Synergy Between Financial Technology and Green Finance on Environmental Efficiency. Sustainability 2024, 17, 4109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sibanda, K.; Takentsi, S.; Gonese, D. Energy consumption, technological innovation, and environmental degradation in SADC countries. Cogent Soc. Sci. 2024, 10, 2355553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradhan, P.; Behera, P.; Sethi, L.; Rath, B.N.; Sethi, N. Can green growth and ecological footprint mitigation go hand on hand? The role of sectoral energy consumption, green innovation, and greenfield investment in emerging economies. Econ. Change Restruct. 2025, 58, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mupunga, M.; Tshuma, C. Institutional quality and environmental sustainability in Southern Africa. J. Gov. Dev. 2022, 18, 263–279. [Google Scholar]
- Almulhim, A.A.; Inuwa, N.; Chaouachi, M.; Samour, A. Testing the Impact of Renewable Energy and Institutional Quality on Consumption-Based CO2 Emissions: Fresh Insights from MMQR Approach. Sustainability 2024, 17, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satrianto, A.; Ikhsan, A.; Dirma, E.Y.; Candrianto, C.; Juniardi, E.; Gusti, M.A. The effect of institutional quality on renewable energy: Evidence from developing countries. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2025, 14, 678–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajide, F.M.; Ajide, S.A. Do renewable energy and institutional quality affect environmental degradation? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Clean. Prod. Lett. 2022, 3, 100021. [Google Scholar]
- Gabriel, E.M.; Darcilio, V.M.; Babi, J.K.M.; Torronda, A.M.; Marnela, E.B.T.; Kadi, D.M. The Effects of Green Energy and CO2 Emissions on Sustainable Economic Development in Southern African Development Community. Mod. Econ. 2025, 16, 135–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madakufamba, M.; Ngwawi, J.; Johnson, P.; Dzinomwa, G.; Ndhlovu, A.; Chitsa, T.; Kampilipili, N. Overview of the SADC Energy and Resources: Prospects and Challenges for China-SADC Cooperation; Southern African Research and Documentation Centre (SARDC): Harare, Zimbabwe, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Global Air. Air Pollution and Health Impacts in Africa. 2019. Available online: https://www.stateofglobalair.org/resources/africa (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Hervey, A.F. The London School of Economics and Political Science: Why Governance Matters: A Comparative Study of the Causes of Deforestation in the Miombo Woodlands of Zambia and Mozambique, 1990–2010. Ph.D. Thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK, 2018. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16390702.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Our World in Data. Drivers of Deforestation. 2024. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/drivers-of-deforestation (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- SIPRI. Climate-Related Security Risks in the SADC Region. 2022. Available online: https://www.sipri.org/commentary/topical-backgrounder/2022/climate-related-security-risks-sadc-region (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Machado, J.A.; Silva, J.S. Quantiles via moments. J. Econom. 2019, 213, 145–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumba, H.; Olanrewaju, O.A. Towards Sustainable Development: Analyzing the Viability and Integration of Renewable Energy Solutions in South Africa—A Review. Energies 2024, 17, 1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deka, A. The impact of forest resources, energy efficiency, and renewable energy on environmental degradation—A comparative analysis of the less-and high-emitting sub-Saharan African countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 105781–105792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deka, A. Juxtaposing the role of effective capital, energy efficiency and technological innovations on environmental sustainability in the EU countries. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jinapor, J.A.; Suleman, S.; Cromwell, R.S. Energy consumption and environmental quality in Africa: Does energy efficiency make any difference? Sustainability 2023, 15, 2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frnana, F.M.; Kareem, P.H. Pathways to Achieving Low Energy-Poverty Problems in Central African Nations with Government Effectiveness, Technology. Natural Resources and Sustainable Economic Growth. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adekunle, I.A. On the search for environmental sustainability in Africa: The role of governance. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 14607–14620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leonard, L. Socio-environmental impacts of mineral mining and conflicts in Southern and West Africa: Navigating reflexive governance for environmental justice. Environ. Res. Lett. 2024, 19, 104013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Q.; Zhong, K.; Liao, Y.; Xiong, R.; Wang, F.; Pang, M. Coupling coordination degree of environment, energy, and economic growth in resource-based provinces of China. Resour. Policy 2023, 81, 103308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Our World in Data. International Finance Received for Clean Energy. 2025. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/international-finance-clean-energy#:~:text=International%20financial%20flows%20to%20developing%20countries%20in%20support,UN%20%E2%80%93%20processed%20by%20Our%20World%20in%20Data (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Jarijari, T.; Deka, A.; Cavusoglu, B. The synergistic role of natural resources, green finance and green technological innovations in promoting environmental sustainability in Sub-Saharan Africa. Resour. Policy 2025, 105, 105598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Cheng, X.; Ma, Y. Research on the impact of green finance policy on regional green innovation-based on evidence from the pilot zones for green finance reform and innovation. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 896661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, A.; Hassan, A. Role of green finance, environmental regulations, and economic development in the transition towards a sustainable environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 413, 137425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahoo, M.; Bhujabal, P.; Gupta, M.; Islam, M.K. Empowering BRICS economies: The crucial role of green finance, information and communication technology and innovation in sustainable development. Sustain. Dev. 2024, 32, 7292–7308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nenavath, S.; Mishra, S. Impact of green finance and fintech on sustainable economic growth: Empirical evidence from India. Heliyon 2023, 9, e16301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muazu, A.; Yu, Q.; Alariqi, M. The impact of renewable energy consumption and economic growth on environmental quality in Africa: A threshold regression analysis. Energies 2023, 16, 4533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deka, A. The role of natural resources rent, trade openness and technological innovations on environmental sustainability—Evidence from resource-rich african nations. Resour. Policy 2024, 98, 105364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shuayb, A.S.S.; Dube, S.; Khalifa, W.; Deka, A.; Kareem, P.H.; Cavusoglu, B. The Impact of Natural Resources Rent, Renewable Energy, and Governance on the Environmental Sustainability—Evidence from Resource-Rich Countries. In Natural Resources Forum; Blackwell Publishing Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 2025; Volume 49, pp. 1842–1858. [Google Scholar]
- Auty, R.M. Resource Abundance and Economic Development; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Asongu, S.A.; Odhiambo, N.M. Enhancing governance for environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2021, 39, 444–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukhtarov, S.; Yuksel, S.; Dinçer, H. The impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from Turkey. Renew. Energy 2022, 187, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarijari, T.; Deka, A.; Cavusoglu, B. The synergistic role of natural resources, low carbon energy and technological innovation in promoting environmental sustainability: The evidence of BRICS economies. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 22, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pata, U.K.; Samour, A. Assessing the role of the insurance market and renewable energy in the load capacity factor of OECD countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 48604–48616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adebayo, T.S.; Samour, A. Renewable energy, fiscal policy and load capacity factor in BRICS countries: Novel findings from panel nonlinear ARDL model. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024, 26, 4365–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Global Footprint Network. Ecological Footprint vs. Biocapacity. 2025. Available online: https://data.footprintnetwork.org/#/countryTrends?cn=5001&type=BCtot,EFCtot (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Lv, Z.; Chen, L.; Ali, S.A.; Muda, I.; Alromaihi, A.; Boltayev, J.Y. Financial technologies, green technologies and natural resource nexus with sustainable development goals: Evidence from resource abundant economies using MMQR estimation. Resour. Policy 2024, 89, 104649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesaran, M.H. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Economics 2004, 1240, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesaran, M.H. Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econom. Rev. 2015, 34, 1089–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frees, E.W. Assessing cross-sectional correlation in panel data. J. Econom. 1995, 69, 393–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frees, E.W. Longitudinal and Panel Data: Analysis and Applications in the Social Sciences; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Friedman, M. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1937, 32, 675–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pesaran, M.H.; Yamagata, T. Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J. Econom. 2008, 142, 50–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Im, K.S.; Pesaran, M.H.; Shin, Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J. Econom. 2003, 115, 53–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, N.; Katz, J.N. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 1995, 89, 634–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bailey, D.; Katz, J.N. Implementing panel-corrected standard errors in R: The pcse package. J. Stat. Softw. 2011, 42, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Safi, A.; Ge, F. Towards carbon neutrality: Will artificial intelligence and green bond become catalysts? Energy Econ. 2025, 148, 108711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akpanke, T.A.; Deka, A.; Ozdeser, H.; Seraj, M. Ecological footprint in the OECD countries: Do energy efficiency and renewable energy matter? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 15289–15301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Variables | Source | Measurements |
|---|---|---|
| Load Capacity Factor (LCF) | GFN | Ratio of BC to EFP |
| Technological Innovation (TI) | WB | Index of FBS and MCS developed with the PCA technique |
| Institutional Quality (IQ) | WB | Index of GE and CC developed with the PCA technique |
| Green finance (GF) | OWD | Total value in U.S. Dollars |
| Financial development (FD) | IMF | Index measuring the depth and efficiency of financial institutions and market |
| Renewable Energy (RE) | WB | Clean energy as % of total energy use |
| Variable | Obs | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCF | 161 | 0.5169 | 0.2502 | 0.1298 | 0.9775 |
| RE | 161 | 52.7224 | 29.2840 | 6.3167 | 93.73 |
| FBS | 161 | 1.9137 | 5.0068 | 0 | 25.7259 |
| MCS | 161 | 45.1414 | 40.3797 | 0 | 161.3582 |
| GE | 161 | −0.4151 | 0.7407 | −1.8138 | 1.15044 |
| CC | 161 | −0.2616 | 0.4277 | −1.3097 | 0.5503 |
| FD | 161 | 0.2013 | 0.1703 | 0.0318 | 0.6079 |
| GF | 161 | 34,600,000 | 96,700,000 | 0 | 740,000,000 |
| Coefficient | z-Statistic | p-Value | Coefficient | z-Statistic | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quantile | 0.1 | 0.25 | ||||
| TI | −0.0898 | −7.617 *** | 0.000 | −0.0861 | −8.32 *** | 0.000 |
| IQ | 0.1339 | 6.587 *** | 0.000 | 0.1259 | 7.08 *** | 0.000 |
| FD | 0.7984 | 4.007 *** | 0.000 | 0.5804 | 3.41 *** | 0.001 |
| lnGF | 0.0105 | 6.277 *** | 0.000 | 0.0109 | 7.37 *** | 0.000 |
| RE | 0.0129 | 11.77 *** | 0.000 | 0.0115 | 12.47 *** | 0.000 |
| Quantile | 0.5 | 0.75 | ||||
| TI | −0.0802 | −8.05 *** | 0.000 | −0.0739 | −6.13 *** | 0.000 |
| IQ | 0.1134 | 6.58 *** | 0.000 | 0.0999 | 4.80 *** | 0.000 |
| FD | 0.2405 | 1.37 | 0.169 | −0.1266 | −0.61 | 0.541 |
| lnGF | 0.0114 | 8.03 *** | 0.000 | 0.0119 | 6.95 *** | 0.000 |
| RE | 0.0094 | 9.62 *** | 0.000 | 0.0071 | 6.16 *** | 0.000 |
| Quantile | 0.9 | PCSE | ||||
| TI | −0.0680 | −4.36 *** | 0.000 | −0.0797 | −6.77 *** | 0.000 |
| IQ | 0.0872 | 3.24 *** | 0.001 | 0.1121 | 7.15 *** | 0.000 |
| FD | −0.4730 | −1.76 * | 0.079 | 0.2071 | 1.85 * | 0.065 |
| lnGF | 0.0124 | 5.61 *** | 0.000 | 0.0114 | 7.10 *** | 0.000 |
| RE | 0.0049 | 3.26 *** | 0.001 | 0.0092 | 18.21 *** | 0.000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wali, M.F.A.; Kareem, P.H.; Çelebi, A.İ. Green Financial Technology and Institutional Quality as Pathways to Environmental Sustainability in Southern African Countries Facing Severe Ecological Pressures. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9656. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219656
Wali MFA, Kareem PH, Çelebi Aİ. Green Financial Technology and Institutional Quality as Pathways to Environmental Sustainability in Southern African Countries Facing Severe Ecological Pressures. Sustainability. 2025; 17(21):9656. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219656
Chicago/Turabian StyleWali, Mohammed Fathi Abdulkarim, Ponle Henry Kareem, and Ayşem İyikal Çelebi. 2025. "Green Financial Technology and Institutional Quality as Pathways to Environmental Sustainability in Southern African Countries Facing Severe Ecological Pressures" Sustainability 17, no. 21: 9656. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219656
APA StyleWali, M. F. A., Kareem, P. H., & Çelebi, A. İ. (2025). Green Financial Technology and Institutional Quality as Pathways to Environmental Sustainability in Southern African Countries Facing Severe Ecological Pressures. Sustainability, 17(21), 9656. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219656

