Next Article in Journal
Deeper Understanding of Sustainability: Ecological Self as Core Competence of Social Work Students in Fieldwork Teaching
Previous Article in Journal
Social Innovation Ecosystems in Times of Crisis: Rethinking Innovation Policy Through the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

How Do Alliance Networks Affect Firms’ Capability of Influencing Technological Standardization? Configuration Analysis Based on the TOE Framework

1
School of Business Administration, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China
2
School of Management, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(21), 9499; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219499 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 17 September 2025 / Revised: 20 October 2025 / Accepted: 23 October 2025 / Published: 25 October 2025

Abstract

Standardization alliance networks serve as crucial channels for firms to sponsor standards and access external resources, exerting a substantial impact on their standard-setting competitiveness and their ability to foster a sustainable innovation ecosystem. The technology–organization–environment (TOE) framework offers an integrated theoretical perspective for studying the causal recipes of how the technological composition, the network structure, and the environment features of standardization alliance network affect firms’ capabilities to dominate and support technological standardization. Based on the data of 88 vehicle manufacturers with experience in participating in standardization alliances, the results of fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) show that: (1) large-scale networks with low density and high technological diversity can simultaneously explain firms’ high level capabilities to dominate and support standardization; (2) supporting standardization is highly dependent on network scale, as firms embedded in large-scale alliance networks with high technological diversity or proximity both enjoy advantages in supporting standardization; (3) dominating standardization shows relatively low dependence on network scale, a firm can enhance its standardization dominance by maintaining an alliance network with low technological proximity in institutional environment with high government intervention. Overall, this study contributes to the theoretical literature on cooperative standard-setting and provides managerial implications for firms looking to enhance capabilities to dominate and support standardization, thereby shaping sustainable technology trajectories and securing their long-term industrial competitiveness in a rapidly evolving technological environment.
Keywords: standardization alliance network; dominating standardization; supporting standardization; TOE framework standardization alliance network; dominating standardization; supporting standardization; TOE framework

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wen, J.; Tan, D.; Wang, H.; Gao, Y. How Do Alliance Networks Affect Firms’ Capability of Influencing Technological Standardization? Configuration Analysis Based on the TOE Framework. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219499

AMA Style

Wen J, Tan D, Wang H, Gao Y. How Do Alliance Networks Affect Firms’ Capability of Influencing Technological Standardization? Configuration Analysis Based on the TOE Framework. Sustainability. 2025; 17(21):9499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219499

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wen, Jinyan, Donghua Tan, Honglue Wang, and Yanxiao Gao. 2025. "How Do Alliance Networks Affect Firms’ Capability of Influencing Technological Standardization? Configuration Analysis Based on the TOE Framework" Sustainability 17, no. 21: 9499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219499

APA Style

Wen, J., Tan, D., Wang, H., & Gao, Y. (2025). How Do Alliance Networks Affect Firms’ Capability of Influencing Technological Standardization? Configuration Analysis Based on the TOE Framework. Sustainability, 17(21), 9499. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219499

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop