Next Article in Journal
Intergenerational Information-Sharing Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: From Protective Action Decision Model Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring of Chlorophyll-a Levels in Lakes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Framework for Analyzing and Supporting Communities on Their Path to Sustainability

School of Mechanical Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Sustainability 2025, 17(16), 7262; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167262
Submission received: 13 June 2025 / Revised: 23 July 2025 / Accepted: 6 August 2025 / Published: 11 August 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Social Ecology and Sustainability)

Abstract

Sustainable community development presents complex challenges, often leading to failed initiatives. This paper addresses the need for a conceptual framework to analyze, understand, and support communities striving for sustainability. It questions how diverse community stories can be synthesized to clarify core issues and subtleties, enabling communities to navigate towards a sustainable future. The research adopts a design perspective, drawing parallels between engineering design processes and community development. The methodology involves applying the Problem-Social-Institutional (PSI) framework, initially developed for engineering design, to analyze published case studies of sustainable and ecological community projects in Israel. The PSI matrix, a tool within the framework, models initiatives across three layers (vision, reflection/implementation, daily life) and three spaces (Problem-‘What’, Social-‘Who’, Institutional-‘How’). By analyzing multiple case studies using the PSI matrix, the research identifies key factors that contribute to both the success and failure of these initiatives. Results indicate that sustainable communities require dynamic alignment across all matrix cells, a shared and adaptable vision achieved through dialogue, an active ‘reflection/implementation’ layer for monitoring and alignment, community-defined daily operations, and the nurturing of citizen skills and leadership for participation and dialogue. The framework effectively highlights misalignments—such as conflicting visions or the absence of a reflection layer—as early indicators of potential failure. The paper concludes that the PSI framework provides a valuable, albeit simplified, tool for communities to diagnose challenges, facilitate dialogue, and guide actions toward sustainability, acknowledging the complexity of social systems and the need for continuous adaptation and learning.
Keywords: sustainable communities; PSI framework; community development; case study analysis; systems thinking; alignment; community vision; reflection sustainable communities; PSI framework; community development; case study analysis; systems thinking; alignment; community vision; reflection
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reich, Y. A Framework for Analyzing and Supporting Communities on Their Path to Sustainability. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7262. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167262

AMA Style

Reich Y. A Framework for Analyzing and Supporting Communities on Their Path to Sustainability. Sustainability. 2025; 17(16):7262. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167262

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reich, Yoram. 2025. "A Framework for Analyzing and Supporting Communities on Their Path to Sustainability" Sustainability 17, no. 16: 7262. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167262

APA Style

Reich, Y. (2025). A Framework for Analyzing and Supporting Communities on Their Path to Sustainability. Sustainability, 17(16), 7262. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167262

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop