Next Article in Journal
Biomass Transformation: Sustainable Development
Previous Article in Journal
Has Climate Change Affected the Occurrence of Compound Heat Wave and Heavy Rainfall Events in Poland?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ultra-Trace Monitoring of Methylene Blue Degradation via AgNW-Based SERS: Toward Sustainable Advanced Oxidation Water Treatment

by
Isabela Horta
*,
Nilton Francelosi Azevedo Neto
,
Letícia Terumi Kito
,
Felipe Miranda
,
Gilmar Thim
,
André Luis de Jesus Pereira
and
Rodrigo Pessoa
*
Plasmas and Processes Laboratory (LPP), Aeronautics Institute of Technology (ITA), São José dos Campos 12228-900, SP, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(10), 4448; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104448
Submission received: 8 April 2025 / Revised: 26 April 2025 / Accepted: 11 May 2025 / Published: 14 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Materials)

Abstract

:
Methylene blue (MB), a widely used industrial dye, is a persistent pollutant with documented toxicity to aquatic organisms and potential health risks to humans, even at ultra-trace levels. Conventional monitoring techniques such as UV–Vis spectroscopy and fluorescence emission suffer from limited sensitivity, typically failing to detect MB below ~10−7 M. In this study, we introduce a surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) platform based on silver nanowire (AgNW) substrates that enables MB detection over an unprecedented dynamic range—from 1.5 × 10−4 M down to 1.5 × 10−16 M. Raman mapping confirmed the presence of individual signal hot spots at the lowest concentration, consistent with the theoretical number of analyte molecules in the probed area, thereby demonstrating near-single-molecule detection capability. The calculated enhancement factors reached up to 1.90 × 1012, among the highest reported for SERS-based detection platforms. A semi-quantitative calibration curve was established spanning twelve orders of magnitude, and this platform was successfully applied to monitor MB degradation during two advanced oxidation processes (AOPs): TiO2 nanotube-mediated photocatalysis under UV irradiation and atmospheric-pressure dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma treatment. While UV–Vis and fluorescence techniques rapidly lost sensitivity during the degradation process, the SERS platform continued to detect the characteristic MB Raman peak at ~1626 cm−1 throughout the entire treatment duration. These persistent SERS signals revealed the presence of residual MB or partially degraded aromatic intermediates that remained undetectable by conventional optical methods. The results underscore the ability of AgNW-based SERS to provide ultra-sensitive, molecular-level insights into pollutant transformation pathways, enabling time-resolved tracking of degradation kinetics and validating treatment efficiency. This work highlights the importance of integrating SERS with AOPs as a powerful complementary strategy for advanced environmental monitoring and water purification technologies. By delivering an ultra-sensitive, low-cost sensor (<USD 0.16 per test) and promoting reagent-free treatment methods, this study directly advances SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production).

1. Introduction

Methylene blue (MB) is a synthetic dye extensively used in industries such as textiles, pharmaceuticals, and paper manufacturing, resulting in significant water pollution. Even at trace concentrations, MB poses environmental and health risks, demanding highly sensitive detection methods and effective removal strategies [1,2]. Human exposure to MB can lead to symptoms such as increased heart rate, cyanosis, vomiting, and shock [1]. In aquatic ecosystems, even low MB concentrations can be harmful. For example, the microalga Spirulina platensis exhibits an EC50 value of 1.08 mg/L (~3.37 × 10−6 M), and the crustacean Daphnia magna shows chronic toxicity at concentrations as low as 4.7 μg/L (~1.47 × 10−7 M) [3,4]. Although specific regulatory limits for MB residues in food are not well defined, its potential for bioaccumulation raises concerns for both environmental and food safety [5].
The global discharge of synthetic dyes, including methylene blue, is estimated to reach approximately 7 × 105 tons per year, exerting substantial pressure on freshwater ecosystems and necessitating the development of sustainable monitoring and remediation technologies. Conventional treatment approaches, such as chemical coagulation and Fenton oxidation, often involve high reagent consumption, generate considerable sludge volumes, and impose significant energy demands. Therefore, addressing these environmental challenges requires innovative solutions that balance environmental protection, economic viability, and social equity.
Standard analytical techniques, such as UV–Vis spectroscopy and chromatography, often struggle to detect MB at ultra-trace levels without extensive sample preparation, limiting their applicability in environmental monitoring. For instance, one study reported a UV–Vis detection limit of 0.464 mg/L (~1.45 × 10−6 M) [6], while another achieved a lower limit of 0.65 μg/L (~2.03 × 10−8 M) using a combination of dispersive solid-phase and cloud point extraction methods—but at the cost of added complexity [7]. These limitations highlight the need for advanced or complementary analytical approaches for trace detection of MB in aqueous environments.
Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), first reported in the 1970s, has since evolved into a powerful analytical technique capable of enhancing Raman signals by several orders of magnitude. This enhancement arises from localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effects occurring at nanostructured metal surfaces, where the collective oscillation of conduction electrons generates intense local electromagnetic fields that amplify the Raman signal of nearby molecules [8]. Among various nanostructured materials, silver nanowires (AgNWs) have emerged as particularly effective SERS substrates due to their high aspect ratio and capacity to form dense plasmonic hot spots at junctions and overlapping points. For example, chemical etching of AgNWs has been shown to increase surface roughness and create additional SERS-active sites [9], while aligned AgNW arrays prepared by self-assembly methods achieved enhancement factors as high as 6.12 × 1011 under 532 nm laser excitation [10]. Additionally, cross-patterned AgNW films deposited on gold substrates further enhance SERS activity by increasing the density of junctions that serve as hot spots [11].
Despite its remarkable sensitivity, SERS-based detection presents certain limitations when compared to other analytical methods such as electrochemical sensors and immunosensors. One notable challenge is the variability in signal enhancement due to non-uniform substrate fabrication, which can impact reproducibility [12]. Furthermore, SERS often requires optimization of laser excitation parameters and analyte–substrate interactions, which may limit its robustness in complex sample matrices [13]. In contrast, electrochemical sensors typically offer straightforward miniaturization and real-time detection capabilities, while immunosensors benefit from high specificity owing to antibody–antigen recognition [14,15]. However, these techniques may lack the molecular-level information accessible through SERS and often require extensive labeling or immobilization strategies. Thus, integrating SERS with advanced substrate design and complementary degradation strategies can mitigate these issues and expand its applicability in environmental sensing.
MB is frequently used as a model molecule in SERS studies due to its intense and well-defined Raman peak at ~1626 cm−1, associated with aromatic ring stretching vibrations. While silver nanostars and nanoparticles have been commonly employed for MB detection via SERS [16], studies utilizing AgNW-based substrates for this purpose remain relatively scarce. The recent availability of commercially produced AgNWs with high purity and uniform dimensions has facilitated the fabrication of reliable and reproducible SERS substrates.
Effective environmental remediation, however, requires not only sensitive pollutant detection but also complete degradation into non-toxic byproducts. Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are widely applied for this purpose and have shown high efficacy in breaking down persistent organic pollutants such as MB [1]. Among these, dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma has drawn particular interest due to its ability to generate a wide range of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) directly in aqueous solutions without the need for added reagents [17]. The oxidative environment created by DBD plasma includes hydroxyl radicals (•OH), ozone (O3), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and atomic oxygen (O), all of which contribute to MB degradation through mechanisms such as aromatic ring cleavage, demethylation, and deamination—ultimately leading to the formation of biodegradable intermediates or complete mineralization into CO2 and H2O [18].
Titania nanostructures, particularly nanotubes (TiNTs), are extensively utilized in AOPs due to their high surface area, superior photocatalytic activity, and remarkable chemical stability. When exposed to ultraviolet (UV) and visible light, TiNTs facilitate the generation of reactive species capable of degrading organic dyes such as MB. The photocatalytic efficiency of TiNTs can be further improved by doping with elements like cerium, which enhances charge carrier separation and broadens the absorption spectrum [19]. The prevalent use of TiNTs in photocatalytic water treatment highlights their significance as a complementary or alternative approach to plasma-based degradation processes.
Monitoring MB degradation is crucial for evaluating treatment efficiency. SERS poses a highly sensitive method to track molecular changes, detecting even trace concentrations beyond the limits of conventional techniques. By analyzing shifts in Raman bands, it enables the identification of intermediates, supports kinetic studies, and aids in optimizing degradation parameters [20,21].
The integration of ultra-sensitive SERS detection with reagent-free AOPs, such as DBD plasma and TiNT-mediated photocatalysis, offers a greener alternative to traditional methods by minimizing chemical inputs, secondary pollution, and energy consumption. This approach directly contributes to United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6, particularly targets 6.3 (improving water quality by reducing pollution) and 6.a (expanding international cooperation and technology transfer for water-related activities), supporting global efforts toward sustainable water management.
Several studies have demonstrated the utility of SERS for detecting and monitoring the degradation of organic dyes such as MB, typically employing silver nanoparticles, nanostars, or composite nanostructures as active substrates [16,20,21]. These platforms have achieved high enhancement factors and have been applied to evaluate photocatalytic processes and dye–substrate interactions. However, most reports emphasize qualitative detection or narrow concentration ranges, often under optimized laboratory conditions with less emphasis on degradation kinetics or the tracking of residual intermediates. Furthermore, AgNW-based substrates—despite their high enhancement potential due to well-defined plasmonic junctions—remain underexplored in degradation studies. In this work, we address these gaps by developing an accessible AgNW–SERS platform capable of detecting MB at concentrations as low as 10−16 M and by applying it to monitor degradation dynamics induced by both DBD plasma and TiO2 nanotube photocatalysis. The ability to establish a semi-quantitative correlation between MB concentration and SERS intensity over twelve orders of magnitude represents a significant advance toward high-sensitivity, molecule-level environmental diagnostics, and time-dependent monitoring of pollutant degradation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. SERS Substrate Preparation

SERS substrates were prepared by drop-casting 10 µL of an aqueous silver nanowire solution (Nanostructured & Amorphous Materials Inc., code 0475NW3W, Beijing, China; diameter: 25–35 nm, length: 15–25 µm) onto clean glass slides, followed by drying at room temperature overnight. Fabrication requires no organic solvents and generates negligible solid waste, illustrating a benign-by-design approach aligned with green nanofabrication principles. The resulting dried AgNW spots served as SERS-active substrates for Raman analysis. Additional details regarding substrate preparation and characterization are provided in the Supplementary Materials (Section S1, Figures S1 and S2).

2.2. Methylene Blue Solutions

Methylene blue (MB, C16H18ClN3S, CAS No. 7220-79-3, Sigma-Aldrich (São Paulo, Brazil), ≥82% dye content) solutions were prepared at seven different concentrations—1.5 × 10−4 M, 1.5 × 10−5 M, 1.5 × 10−6 M, 1.5 × 10−7 M, 1.5 × 10−10 M, 1.5 × 10−13 M, and 1.5 × 10−16 M—using deionized water as the solvent. A 10 µL drop of each solution was deposited onto the AgNW substrates for Raman analysis. For control experiments, identical volumes of each concentration were also placed on bare glass slides to verify the enhancement due to the SERS effect.

2.3. Synthesis, Characterization, and Photocatalytic Application of Titanate Nanotubes (TiNTs) for Methylene Blue Degradation

TiNTs were synthesized via a hydrothermal method. Briefly, 1 g of TiO2 nanoparticles—prepared according to the method described by da Silva et al. (2019) [22]—was dispersed in 50 mL of a 10 mol·L−1 sodium hydroxide (NaOH, Cinética) solution and stirred at 600 rpm for 20 min. The mixture was then transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and heated at 150 °C for 24 h. The resulting precipitate was washed by centrifugation using a 0.1 mol·L−1 hydrochloric acid (HCl, Neon) solution, followed by repeated rinsing with deionized water until the pH reached 5. The final product was dried at 60 °C for 24 h.
The morphology and structure of the synthesized nanomaterial were comprehensively characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction (XRD), as detailed in the Supplementary Materials (Section S2, Figures S3–S5). TEM imaging revealed cylindrical, hollow structures with average lengths of 148 ± 68 nm and diameters of 8 ± 1 nm. Raman spectra confirmed the presence of anatase and rutile TiO2 phases, along with characteristic Ti–O and Ti–OH vibrational modes associated with titanate structures.
Importantly, the XRD pattern exhibited a distinct low-angle reflection at 2θ ≈ 10°, indicative of the (200) plane of hydrogen trititanate (H2Ti3O7 or H2Ti6O13), which is a hallmark of scroll-like nanotube structures. This feature is not typically observed in nanorods, which require higher hydrothermal synthesis temperatures and present different diffraction profiles. As reported by Lan et al. [23], nanorods tend to form at temperatures exceeding 180 °C and display sharper peaks corresponding to more crystalline phases. Thus, the combination of morphological and structural features observed here confirms the successful synthesis of titanate nanotubes under the adopted conditions.
To evaluate the photocatalytic degradation of MB, a stock solution with a concentration of 10 mg·L−1 was prepared. TiNTs were employed as the photocatalyst, with 0.5 mg of TiNTs added to 60 mL of the MB solution.
The experiment commenced with a 15 min dark stirring period to ensure homogeneous dispersion of the photocatalyst and to allow adsorption–desorption equilibrium between MB molecules and the TiNT surface. A sample collected at the end of this period was designated as the “initial” condition.
Following this equilibration phase, the suspension was exposed to UV irradiation under continuous stirring in a photodegradation chamber. Aliquots were withdrawn at predetermined intervals of 15, 30, 60, 75, and 90 min using a syringe. To prevent interference in subsequent analyses, TiNTs were removed from each aliquot via syringe filtration.
Immediately after collection, the filtered aliquots were analyzed using UV–Vis spectroscopy to determine the residual MB concentration. Portions of each sample were also reserved for SERS analysis using AgNW-based substrates, as illustrated in Scheme 1.

2.4. Degradation of Methylene Blue via Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Plasma

A separate set of experiments was performed using a coaxial DBD plasma system [24,25] operated with compressed air supplied at 5 L/min to evaluate the degradation of MB under plasma-induced advanced oxidation conditions.
For this experiment, 60 mL of the 10 mg/L MB solution was placed in a beaker and subjected to direct exposure from the air plasma jet for 40 min. During treatment, approximately 2 mL aliquots were collected at specific time points (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 40 min) using Pasteur pipettes.
After collecting, all aliquots were immediately analyzed by UV–Vis spectroscopy to quantify the remaining MB concentration. In addition, portions of each sample were used for SERS measurements. For this purpose, 10 µL of each aliquot was dropped-cast onto AgNW-coated glass substrates and left to dry overnight at room temperature, as depicted in Scheme 1.

2.5. Optical Characterization of MB Solutions

UV–Vis spectroscopy was utilized to analyze the absorbance spectra of the MB samples before and after treatment with plasma or photodegradation. Measurements were conducted using a Thermo Scientific GENESYS 180 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil), covering a spectral range from 200 to 800 nm. All measurements were performed using a 10 mm path-length quartz cuvette to ensure accurate optical transmission and minimize interference in the UV range.
Fluorescence emission spectra were acquired using a Fluoromax Plus-C spectrofluorometer (HORIBA, São Paulo, Brazil). Samples were contained within a 10 mm path-length quartz cuvette. Excitation was performed at 450 nm, and emission spectra were recorded over the wavelength range of 500 to 800 nm.

2.6. Raman Spectroscopy

Raman spectra were acquired using a LabRAM Odyssey Raman spectrometer (HORIBA, São Paulo, Brazil) equipped with excitation lasers at 532 nm, 633 nm, and 785 nm. Spectral acquisition was performed in the 100–1700 cm−1 range. A 50× long working distance objective was employed for measurements in liquid-phase samples, while both 50× and 100× objectives were used for dried samples, depending on the specific experimental configuration and desired spatial resolution (see Figure S6 of the Supplementary Materials).
All AgNW-based SERS substrates were prepared and dried under stable ambient laboratory conditions (22–24 °C, relative humidity ~50–55%) to ensure the reproducibility of nanowire self-assembly and hot spot formation. Although no active environmental control system was used, maintaining consistent temperature and humidity during substrate drying proved important for achieving uniform SERS responses and should be standardized in future applications.
Raman measurements were also conducted under the same ambient conditions, without external temperature regulation. To assess the background signal and minimize interferences, preliminary spectra were acquired on bare glass slides before testing the AgNW substrates. Laser power settings (3 mW, 0.3 mW, and 0.03 mW) and integration times were optimized to prevent localized heating, photothermal damage, and detector saturation—especially at higher MB concentrations (10−4 to 10−6 M). These precautions also contributed to improved signal detection at ultra-low concentrations.
For the quantitative assessment of the SERS enhancement factor (EF), the Raman band at approximately 1626 cm−1—assigned to the C–C ring stretching mode of MB—was selected due to its high intensity, reproducibility, and minimal spectral overlap with other features. Slight shifts of ±5 cm−1 were occasionally observed, consistent with variations arising from analyte–substrate interactions and experimental conditions.
The number of probed molecules (N) was estimated based on the analyte concentration, the laser spot size, and the dried droplet area, following the detailed methodology provided in the Supplementary Information. This approach allowed the EF to be calculated consistently by normalizing the Raman and SERS intensities with respect to molecular density.
The EF was calculated for each concentration using the following equation, which accounts for differences in acquisition parameters such as laser power and exposure time [26,27]:
E F = I S E R S I R a m a n × t S E R S t R a m a n × P S E R S P R a m a n × N S E R S N R a m a n ,
where I S E R S and I R a m a n are the integrated intensities of the selected peak for the SERS-active (AgNW substrate) and non-SERS-active (glass slide) samples, respectively; t denotes the acquisition time, P the laser power, and N the estimated number of molecules probed within the laser excitation volume for each case.
This methodology enables consistent and comparative evaluation of signal enhancement across varying sample conditions and concentrations.

3. Results

3.1. Optical and Fluorescence Characterization of MB Samples

Methylene blue was used as the model dye in this study and prepared by dissolving the solid compound in deionized water. Its UV–Vis absorption spectra across a broad concentration range—from 1.5 × 10−4 M to 1.5 × 10−16 M—are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1a displays the spectra for concentrations between 1.5 × 10−4 M and 1.5 × 10−5 M. At 1.5 × 10−4 M, strong absorbance is observed across the visible range (particularly from ~520 to 700 nm), accompanied by spectral broadening and baseline elevation due to optical saturation and molecular aggregation. As the concentration decreases, the spectrum becomes more resolved, with four characteristic peaks emerging at 246, 292, 613, and 664 nm. The peak at 664 nm is attributed to monomeric MB, while the shoulder at 613 nm is indicative of aggregated species in solution [28,29].
Figure 1b presents data corresponding to ultra-dilute analyte concentrations (1.5 × 10−8 M to 1.5 × 10−16 M). In this range, absorbance values drop significantly, and spectral features become less defined. The 664 nm peak, although still discernible at higher dilutions, approaches the detection limit of the UV–Vis spectrophotometer as concentration decreases, limiting reliable quantification below approximately 10−7 M.
Figure 2 shows the fluorescence emission spectra of MB in deionized water across concentrations from 1.5 × 10−16 M to 1.5 × 10−4 M. At low concentrations, a well-defined emission band centered around 677 nm is observed, corresponding to the radiative decay of monomeric MB in aqueous solution [29]. This emission remains clearly detectable down to 1.5 × 10−13 M, highlighting the high sensitivity of fluorescence spectroscopy under the conditions employed.
At higher concentrations, particularly at 1.5 × 10−4 M, the emission peak undergoes red-shifting and broadening (Figure 2a), effects typically attributed to molecular aggregation. Such aggregates alter the electronic environment and result in distinct emissive behavior compared to monomeric species [30]. Although the fluorescence intensity initially increases with concentration, it eventually plateaus or decreases due to self-quenching, driven by close molecular packing and energy transfer between excited states.
In contrast, for MB concentrations of 1.5 × 10−14 M and below (Figure 2b), the emission signal becomes indistinguishable from baseline noise, setting 1.5 × 10−13 M as the practical fluorescence detection limit in this system.
The emission profile of MB overlaps with common Raman excitation wavelengths, which has implications for SERS measurements. The fluorescence maximum at ~677 nm lies near the 633 nm laser line and significantly overlaps with the 785 nm region due to spectral broadening at high concentrations. This overlap may introduce substantial fluorescence background, interfering with the detection of Raman signals at those excitation wavelengths.
In contrast, excitation at 532 nm—though further from the emission maximum—provides a higher Raman scattering cross-section and can yield stronger SERS signals. However, it also increases the risk of photodegradation or fluorescence saturation at high dye concentrations. Therefore, the selection of an excitation wavelength must balance minimizing fluorescence background and maximizing SERS signal enhancement.

3.2. SERS of MB and Fluorescence Interference

Figure 3 displays the Raman spectra of MB at a concentration of 1.5 × 10−5 M, obtained using three different excitation wavelengths: 532 nm, 633 nm, and 785 nm. Clear differences in spectral quality and fluorescence interference are evident, primarily influenced by the overlap between the MB emission spectrum and the excitation wavelength.
Among the lasers tested, the 633 nm excitation produced the highest-quality Raman spectrum, with strong signal intensity, well-defined peaks, and minimal fluorescence background. This result is attributed to the proximity of the excitation wavelength to, but slightly below, the MB emission maximum (~677 nm), reducing overlap with fluorescence emission while still ensuring effective Raman scattering.
The 532 nm laser also enabled the observation of key Raman features; however, the spectra exhibited increased the fluorescence background, likely due to the higher photon energy and excitation efficiency of this wavelength, which can promote photoluminescence and possible photodegradation—especially at higher concentrations. Despite this, the 532 nm line is commonly used for SERS due to its higher Raman cross-section [31].
In contrast, 785 nm excitation resulted in a strong fluorescence background that significantly obscured the Raman features. This is consistent with the fluorescence spectra presented in Figure 2, which shows intense and broad emission bands extending into the near-infrared region, overlapping the 785 nm excitation and detection window. As a result, the Raman signal was suppressed and the spectral baseline elevated, making 785 nm less suitable for MB detection under these conditions.
The characteristic Raman peaks of MB observed in this study are consistent with those reported by Li et al. [32] and are listed in Table 1. Notably, the most intense and reliable peak was consistently found at 1626 cm−1, corresponding to the C–C ring stretching vibration. This peak was used for enhancement factor (EF) calculations due to its strong intensity and reproducibility across different samples and conditions. Additionally, a small peak at ~243 cm−1 was observed in all spectra and is attributed to silver oxide, originating from the AgNW substrate.
To further assess the influence of laser power on signal quality and reproducibility, we focused on the 1626 cm−1 Raman peak—chosen for its stability, high intensity, and consistent appearance across all experimental conditions. Across the full concentration range, we observed that higher laser powers (3 mW) yielded stronger signals but also increased the risk of spectral distortion due to local heating or saturation, especially at micromolar MB concentrations. Conversely, lower powers (0.3 mW and 0.03 mW) reduced this risk and were more suitable for measurements in the single-molecule regime. This power-dependent behavior aligns with the response trends observed in the calibration curves (see Figure 4b), where signal intensity exhibits nonlinear increases at higher concentrations, potentially influenced by both molecular adsorption dynamics and partial signal saturation. These findings emphasize the importance of carefully optimizing laser parameters when employing SERS for quantitative analysis.

3.3. Determination of MB Concentration and Enhanced Factor via SERS

Figure 4a presents the Raman spectra of MB at concentrations ranging from 1.5 × 10−16 to 1.5 × 10−4 M, acquired using 633 nm laser excitation. These results demonstrate the remarkable sensitivity of the AgNW-based SERS substrates, which enabled the detection of MB at concentrations far below the detection limits of conventional optical techniques. The characteristic Raman band at ~1626 cm−1 becomes increasingly intense with concentration, making it a robust marker for detection and quantification.
To evaluate the semi-quantitative performance of the SERS platform, the intensity of the 1626 cm−1 peak was measured for each concentration and plotted as a function of MB concentration in Figure 4b. The resulting calibration curve spans over more than ten orders of magnitude, divided into two distinct regions.
In Region 1 (C ≥ 10−10 M), a power-law relationship is observed, indicative of typical SERS behavior in which the signal increases with concentration due to enhanced molecular adsorption and activation at plasmonic hot spots. In Region 2 (C < 10−10 M), the signal plateaus, with minimal variation in intensity, reflect the detection limit of the platform and the transition into the single- or few-molecule regime.
Despite the nonlinear overall behavior—expected in SERS due to surface saturation effects, adsorption dynamics, and hot spot distribution—the response exhibits excellent reproducibility. This complex yet predictable trend underscores the platform’s robustness for semi-quantitative analysis, even at ultralow analyte concentrations.
To confirm MB detection at the lowest tested concentration (1.5 × 10−16 M), Raman mapping was performed over a 57 × 37 µm area with a spatial resolution of 2.2 µm. At each point, spectra were collected using a 10 s acquisition time with three accumulations. After baseline correction, the 1626 cm−1 peak intensity was extracted for spatial analysis.
As shown in Figure 5, only a few localized spots exhibited measurable Raman signals, corresponding to discrete SERS hot spots where individual or very few MB molecules were likely adsorbed. Based on the total number of MB molecules estimated to be present within the scanned area (approximately nine), the number of detected hot spots matches closely, confirming the system’s near-single-molecule detection capability.
It is worth noting that minor spectral shifts of the 1626 cm−1 peak were observed across different MB concentrations. These shifts are commonly reported in SERS studies and are attributed to variations in the local chemical environment, analyte orientation on the AgNW surface, and hot spot-induced electromagnetic field effects [33]. Additionally, an unexpected intensity inversion was observed—namely, the Raman signal at 1.5 × 10−16 M was higher than that at 1.5 × 10−13 M. This non-monotonic behavior is characteristic of the single-molecule detection regime and is attributed to stochastic analyte–hot spot interactions. At such ultralow concentrations, signal intensity is not linearly correlated with analyte quantity, but rather governed by the probability that individual MB molecules adsorb precisely at plasmonic junctions exhibiting maximal field enhancement. In this context, a favorable hot spot–analyte alignment at a lower concentration can yield stronger signals than a slightly higher concentration where analytes may not be optimally positioned. This phenomenon, consistent with the discrete high-intensity regions observed in the Raman mapping (Figure 5), has been reported in prior SERS studies employing similar detection strategies [33,34,35,36].
Further validation of the system’s sensitivity is provided by the calculated EFs, summarized in Table 2. These values, derived from the intensity of the 1626 cm−1 Raman peak, increase markedly with decreasing MB concentration, reaching an EF of 1.90 × 1012 at 1.5 × 10−16 M. This dramatic rise underscores the effectiveness of localized electromagnetic field enhancement at AgNW-based SERS hot spots and confirms the platform’s capacity for time-dependent, ultra-trace analyte detection with high spatial resolution.
When compared to values reported in the literature, the EFs obtained in this study are significantly higher. For instance, Vu et al. (2020) achieved an EF of 1.6 × 106 using silver nanodecahedra [37]. Xiao and Man (2007) demonstrated EFs up to 4.2 × 107 using silver nanocaps synthesized via combined chemical and physical methods [38]. More recently, Ren et al. (2025) reported an EF of 5.81 × 108 using spherical, flower-like, magnetic Fe₃O₄@CoNi layered double hydroxide nanostructures decorated with silver nanoparticles (Fe₃O₄@CoNi LDH@Ag) hybrid nanostructures [39]. These comparisons highlight the exceptional performance of the present SERS platform, which outperforms many existing nanostructured substrates in terms of both sensitivity and detection range.

3.4. SERS and UV–Vis Analysis of Plasma-Treated MB Samples

To evaluate the degradation efficiency of atmospheric pressure plasma treatment on MB, a combination of SERS and UV–Vis analysis was employed. Figure 6 presents the temporal evolution of MB concentration as a function of plasma exposure time, derived from both UV–Vis and SERS data. The SERS-based concentration estimates were obtained by applying the calibration curve constructed in Figure 4b to the spectral intensities of the 1626 cm−1 peak extracted from the time-resolved spectra shown in Figure S7b.
UV–Vis spectroscopy showed a rapid decrease in MB concentration, with the signal falling below the detection limit (~10−7 M) after approximately 10 min of plasma treatment. This behavior is consistent with the visible decolorization observed in the treated samples (Figure S8), indicating disruption of the chromophoric structure of MB. However, UV–Vis fails to provide information beyond this point, as no meaningful absorbance signal remains at lower concentrations.
In contrast, SERS analysis revealed continued detection of MB at concentrations well below the UV–Vis threshold. The characteristic Raman peak at ~1626 cm−1 remained observable throughout the full 40 min plasma treatment (Figure S7b), allowing for the estimation of MB concentration down to 10−10 M using the dynamic response established in Figure 4b. This extended sensitivity range highlights the superior capability of SERS for real-time monitoring of trace analyte levels, especially in advanced oxidation processes in which conventional optical techniques are insufficient.
The integration of the calibration curve with time-resolved spectral data allowed for a semi-quantitative assessment of the degradation kinetics. The non-linear decrease in MB concentration observed in Figure 6 suggests that the degradation process does not follow simple first-order kinetics, but rather involves multiple concurrent pathways. This behavior is commonly reported in plasma-assisted advanced oxidation processes, in which the generation and interaction of RONS lead to both direct molecular fragmentation and stepwise oxidation through intermediate products [40,41].
The observed rapid initial decline in MB concentration during plasma treatment is likely due to the high reactivity of short-lived species such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH) and atomic oxygen (O), which are known to efficiently attack aromatic structures. This phenomenon has been documented in studies in which hydroxyl radicals play a significant role in the degradation of organic pollutants, including dyes like MB [41,42].
As the treatment progresses and MB concentration drops below micromolar levels, the reaction rate appears to plateau. This trend likely reflects limitations in the availability of target molecules at the plasma–liquid interface and possible accumulation of refractory intermediates that are less reactive or more resistant to further degradation. Similar observations have been reported in studies on plasma-based degradation processes, in which the formation of intermediate compounds can hinder complete mineralization [42].
These observations suggest that while UV–Vis confirms the loss of visible chromophores, it may overlook non-chromophoric degradation intermediates. The continued presence of the ~1626 cm−1 SERS peak indicates the existence of MB residues or aromatic by-products not fully mineralized. Such intermediates could include partially oxidized species (e.g., azure B, demethylated MB derivatives), as previously reported in degradation studies involving hydroxyl radicals or plasma-derived RONS [17,18,40]. This highlights the multistep nature of plasma-induced degradation, in which complete mineralization requires sequential bond cleavage and oxidation steps. By retaining sensitivity to molecular structure even after decolorization, SERS proves valuable not only for detecting MB but also for tracking persistent or transformation products that would otherwise remain undetected by UV–Vis.
Additional investigations involving high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or mass spectrometry could further clarify the identity of these intermediates in future studies. Nonetheless, the current SERS data already provides strong evidence for incomplete mineralization under the conditions tested and emphasizes the complementary role of SERS in revealing hidden degradation dynamics.

3.5. SERS and UV–Vis Analysis of MB Photodegradation Under TiO2–UV Treatment

The photodegradation of MB was further investigated using a combination of UV–Vis spectroscopy and SERS during TiO2-assisted UV photocatalysis. Both techniques were applied to aliquots from the same set of samples collected at different time points following UV exposure. As shown in Figure 7, MB concentrations were estimated using UV–Vis (orange) and SERS (blue), allowing a direct comparison of the spectroscopic responses under identical chemical conditions. Prior to UV exposure, all samples underwent a 15 min dark equilibration period (indicated by the dashed vertical line), ensuring adsorption–desorption equilibrium between MB molecules and the TiNT photocatalyst.
To isolate the contribution of TiNTs, a control test was conducted in which MB was exposed to UV irradiation without any photocatalyst. The results, shown in Supplementary Figure S9, indicate only a slight decrease in MB concentration (~1 mg/L) after 2 h, confirming the limited efficiency of direct UV photolysis under these conditions. This highlights the essential role of TiNTs in promoting photodegradation by generating reactive species and improving charge carrier dynamics.
The MB concentrations obtained via SERS were derived by applying the calibration curve established in Figure 4b to the intensity values of the 1626 cm−1 Raman peak extracted from the time-resolved SERS spectra presented in Figure S7a. This enabled semi-quantitative tracking of MB degradation well beyond the detection limits of UV–Vis spectroscopy.
Despite originating from the same samples, differences in concentration estimates between the two techniques were observed, particularly at later time points. While UV–Vis spectroscopy reported a continuous decline in absorbance, approaching its detection threshold (~10−7 M) by 90 min, SERS analysis revealed the persistent presence of MB—or structurally related aromatic intermediates—at submicromolar to nanomolar levels. This divergence arises from the inherent distinctions between the two techniques: UV–Vis measures the bulk absorbance of chromophoric species in solution, while SERS detects molecules adsorbed onto plasmonic hot spots, offering superior sensitivity and surface selectivity.
Interestingly, the SERS signal intensity showed a transient increase of around 60 min, suggesting either temporary accumulation of intermediates or enhanced adsorption of residual MB species onto the SERS substrate. Such behavior is consistent with multistep degradation pathways, in which partially oxidized products may momentarily dominate the population of Raman-active species [43]. These observations correlate with the progressive discoloration seen in the corresponding visual inspection (Figure S10), where complete decolorization was only evident after 90 min of irradiation.
In sum, the combination of SERS and UV–Vis spectroscopy provides a powerful complementary approach for evaluating the efficiency and dynamics of photocatalytic degradation. While UV–Vis captures the overall chromophore breakdown, SERS enables molecular-level monitoring of residual MB and its transformation intermediates, thus offering a more complete and more sensitive picture of the process.

4. Discussion

The present study demonstrates the successful implementation of silver nanowire (AgNW)-based substrates for ultra-sensitive detection of MB, achieving detection limits as low as 10−16 M. This performance significantly surpasses conventional methods such as UV–Vis spectrophotometry, which exhibited a detection threshold near 10−7 M (Figure 1). The ability of SERS to operate in this ultra-trace regime highlights its relevance for environmental monitoring, particularly when addressing pollutants with known toxicity at low concentrations [1,2,3,4].
UV–Vis and fluorescence analyses confirmed the spectroscopic limitations encountered at dilute MB concentrations. As shown in Figure 1b, the characteristic absorption band at 664 nm disappears below ~10−7 M, while fluorescence intensity vanishes below 1.5 × 10−10 M (Figure 2b), confirming the inadequacy of these techniques for sub-nanomolar detection. By contrast, SERS measurements provided robust signal detection well beyond these limits (Figure 4a), reinforced by a calibration curve spanning over twelve orders of magnitude (Figure 4b). This broad dynamic range enabled not only qualitative detection but also semi-quantitative estimation of MB concentration at ultralow levels.
A key strength of the AgNW-based SERS platform lies in its ability to localize electromagnetic fields at nanowire junctions, forming plasmonic hot spots that facilitate significant Raman enhancement. Raman mapping of the 1.5 × 10−16 M sample revealed discrete signal peaks (Figure 5), attributed to individual or few MB molecules adsorbed at these hot spots. The detection of approximately nine such sites matched theoretical expectations based on molecular density, supporting the system’s near-single-molecule sensitivity.
Despite this exceptional performance at low concentrations, we observed greater signal variation in SERS measurements at higher MB concentrations. This variability is attributed to the widespread adsorption of MB molecules across the AgNW substrate surface, which reduces the influence of discrete plasmonic hot spots. As a result, random measurements across different regions may sample areas with slightly varying AgNW density or surface morphology, leading to signal fluctuations. In contrast, at ultra-low concentrations, analyte molecules tend to localize at hot spots, producing highly reproducible and intense signals—an effect clearly visualized in the Raman mapping shown in Figure 5. These trends are consistent with the known behavior of surface-enhanced Raman substrates and underscore the sensitivity of the AgNW system to surface distribution and concentration-dependent adsorption effects.
The EFs derived from the 1626 cm−1 peak further confirm the high sensitivity of the platform. A significant increase in EF was observed with decreasing concentration, attaining a value of 1.90 × 1012 at 10−16 M (Table 2). These values are substantially higher than those reported in recent literature using comparable or more complex substrates [37,38,39].
These SERS results contrast strongly with those obtained from UV–Vis and fluorescence spectroscopy. As shown in Figure 1, UV–Vis detection was limited to concentrations down to 1.5 × 10−7 M, with lower levels producing signals indistinguishable from the background. Fluorescence spectroscopy extended the detection limit to 1.5 × 10−10 M (Figure 2), which, while more sensitive than UV–Vis, remains six orders of magnitude above the detection threshold achieved by SERS.
Compared to other SERS-active nanostructures, AgNWs demonstrate distinct advantages in hot spot formation, substrate reproducibility, and enhancement factors. Silver nanospheres, nanodecahedra, and cap-shaped nanoparticles typically yield EFs in the range of 106 to 108 [37,38]. While some recent hybrid nanostructures have achieved higher EFs—such as 5.81 × 108 using Ag nanoparticle-decorated layered double hydroxides [39]—they often involve complex synthesis and limited scalability. In contrast, the AgNW-based SERS substrates in this study attained EFs up to 1.90 × 1012 via a straightforward drop-casting procedure. The elongated morphology of nanowires promotes anisotropic field localization and the formation of dense plasmonic junctions, which are critical for achieving near-single-molecule sensitivity. Prior work by Goh et al. [9] and Pang et al. [10] has demonstrated that junction density and nanowire alignment significantly boost SERS activity in AgNW films, which aligns with our findings and reinforces the suitability of AgNWs for scalable, high-performance sensing applications.
The drying of MB solutions prior to measurement was also found to improve SERS signal quality significantly (Figure S6), owing to reduced fluorescence interference and enhanced analyte–substrate interaction. This finding is consistent with prior studies [7,11], in which drying facilitates stronger molecular adsorption onto the metallic surface, promoting more efficient excitation of the plasmonic field.
The comparative evaluation of different laser excitations (Figure 3) indicated that 633 nm provided the optimal balance between fluorescence suppression and Raman signal enhancement. Excitation at 532 nm resulted in excessive fluorescence background, while 785 nm yielded weak Raman intensity due to reduced scattering efficiency and overlap with broad emission tails (Figure 2).
When applied to degradation monitoring, the SERS method provided valuable insights beyond the detection capabilities of UV–Vis spectroscopy. As shown in Figure 6, UV–Vis analysis of MB degradation under air-flow DBD plasma revealed a rapid decline in absorbance within the first 10 min, followed by complete signal loss. In contrast, SERS continued to detect the characteristic MB Raman peak at 1626 cm−1 for the entire 40 min treatment (Figure S7b), enabling estimation of concentrations below 10−10 M using the previously established calibration curve (Figure 4b). These results underscore the superior sensitivity and utility of SERS for kinetic studies and endpoint verification in AOPs.
The observed non-linear degradation trend suggests that MB breakdown during plasma treatment does not conform to simple first-order kinetics. Instead, it likely involves multistep mechanisms driven by various RONS, such as hydroxyl radicals and atomic oxygen [17,18]. The initial rapid decay phase was followed by a slower regime, possibly due to reduced availability of MB at the plasma–liquid interface or the formation of refractory intermediates [39].
A similar analytical approach was employed to assess TiNT-mediated UV photodegradation of MB (Figure 7). Although both SERS and UV–Vis analyses were performed on aliquots from the same samples, differences in sensitivity led to divergent results, particularly at longer exposure times. UV–Vis measurements reached the detection limit at 90 min, whereas SERS still detected MB or related aromatic species, confirming its applicability in monitoring residual traces (Figure S7a). The transient increase in SERS signal around 60 min suggests possible intermediate accumulation or enhanced molecular adsorption, phenomena often observed in multistep degradation systems. These observations are further supported by the visual decolorization trends shown in Figure S9.
Although this study focused on separate evaluations of the DBD plasma and TiNT-based photocatalytic treatments, we acknowledge that future optimization strategies should explore their integration. Plasma-enhanced photocatalysis, wherein TiO2 nanostructures are either incorporated into the plasma reactor or sequentially applied, may offer synergistic advantages such as improved charge carrier separation, expanded reactive species profiles, and enhanced degradation kinetics. Parameters such as TiO2 morphology, doping, UV intensity, and plasma discharge characteristics (e.g., frequency, power, and gas flow) could be co-optimized for catalytic enhancement. Future studies combining both modalities in a hybrid or tandem configuration will be critical to determining the most effective pathway for pollutant mineralization under real-world conditions.
Overall, this work illustrates the synergistic potential of combining AgNW-based SERS with conventional techniques to achieve comprehensive, time-resolved monitoring of pollutant degradation. SERS not only offers exceptional sensitivity and specificity but also enhances understanding of degradation mechanisms by detecting transient intermediates and residual molecules invisible to bulk measurement methods. Its integration into AOP workflows, including DBD plasma and TiO2 photocatalysis, represents a promising strategy for time-dependent evaluation and optimization of water treatment technologies.
Although the current study primarily aimed to demonstrate the sensitivity and semi-quantitative capabilities of the AgNW-SERS platform, we recognize that a more comprehensive mechanistic investigation of the degradation pathways would be further enhanced by complementary analyses. In particular, the identification of dominant reactive species (e.g., hydroxyl radicals, singlet oxygen, ozone) via quenching experiments or electron spin resonance (ESR), and the tracking of degradation intermediates using total organic carbon (TOC) measurements or liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), are important next steps. These techniques could provide further confirmation of the oxidative pathways and mineralization efficiency underlying both the plasma and photocatalytic processes investigated here. Future works can incorporate these complementary methods to deepen the mechanistic understanding and validate the treatment performance from a chemical transformation perspective.
Finally, the AgNW-based SERS substrates used in this study were fabricated by drop-casting 10 μL of an aqueous AgNW dispersion onto glass slides, as detailed in Figure S2. This simple and rapid process enables the preparation of multiple SERS-active regions on a single slide and is highly reproducible. Due to the nanoscale morphology and intrinsic fragility of the silver nanowires, these substrates were not reused. However, their low cost (estimated between USD 0.08 and 0.16 per substrate based on commercial AgNW solution pricing), ease of fabrication via drop-casting, and reproducible performance make them ideal candidates for disposable, single-use environmental sensing applications. In addition, the point-of-use capability of the AgNW–SERS platform supports decentralized water monitoring in low-resource settings, enabling rapid, on-site analysis without the need for centralized laboratories. Such portable sensing approaches are particularly relevant for advancing sustainable water management practices and align with emerging environmental policy frameworks, including ISO 14046 (water footprint standard) [44], which emphasizes real-time discharge monitoring and the minimization of environmental impacts. While long-term durability testing was not the focus of this work, future efforts may explore strategies to enhance substrate robustness—such as encapsulation with ultrathin oxide coatings via atomic layer deposition [45]—without compromising the plasmonic enhancement.
To further contextualize the analytical performance of our SERS platform, Table 3 presents a comparative summary of reported nanostructured SERS substrates used for MB detection, detailing their respective detection limits and EF. The AgNW-based substrate developed in this work not only achieved the lowest detection limit reported to date (1.5 × 10−16 M) but also maintained one of the highest EFs (1.90 × 1012) among contemporary platforms. These results underscore the competitive advantage of our substrate, which combines high sensitivity with straightforward fabrication. For instance, even compared to advanced composite systems such as Au/Cu2O microspheres [46] or AgNP-decorated Co3O4 nanorods [9], the AgNW-based substrate provides superior or comparable performance with reduced material and synthesis complexity. This broad benchmarking reinforces the platform’s value for real-world applications in ultra-trace pollutant sensing.

5. Conclusions

This work contributes a resource-efficient analytical–remediation toolkit that supports sustainable water management under SDG 6 by combining ultra-trace sensing with low-energy, reagent-free degradation processes. Silver nanowire (AgNW)-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) substrates were fabricated using a simple and reproducible drop-casting technique, enabling the detection of methylene blue (MB) at concentrations as low as 1.5 × 10−16 M—representing a sensitivity enhancement of over eight orders of magnitude compared to conventional UV–Vis spectroscopy. The high enhancement factors achieved (up to 1.90 × 1012), supported by Raman mapping of discrete hot spots, demonstrate the system’s near-single-molecule detection capability.
Beyond qualitative detection, the platform achieved a broad dynamic range spanning twelve orders of magnitude, enabling semi-quantitative calibration and allowing SERS to serve as a reliable analytical tool for kinetic studies and degradation pathway analysis. Importantly, the system maintained signal integrity and sensitivity at concentrations at which UV–Vis and fluorescence spectroscopy failed to provide measurable responses, highlighting its distinct advantage for trace-level monitoring.
The AgNW–SERS platform was successfully applied to evaluate MB degradation under two advanced oxidation processes—atmospheric-pressure dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma and TiO2-assisted UV photocatalysis. In both systems, SERS detected persistent MB signals and aromatic intermediates long after UV–Vis analysis indicated complete degradation. These results underscore the value of SERS for tracking transformation products and assessing the true extent of pollutant mineralization, particularly in non-chromophoric or ultra-dilute regimes.
Overall, this study demonstrates the analytical power of AgNW-based SERS as a complementary technique for environmental sensing. Its integration with advanced oxidation processes provides unprecedented molecular-level insight into degradation dynamics and treatment efficacy. Future studies will focus on extending this methodology to other environmentally relevant contaminants, incorporating multivariate spectral analyses, and combining SERS with complementary techniques (e.g., LC–MS, ESR) to further elucidate degradation mechanisms and guide the development of optimized water purification strategies. Future integration of renewable-powered plasma reactors and solar-driven photocatalysis will further reduce energy intensity, aligning the technology with carbon-neutral treatment goals.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su17104448/s1, Figure S1: X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of AgNW-based SERS substrates, confirming the face-centered cubic (fcc) crystalline structure of silver nanowires; Figure S2: (a) Photograph of the AgNW substrate with labeled drop-cast spots; (b) optical microscopy image showing overlapping nanowire networks; (c) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image displaying the morphology and interconnection of AgNWs; Figure S3. X-ray diffractogram of the samples TiNT and TiO2 nanoparticles; Figure S4: Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of TiNTs synthesized by hydrothermal treatment, revealing cylindrical morphology and dimensions; Figure S5: Raman spectrum of TiNTs highlighting vibrational bands characteristic of anatase and rutile TiO2 phases and Ti–OH structures; Figure S6: Comparison of SERS spectra of MB solutions in wet and dry states, showing fluorescence suppression and improved peak visibility after drying; Figure S7: (a) Time-resolved SERS spectra of MB degradation under TiNT/UV photocatalysis; (b) SERS spectra of MB during air-DBD plasma treatment, demonstrating extended detection at trace levels; Figure S8: Visual color change of MB solutions during DBD plasma exposure, with rapid discoloration observed within 15–20 min; Figure S9: Visual progression of MB decolorization under TiNT/UV photocatalysis, showing gradual fading and complete decolorization by 90 min; Figure S10. Photodegradation of methylene blue (10 mg/L) under UV light without TiNT catalyst; Figure S11. Raman spectra of methylene blue (MB) for EF calculation. References [23,26,27,52,53,54,55,56,57] are listed in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.H. and R.P.; methodology, I.H., L.T.K., N.F.A.N. and F.M.; software, A.L.d.J.P.; validation, I.H., N.F.A.N. and L.T.K.; formal analysis, I.H. and L.T.K.; investigation, I.H., L.T.K. and N.F.A.N.; resources, R.P. and F.M.; data curation, L.T.K. and A.L.d.J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, I.H. and R.P.; writing—review and editing, G.T. and R.P.; visualization, I.H. and A.L.d.J.P.; supervision, G.T. and R.P.; project administration, R.P.; funding acquisition, R.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful for the financial assistance received through the Brazilian agency program FAPESP, under Grant 2019/05856-7, No. 2022/11544-0, No. 2022/02994-2, No. 2023/02268-2, and No. 2024/15258-8.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. All relevant spectral data, calibration curves, and degradation kinetics datasets used in the analysis are included in the manuscript and Supplementary Materials. No publicly archived datasets were generated during this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AOPAdvanced Oxidation Process
AgNWSilver Nanowire
DBDDielectric Barrier Discharge
EFEnhancement Factor
LSPRLocalized Surface Plasmon Resonance
MBMethylene Blue
RONSReactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species
SERSSurface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy
TiNTTitania Nanotube
UV–VisUltraviolet–Visible (Spectroscopy)
SDGSustainable Development Goal

References

  1. Khan, I.; Saeed, K.; Zekker, I.; Zhang, B.; Hendi, A.H.; Ahmad, A.; Ahmad, S.; Zada, N.; Ahmad, H.; Shah, L.A.; et al. Review on Methylene Blue: Its Properties, Uses, Toxicity and Photodegradation. Water 2022, 14, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Oladoye, P.O.; Ajiboye, T.O.; Omotola, E.O.; Oyewola, O.J. Methylene blue dye: Toxicity and potential elimination technology from wastewater. Results Eng. 2022, 16, 100678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moorthy, A.K.; Rathi, B.G.; Shukla, S.P.; Kumar, K.; Bharti, V.S. Acute toxicity of textile dye Methylene blue on growth and metabolism of selected freshwater microalgae. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2021, 82, 103552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, S.; Cui, Y.; Wen, M.; Ji, G. Toxic Effects of Methylene Blue on the Growth, Reproduction and Physiology of Daphnia magna. Toxics 2023, 11, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bojarski, B.; Jurecka, P.; Szala, L.; Kondera, E.; Gaj-Chucher, C.; Stonawski, B.; Rombel-Bryzek, A. The influence of methylene blue and malachite green on common carp (Cyprinus carpio) blood parameters. Anim. Sci. Genet. 2023, 19, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hulupi, M.; Kery, K.; Rahmawati, K.A.; Abdilah, F. Validation of Methylene Blue Analysis Method in Wastewater Samples by UV-Vis Spectrophotometry. Equilib. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 7, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nekouei, F.; Kargarzadeh, H.; Nekouei, S.; Makhlouf, A.S.H. Efficient method for determination of methylene blue dye in water samples based on a combined dispersive solid phase and cloud point extraction using Cu(OH)2 nanoflakes: Central composite design optimization. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 409, 1079–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yi, J.; You, E.-M.; Hu, R.; Wu, D.-Y.; Liu, G.-K.; Yang, Z.-L.; Zhang, H.; Gu, Y.; Wang, Y.-H.; Wang, X.; et al. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: A half-century historical perspective. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025, 54, 1453–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goh, M.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Pedireddy, S.; Phang, I.Y.; Tjiu, W.W.; Tan, J.M.R.; Ling, X.Y. A Chemical Route To Increase Hot Spots on Silver Nanowires for Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Application. Langmuir 2012, 28, 14441–14449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pang, Y.; Jin, M. Self-Assembly of Silver Nanowire Films for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Applications. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Jang, S.; Lee, J.; Nam, S.; Ko, H.; Chang, S.T. Large-Area, Highly Sensitive SERS Substrates with Silver Nanowire Thin Films Coated by Microliter-Scale Solution Process. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Betz, J.F.; Yu, W.W.; Cheng, Y.; White, I.M.; Rubloff, G.W. Simple SERS Substrates: Powerful, Portable, and Full of Potential. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 20508–20518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yin, T.; Peng, Y.; Chao, K.; Li, Y. Emerging Trends in SERS-Based Veterinary Drug Detection: Multifunctional Substrates and Intelligent Data Approaches. npj Sci. Food 2025, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Privett, B.J.; Shin, J.H.; Schoenfisch, M.H. Electrochemical Sensors. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 4723–4741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Baranwal, J.; Barse, B.; Gatto, G.; Broncova, G.; Kumar, A. Electrochemical Sensors and Their Applications: A Review. Chemosensors 2022, 10, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zamora-Navarro, J.L.; González-Zárate, D.; Díaz-Solís, M.A.; Soriano-Rosales, M.G.; Okolodkov, Y.B.; Zamora-Peredo, L. SERS Detection of Methylene Blue and Crystal Violet Using Silver Nanostars. Mater. Proc. 2022, 9, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shaban, M.; Merkert, N.; van Duin, A.C.T.; van Duin, D.; Weber, A.P. Advancing DBD plasma chemistry: Insights into reactive nitrogen species such as NO2, N2O5, and N2O optimization and species reactivity through experiments and MD simulations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 16087–16099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, F.; Chen, L.; Wang, H.; Yan, Z. Analysis of the degradation mechanism of methylene blue by atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge plasma. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 162, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xue, W.; Zhang, G.; Xu, X.; Yang, X.; Liu, C.; Xu, Y. Preparation of titania nanotubes doped with cerium and their photocatalytic activity for glyphosate. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 167, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, L.; Guo, S.; Di, S.; Park, E.; Zhao, H.; Jung, Y.M. SERS monitoring of methylene blue degradation by Au-Ag@Cu2O-rGO nanocomposite. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2024, 316, 124354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stefancu, A.; Aizpurua, J.; Alessandri, I.; Bald, I.; Baumberg, J.J.; Besteiro, L.V.; Christopher, P.; Correa-Duarte, M.; de Nijs, B.; Demetriadou, A.; et al. Impact of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy in catalysis. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 29337–29379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. da Silva, D.M.; de Menezes, B.R.C.; Bezzon, V.D.N.; Montanheiro, T.L.A.; de Macedo, E.F.; Tada, D.B.; Petraconi, G.; Thim, G.P. Phase transition of TiO2 nanoparticles into titanate nanorods via hydrothermal reactions. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lan, Y.; Gao, X.P.; Zhu, H.Y.; Zheng, Z.F.; Yan, T.Y.; Wu, F.; Ringer, S.P.; Song, D.Y. Titanate Nanotubes and Nanorods Prepared from Rutile Powder. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2005, 15, 1310–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Miranda, F.S.; Tavares, V.K.F.; Gomes, M.P.; Neto, N.F.A.; Chiappim, W.; Petraconi, G.; Pessoa, R.S.; Koga-Ito, C.Y. Physicochemical Characteristics and Antimicrobial Efficacy of Plasma-Activated Water Produced by an Air-Operated Coaxial Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma. Water 2023, 15, 4045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Miranda, F.S.; Tavares, V.K.F.; Silva, D.M.; Milhan, N.V.M.; Azevedo Neto, N.F.; Gomes, M.P.; Pessoa, R.S.; Koga-Ito, C.Y. Influence of gas type on reactive species formation, antimicrobial activity, and cytotoxicity of plasma-activated water produced in a coaxial DBD reactor. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2024, 44, 1713–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Le Ru, E.C.; Etchegoin, P.G. SERS enhancement factors and related topics. In Principles of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 185–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Le Ru, E.C.; Blackie, E.; Meyer, M.; Etchegoin, P.G. Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Enhancement Factors: A Comprehensive Study. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 13794–13803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dinh, V.-P.; Huynh, T.-D.-T.; Le, H.M.; Nguyen, V.-D.; Dao, V.-A.; Hung, N.Q.; Tuyen, L.A.; Lee, S.; Yi, J.; Nguyen, T.D.; et al. Insight into the adsorption mechanisms of methylene blue and chromium(III) from aqueous solution onto pomelo fruit peel. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 25847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Selvam, S.; Sarkar, I. Bile salt induced solubilization of methylene blue: Study on methylene blue fluorescence properties and molecular mechanics calculation. J. Pharm. Anal. 2017, 7, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hemdan, S.S. The shift in the behavior of methylene blue toward the sensitivity of medium: Solvatochromism, solvent parameters, regression analysis, and investigation of cosolvent on the acidity constants. J. Fluoresc. 2023, 33, 2489–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Langer, J.; Jimenez de Aberasturi, D.; Aizpurua, J.; Alvarez-Puebla, R.A.; Auguié, B.; Baumberg, J.J.; Bazan, G.C.; Bell, S.E.J.; Boisen, A.; Brolo, A.G.; et al. Present and future of surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 28–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, C.; Huang, Y.; Lai, K.; Rasco, B.A.; Fan, Y. Analysis of trace methylene blue in fish muscles using ultra-sensitive surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Food Control 2016, 65, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Anastasopoulos, J.A.; Soto Beobide, A.; Manikas, A.C.; Voyiatzis, G.A. Quantitative Surface-Enhanced Resonance Raman Scattering Analysis of Methylene Blue Using Silver Colloid. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2017, 48, 1762–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, Y.; Luo, F. Spatial Raman Mapping Investigation of SERS Performance Related to Localized Surface Plasmons. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, J.; Palla, M.; Bosco, F.G.; Rindzevicius, T.; Alstrøm, T.S.; Schmidt, M.S.; Boisen, A.; Ju, J.; Lin, Q. Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Based Quantitative Bioassay on Aptamer-Functionalized Nanopillars Using Large-Area Raman Mapping. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 5350–5359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hsu, K.H.; Back, J.H.; Fung, K.H.; Ferreira, P.M.; Shim, M.; Fang, N.X. SERS EM Field Enhancement Study through Fast Raman Mapping of Sierpinski Carpet Arrays. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2010, 41, 1124–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vu, X.H.; Dien, N.D.; Pham, T.T.H.; Trang, T.T.; Ca, N.X.; Tho, P.T.; Vinh, N.D.; Do, P.V. The sensitive detection of methylene blue using silver nanodecahedra prepared through a photochemical route. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 38974–38988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xiao, G.-N.; Man, S.-Q. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering of methylene blue adsorbed on cap-shaped silver nanoparticles. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 447, 305–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ren, S.; Fu, J.; Liu, G.; Zhang, H.; Wang, B.; Yu, J. Ultrasensitive detection of methylene blue by surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) with Ag nanoparticle-decorated magnetic CoNi layered double hydroxides. Anal. Methods 2025, 17, 1010–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sugha, A.; Bhatti, M.S. Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye by UV/H2O2 Advanced Oxidation Process: Reaction Kinetics, Residual H2O2 and Specific Energy Consumption Evaluation. Desalination Water Treat. 2022, 274, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, S.; Kim, K.; Chun, S.; Moon, S.Y. Plasma-assisted advanced oxidation process by a multi-hole dielectric barrier discharge in water and its application to wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 2019, 243, 125377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, L.; Xie, Q.; Lv, Y.; Wu, Z.; Liang, X.; Lu, M.; Nie, Y. Degradation of Methylene Blue via Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Treatment. Water 2019, 11, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jing, H.; Chen, L.; Xin, Y.; Gong, Z.; Xu, R.; Wan, C.; Zhang, R.-Q.; Wang, Z. Impact of adsorbed molecules on the relative intensity of surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Phys. Rev. B 2025, 111, 075430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. ISO 14046:2014; Environmental Management—Water Footprint—Principles, Requirements and Guidelines. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
  45. Wang, X.; Zhu, L.; Cheng, T.; Qian, J.; Wang, Q.; Ding, Q.; Li, A.; Jiang, L.; Cao, Y. Atomic Layer Deposition Assisted Non-Destructive Strategy for Cleaning Ag Dendrites Based SERS Substrates. Talanta 2023, 259, 124502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ashok Kumar, E.; Wang, T.J.; Chang, Y.H. Ultrasensitive SERS Substrates Based on Au Nanoparticles Photo-Decorated on Cu2O Microspheres for the Detection of Rhodamine B and Methylene Blue. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 585, 152696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ali, H.T.; Mateen, A.; Ashraf, F.; Javed, M.R.; Ali, A.; Mahmood, K.; Zohaib, A.; Amin, N.; Ikram, S.; Yusuf, M. A New SERS Substrate Based on Zn2GeO4 Nanostructures for the Rapid Identification of E. coli and Methylene Blue. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 27998–28003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yang, J.; Chen, B.; Peng, J.; Huang, B.; Deng, W.; Xie, W.; Luo, Z. Preparation of CuO Nanowires/Ag Composite Substrate and Study on SERS Activity. Plasmonics 2021, 16, 1059–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Doan, M.Q.; Anh, N.H.; Quang, N.X.; Dinh, N.X.; Tri, D.Q.; Huy, T.Q.; Le, A.T. Ultrasensitive Detection of Methylene Blue Using an Electrochemically Synthesized SERS Sensor Based on Gold and Silver Nanoparticles: Roles of Composition and Purity on Sensing Performance and Reliability. J. Electron. Mater. 2022, 51, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gokulakrishnan, J.; Koppole, K. Green Synthesized Ag/RGO Embedded Flexible Cotton SERS Substrate for Methylene Blue Detection. Opt. Mater. 2024, 147, 114712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pham, T.T.H.; Vu, X.H.; Dien, N.D.; Trang, T.T.; Chi, T.T.K.; Phuong, P.H.; Nghia, N.T. Ag Nanoparticles on ZnO Nanoplates as a Hybrid SERS-Active Substrate for Trace Detection of Methylene Blue. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 7850–7863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, L.; Liu, W.; Wang, T.; Ni, J. Highly efficient adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by amino-functionalized titanate nanotubes. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 225, pp. 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bayan, E.; Lupeiko, T.G.; Volkova, M.G.; Fedorenko, A.G. Hydrothermal Two-Step Synthesis of Titanate Nanotubes. In Advanced Materials; Kharisov, B.I., Torres Martínez, L.M., Kharissova, O.V., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ma, Y.; Lin, Y.; Xiao, X.; Zhou, X.; Li, X. Sonication–hydrothermal combination technique for the synthesis of titanate nanotubes from commercially available precursors. Mater. Res. Bull. 2006, 41, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gao, L.; Fjellvåg, H.; Norby, P. Titanate Nanotubes: Synthesis, Structure and Properties. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 1423–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Mosier-Boss, P.A. Review of SERS substrates for chemical sensing. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Tian, Z.; Yan, H.; Peng, Q.; Guo, L.J.; Zhou, S.; Ding, C.; Li, P.; Luo, Q. Atomistic Insights into Aluminum Doping Effect on Surface Roughness of Deposited Ultra-Thin Silver Films. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Schematic overview of the experimental procedures for methylene blue (MB) degradation via TiNT photocatalysis and air DBD plasma treatment, followed by detection using AgNW-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) substrates. Arrows indicate the direction of the experimental workflow, including sample treatments (UV, plasma), mixing steps, and sample deposition onto AgNW-coated substrates for SERS analysis.
Scheme 1. Schematic overview of the experimental procedures for methylene blue (MB) degradation via TiNT photocatalysis and air DBD plasma treatment, followed by detection using AgNW-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) substrates. Arrows indicate the direction of the experimental workflow, including sample treatments (UV, plasma), mixing steps, and sample deposition onto AgNW-coated substrates for SERS analysis.
Sustainability 17 04448 sch001
Figure 1. UV–Vis absorbance spectra of methylene blue (MB) solutions at various concentrations. (a) Spectra from 1.5 × 10−4 M to 1.5 × 10−5 M showing characteristic absorption bands and saturation at high concentration. (b) Spectra from 1.5 × 10−6 M to 1.5 × 10−16 M. MB is detectable down to 1.5 × 10−7 M; lower concentrations overlap with the instrument’s noise baseline.
Figure 1. UV–Vis absorbance spectra of methylene blue (MB) solutions at various concentrations. (a) Spectra from 1.5 × 10−4 M to 1.5 × 10−5 M showing characteristic absorption bands and saturation at high concentration. (b) Spectra from 1.5 × 10−6 M to 1.5 × 10−16 M. MB is detectable down to 1.5 × 10−7 M; lower concentrations overlap with the instrument’s noise baseline.
Sustainability 17 04448 g001
Figure 2. Fluorescence emission spectra of methylene blue (MB) in aqueous solution. (a) Spectra from 1.5 × 10−4 M to 1.5 × 10−5 M, showing increased intensity and spectral red shift due to aggregation at high concentration. (b) Spectra from 1.5 × 10−6 M to 1.5 × 10−16 M. MB is detectable down to 1.5 × 10−13 M; lower concentrations exhibit no distinguishable fluorescence signal.
Figure 2. Fluorescence emission spectra of methylene blue (MB) in aqueous solution. (a) Spectra from 1.5 × 10−4 M to 1.5 × 10−5 M, showing increased intensity and spectral red shift due to aggregation at high concentration. (b) Spectra from 1.5 × 10−6 M to 1.5 × 10−16 M. MB is detectable down to 1.5 × 10−13 M; lower concentrations exhibit no distinguishable fluorescence signal.
Sustainability 17 04448 g002
Figure 3. Raman spectra of methylene blue (MB) at a concentration of 1.5 × 10−5 M, acquired using excitation lasers at 532 nm, 633 nm, and 785 nm. The 633 nm laser provided the best spectral quality, with high signal intensity and reduced fluorescence background.
Figure 3. Raman spectra of methylene blue (MB) at a concentration of 1.5 × 10−5 M, acquired using excitation lasers at 532 nm, 633 nm, and 785 nm. The 633 nm laser provided the best spectral quality, with high signal intensity and reduced fluorescence background.
Sustainability 17 04448 g003
Figure 4. (a) Raman spectra of methylene blue (MB) at concentrations from 1.5 × 10−16 M to 1.5 × 10−4 M using 633 nm excitation. (b) Calibration curve showing the intensity of the 1626 cm−1 Raman peak as a function of MB concentration. For each concentration, a full Raman intensity map (as exemplified in Figure 5 for 1.5 × 10−16 M) was acquired and analyzed to ensure representative data collection across multiple substrate regions. Each data point corresponds to the average intensity obtained from at least three distinct hot spots. Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent measurements.
Figure 4. (a) Raman spectra of methylene blue (MB) at concentrations from 1.5 × 10−16 M to 1.5 × 10−4 M using 633 nm excitation. (b) Calibration curve showing the intensity of the 1626 cm−1 Raman peak as a function of MB concentration. For each concentration, a full Raman intensity map (as exemplified in Figure 5 for 1.5 × 10−16 M) was acquired and analyzed to ensure representative data collection across multiple substrate regions. Each data point corresponds to the average intensity obtained from at least three distinct hot spots. Error bars represent standard deviations from three independent measurements.
Sustainability 17 04448 g004aSustainability 17 04448 g004b
Figure 5. Raman intensity map of the 1.5 × 10−16 M MB sample, showing the spatial distribution of the 1626 cm−1 signal. The map reveals isolated hot spots that correlate with the presence of individual MB molecules.
Figure 5. Raman intensity map of the 1.5 × 10−16 M MB sample, showing the spatial distribution of the 1626 cm−1 signal. The map reveals isolated hot spots that correlate with the presence of individual MB molecules.
Sustainability 17 04448 g005
Figure 6. Methylene blue (MB) concentration as a function of plasma treatment time determined using UV–Vis spectroscopy (red) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS, yellow). SERS-based concentrations were estimated from the intensity of the Raman peak at ~1626 cm−1, corresponding to the C–C ring stretching mode of MB. UV–Vis concentrations were obtained by monitoring absorbance at 664 nm, the characteristic peak associated with monomeric MB. All UV–Vis measurements were performed in triplicate; standard deviations were calculated but are not visible due to the small magnitude of errors relative to the logarithmic scale. For each SERS data point, error bars represent the standard deviation calculated from multiple Raman intensity maps (as shown in Figure 5), obtained by averaging at least three distinct hot spots to ensure representative signal quantification.
Figure 6. Methylene blue (MB) concentration as a function of plasma treatment time determined using UV–Vis spectroscopy (red) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS, yellow). SERS-based concentrations were estimated from the intensity of the Raman peak at ~1626 cm−1, corresponding to the C–C ring stretching mode of MB. UV–Vis concentrations were obtained by monitoring absorbance at 664 nm, the characteristic peak associated with monomeric MB. All UV–Vis measurements were performed in triplicate; standard deviations were calculated but are not visible due to the small magnitude of errors relative to the logarithmic scale. For each SERS data point, error bars represent the standard deviation calculated from multiple Raman intensity maps (as shown in Figure 5), obtained by averaging at least three distinct hot spots to ensure representative signal quantification.
Sustainability 17 04448 g006
Figure 7. Methylene blue (MB) concentration as a function of TiO2–UV irradiation time determined using UV–Vis spectroscopy (orange) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS, blue). SERS-based concentrations were derived from the intensity of the Raman peak at ~1626 cm−1, characteristic of the C–C ring stretching vibration. UV–Vis concentrations were obtained by measuring absorbance at 664 nm, associated with monomeric MB. A 15 min dark equilibration period preceded UV exposure, as indicated by the vertical dashed line. UV–Vis data represent the mean of three measurements; error bars were omitted in the plot as they are too small to be visible on the logarithmic scale. For each SERS data point, the reported concentration reflects the average Raman intensity from at least three spatially distinct hot spots per sample, with standard deviations calculated based on the corresponding intensity maps (see Figure 5 for an example).
Figure 7. Methylene blue (MB) concentration as a function of TiO2–UV irradiation time determined using UV–Vis spectroscopy (orange) and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS, blue). SERS-based concentrations were derived from the intensity of the Raman peak at ~1626 cm−1, characteristic of the C–C ring stretching vibration. UV–Vis concentrations were obtained by measuring absorbance at 664 nm, associated with monomeric MB. A 15 min dark equilibration period preceded UV exposure, as indicated by the vertical dashed line. UV–Vis data represent the mean of three measurements; error bars were omitted in the plot as they are too small to be visible on the logarithmic scale. For each SERS data point, the reported concentration reflects the average Raman intensity from at least three spatially distinct hot spots per sample, with standard deviations calculated based on the corresponding intensity maps (see Figure 5 for an example).
Sustainability 17 04448 g007
Table 1. Raman peak positions of methylene blue (MB) and corresponding vibrational mode assignments [32].
Table 1. Raman peak positions of methylene blue (MB) and corresponding vibrational mode assignments [32].
Peak Position (cm−1)Vibrational Mode Assignment
449Skeletal deformation of C–N–C
502Skeletal deformation of C–N–C
669Out-of-plane bending of C–H
772In-plane bending of C–H
886In-plane bending of C–H
949In-plane bending of C–H
1040In-plane bending of C–H
1154In-plane bending of C–H
1180Stretching of C–N
1302In-plane ring deformation of C–H
1326In-plane ring deformation of C–H
1396Symmetrical stretching of C–N
1436Asymmetrical stretching of C–N
1471Asymmetrical stretching of C–N
1501Asymmetrical stretching of C–C
1626Ring stretching of C–C
Table 2. Enhancement factors (EF) for methylene blue (MB) at different concentrations using AgNW-based SERS substrates.
Table 2. Enhancement factors (EF) for methylene blue (MB) at different concentrations using AgNW-based SERS substrates.
MB Concentration (M)Enhancement Factor (EF)
1.5 × 10−41.17 × 103
1.5 × 10−52.42 × 104
1.5 × 10−63.09 × 104
1.5 × 10−71.17 × 105
1.5 × 10−101.96 × 106
1.5 × 10−132.53 × 109
1.5 × 10−161.90 × 1012
Table 3. Comparative performance of SERS substrates for MB detection [9,46,47,48,49,50,51].
Table 3. Comparative performance of SERS substrates for MB detection [9,46,47,48,49,50,51].
SERS SubstrateDetection Limit (M)Enhancement Factor (EF)Reference
Au/Cu2O1.0 × 10−122.55 × 1012[46]
AgNPs1.0 × 10−121.20 × 1011[49]
CuO nanowires/Ag1.0 × 10−21.0 × 107[48]
Ag/rGO1.0 × 10−81.98 × 109[50]
ZnO/Ag31.0 × 10−95.33 × 105[51]
Zn2GeO4/Au/Si3.0 × 10−17.0 × 102[47]
AgNPs@Co3O4 Nanorods1.0 × 10−10Not specified[9]
AgNW-based substrate1.5 × 10−161.90 × 1012This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Horta, I.; Neto, N.F.A.; Kito, L.T.; Miranda, F.; Thim, G.; Pereira, A.L.d.J.; Pessoa, R. Ultra-Trace Monitoring of Methylene Blue Degradation via AgNW-Based SERS: Toward Sustainable Advanced Oxidation Water Treatment. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104448

AMA Style

Horta I, Neto NFA, Kito LT, Miranda F, Thim G, Pereira ALdJ, Pessoa R. Ultra-Trace Monitoring of Methylene Blue Degradation via AgNW-Based SERS: Toward Sustainable Advanced Oxidation Water Treatment. Sustainability. 2025; 17(10):4448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104448

Chicago/Turabian Style

Horta, Isabela, Nilton Francelosi Azevedo Neto, Letícia Terumi Kito, Felipe Miranda, Gilmar Thim, André Luis de Jesus Pereira, and Rodrigo Pessoa. 2025. "Ultra-Trace Monitoring of Methylene Blue Degradation via AgNW-Based SERS: Toward Sustainable Advanced Oxidation Water Treatment" Sustainability 17, no. 10: 4448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104448

APA Style

Horta, I., Neto, N. F. A., Kito, L. T., Miranda, F., Thim, G., Pereira, A. L. d. J., & Pessoa, R. (2025). Ultra-Trace Monitoring of Methylene Blue Degradation via AgNW-Based SERS: Toward Sustainable Advanced Oxidation Water Treatment. Sustainability, 17(10), 4448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104448

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop