3.2. Methods
The Methods Section consists of different steps including the conceptualization of the topic, data collection, review of related documents, secondary data collection, and analyses of the results.
Figure 2 provides a step-by-step overview of this framework of methodology.
Data Collection: The data collection process of this research is based on two phases to examine the levels of sustainability in the study area. This study proposed to examine the city from a social aspect by analyzing society’s perception of urban sustainability. The primary data were collected through a random sampling survey to analyze the current challenges faced by the local population with an open-ended questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of four parts. The first part was related to the socio-economic profile of the residents/interviewer, the second portion was related to environmental conditions in the area, the third portion was associated with economic conditions, and the fourth part was related to the social conditions of the area. This survey provides a snapshot/baseline of the major environmental, economic, and social issues faced by the locals. From these bases, relevant documents such as the revised master plan of the city, urban gazette, weather reports from the environmental protection agency, and projects of the Capital Development Authority (CDA) were studied, and urban sustainability indicators were selected.
After the selection of indicators for secondary data collection, urban sustainability questions were asked, which were related to the local weather conditions in the area, such as the occurrence of natural disasters, their frequency, changes in seasonal average temperature, and changes in weather patterns. Similarly, the data associated with economic sustainability were collected by asking the public’s opinion regarding the availability of jobs, land values and their prices in the past two decades in this area, sizes of their residencies, and house ownership. Social sustainability was judged by public opinion regarding the sense of belonging; sense of security in the area; the services available in the surroundings; accessibility to the roads, streets, and market; and provision of municipal services in the settlement.
Survey Methods: The total population of the city is 2.3 million according to the National Survey of Pakistan, as reported in [
38]. A total of 400 respondents were interviewed from the population. The sample size was calculated through the below formulation, and the online calculator available at
https://www.calculator.net/sample-size-calculator.html (accessed on 12 October 2023) or this calculation at a 95% confidence level was used, where “n” is population, “
” is population portion, and n is sample size.
The questionnaire was filled as primary data by asking the public’s opinion regarding the social conditions in the area, security issues, and facilities available in the settlement areas. This survey data with open-ended questions provides a snapshot of all issues associated with the environment, economy, and society in the urban area of Islamabad and explains the current scenarios of sustainability and its challenges.
Secondary Data Collection: Based on primary data collected from the survey, the secondary data, including the revised master plan (2020–2040) of the city, documents of Capital Development Authority (CDA), land value records, urban gazette data, and published material in the past, were studied. After a very comprehensive review of all of these documents, the variables for secondary data were selected, including land values (LVs) in the area from the capital urban gazette, housing rent (HR) from property real estate dealers, job opportunities (JOs) in the area from the Federal Board of Revenue, ownership of house and vehicle (OHV), and size of the residency (SR) for economic sustainability measures. A Likert scale with points (ranging from 1, strongly agree, to 5, strongly disagree) was used to quantify the public opinions, including their levels of satisfaction, ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Statistical Software for Social Sciences (SPSS, Version 23) was used for further analyses. Their correlation with urban sustainability was examined through Multiple Linear Regression Analysis (MLRA) and regression equations.
For environmental sustainability or physical environmental sustainability, the level of occurrence of natural disasters (ONDs), change in weather pattern (CWP), and loss of urban green (LUG) were selected for regression analyses. These data were provided by documents from the Ministry of Climate Change and Environmental Coordination and past published papers. Similarly, the provision of neighborhood services (PNS); sense of belonging (SB) among the local dwellers; presence of parks and playgrounds (PP); easy access (AM) to markets, accessible roads, and street networks (ARS); and solid waste management (SWM) in the areas were selected as social sustainability indicators. For statistical examination, the Multiple Linear Regression Analysis (MLRA) was applied, and the results were expressed through the values of “R” and “R
2” as the coefficient of regression and coefficient of correlation. The following regression equations were adopted for regression analysis in the overall assessment of the research.
In Equation (1), “∑US” represents urban sustainability, that is, the combination of all (economic, environmental, and social) sustainability indicators of the study area. Furthermore, to measure the level of sustainability of each pillar, every pillar was examined individually by different parameters associated with their nature. These equations include the formulation shown below.
The mathematical equation for economic sustainability (ES) is as follows:
In Equation (2), “∑ES” is economic sustainability, XLV is the sum of public opinion of land values, XJO is the sum of public opinion of job opportunities, XOHV is the ownership of a house, and XSR represents the size of residency. The investigations show that, due to the rapid rate of urbanization, the high demand for commercial spaces and land increases the land values, prices, and commercial rent in the area, which is alarming for the economic sustainability of the area.
The mathematical equation for urban sustainability (ENVIS) is as follows:
∑ENVIS is environmental sustainability in Equation (3), which is a combination of public opinion regarding the “XOND”, or the occurrence of natural disasters; “XCWP”, or the change in the weather pattern; and “XLUG”, which is associated with the public’s opinion regarding loss of urban green (LYG). It has been observed that, due to the high rate of conversion of natural land into built-up infrastructure, urban green space is lost in the region.
The mathematical equation for social sustainability (SS) is as follows:
In Equation (4), the formulation expresses the conceptualization of the social sustainability in the area. In the above equation, ∑SS represents social sustainability, which is measured by “XPNS”, or the provision of neighborhood services; Xpp, or the presence of parks; “XAM”, or access to the market; “XARS”, or accessible road and streets networks; and “XSWM”, or solid waste management in the area. For social sustainability, the provision of social services, including open public spaces and = accessibility to neighborhood services, green spaces, and parks, are the fundamental needs in an area, and this has been approved by previous research [
40].
The significance and impact of the economic estimation of each independent variable on the dependent variable were expressed through the coefficient table and regression results. The coefficient table uses the values of R (correlation coefficient), R2 (coefficient of determination), and adjusted R2; the coefficient of regression was used to show the statistical results of the analysis. The values of R and R2 close to −1 and +1 show the relevant percentages of the used variables.
Finally, after a very careful investigation and comprehensive review of past studies, reports, and the revised master plan of the city, this research provides empirical evidence regarding the current scenarios of environmental, economic, and social indicators affecting the city’s sustainability and development. These results will be useful tools for maintaining the city’s landscape and its beauty and to boost the level of development to achieve the society’s well-being and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.