Consumer Motivations for Solar Energy Adoption in Economically Challenged Regions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development
2.1. Mainstream Literature
2.1.1. Consumer Behavior
2.1.2. Renewable Energy: Solar Energy
2.1.3. Green Marketing
2.1.4. Consumer Awareness and Energy Consumption
2.2. Theoretical Underpinning
2.3. Hypotheses Development
2.4. Research Context
3. Methodology
4. Hypothesis Testing
4.1. KMO and Barlett’s Test of Sphericity
4.1.1. Exploratory Factor Analysis
4.1.2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.1.3. Hypotheses Validation Using SEM
5. Discussion
5.1. General Discussion
5.2. Theoretical Implications
5.3. Practical Implications
5.4. Contributions of the Study
- Comprehensive framework: This research provides a comprehensive and integrated approach to understanding the factors that shape and enhance consumer behavior toward renewable energy, particularly solar energy. It meticulously identifies the key factors influencing consumer behavior and clearly delineates the relationships between these factors and the intention to invest in solar energy systems.
- Theoretical and empirical integration: The study’s integrated model represents a significant contribution to academic research, as it combines both theoretical and empirical approaches to identify and validate the relevant determinants of consumer behavior in the context of renewable energy.
- Holistic understanding: By bridging theoretical insights with robust statistical analysis, the research offers a nuanced understanding of how environmental concerns, personal motives, social influences, perception, and governmental intervention collectively influence consumer attitudes and intentions.
- Extension of existing knowledge: This study extends the existing body of knowledge by providing a holistic framework that can be applied in future research to explore consumer behavior in other renewable energy contexts.
5.5. Limitations and Future Research
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Elrick-Barr, C.E.; Zimmerhackel, J.S.; Hill, G.; Clifton, J.; Ackermann, F.; Burton, M.; Harvey, E.S. Man-made structures in the marine environment: A review of stakeholders’ social and economic values and perceptions. Environ. Sci. Policy 2022, 129, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loucks, D.P. Impacts of climate change on economies, ecosystems, energy, environments, and human equity: A systems perspective. In The Impacts of Climate Change; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 19–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulmeister, S. Fixing rising price paths for fossil energy: Basis of a “green growth” without rebound Effects. In Climate Change in Regional Perspective: European Union and Latin American Initiatives, Challenges, and Solutions; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 89–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanwal, S.; Mehran, M.T.; Hassan, M.; Anwar, M.; Naqvi, S.R.; Khoja, A.H. An integrated future approach for the energy security of Pakistan: Replacement of fossil fuels with syngas for better environment and socio-economic development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 156, 111978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salem, H.S.; Pudza, M.Y.; Yihdego, Y. Harnessing the energy transition from total dependence on fossil to renewable energy in the Arabian Gulf region, considering population, climate change impacts, ecological and carbon footprints, and United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain. Earth Rev. 2023, 6, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dagher, L.; Jamali, I.; Abi Younes, O. Extreme energy poverty: The aftermath of Lebanon’s economic collapse. Energy Policy 2023, 183, 113783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramadan, D. Shock Value: A Study of Energy Access, Resilience, and How Public-Private Electricity Distribution Can Bring Energy Justice to Lebanon; The American University of Paris (France): Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Han, H. Consumer behavior and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: A review of theories, concepts, and latest research. In Sustainable Consumer Behaviour and the Environment; Routledge: London, UK, 2021; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schüler, M.; Fee Maier, M.; Liljedal, K.T. Motives and barriers affecting consumers’ co-creation in the physical store. Int. Rev. Retail. Distrib. Consum. Res. 2020, 30, 289–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durmaz, Y.; Diyarbakırlıoğlu, I. A Theoritical Approach to the Strength of Motivation in Customer Behavior. Glob. J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 2011, 11, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
- Duygun, A.; Şen, E. Evaluation of consumer purchasing behaviors in the COVID-19 pandemic period in the context of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. PazarlamaTeorisi Ve Uygulamaları Derg. 2020, 6, 45–68. [Google Scholar]
- Ghatak, S.; Singh, S. Examining Maslow’s hierarchy need theory in the social media adoption. FIIB Bus. Rev. 2019, 8, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prabhu, J.J. A study and analysis of consumer behavior and factor influencing in marketing. Int. Res. J. Mod. Eng. 2020, 2, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
- Kotler, P.; Keller, K.L.; Ancarani, F.; Costabile, M. Marketing Management 14/e; Pearson: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Cherian, J.; Jacob, J. Green marketing: A study of consumers’ attitude towards environment friendly products. Asían Soc. Sci. 2012, 8, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, S.F.; Horng, J.S.; Liu CH, S.; Lin, J.Y. Identifying the critical factors of customer behavior: An integration perspective of marketing strategy and components of attitudes. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 55, 102113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q.; Zhao, S. Determinants of consumers’ willingness to buy counterfeit luxury products: An empirical test of linear and inverted u-shaped relationship. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Argyriou, E.; Melewar, T.C. Consumer attitudes revisited: A review of attitude theory in marketing research. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2011, 13, 431–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solomon, M.; Russell-Bennett, R.; Previte, J. Consumer Behaviour; Pearson Higher Education AU: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Sands, P. Environmental protection in the twenty-first century: Sustainable development and international law. In The Global Environment; Routledge: London, UK, 2023; pp. 116–137. [Google Scholar]
- Bal, M.; Stok, M.; Bombaerts, G.; Huijts, N.; Schneider, P.; Spahn, A.; Buskens, V. A fairway to fairness: Toward a richer conceptualization of fairness perceptions for just energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2023, 103, 103213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stenseke, M. Agenda 2030 and the green economy. In Research Handbook on the Green Economy; Edward Elgar Publishing: Northampton, MA, USA, 2024; pp. 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, S. Energy crisis and climate change: Global concerns and their solutions. In Energy: Crises, Challenges and Solutions; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Majid, M. Renewable energy for sustainable development in India: Current status, future prospects, challenges, employment, and investment opportunities. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2020, 10, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corkish, R.; Lipiński, W.; Patterson, R.J. Introduction to solar energy. In Solar Energy; World Scientific: Singapore, 2016; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, A.K.; Kumar, R.R.; Kalidasan, B.; Laghari, I.A.; Samykano, M.; Kothari, R.; Abusorrah, A.M.; Sharma, K.; Tyagi, V.V. Utilization of solar energy for wastewater treatment: Challenges and progressive research trends. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 297, 113300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.P. Consumers’ purchase behaviour and green marketing: A synthesis, review and agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 1217–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nath, P.; Siepong, A. Green marketing capability: A configuration approach towards sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 354, 131727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chung, K.C. Green marketing orientation: Achieving sustainable development in green hotel management. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2020, 29, 722–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahhan, A.; Arenkov, I.A. Green marketing as a trend towards achieving sustainable development. Экoнoмика Предпринимательствo И Правo 2021, 11, 2497–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nekmahmud, M.; Fekete-Farkas, M. Why not green marketing? Determinates of consumers’ intention to green purchase decision in a new developing nation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, P.C.; Wang, H.M.; Huang, H.L.; Ho, C.W. Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward rooftop photovoltaic installation: The roles of personal trait, psychological benefit, and government incentives. Energy Environ. 2020, 31, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vu, D.M.; Ha, N.T.; Ngo TV, N.; Pham, H.T.; Duong, C.D. Environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and green purchase intention: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Soc. Responsib. J. 2022, 18, 1627–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asante, D.; Ampah, J.D.; Afrane, S.; Adjei-Darko, P.; Asante, B.; Fosu, E.; Dankwah, D.A.; Amoh, P.O. Prioritizing strategies to eliminate barriers to renewable energy adoption and development in Ghana: A CRITIC-fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Renew. Energy 2022, 195, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vermeir, I.; Weijters, B.; De Houwer, J.; Geuens, M.; Slabbinck, H.; Spruyt, A.; Van Kerckhove, A.; Van Lippevelde, W.; De Steur, H.; Verbeke, W. Environmentally sustainable food consumption: A review and research agenda from a goal-directed perspective. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trotta, G.; Kalmi, P.; Kazukauskas, A. The role of energy literacy as a component of financial literacy: Survey-based evidence from Finland. In Heading towards Sustainable Energy Systems: Evolution or Revolution? 15th IAEE European Conference; International Association for Energy Economics: Vienna, Austria, 2017; pp. 3–6. [Google Scholar]
- Mushtaq, B.; Bandh, S.A.; Shafi, S. Environmental Management: Environmental Issues, Awareness and Abatement; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinu, M.; Pătărlăgeanu, S.R.; Petrariu, R.; Constantin, M.; Potcovaru, A.M. Empowering sustainable consumer behavior in the EU by consolidating the roles of waste recycling and energy productivity. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalila, D.; Latif, H.; Jaafar, N.; Aziz, I.; Afthanorhan, A. The mediating effect of personal values on the relationships between attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control and intention to use. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2020, 10, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Indriani IA, D.; Rahayu, M.; Hadiwidjojo, D. The influence of environmental knowledge on green purchase intention the role of attitude as mediating variable. Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst. 2019, 6, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pratama AA, N.; Hamidi, M.L.; Cahyono, E. The effect of halal brand awareness on purchase intention in indonesia: The mediating role of attitude. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2023, 10, 2168510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gibbons, R. Exploring Consumer Perception and Attitudes towards Renewable Energy with a View to Developing Best Practice for Marketing Renewable Energy. Master’s Thesis, Letterkenny Institute of Technology, Letterkenny, Ireland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Wall, W.P.; Khalid, B.; Urbański, M.; Kot, M. Factors influencing consumer’s adoption of renewable energy. Energies 2021, 14, 5420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polcyn, J.; Us, Y.; Lyulyov, O.; Pimonenko, T.; Kwilinski, A. Factors influencing the renewable energy consumption in selected European countries. Energies 2021, 15, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, B.; Urbański, M.; Kowalska-Sudyka, M.; Wysłocka, E.; Piontek, B. Evaluating consumers’ adoption of renewable energy. Energies 2021, 14, 7138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loan, C.T.K. Factors Influencing Green Purchase Intention of Students: A Case Study at Vietnam National University of Agriculture: Factors influencing green purchase intention of students: A case study at Vietnam National University of Agric. Vietnam. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 3, 732–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stango, V.; Zinman, J. We are all behavioural, more, or less: A taxonomy of consumer decision-making. Rev. Econ. Stud. 2023, 90, 1470–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmustapha, H.; Hoppe, T. Challenges and opportunities of business models in sustainable transitions: Evidence from solar energy niche development in Lebanon. Energies 2020, 13, 670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The Theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zolait, A.H.S. The nature and components of perceived behavioural control as an element of theory of planned behaviour. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2014, 33, 65–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elahi, E.; Khalid, Z.; Zhang, Z. Understanding farmers’ intention and willingness to install renewable energy technology: A solution to reduce the environmental emissions of agriculture. Appl. Energy 2022, 309, 118459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maichum, K.; Parichatnon, S.; Peng, K.C. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability 2016, 8, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minton, E.A.; Spielmann, N.; Kahle, L.R.; Kim, C.H. The subjective norms of sustainable consumption: A cross-cultural exploration. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 82, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setyo, W.; Mukhamad, N.; Ujang, S.; Yudha, A. Broadening influence: Scale development for subjective norms across extended social groups in green purchasing. Environ. Soc. Psychol. 2024, 9, 2940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolske, K.S.; Gillingham, K.T.; Schultz, P.W. Peer influence on household energy behaviours. Nat. Energy 2020, 5, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhamad, A.; Ahmed, E.R.; Akyürek, M.; Baadhem, A.M.S. The impact of environmental awareness and attitude on green purchase intention: An empirical study of turkish consumers of green product. Mal. Turgut Özal Üniversitesi İşletme Ve Yönetim Bilim. Derg. 2023, 4, 22–36. [Google Scholar]
- Anvar, M.; Venter, M. Attitudes and purchase behaviour of green products among generation Y consumers in South Africa. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 2014, 5, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahl, S.; Chandra, T. Impact of marketing mix on consumer attitude and purchase intention towards ‘green’ products. A J. Res. Artic. Manag. Sci. Allied Areas (Ref.) 2018, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, T.B.; Chai, L.T. Attitude towards the environment and green products: Consumers’ perspective. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2010, 4, 27. [Google Scholar]
- Lestari, E.R.; Hanifa, K.P.U.; Hartawan, S. Antecedents of attitude toward green products and its impact on purchase intention. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 515, No. 1, p. 012073. [Google Scholar]
- Mehta, P.; Chahal, H.S. Consumer attitude towards green products: Revisiting the profile of green consumers using segmentation approach. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2021, 32, 902–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahioun, A.; Bataineh, A.Q.; Abu-AlSondos, I.A.; Haddad, H. The impact of green marketing on consumers’ attitudes: A moderating role of green product awareness. Innov. Mark. 2023, 19, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souri, M.E.; Sajjadian, F.; Sheikh, R.; Sana, S.S. Grey SERVQUAL method to measure consumers’ attitudes towards green products-A case study of Iranian consumers of LED bulbs. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 177, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.; Wang, X.; Lu, P. Chinese consumer attitude and purchase intent towards green products. Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 2014, 6, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walia, S.B.; Kumar, H.; Negi, N. Consumers’ attitude and purchase intention towards ‘green’ products: A study of selected FMCGs. Int. J. Green Econ. 2019, 13, 202–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellomo, M.; Pleyers, G. Sustainable Cosmetics: The Impact of Packaging Materials, Environmental Concern and Subjective Norm on Green Consumer Behaviour. DIAL Digital Access to Libraries Université Catholique de Louvain. 2021. Available online: https://dial.uclouvain.be/memoire/ucl/en/object/thesis%3A31245 (accessed on 5 October 2023).
- Lin, S.T.; Niu, H.J. Green consumption: Environmental knowledge, environmental consciousness, social norms, and purchasing behavior. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2018, 27, 1679–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Young consumers’ intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, H.W.; Udall, A.M.; Tam, K.P. Effects of perceived social norms on support for renewable energy transition: Moderation by national culture and environmental risks. J. Environ. Psychol. 2022, 79, 101750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagliuca, M.M.; Panarello, D.; Punzo, G. Values, concern, beliefs, and preference for solar energy: A comparative analysis of three European countries. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2022, 93, 106722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abreu, J.; Wingartz, N.; Hardy, N. New trends in solar: A comparative study assessing the attitudes towards the adoption of rooftop PV. Energy Policy 2019, 128, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cousse, J. Still in love with solar energy? Installation size, affect, and the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 145, 111107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irfan, M.; Elavarasan, R.M.; Hao, Y.; Feng, M.; Sailan, D. An assessment of consumers’ willingness to utilize solar energy in China: End-users’ perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 292, 126008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irfan, M.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Li, H.; Rehman, A. The influence of consumers’ intention factors on willingness to pay for renewable energy: A structural equation modeling approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 21747–21761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perlaviciute, G.; Steg, L. The influence of values on evaluations of energy alternatives. Renew. Energy 2015, 77, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rai, V.; Beck, A.L. Public perceptions and information gaps in solar energy in Texas. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 074011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sütterlin, B.; Siegrist, M. Public acceptance of renewable energy technologies from an abstract versus concrete perspective and the positive imagery of solar power. Energy Policy 2017, 106, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Axsen, J.; Kurani, K.S. Social influence, consumer behavior, and low-carbon energy transitions. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2012, 37, 311–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aziz, N.S.; Wahid, N.A.; Sallam, M.A.; Ariffin, S.K. Factors influencing Malaysian consumers’ intention to purchase green energy: The case of solar panel. Glob. Bus. Manag. Res. 2017, 9, 328–346. [Google Scholar]
- Elmustapha, H.; Hoppe, T.; Bressers, H. Consumer renewable energy technology adoption decision-making; comparing models on perceived attributes and attitudinal constructs in the case of solar water heaters in Lebanon. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arshiya Fathima, M.S.; Batcha, H.M.; Alam, A.S. Factors affecting consumer purchase intention for buying solar energy products. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 2023, 17, 820–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arshiya Fathima, M.S.; Khan, A.; Alam, A.S. A Bibliometric Review of Consumers’ Purchase Behaviour for Solar Energy Products. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manag. 2023. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kratschmann, M.; Dütschke, E. Selling the sun: A critical review of the sustainability of solar energy marketing and advertising in Germany. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 73, 101919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H. Consumer Behavior, Social Influence, and Smart Grid Implementation. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, X.; Hu, X.; Islam, T.; Mubarik, M.S. Social support, source credibility, social influence, and solar photovoltaic panels purchase intention. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 57842–57859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arroyo, P.; Carrete, L. Motivational drivers for the adoption of green energy: The case of purchasing photovoltaic systems. Manag. Res. Rev. 2019, 42, 542–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalska-Pyzalska, A. What makes consumers adopt to innovative energy services in the energy market? A review of incentives and barriers. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 3570–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hille, E. Europe’s energy crisis: Are geopolitical risks in source countries of fossil fuels accelerating the transition to renewable energy? Energy Econ. 2023, 127, 107061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, J.; Yang, G.; Wang, G.; Zhu, Y.; Guo, Z. Substitutes or complements? Exploring the impact of environmental regulations and informal institutions on the clean energy utilization behaviors of farmers. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2023, 25, 3893–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Claudy, M.C.; Peterson, M.; O’driscoll, A. Understanding the attitude-behavior gap for renewable energy systems using behavioral reasoning theory. J. Macromarketing 2013, 33, 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornara, F.; Pattitoni, P.; Mura, M.; Strazzera, E. Predicting intention to improve household energy efficiency: The role of value-belief-norm theory, normative and informational influence, and specific attitude. J. Environ. Psychol. 2016, 45, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, C.S.; Ooi, H.Y.; Goh, Y.N. A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict consumers’ purchase intention for energy-efficient household appliances in Malaysia. Energy Policy 2017, 107, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osseily, H.A. Design and Analysis of a Net Zero Electrical Energy Building in Beirut-Lebanon. At. Spectrosc. 2024, 45, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Nassar, A. Renewable Energy in Lebanon Will Save Lives. 25 August 2021. Available online: https://interzine.org/2021/08/25/renewable-energy-in-lebanon-will-save-lives/ (accessed on 26 August 2024).
- Fayssal, N.; Al Tawil, L.; Danageuzian, H.; Sabat, M.; ElMerehbi, H.; Darazi, D.; Sabat, M.; Roukos, R.; Dargham, S.A.; Romanos, J. Navigating the water–energy nexus amidst the Lebanese economic crisis. AQUA—Water Infrastruct. Ecosyst. Soc. 2024, 73, 917–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Julian, M.; Bassil, N.; Dellagi, S. Lebanon’s electricity from fuel to solar energy production. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 420–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hage Botros, Philippe, Lebanon Is Turning to Solar Energy, but Are There Risks? OLJ 13 September 2022. Available online: https://today.lorientlejour.com/article/1311288/lebanon-is-turning-to-solar-energy-but-are-there-risks.html (accessed on 26 August 2024).
- Xu, J.; Lv, T.; Hou, X.; Deng, X.; Li, N.; Liu, F. Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of renewable energy production in China: A spatial econometric analysis. Energy Econ. 2022, 116, 106399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kianpour, K.; Anvari, R.; Jusoh, A.; Othman, M.F. Important motivators for buying green products. Intang. Cap. 2014, 10, 873–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabachenik, D.; Fidel, J. Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. J. Bus. Res. Methods 2012, 6, 1–55. [Google Scholar]
Percentage | ||
---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 41.3 |
Female | 58.7 | |
Age | ≥21–25 | 22.2 |
>25–30 | 26.2 | |
>30–35 | 16.4 | |
>36 | 35.1 | |
Employment Status | Employee | 70 |
Self-employed | 14.4 | |
Unemployed | 15.6 | |
Educational Level | Bachelor’s degree | 49.6 |
Graduate degree | 50.4 | |
Marital Status | Single | 54 |
Married | 42.2 | |
Divorced | 2.4 | |
Widowed | 1.3 | |
Family Monthly Income | Less than 1000 USD | 25.6 |
1000 USD–2000 USD | 17.8 | |
Between 2000 USD and 3000 USD | 28.2 | |
More than 3000 USD | 28.4 |
KMO and Bartlett’s Test | ||
---|---|---|
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of Sampling adequacy | 0.726 | |
Bartlett’s test of sphericity | Approx. chi-Square | 6060.197 |
df | 231 | |
Sig. | 0.000 |
Total Variance Explained | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component | Initial Eigenvalues | Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings | Rotation Sums of Squared Loadings | ||||||
Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | Total | % of Variance | Cumulative % | |
1 | 3.549 | 16.133 | 16.133 | 3.549 | 16.133 | 16.133 | 3.004 | 13.655 | 13.655 |
2 | 3.242 | 14.737 | 30.870 | 3.242 | 14.737 | 30.870 | 2.742 | 12.465 | 26.120 |
3 | 2.865 | 13.021 | 43.892 | 2.865 | 13.021 | 43.892 | 2.522 | 11.465 | 37.585 |
4 | 2.576 | 11.710 | 55.602 | 2.576 | 11.710 | 55.602 | 2.334 | 10.611 | 48.196 |
5 | 2.034 | 9.247 | 64.849 | 2.034 | 9.247 | 64.849 | 2.262 | 10.281 | 58.477 |
6 | 1.802 | 8.189 | 73.038 | 1.802 | 8.189 | 73.038 | 2.246 | 10.210 | 68.687 |
7 | 1.288 | 5.856 | 78.894 | 1.288 | 5.856 | 78.894 | 2.246 | 10.207 | 78.894 |
Rotated Component Matrix a | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Component | ||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
Attitude toward green products | Mot1 Concern1: Humans must live in harmony with nature to survive. | 0.884 | ||||||
Mot1 Concern2: Mankind should refrain from severely abusing the environment. | 0.907 | |||||||
Mot1 Concern3: Environmental pollution can only be eliminated when governments work together. | 0.766 | |||||||
Subjective norms | Mot2 Subjective1: I think sustainable green energy products are necessary for the socio-economic development of a country. | 0.888 | ||||||
Mot2 Subjective 2: I am part of an online social group advocating for sustainable green energy. | 0.901 | |||||||
Mot2 Subjective3: I think sustainable green energy is more in line with my social values. | 0.879 | |||||||
Social influence | Mot3 Social Influence1: Most of my family, neighbors, and acquaintances have installed solar energy panels. | 0.857 | ||||||
Mot3 Social Influence2: Mass media and social media platforms provide much information about solar energy panel green products. | 0.869 | |||||||
Mot3 Social Influence3: Relying on social energy has become a social trend on a global level. | 0.888 | |||||||
Functional utility (perception of solar energy values) | Mot4 Funct Utility1: I am confident that shifting solar energy will have long-term financial benefits. | 0.884 | ||||||
Mot4 Funct Utility2: I am confident that operating solar energy is easy. | 0.877 | |||||||
Mot4 Funct Utility3: I am confident that solar energy does not require costly maintenance fees. | 0.891 | |||||||
Mot4 Funct Utility4: I am encouraged to install solar energy as it is less hazardous than regular sources of energy. | 0.783 | |||||||
Behavioral constraints (laws and regulations) | Mot5 Laws1: I would be encouraged to install solar energy to benefit from the tax exemption on my income. | 0.949 | ||||||
Mot5 Laws2: I would be encouraged to install solar energy in case financial aid programs are provided by the government. | 0.949 | |||||||
Mot5 Laws3: I would be encouraged to install solar energy in case low loan rates are provided by the government. | 0.960 | |||||||
Attitude toward green products | GPB1: I buy eco-friendly products whenever possible. | 0.822 | ||||||
GPB2: I buy healthy organic food whenever possible. | 0.845 | |||||||
GPB3: I use products made from healthy and environmentally friendly materials. | 0.835 | |||||||
Solar energy buying intention | BI1: I believe solar energy is a good investment in the long run. | 0.939 | ||||||
BI2: I have a positive attitude towards using solar energy. | 0.715 | |||||||
BI3: I intend to recommend solar energy to others. | 0.902 |
CFA Model Fit Measures | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test of Exact Fit | Goodness of Fit Indices | ||||
χ2 | p | CFI | TLI | SRMR | RMSEA |
138 | 0.002 | 0.964 | 0.955 | 0.039 | 0.049 |
Factor | Indicator | Std. Est. (all) | z-Value | p | AVE | CR | Cronbach Alpha |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1 | Mot_1ConcernGreenEnvir1 | 0.792 | 18.27 | <0.001 | 0.597 | 0.81 | 0.879 |
Mot_1ConcernGreenEnvir2 | 0.95 | 22.71 | <0.001 | ||||
Mot_1ConcernGreenEnvir3 | 0.618 | 13.62 | <0.001 | ||||
Factor 2 | Mot_2Subj1 | 0.867 | 22.36 | <0.001 | 0.764 | 0.91 | 0.814 |
Mot_2Subj2 | 0.901 | 23.72 | <0.001 | ||||
Mot_2Subj3 | 0.844 | 21.48 | <0.001 | ||||
Factor 3 | Mot_3Socialinfluence1 | 0.759 | 17.77 | <0.001 | 0.648 | 0.84 | 0.901 |
Mot_3Socialinfluence2 | 0.83 | 20 | <0.001 | ||||
Mot_3Socialinfluence3 | 0.853 | 20.77 | <0.001 | ||||
Factor 4 | Mot_4FunctionalUtility1 | 0.846 | 21.43 | <0.001 | 0.661 | 0.89 | 0.823 |
Mot_4FunctionalUtility2 | 0.839 | 21.18 | <0.001 | ||||
Mot_4FunctionalUtility3 | 0.869 | 22.29 | <0.001 | ||||
Mot_4FunctionalUtility4 | 0.697 | 16.25 | <0.001 | ||||
Factor 5 | Mot_5LawsRegulation1 | 0.921 | 25.41 | <0.001 | 0.864 | 0.95 | 0.714 |
Mot_5LawsRegulation2 | 0.92 | 25.37 | <0.001 | ||||
Mot_5LawsRegulation3 | 0.952 | 26.93 | <0.001 | ||||
Factor 6 | Buying1GreenProductsPurchase1 | 0.739 | 16.79 | <0.001 | 0.605 | 0.82 | 0.846 |
Buying2GreenProductsPurchase2 | 0.853 | 20.06 | <0.001 | ||||
Buying3GreenProductsPurchase3 | 0.754 | 17.22 | <0.001 | ||||
Factor 7 | Attitude1SolarEnergy | 0.738 | 13.16 | <0.001 | 0.616 | 0.77 | 0.892 |
Attitude2SolarEnergy | 0.722 | 12.93 | <0.001 | ||||
Attitude3SolarEnergy | 0.617 | 13.62 | <0.001 |
Mean | Std. Error of Mean | Std. Deviation | |
---|---|---|---|
GPBI_1 | 3.8553 | 0.05944 | 1.18586 |
GPBI_2 | 3.7508 | 0.05706 | 1.13836 |
GPBI_3 | 3.7412 | 0.05593 | 1.11589 |
Mot1 Concern1 | 3.7980 | 0.05680 | 1.13306 |
Mot1 Concern2 | 3.8568 | 0.05652 | 1.12767 |
Mot1 Concern3 | 3.8151 | 0.05554 | 1.10803 |
Mot2 Subjective1 | 3.9095 | 0.05209 | 1.03921 |
Mot2 Subjective 2 | 3.9648 | 0.05393 | 1.07585 |
Mot2 Subjective3 | 4.1106 | 0.05175 | 1.03239 |
Mot3 Social Influence1 | 3.7663 | 0.05874 | 1.17195 |
Mot3 Social Influence2 | 3.81658 | 0.056119 | 1.119566 |
Mot3 Social Influence3 | 3.8668 | 0.05395 | 1.07636 |
Mot4 Funct Utility1 | 3.7211 | 0.05900 | 1.17707 |
Mot4 Funct Utility2 | 3.8432 | 0.06024 | 1.20174 |
Mot4 Funct Utility3 | 3.7513 | 0.05761 | 1.14928 |
Mot4 Funct Utility4 | 3.8553 | 0.05858 | 1.16874 |
Mot5 Laws1 | 3.9653 | 0.06099 | 1.21680 |
Mot5 Laws2 | 3.8869 | 0.05758 | 1.14877 |
Mot5 Laws3 | 3.8191 | 0.06085 | 1.21387 |
BI1 | 3.6156 | 0.06112 | 1.21927 |
BI2 | 3.8894 | 0.06044 | 1.20571 |
BI3 | 3.3241 | 0.06189 | 1.23467 |
Heterotrait–Monotrait Ratio | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | Factor 5 | Factor 6 | Factor 7 |
1 | ||||||
0.087 | 1 | |||||
0.15 | 0.07 | 1 | ||||
0.047 | 0.037 | 0.18 | 1 | |||
0.048 | 0.053 | 0.036 | 0.028 | 1 | ||
0.172 | 0.497 | 0.031 | 0.056 | 0.034 | 1 | |
0.077 | 0.075 | 0.243 | 0.17 | 0.052 | 0.042 | 1 |
Regression Coefficients | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | Outcome | β | z-Value | p | Decision |
CO | ATG | 0.272 | 7.72 | <0.001 | Supported |
SN | ATG | 0.092 | 4.867 | <0.001 | Supported |
SI | ATG | 0.047 | 4.832 | <0.001 | Supported |
FU | ATG | 0.533 | 14.353 | <0.001 | Supported |
LR | ATG | −0.204 | −6.7 | <0.001 | Supported |
ATG | BIS | 0.944 | 18.843 | <0.001 | Supported |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jabbour Al Maalouf, N.; Sayegh, E.; Inati, D.; Sarkis, N. Consumer Motivations for Solar Energy Adoption in Economically Challenged Regions. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8777. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208777
Jabbour Al Maalouf N, Sayegh E, Inati D, Sarkis N. Consumer Motivations for Solar Energy Adoption in Economically Challenged Regions. Sustainability. 2024; 16(20):8777. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208777
Chicago/Turabian StyleJabbour Al Maalouf, Nada, Elie Sayegh, Diala Inati, and Nada Sarkis. 2024. "Consumer Motivations for Solar Energy Adoption in Economically Challenged Regions" Sustainability 16, no. 20: 8777. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208777
APA StyleJabbour Al Maalouf, N., Sayegh, E., Inati, D., & Sarkis, N. (2024). Consumer Motivations for Solar Energy Adoption in Economically Challenged Regions. Sustainability, 16(20), 8777. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208777