Development of Geographic Information System Architecture Feature Analysis and Evolution Trend Research

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I have reviewed the manuscript entitled "Development of GIS Architecture Feature Analysis and Evolution Trends Research". As far as my review is concerned, I noticed that this is a review paper. There neem many correction before accepting this paper:

(1) Abstract is very general and need to rewrite it by looking towards the objective and methodological application.

(2) No, methodological description. The authors need to add detail methodology applied to this review

(3) Quality assessment of review is missing

(4) In result section only state the findings of your review

(5) Real discussion should be incorporated

(6) Conclusion section is very long and it would be better to break Conclusions and Future Research Directions in two seperate section

Thank you.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

请参阅附件

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Comments:

1. Please convert the content of Figure 4 to English. 

2. Please include in the introduction section the purpose, research gaps, and novelty of your work. 

3. How does your study related to the Sustainability?  You sent it to this journal, but I couldn't locate enough connections to make sense of it. Therefore, it is much preferable to make clear how sustainability is related to your current concern in the introduction. 

4- It is preferable to discuss your work under the new heading "Discussion" and compare your findings to those of earlier investigations. 

5- An expert in computer science should, in my opinion, review the content of your figures. 

Thank you. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This paper discusses the development trends of modern architecture of GIS platforms.

However, the current state lacks generalizing the general trend of the GIS platform developments, such as not discussing the quantum computing trends. Besides, the current state of the paper concludes the part of Chinese character figures like Figure 4. This paper has not illustrated the contribution of investigating works on figures or tables.

 

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The author has provided a comprehensive review of the issue mentioned in the paper. They have given a detailed description and effectively reviewed and discussed the development and trends of GIS architecture. Furthermore, the paper covers the limitations and advantages associated with each stage of GIS system development. Overall, this is a well-executed review paper.

 

However, it is mentioned that a substantial amount of domestic and foreign literature was investigated and analysed. Unfortunately, the paper lacks information about the total number of papers or pieces of literature considered for this review, the methodology employed for collecting these papers, and the specific process used for their analysis. To enhance the transparency and rigour of the study, it would be beneficial to include this information in the manuscript. Providing some statistical data regarding the sources surveyed and the analysis process undertaken would further strengthen the paper.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of the English language is required.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 5 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I have severeal secommendations for the authors in order to improve their research paper. My suggestions are attached in the sepparate document.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

English language is understandable. Few sentences need shortening for a better understanding, but mentions have been made in the attachement.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

As per my previous comments and suggestions, the authors have made sufficient changes and added clarification. Therefore, I have now no negative comments and it is my pleasure to accept this paper to publish in your esteemed journal.

Thank you and best wishes.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor editing of English language required

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

No comments.