Next Article in Journal
Experimental Study on Uniaxial Compression Mechanics and Failure Characteristics of Non-Through Fractured Rock
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Scale Geographically Weighted Elasticity Regression Model to Explore the Elastic Effects of the Built Environment on Ride-Hailing Ridership
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Water–Energy–Food Nexus in European Countries: A Review and Future Perspectives

by
Somayeh Rezaei Kalvani
* and
Fulvio Celico
Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parco Area Delle Scienze 157/A, 43124 Parma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(6), 4960; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064960
Submission received: 17 February 2023 / Revised: 8 March 2023 / Accepted: 9 March 2023 / Published: 10 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synergies and Trade-Offs in Water–Energy–Food–Ecosystem Nexus)

Abstract

:
The interaction between water, energy, and food as the water–energy–food (WEF) nexus has drawn much attention recently to solve upcoming uncertainty in food security. The aim of this study is to investigate the status of the WEF nexus in European countries. It is indicated that the largest nexus studies (among 27 European countries) have been conducted in Spain and Italy. It is confirmed that there is a large number of nexus studies in water-stressed countries while there are few studies on water-abundant countries (Slovakia and Luxembourg). Based on existing research, the majority of nexus studies focused on energy production. It is highlighted that most of the nexus studies were focused on water quantity aspects (rarely related to quality aspects) and energy; however, other resources including land, climate, ecosystem, soil, and environment received little attention. The migration of people as a result of climate change in the WEF nexus is not considered. Moreover, there is a lack of common and standard frameworks for nexus assessment. Therefore, we suggest a standard approach for nexus studies and produce a cross-sectoral and holistic approach for the evaluation of a water (quantity and quality)–energy–food–land–climate (WqEFLC) nexus that takes into consideration the circular economy.

1. Introduction

Water, energy, and food are essential resources for improving sustainable development goals (access to food, water, and energy for all people) and human well-being. These resources are inseparable and interrelated resources [1]. Interaction and interlinkage between these resources are of utmost importance, and they are evaluated by the water–energy–food (WEF) nexus [2]. This nexus shows that the interaction between these resources is essential and the same resources should be managed altogether [3]. The nexus was initially introduced at the Bonn conference in 2011 as a crucial element to achieve sustainable development goals. After the Bonn conference, the number of nexus studies increased and so many approaches were created, such as [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. In spite of the sharp increase in nexus publication after the Bonn conference, to date, there is not any review on the WEF nexus focusing on European countries. This study fills this gap for the first time. In particular, this study points out those aspects that should be integrated into the actual approaches through the following items: (i) methodology and protocol for conducting this review, (ii) an overview of the evolution of the nexus, (iii) an overview of the number of nexus studies in different European countries, (iv) the percentages of different types of nexus studies (including the water–energy [WE] nexus, water–energy–food [WEF] nexus, water–energy–food–land–climate [WEFLC] nexus, water–energy-land [WEL] nexus, WEL–carbon nexus, water–energy–food–environmental [WEFE] nexus, land–water [LW] nexus, and water–energy–soil [WES] nexus) in 27 European countries, (v) integration among circular economy and nexus approach, (vi) nexus gaps in European countries, and (vii) a summary of the main finding of this paper and future perspectives.
On the whole, the following research questions will be answered during this study. (i) What is the evolution of nexus worldwide? (ii) Which European countries have the largest number of nexus studies, and why? (iii) Which types of nexus studies have drawn much attention in European countries? (iv) What are the research gaps related to the nexus in European countries? Then, what future perspectives are emerging and what previously unanswered questions must be answered soon?

2. Materials and Methods

This study used a narrative review based on papers published before 2023 because this kind of review is comprehensive and can cover a variety of issues within a specific topic [11]. The following steps have been conducted:
  • Conducting a search: it is crucial to use different databases to ensure that most of the relevant databases have been covered [12]. In this study Scopus, ISI Web of Science, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct were used.
  • Finding appropriate keywords: using appropriate keywords helps to answer the research questions.
  • Reviewing relevant articles: after completing the search, all duplicated articles are removed. In this step, the abstract section from the remaining papers is reviewed to find the relevant papers that can answer the research questions; less relevant papers based on a review of abstracts and their titles are omitted; then, the relevant papers based on research questions were reviewed. In the narrative review, it is not necessary to include all of the existing relevant papers on the topics because we need the papers that address our research questions. Therefore, taking into consideration the main goal of the present work, this research reviews the 109 papers focused on studies that were carried out within Europe.
  • Writing results: in this step, all of the results are summarized and integrated appropriately [12].
The search string used to classify the papers consisted of all types of nexus discussed until now in the scientific literature, including (i) the water–energy–food (WEF) nexus, (ii) water–energy–food–land nexus (WEFL), (iii) water–energy–food–climate nexus (WEFC), (iv) water–energy–food–security (WEFS), (v) the impact of climate change on the WEF nexus, (vi) the WEF nexus in seafood, in livestock, and in crop production, (vii) net primary production in the WEF nexus, (viii) the WEF nexus and ecological footprint, (ix) the WEF nexus and land use, (x) the resource nexus, (xi) ecosystems and the WEF nexus, (xii) soil and the WEF nexus, (xiii) forests and the WEF nexus, (xiv) water quality and the WEF nexus, (xv) sustainable development, and (xvi) food security.

3. Results

3.1. The Evolution of Nexus Study

Numerous nexus studies, conferences, and projects have been performed around the world. The interaction between water and energy became obvious in the 1970s. The food–energy nexus was created by United Nations University (UNU) in 1983 to solve water and energy insecurity [13]. In the next year, a water–energy–ecosystem conference was conducted in Brazil by UNU. The second water–energy ecosystem nexus symposium was held in India by UNU in 1986. In the 1990s, the World Bank used the terminology of nexus for interlinkage between water, energy, and trade [14]. The concept was like virtual water and water footprint [15]. Scientists around the world acknowledged the need for considering energy as one of the pillars of the nexus [16]. Finally, the WEF nexus was officially introduced for the green economy at the Bonn conference in November 2011. Considerable attention has been paid to the interlinkage between water, energy, and food after the Bonn conference. In the following year, the food–water–energy (FWE) nexus was created (ICIMOD, 2012) for the Himalayan ecosystem [4]. The ecosystem was identified as a key factor in this framework, which contributes to resource security. Andrews-Speed et al. (2012) created a new framework, called the resource nexus, by considering five resources in the nexus approach, including water, energy, mineral, food, and land. Physical, economic, political, environmental, and equity dimensions were added to the framework [5]. Howells et al. (2013) provided a framework which was called climate, land-use, energy, and water strategies (CLEWs), combining climate change, land, water, and energy [6]. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization provided a conceptual framework for the WEF nexus in 2014 [10]. The water–energy–food–ecosystem nexus framework was created by considering political and physical dimensions and taking into consideration transboundary rivers [7]. Melo et al. (2021) [17] produced a novel nexus approach by adding forests to the usual WEF nexus.

3.2. Analysis of Different Types of Nexus in European Countries

Figure 1 shows the number of nexus studies in European countries. Spain had the largest nexus publications (26). Italy and Portugal are the second (eleven) and the third (nine) largest cases of nexus studies, respectively. It can be indicated that the largest nexus studies were carried out in water scarcity countries, because the WEF nexus is identified as a solution to manage water supply and water demand spanning water, energy, and agricultural sectors, especially in water scarcity areas [18]. Conversely, only one study was conducted in water-abundant countries, such as Slovakia and Luxembourg.
Figure 2 shows the percentages of different types of nexus studies in 27 European countries. Most of the nexus studies focused on the WE and WEF nexus, accounting for 39% each and, therefore, suggesting that in different countries nexus studies are mainly focused on the interlinkage between water and energy sectors. For example, in Italy and Spain, the majority of nexus research were focused on energy production, and the nexus was applied with two pillars as the WE nexus, such as in [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. The WE nexus is important since electricity fuel production relies on non-sustainable water resources [29]. Recently, the WE nexus has received numerous attention from scholars and policymakers [30]. However, in some geographical areas, such as Sweden, Finland, Romania, Malta, and Latvia, more focus has been paid on the interconnection and interaction between the water, energy, and food sectors. Only 4% of nexus studies focused on the WEFLC nexus because the application of a complex nexus is not successful, due to a lack of data availability [31]. A few studies were focused on other types of nexus, such as the WEL nexus, WEL–carbon nexus, WEF nexus, LW nexus, and WE–soil (WES) nexus, accounting for only 1% each.
Figure 3 shows the number of studies for each resource/sector in European countries. The largest number of nexus studies was focused on the water sector (87 papers). The energy sector is the second one (77 papers). Only 38 studies considered the food sector. On the whole, in European countries, the water and energy sectors are more considered than the food and other sectors. There are very limited studies on land use and land change (eight papers). Carbon and climate were considered rarely in nexus evaluations, with only eight and five studies, respectively. Other resources such as the ecosystem, soil, and environment have received little attention, with only three, one, and one papers, respectively.

3.3. Overview of Different Nexus Approaches in the European Countries

Table 1 shows the existing nexus studies in the 27 European countries in terms of approach, sector, and results. Nexus studies can be carried out at different scales, from the farm level, urban, tourism, industry, forest, river basin, hotel, household, to country scale. In the agricultural sector, the nexus approach can be applied with different aims, such as for irrigation management [32,33], for comparing different fertilization systems in terms of economic and environmental sustainability [34,35], for climate change adaptation by comparing different climate change scenarios [36], and for providing a new guideline for drought management [37,38,39,40]. At the urban scale, it was applied with the aim of obtaining sustainable aquaponic production [41,42] by comparing different wastewater treatment scenarios in terms of resource use efficiency [27,43,44,45,46], increasing a sustainable smart environment for cities [47]. In Portugal, a new framework, the Water–Energy–Greenhouse gas emission nexus, was created for wastewater treatment in urban drainage systems. Only CO2 emissions were considered for greenhouse emissions as a result of wastewater treatment [48]. Another study by Santos et al. (2021) also accounted for WE–CO2 emissions of wastewater treatment at the urban scale in Portugal [46].
From the methodological point of view, there is no universally accepted approach for nexus analysis. Each scholar used a different approach for his/her analysis. In some cases, the life cycle assessment (LCA) was integrated with the nexus because this combination was identified as a powerful tool for evaluating environmental impacts in the life cycle of products [49,50] and can provide sustainable alternatives for global food insecurity by developing sustainable production and consumption [50]. Numerous nexus studies used the LCA in order to analyze some environmental impacts, with the aim of finding effective solutions for coping with climate change and increasing resource security (e.g., [27,28,36,41,43,51,52,53,54]). Some of the scholars used the LCA for the evaluation of carbon footprints [53,55,56,57]. The system dynamic model was used to accelerate the analysis of the complex system between different variables [58], which can contribute to increasing synergic strategies and sustainability solutions [59]. In Latvia, the WEFLC nexus was applied to different policies in cereal crop production using the integrated system dynamics model [60]. Based on the existing literature, most of the studies evaluated land use in terms of land suitability, land use change, [21,27,43,61,62], economic land productivity [32], and land productivity [33]. However, indirect land use in terms of the ecological footprint was not considered. The ecological footprint enables one to account for both direct and indirect land use (land use associated with carbon dioxide emission as a result of fossil fuel for machines) for crop production [63].
In the Netherlands, a nexus was performed with the aim of producing new frameworks. For example, the NexSESF was created by considering the social–ecological system in the FEW nexus [64]. Additionally, the CLEW nexus framework was produced [65] to increase land security. A new framework for water security assessment in Finland was established by using the WEF nexus and considering human well-being, human health, and sustainability of livelihood [66].
Data availability is one of the challenges of creating a nexus. The lack of data availability was claimed in some studies, such as [48,67].
Table 1. The nexus studies in 27 European countries.
Table 1. The nexus studies in 27 European countries.
CountryApproach Sector Result
Italy (central Italy)WEF nexus + energy inputs-outputs analysis Farm (wheat)The economic and environmental impacts of chemical and organic fertilizers were compared. The result indicated that organic fertilizer has a lower environmental impact in terms of low nitrate leaching in groundwater and low energy use, while chemical fertilizer contributes to increasing crop yield [34].
ItalyWE nexus + economic water productivity + WF Electricity productionA novel nexus framework as economic WE nexus was created [19].
ItalyWE nexusHydropower plant The WE nexus under different climate scenarios was analyzed [20].
Turin, Toronto, Oslo, NantesWE–carbon nexus + LCAWater treatment (city)Water treatment in terms of the WE–carbon nexus was evaluated in Italy, France, and Canada [43].
Italy (northern, central, and southern)WE nexus
Water footprint + LCA
Biogas production (maize, sorghum, and wheat)The result shows that bioenergy crop production in southern Italy is unsustainable in terms of water consumption. The crop cultivation stage is identified as the main source of environmental impact because of fertilization [51].
ItalyWEF nexusWine production [68]
Italy (Milan)WEFC nexus
water footprint + carbon footprint +Energy footprint
Wastewater treatment (reuse) The nexus approach was used with the aim of understanding the interlinkage between the WEFC and assessing the impacts of different scenarios of wastewater reuse. The nexus can increase sustainable water resource management [55].
Italy (Sardinia)WEFLC nexus (SIM4NEXUS method)
(RCP 8.5 and RCP 4.5)
Agriculture, tourism, and domesticProvide a novel approach for different climate change scenarios, such as the SIM4NEXUS approach [36].
Italy (Turin)Urban WE L nexusMini-hydro power plants [21]
Italy (Emilia Romagna)WE nexus + LCADrinking water supply The environmental impacts of different drinking water production systems were compared [52].
Italy (south)LWEF nexus
multi-criteria decision analysis +GIS
(Rapeseed and cardoon)
Biofuel crops
The nexus was applied to find suitable areas for crop production in terms of more efficiency in water, energy, and land resources. The nexus approach provides a sustainable solution for resource management. Economic land productivity is an important factor for assessing irrigation sustainability [32].
Italy (Puglia)WEF nexusCrops at catchment scaleThe WEF nexus was used to evaluate irrigation sustainability and land productivity [33].
Germany (Munich)WEF nexus and urban nexus
(use QGIS and ArcGIS)
CityThe result indicated that urban agriculture can provide around 60% and 240% of fruit and vegetable demand. Wastewater treatment and rainwater harvesting can save water supply. Biogas can contribute to saving electricity supply [69].
Germany (Berlin)WEF nexus + LCAUrban Aquaponics
(Circular city)
It is indicated that aquaponics contributes to saving 2 Mm3 of water. It contributes to providing sustainability resources. Aquaponics increased food production and reduce environmental impacts [41].
GermanyFEW nexusFramework[70]
GermanyClimate change impact on the WEF nexus
energy system model TIMES PanEU + integrated assessment approach
Cooling technologiesThere will be a risk of water scarcity in Germany that can be reduced by using recycled water
[71].
GermanyFEW nexusWater supply and livestock bioenergyA novel analytical framework was introduced by adding ecosystem service and network to the nexus framework.
The WEF nexus contributes to increasing sustainable development goals [72].
GermanyWF–technology nexus + interview + surveySewage treatment plant for hydroponic A new framework was produced and the results show that new technology can accelerate sustainable developments goals [73].
GermanyEvaluate the SDG of the WEF nexus sectorNew frameworkThe green economy innovation index for the evaluation of sustainability was produced [74].
FranceWES nexus + statistical model + GISCity[75]
New framework.
NetherlandFWE nexus + social–ecological systems (SES)Framework called NexSESFA novel framework was produced [64].
NetherlandWEF nexusDifferent scenarios and the SIM4NEXUS game was tested in terms of policies[76]
Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Latvia, and Sweden CLEWF nexusFramework A new framework was created [65].
SpainWE nexusIrrigationThe long-term WE nexus for drip and sprinkler irrigation was analyzed. The result shows that water conservation technology can increase water use efficiency [23].
SpainWE nexus +
environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) + ARDL model
Thermoelectric The result shows that there is a direct relationship between water withdrawal and per capita income [24].
SpainWEF nexusDuero river basinThe result indicated the important role of the nexus for synergy between resources and policies [77].
SpainWE nexusWater user associations (WUAs) There is an interlinkage between the WUA, energy, and other water use and the environment [25].
Spain (Andalusia)WEF nexus + fuzzy cognitive maps (FCMs) to analyze different scenarios + interviewAgricultureProduce a system dynamic model [78].
SpainWE nexusIrrigation[26]
SpainWE nexus + LCAUrban water system (wastewater treatment)The region that used tertiary treatment for wastewater treatment shows a higher environmental impact related to energy consumption and GHG emissions [27].
Spain WEL nexus + LCADecarburization on the WEL nexus (electricity)The results show that decarburization contributes to reducing all environmental impacts except aquatic ecotoxicity [28].
Spain (Almeria)WEF nexus + process systems analysis + LCATomatoThe result indicated that carbon footprint, water footprint, and chemical footprint are good indicators for the evaluation of environmental performances in terms of sustainability in the nexus approach and suitable tools for decision-makers [53].
Spain WEFC nexus and carbon footprintAgriculture[56]
SpainWE nexus
+ virtual water + water footprint
Biofuel cropThe nexus between water and energy in Spain was evaluated [79].
SpainWEC nexus of gin
linear programming (LP) + LCA
Spirit drinksCreated a novel integrated index, the IWECN, by integrating the LP, LCA, and WEC nexus. The result shows that using solar energy and plastic material for bottles is the best alternative in terms of reduction in the IWECN [54].
Spain WEF nexus + SDMAgriculture The system dynamic model can contribute to increasing synergic strategies and increasing sustainability solutions [59].
SpainWEF nexusCrop[80]
Spain (Benidorm)WE nexus + interview + questionnaireTourismThe result shows a strong relationship between water and nonrenewable energy. An unsustainable tradeoff between water and energy was found for salty groundwater withdrawal [81].
Spain (Benidorm)WE nexusUrban water cycleThe results show that energy consumption will be increased six times more in dry years than in normal years when desalination is applied. Wastewater treatment and transfer show better performances [45].
SpainWEF nexus
Water footprint + carbon footprint + energy footprint
CropsModernization in irrigation contributes to increase water use efficiency by around 8% [57].
Spain (Barcelona)WEF nexus
surveys
HouseholdsCreating WE vulnerability
[67].
SpainWE nexusWastewater treatment plantDifferent scenarios were analyzed with the aim of reducing GHG emission [44].
SpainWE nexusEU27 for electricity productionProvide yearly water consumption for energy consumption in the EU [82].
SpainWEF nexus + multi-scale integrated analysis Desalination for crop productionA new integrated approach and quantitative analysis for nexus was introduced [83] which was called the MUSISEM approach.
The approach provides a holistic view of the different components of the system.
EUWE–carbon nexus
+ input–output model
Different countries in the EUFrance, Germany, and Austria are identified as eco-friendly in European countries. Sweden, France, Portugal, and Lithuania used more energy and low CO2 emissions due to using renewable energy [84].
EUWE nexus
Water and energy efficiency, energy saving, water saving
Industry (metal, chemical, food, paper, and pulp) Improvement in the water efficiency trend can contribute to a similar trend in water efficiency [85].
AustriaWater assessment tool (SWAT)
Ecosystem–WEF nexus
Danube river basin A new approach for the nexus was produced by considering the environmental flow requirement for the lotic ecosystem
[86].
Portugal (southern)CWEF nexusHydropower productionVariability in climate and water; energy was evaluated [87].
PortugalEconomic impact on the WE nexusTransboundary river basinsThe economic impact in 2050 relies on the interaction between other sectors. The impact is high when water consumption in a neighboring country is considered [88].
PortugalWE nexus + co2 emissionWastewater treatment municipal scale
Different scenarios were compared and the best scenario in terms of energy saving was introduced [46].
Portugal (Lisbon)WE nexusUrban irrigation system Helps to increase a sustainable smart environment at the urban scale [47].
PortugalWE nexus and emissionUrban drainageA different scenario with the aim of increasing energy saving was compared. Data availability is the main challenge [48].
PortugalWE nexusUniversity buildingWater efficiency at the building level shows the water efficiency at the urban scale. There is small nexus between water and energy since the demand for hot water is small and the pump was not used [89].
Portugal (Algarve)WE nexus [90]
PortugalWE nexus and emissionUniversity building and hotel buildingThe cascade effect of water efficiency on the reduction of water energy and GHG emissions [91].
ItalyDynamic simulation model
WE nexus
Energy production from different sourcesThe nexus between different sources of energy. Renewable energy is a good option in terms of efficiency and a reduction in GHG emissions [92].
CyprusWE nexus The WEF nexus helps to achieve sustainable development goals [93].
Czech Republic and Greece WEF nexusWheatCompare different fertilization technologies by taking into account the economic and environmental aspects. The result shows that variable rate technology (VRT) can increase environmental impacts and reduce groundwater pollution while resulting in economic (low cost) benefits [35].
BelgiumEcosystem–WEF nexusRiver basin[86]
BelgiumWEF nexus
Water efficiency, energy efficiency, and food efficiency
BiofuelsA new nexus index was designed by efficiency indexes [94].
Estonia
LW nexusKemi River hydropower and tourismIn the nexus, wet and dry rhythms should be considered [61].
GreeceWE nexus Electricity generationThe WE nexus in the electricity sector, the energy used for sewerage, conventional and thermal power plants, and biodiesel [95].
LatviaWEFLC + system dynamics mode + SIM4NEXUS Investigate how policy in one sector can impact other nexus sectors [60].
LatviaWEFLCForest (biofuel)Land use changed as a result of converting forest land to the biofuel crop and new policies were provided for current and future changes [62].
Malta
WEF nexus AquaponicsThe nexus of water and energy for aquaponics was evaluated [42].
Romania
Tulcea, Roman
WEF nexus
ISO50001 (standard framework for energy management) + ISO14046 (water footprint assessment)
The value system is identified as one of the requirements for appropriate water management
[96].
RomaniaWEF nexusCountrySynergic and trades of the nexus between w–e–f and waste regarding economic dimensions [97].
SwedenWEF nexus
+ mesoscale model
Crop irrigationEvaluation of the impact of drought on agricultural water consumption, water stress, yield, and energy. Provide a new model and guideline for drought management [37].
SwedenWEF nexusDrought impacts on irrigation and agricultureIrrigation water saving and water productivity based on the new model were compared in drought and normal years. In a normal year, water saving and high yield were obtained. In drought years, there was no water saving. However, crop yield increased by 10%
[39].
SwedenWEFLC nexusCountry sectorIntegrating the ecosystem with the nexus can contribute to an increasing tradeoff between resources and figuring out the impacts
[98].
Sweden Impact of drought WEFE nexusCatchmentsStandardized drought indices were produced [40].
SwedenWEF nexus + mesoscale MESAN and STRÅNG modelsEffects of drought on the agriculture Provide an irrigation guideline and water management [38].
FinlandWEF nexusProduce a new frameworkConsidering stakeholders in the framework can help to accelerate water security [66].
FinlandWEF nexus+ hydrological modelHydropower and water supplyLocal drought management can reduce drought [99].

3.4. Importance of the Circular Economy in the Nexus Study

The circular economy contributes to enhancing the world’s green economy, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and increasing global resource security [100]. The circular economy is the key to increasing nexus thinking in European countries by analyzing the whole life cycle of products [101]. The Netherlands uses circular economy technologies to reduce stress on the WE and WF nexus [100] by increasing recycling infrastructure. Another example is in southern Spain, where approximately 90% of wastewater is reused in the agricultural sector [102]. Moving toward the circular economy involves activities such as reducing wastage (zero waste), enhancing recycling, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions while increasing job opportunities (European Commission, 2014). The European Commission provided a new circular economy action in March 2020 with the aim of increasing sustainable growth and climate neutrality (European Commission, 2020). Integrating the nexus approach with the life cycle thinking approach provides a good opportunity for a circular economy [103].
In the existing WEF nexus studies, a lack of attention has been paid to considering the circular economy. Furthermore, a circular economy needs to be integrated with the WEFL nexus to increase resource use efficiency. Based on the existing nexus literature, it is obvious that there is an essential need to provide a systematic approach to analyze interactions between the use of water, energy, food, and land, for instance, in multiuser systems, waste, and byproducts, which can be reused for other product and services. Mitigating waste can contribute to maintaining products and materials at the biggest benefit at any time and reducing resource use and CO2 emissions and mitigating the WEFL nexus. This approach can be made by conducting a circular economy integrated with the WEFL nexus. The circular economy helps to increase resource protection and economic development. The circular use of products (for example, biomass) helps resource use efficiency and enhances production with high value in terms of reducing wastage. Considering the circular economy in the WEF nexus approach contributes to mitigating stress on natural resources and providing sustainable growth, it also helps to achieve climate neutrality and reduce biodiversity loss. The strategy helps the European green deal and clean energy strategy [104].

3.5. Research Gaps in European Countries

The review of scientific papers published before 2023 on the WEF nexus in European countries revealed several gaps. The most important issues are listed:
  • To date, most of the studies look at the WE and WEF nexus by considering historical data. There are very limited studies that considered future changes in water and energy demand due to climate change, although climate change is an important factor that impacts water availability, snowpack, and precipitation [105]. There is a lack of research that evaluates the impact of climate change on other pillars of the nexus framework in European countries. Climate change leads to some disasters, such as floods and drought, in some geographical areas [106,107]. It is expected that climate change puts pressure on water and energy resources; therefore, these dimensions need to be addressed in European countries appropriately. It is recommended to analyze the different climate change scenarios related to various pillars of the nexus on both the supply and demand side at a regional scale. There is no study that evaluates the interlinkage between food security, water stress, land security, and the migration of people as a result of climate change.
  • The majority of the papers focused on the energy sector and the interaction between water and energy. However, there is a lack of research on land use, land productivity, and land suitability. Moreover, there is a lack of attention on soil and the environment nexus, despite the fact that food security can only be achieved by having access to healthy soil for cultivating crops. Food and soil are interlinked and considering soil in the nexus could contribute to increasing sustainability in water quality and food by enhancing soil care development. Soil is a finite resource that can endanger food security by soil erosion in some geographical areas due to mismanagement [108].
  • Most of the nexus frameworks and approaches have only considered water consumption, and water quality is rarely taken into consideration. To date, there are no studies that consider both water quantity and quality as one of the nexus dimensions in the nexus framework in European countries, while just one work was conducted outside Europe [109]. Water quality in the nexus can contribute to identifying an appropriate solution for achieving sustainable development goals since environmental issues associated with low water quality leads to other social and economic problems. For example, low water quality can lead to other social and economic problems, such as a lack of equality and human well-being [110]. In more detail, water quality is identified as the chemical, substantial, and biological dimensions of water including water treatment. Only two studies by Fabiani, Vanino, Napoli, and Nino, 2020 [34] and Fabiani et al. (2020) [35] considered water quality in nexus evaluation in European countries. Another study in Thailand considered the water quality–energy–food nexus in aquaculture [109]. Water quality was evaluated in terms of pH, nitrite, suspended solids, total phosphorus, ortho-phosphate phosphorus, fecal coliform bacteria, dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity, and ammonia. One study by Fabiani, et al. (2020) only considered water quality, while water quantity was not considered in wheat production since wheat production was cultivated as a rainfed crop in their study area. Water quality was evaluated in terms of nitrate loss in green water during different fertilization applications. Another study conducted similar research in two regions (in Greece and the Czech Republic) to evaluate the water quality–energy–food nexus with a focus on sustainability (the economic and environmental dimensions) of variable rate technology (VRT) for wheat production in different fertilization methods [35]. Food and energy production need water in appropriate quality and efficient quantity. In return, energy production and crop cultivation can reduce water quality. The water quality in terms of well-being, health, and the environment is rarely considered by the WEF nexus approach [111]. One reported impact is the impact of biomass cultivation on soil and water pollution. For instance, one study in the USA on biofuel crop production shows that soybean and corn can help to reduce nitrate; however, water consumption increased [112].
  • Most of the nexus researchers in European countries focus on two pillars of the nexus rather than using a holistic nexus. There is a lack of studies on a comprehensive nexus that takes into account the possible interactions between the different resources, including water, energy, food, and land use. There is an essential need to provide a comprehensive approach in which all the resources are evaluated equally.
  • In the existing WEF nexus studies, a lack of attention has been paid to considering the circular economy. It is essential to consider circular economy needs to be integrated with the WEFL nexus to increase resource use efficiency, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and mitigate wastage.

4. Conclusions

This paper provides valuable and useful information about research papers related to nexus studies in European countries published before 2023. It provides important information for researchers to deeply understand the WEF nexus approach in different sectors. It also contributes to researchers and scholars knowing the existing nexus gaps in European countries, therefore suggesting the unanswered questions to be addressed in the near future.
It is indicated that resource security, optimal resource management, climate change adaptation, and policymaking are the main topics in nexus research. Based on existing literature, in European countries, more focus has been paid to the energy sector, the WE nexus, and bioenergy crop production. There is a lack of studies on the impact of climate change on the WEF nexus. Additionally, water quality is not considered in the nexus evaluation in European countries. This study confirms that the largest nexus studies were conducted in water scarcity countries to solve water stress, while the lowest studies were allocated to water-abundant countries.
Therefore, how does one face the interlinkage between food security, water security, land security, and the migration of people as a result of climate change? Firstly, the expected effects of climate change in a specific region must be identified based on an area-specific study. For example, within the so-called “Food Valley” in the Emilia Romagna Region (northern Italy), D’Oria et al. (2018) showed a substantial invariance of precipitation in the period 1986–2005, with changes that were comparable with the natural variability of the climate. Differently, the warming of the study area is unequivocal [113]. A progressive rise of atmospheric temperatures is expected with increments (i) up to +0.75 °C in the short term (until 2035), +1.5 °C in the medium term (2046–2065), and +2 °C in the long term (2081–2100) under RCP 4.5 assumed by the ICCP in the 5th Assessment Report (AR5, ICCP, 2014) and (ii) up to +4 °C in the long term with RCP 8.5 [114]. Similar results were obtained in the wider Mediterranean area by Todaro et al. (2022), who did not find any significant tendencies in precipitation but found upward trends in temperature, which were statistically significant for some sites over a historical period [115]. Therefore, what type of influence is expected as a consequence of this kind of climate change and, then, which specific problems must be solved (and how) in that region (or in similar ones)? Undoubtedly, there will be an increase in evapotranspiration and then a decrease in water availability. Nevertheless, recent studies also demonstrated that an upward trend in atmospheric temperature can also negatively influence the microbial groundwater quality [116,117,118], combining land desertification with the increase in human diseases. In some low-income countries, the combination of water scarcity and water pollution can force people to migrate, and the related problems can (must) be solved by designing problem- and site-specific approaches and solutions.
From a methodological perspective, the present review revealed that there is not a common and universal approach for nexus evaluations, suggesting the need to provide a standard and holistic approach. A new holistic framework is needed with the aim of enhancing the effectiveness of future nexus approaches by considering all of the resources/sectors, including water (quantity and quality), energy, food, land, and climate (the WqEFLC nexus).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization S.R.K. and F.C.; research design F.C. and S.R.K.; supervision F.C.; formal analysis S.R.K.; methodology S.R.K.; project administration F.C.; writing—original draft preparation S.R.K. and F.C.; editing F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has benefited from the equipment and framework of the COMP-HUB and COMP-R In-itiatives, funded by the ‘Departments of Excellence’ program of the Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR, 2018–2022 and MUR, 2023–2027).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research supported from the equipment and framework of the COMP-R Initiative, funded by the ‘Departments of Excellence’ program at the Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR, 2018–2022 and MUR, 2023–2027).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviation

LCALife Cycle Assessment
LW nexusLand–Water nexus
LWEF nexusLand–Water–Energy–Food nexus
WE nexusWater–Energy nexus
WEF nexusWater–Energy–Food nexus
WEFC nexusWater–Energy–Food–Climate nexus
WEFE nexusWater–Energy–Food–Environmental nexus
WEFLC nexusWater–Energy–Food–Land–Climate nexus
WEL nexusWater–Energy–Land nexus
WES nexusWater–Energy–Soil nexus
WqEFLC nexusWater (quantity–quality), Energy, Food, Land, and Climate nexus

References

  1. Li, M.; Fu, Q.; Singh, V.P.; Ji, Y.; Liu, D.; Zhang, C.; Li, T. An Optimal Modelling Approach for Managing Agricultural Water-Energy-Food Nexus under Uncertainty. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 1416–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hoff, H. Understanding the Nexus. Background Paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference ‘The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus’; Stockholm Environment Institute: Stockholm, Sweden, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tashtoush, F.M.; Al-Zubari, W.K.; Shah, A. A Review of the Water–Energy–Food Nexus Measurement and Management Approach. Int. J. Energy Water Resour. 2019, 3, 361–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. ICIMOD. Contribution of Himalayan Ecosystems to Water, Energy and Food Security in South Asia: A Nexus Approach; ICIMOD: Kathmandu, Nepal, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrews-Speed, P.; Bleischwitz, R.; Boersma, T.; Johnson, C.; Kemp, G.; VanDeveer, S.D. The Global Resource Nexus: The Struggles for Land, Energy, Food, Water, and Minerals; The Transatlantic Academy: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  6. Howells, M.; Hermann, S.; Welsch, M.; Bazilian, M.; Segerström, R.; Alfstad, T.; Gielen, D.; Rogner, H.; Fischer, G.; van Velthuizen, H.; et al. Integrated analysis of climate change, land-use, energy and water strategies. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2013, 3, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. UNECE. Reconciling Resource Uses in Transboundary Basins: Assessment of the Water-Food-Energy-Ecosystems Nexus; United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
  8. Tidwell, T.L. Nexus between Food, Energy, Water, and Forest Ecosystems in the USA. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2016, 6, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hatfield, J.L.; Sauer, T.J.; Cruse, R.M. Chapter One—Soil: The Forgotten Piece of the Water, Food, Energy Nexus. In Advances in Agronomy; Sparks, D.L., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017; Volume 143, pp. 1–46. [Google Scholar]
  10. FAO. The Water-Energy-Food Nexus at FAO: Concept Note; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins, J.A.; Fauser, B.C.J.M. Balancing the Strengths of Systematic and Narrative Reviews. Hum. Reprod. Update 2005, 11, 103–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Demiris, G.; Oliver, D.P.; Washington, K.T. Chapter 3—Defining and Analyzing the Problem. In Behavioral Intervention Research in Hospice and Palliative Care; Demiris, G., Oliver, D.P., Washington, K.T., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 27–39. ISBN 978-0-12-814449-7. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sachs, I.; Silk, D. Food and Energy: Strategies for Sustainable Development; United Nations University Press: Tokyo, Japan, 1990; ISBN 9280807579. [Google Scholar]
  14. McCalla, A. The Water, Food, and Trade Nexus. In Proceedings of the MENA-MED Conference Convened by the World Bank in Marrakesh, Marrakesh, Morocco, 3–6 September 1997. [Google Scholar]
  15. Merrett, S.; Allan, J.A.; Lant, C. Virtual Water—The Water, Food, and Trade Nexus Useful Concept or Misleading Metaphor? Water Int. 2003, 28, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hussey, K.; Pittock, J. The Energy-Water Nexus: Managing the Links between Energy and Water for a Sustainable Future. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 17, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Melo, F.P.L.; Parry, L.; Brancalion, P.H.S.; Pinto, S.R.R.; Freitas, J.; Manhães, A.P.; Meli, P.; Ganade, G.; Chazdon, R.L. Adding Forests to the Water–Energy–Food Nexus. Nat. Sustain. 2021, 4, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kahil, T.; Albiac, J.; Fischer, G.; Strokal, M.; Tramberend, S.; Greve, P.; Tang, T.; Burek, P.; Burtscher, R.; Wada, Y. A Nexus Modeling Framework for Assessing Water Scarcity Solutions. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 40, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Miglietta, P.P.; Morrone, D.; De Leo, F. The Water Footprint Assessment of Electricity Production: An Overview of the Economic-Water-Energy Nexus in Italy. Sustainability 2018, 10, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bonato, M.; Ranzani, A.; Patro, E.R.; Gaudard, L.; De Michele, C. Water-Energy Nexus for an Italian Storage Hydropower Plant under Multiple Drivers. Water 2019, 11, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Comino, E.; Dominici, L.; Ambrogio, F.; Rosso, M. Mini-Hydro Power Plant for the Improvement of Urban Water-Energy Nexus toward Sustainability—A Case Study. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 249, 119416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kałuża, T.; Hämmerling, M.; Zawadzki, P.; Czekała, W.; Kasperek, R.; Sojka, M.; Mokwa, M.; Ptak, M.; Szkudlarek, A.; Czechlowski, M.; et al. The Hydropower Sector in Poland: Barriers and the Outlook for the Future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 163, 112500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Espinosa-Tasón, J.; Berbel, J.; Gutiérrez-Martín, C. Energized Water: Evolution of Water-Energy Nexus in the Spanish Irrigated Agriculture, 1950–2017. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 233, 106073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sesma-Martín, D.; Rubio-Varas, M. The Weak Data on the Water–Energy Nexus in Spain. Water Policy 2019, 21, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Villamayor-Tomas, S. Polycentricity in the Water–Energy Nexus: A Comparison of Polycentric Governance Traits and Implications for Adaptive Capacity of Water User Associations in Spain. Environ. Policy Gov. 2018, 28, 252–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Villamayor-Tomas, S. Chapter 2.1.3—The Water–Energy Nexus in Europe and Spain: An Institutional Analysis from the Perspective of the Spanish Irrigation Sector. In Competition for Water Resources; Ziolkowska, J.R., Peterson, J.M.B.T., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 105–122. ISBN 978-0-12-803237-4. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, M.; Keller, A.A.; Chiang, P.-C.; Den, W.; Wang, H.; Hou, C.-H.; Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Yan, J. Water-Energy Nexus for Urban Water Systems: A Comparative Review on Energy Intensity and Environmental Impacts in Relation to Global Water Risks. Appl. Energy 2017, 205, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lechón, Y.; De La Rúa, C.; Cabal, H. Impacts of Decarbonisation on the Water-Energy-Land (WEL) Nexus: A Case Study of the Spanish Electricity Sector. Energies 2018, 11, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pltonykova, H.; Koeppel, S.; Bernardini, F.; Tiefenauer-Linardon, S.; de Strasser, L. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2020: Water and Climate Change; UN-Water: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dai, J.; Wu, S.; Han, G.; Weinberg, J.; Xie, X.; Wu, X.; Song, X.; Jia, B.; Xue, W.; Yang, Q. Water-Energy Nexus: A Review of Methods and Tools for Macro-Assessment. Appl. Energy 2018, 210, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mabrey, D.; Vittorio, M. Moving from Theory to Practice in the Water–Energy–Food Nexus: An Evaluation of Existing Models and Frameworks. Water-Energy Nexus 2018, 1, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  32. Viccaro, M.; Caniani, D.; Masi, S.; Romano, S.; Cozzi, M. Biofuels or Not Biofuels? The “Nexus Thinking” in Land Suitability Analysis for Energy Crops. Renew. Energy 2022, 187, 1050–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. de Vito, R.; Portoghese, I.; Pagano, A.; Fratino, U.; Vurro, M. An Index-Based Approach for the Sustainability Assessment of Irrigation Practice Based on the Water-Energy-Food Nexus Framework. Adv. Water Resour. 2017, 110, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fabiani, S.; Vanino, S.; Napoli, R.; Nino, P. Water Energy Food Nexus Approach for Sustainability Assessment at Farm Level: An Experience from an Intensive Agricultural Area in Central Italy. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 104, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fabiani, S.; Vanino, S.; Napoli, R.; Zajíček, A.; Duffková, R.; Evangelou, E.; Nino, P. Assessment of the Economic and Environmental Sustainability of Variable Rate Technology (VRT) Application in Different Wheat Intensive European Agricultural Areas. A Water Energy Food Nexus Approach. Environ. Sci. Policy 2020, 114, 366–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sušnik, J.; Chew, C.; Domingo, X.; Mereu, S.; Trabucco, A.; Evans, B.; Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L.; Savić, D.A.; Laspidou, C.; Brouwer, F. Multi-Stakeholder Development of a Serious Game to Explore the Water-Energy-Food-Land-Climate Nexus: The SIM4NEXUS Approach. Water 2018, 10, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Campana, P.E.; Zhang, J.; Yao, T.; Andersson, S.; Landelius, T.; Melton, F.; Yan, J. Managing Agricultural Drought in Sweden Using a Novel Spatially-Explicit Model from the Perspective of Water-Food-Energy Nexus. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 1382–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Campana, P.E.; Landelius, T.; Melton, F.S. Using Artificial Intelligence for the Water-Food-Energy Nexus Management during Drought in Sweden. In Proceedings of the AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, San Francisco, CA, USA, 9–13 December 2019; Volume 2019, p. PA23B-1160. [Google Scholar]
  39. Campana, P.E.; Lastanao, P.; Zainali, S.; Zhang, J.; Landelius, T.; Melton, F. Towards an Operational Irrigation Management System for Sweden with a Water–Food–Energy Nexus Perspective. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 271, 107734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Teutschbein, C.; Jonsson, E.; Todorović, A.; Tootoonchi, F.; Stenfors, E.; Grabs, T. Future Drought Propagation through the Water-Energy-Food-Ecosystem Nexus—A Nordic Perspective. J. Hydrol. 2023, 617, 128963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Baganz, G.F.M.; Schrenk, M.; Körner, O.; Baganz, D.; Keesman, K.J.; Goddek, S.; Siscan, Z.; Baganz, E.; Doernberg, A.; Monsees, H. Causal Relations of Upscaled Urban Aquaponics and the Food-Water-Energy Nexus—A Berlin Case Study. Water 2021, 13, 2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Borg, M.; Little, D.; Telfer, T.C.; Price, C. Scoping the Potential Role of Aquaponics in Addressing Challenges Posed by the Food-Water-Energy Nexus Using the Maltese Islands as a Case-Study. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Growing Media and Soilless Cultivation 1034, Leiden, The Netherlands, 17–21 June 2013; pp. 163–168. [Google Scholar]
  43. Venkatesh, G.; Chan, A.; Brattebø, H. Understanding the Water-Energy-Carbon Nexus in Urban Water Utilities: Comparison of Four City Case Studies and the Relevant Influencing Factors. Energy 2014, 75, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Del Río-Gamero, B.; Ramos-Martín, A.; Melián-Martel, N.; Pérez-Báez, S. Water-Energy Nexus: A Pathway of Reaching the Zero Net Carbon in Wastewater Treatment Plants. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yoon, H.; Sauri, D.; Rico Amorós, A.M. Shifting Scarcities? The Energy Intensity of Water Supply Alternatives in the Mass Tourist Resort of Benidorm, Spain. Sustainability 2018, 10, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Santos, C.; Taveira-Pinto, F.; Pereira, D.; Matos, C. Analysis of the Water–Energy Nexus of Treated Wastewater Reuse at a Municipal Scale. Water 2021, 13, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ramos, H.M.; Giralt, L.; López-Jiménez, P.A.; Pérez-Sánchez, M. Water-Energy Nexus Management Strategy towards Sustainable Mobility Goal in Smart Cities. Urban Water J. 2021, 12, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jorge, C.; Almeida, M.D.C.; Brito, R.S.; Covas, D. Water, Energy, and Emissions Nexus: Effect of Inflows in Urban Drainage Systems. Water 2022, 14, 868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kalvani, S.R.; Sharaai, A.H.; Manaf, L.A.; Hamidian, A.H. Review on Water Footprint Method In Different Sectors. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 1778–1785. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sala, S.; Anton, A.; McLaren, S.J.; Notarnicola, B.; Saouter, E.; Sonesson, U. In Quest of Reducing the Environmental Impacts of Food Production and Consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pacetti, T.; Lombardi, L.; Federici, G. Water–energy Nexus: A case of biogas production from energy crops evaluated by Water Footprint and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methods. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 101, 278–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arfelli, F.; Ciacci, L.; Vassura, I.; Passarini, F. Nexus Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Regional Water Supply Systems: A Case Study from Italy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 185, 106446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Irabien, A.; Darton, R.C. Energy–Water–Food Nexus in the Spanish Greenhouse Tomato Production. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2016, 18, 1307–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Leivas, R.; Laso, J.; Abejón, R.; Margallo, M.; Aldaco, R. Environmental Assessment of Food and Beverage under a NEXUS Water-Energy-Climate Approach: Application to the Spirit Drinks. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 720, 137576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Marinelli, E.; Radini, S.; Akyol, Ç.; Sgroi, M.; Eusebi, A.L.; Bischetti, G.B.; Mancini, A.; Fatone, F. Water-Energy-Food-Climate Nexus in an Integrated Peri-Urban Wastewater Treatment and Reuse System: From Theory to Practice. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aguilera, E.; Vila-Traver, J.; Deemer, B.R.; Infante-Amate, J.; Guzmán, G.I.; Gonzalez de Molina, M. Methane Emissions from Artificial Waterbodies Dominate the Carbon Footprint of Irrigation: A Study of Transitions in the Food–Energy–Water–Climate Nexus (Spain, 1900–2014). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 5091–5101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Willaarts, B.A.; Lechón, Y.; Mayor, B.; de la Rúa, C.; Garrido, A. Cross-Sectoral Implications of the Implementation of Irrigation Water Use Efficiency Policies in Spain: A Nexus Footprint Approach. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 109, 105795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ford, A.; Ford, F.A. Modeling the Environment: An Introduction to System Dynamics Models of Environmental Systems, 1st ed.; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  59. González-Rosell, A.; Blanco, M.; Arfa, I. Integrating Stakeholder Views and System Dynamics to Assess the Water–Energy–Food Nexus in Andalusia. Water 2020, 12, 3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Susnik, J.; Masia, S.; Indriksone, D.; Bremere, I.; Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L.; Brouwer, F. Integrated System Dynamics Modelling of the Water-Energy-Food-Land-Climate Nexus in Latvia: Exploring the Impact of Policy Measures in a Nexus-Wide Context. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Visual, 19–30 April 2021; p. EGU21-1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Krause, F. Rhythms of Wet and Dry: Temporalising the Land-Water Nexus. Geoforum 2022, 131, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Masia, S.; Sušnik, J.; Indriksone, D.; Bremere, I.; Vamvakeridou-Lyroudia, L.S.; Brouwer, F. A System Dynamics Model to Explore the Water-Land-Energy-Food-Climate Nexus in Latvia. In Proceedings of the 38th IAHR World Congress (Panama, 2019), Panama City, Panama, 1–6 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  63. Silalertruksa, T.; Gheewala, S.H. Land-Water-Energy Nexus of Sugarcane Production in Thailand. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 182, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ghodsvali, M.; Dane, G.; de Vries, B. The Nexus Social-Ecological System Framework (NexSESF): A Conceptual and Empirical Examination of Transdisciplinary Food-Water-Energy Nexus. Environ. Sci. Policy 2022, 130, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Janssen, D.N.G.; Ramos, E.P.; Linderhof, V.; Polman, N.; Laspidou, C.; Fokkinga, D.; de Mesquita e Sousa, D. The Climate, Land, Energy, Water and Food Nexus Challenge in a Land Scarce Country: Innovations in the Netherlands. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Marttunen, M.; Mustajoki, J.; Sojamo, S.; Ahopelto, L.; Keskinen, M. A Framework for Assessing Water Security and the Water–Energy–Food Nexus—The Case of Finland. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Yoon, H.; Saurí, D. ‘No More Thirst, Cold, or Darkness!’—Social Movements, Households, and the Coproduction of Knowledge on Water and Energy Vulnerability in Barcelona, Spain. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2019, 58, 101276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Girotto, F.; Galeazzi, A.; Manenti, F.; Gueguen, S.; Piazza, L. Water-food-energy Nexus-assessing Challenges in the Trend towards Digitalization: The Case Study of an Italian Winemaking Industry. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2022, 41, e13893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gondhalekar, D.; Ramsauer, T. Nexus City: Operationalizing the Urban Water-Energy-Food Nexus for Climate Change Adaptation in Munich, Germany. Urban Clim. 2017, 19, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Märker, C.; Venghaus, S.; Hake, J.-F. Integrated Governance for the Food–Energy–Water Nexus–The Scope of Action for Institutional Change. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 97, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sehn, V.; Blesl, M. Implications of National Climate Targets on the Energy-Water Nexus in Germany: A Case Study. J. Sustain. Dev. Energy Water Environ. Syst. 2021, 9, 1080344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pahl-Wostl, C. Governance of the Water-Energy-Food Security Nexus: A Multi-Level Coordination Challenge. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 92, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Schwindenhammer, S.; Gonglach, D. SDG Implementation through Technology? Governing Food-Water-Technology Nexus Challenges in Urban Agriculture. Politics Gov. 2021, 9, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Holger, S.; Sandra, V.; Jürgen-Friedrich, H. Green Economy Innovation Index (GEII)—A Normative Innovation Approach for Germany & Its FEW Nexus. Energy Procedia 2017, 142, 2310–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Al-Shaar, W.; Bonin, O.; de Gouvello, B.; Chatellier, P.; Hendel, M. Geographically Weighted Regression-Based Predictions of Water–Soil–Energy Nexus Solutions in Île-de-France. Urban Sci. 2022, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ghodsvali, M.; Dane, G.; de Vries, B. An Online Serious Game for Decision-Making on Food-Water-Energy Nexus Policy. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 87, 104220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mayor, B.; López-Gunn, E.; Villarroya, F.I.; Montero, E. Application of a Water–Energy–Food Nexus Framework for the Duero River Basin in Spain. Water Int. 2015, 40, 791–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Martinez, P.; Blanco, M.; Castro-Campos, B. The Water–Energy–Food Nexus: A Fuzzy-Cognitive Mapping Approach to Support Nexus-Compliant Policies in Andalusia (Spain). Water 2018, 10, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Elena, G.-C.; Esther, V. From Water to Energy: The Virtual Water Content and Water Footprint of Biofuel Consumption in Spain. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 1345–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Soto-García, M.; Martin-Gorriz, B.; García-Bastida, P.A.; Alcon, F.; Martínez-Alvarez, V. Energy Consumption for Crop Irrigation in a Semiarid Climate (South-Eastern Spain). Energy 2013, 55, 1084–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yoon, H.; Sauri, D.; Rico, A. The Water-Energy Nexus in Hotels and Recreational Activities of a Mass Tourism Resort: The Case of Benidorm. Curr. Issues Tour. 2022, 25, 592–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Larsen, M.A.D.; Drews, M. Water Use in Electricity Generation for Water-Energy Nexus Analyses: The European Case. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 2044–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Serrano-Tovar, T.; Suárez, B.P.; Musicki, A.; Juan, A.; Cabello, V.; Giampietro, M. Structuring an Integrated Water-Energy-Food Nexus Assessment of a Local Wind Energy Desalination System for Irrigation. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 689, 945–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, X.-C.; Klemeš, J.J.; Long, X.; Zhang, P.; Varbanov, P.S.; Fan, W.; Dong, X.; Wang, Y. Measuring the Environmental Performance of the EU27 from the Water-Energy-Carbon Nexus Perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 265, 121832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Oliveira, M.C.; Iten, M.; Matos, H.A.; Michels, J. Water–Energy Nexus in Typical Industrial Water Circuits. Water 2019, 11, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Karabulut, A.; Egoh, B.N.; Lanzanova, D.; Grizzetti, B.; Bidoglio, G.; Pagliero, L.; Bouraoui, F.; Aloe, A.; Reynaud, A.; Maes, J.; et al. Mapping Water Provisioning Services to Support the Ecosystem–Water–Food–Energy Nexus in the Danube River Basin. Ecosyst. Serv. 2016, 17, 278–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Neves, M.C.; Malmgren, K.; Neves, R.M. Climate-Driven Variability in the Context of the Water-Energy Nexus: A Case Study in Southern Portugal. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 320, 128828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Teotónio, C.; Rodríguez, M.; Roebeling, P.; Fortes, P. Water Competition through the ‘Water-Energy’ Nexus: Assessing the Economic Impacts of Climate Change in a Mediterranean Context. Energy Econ. 2020, 85, 104539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rodrigues, F.; Silva-Afonso, A.; Pinto, A.; Macedo, J.; Santos, A.S.; Pimentel-Rodrigues, C. Increasing Water and Energy Efficiency in University Buildings: A Case Study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 4571–4581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. da Conceição Neves, M.; Neves, R.M. Exploring the Interplay between Water Availability and Solar and Wind Energy Potential in the Algarve (Portugal). In Water-Energy-Nexus in the Ecological Transition; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 63–65. [Google Scholar]
  91. Meireles, I.; Sousa, V. Assessing Water, Energy and Emissions Reduction from Water Conservation Measures in Buildings: A Methodological Approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 4612–4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Calise, F.; Cappiello, F.L.; Vicidomini, M.; Petrakopoulou-Robinson, F. Water-Energy Nexus: A Thermoeconomic Analysis of Polygeneration Systems for Small Mediterranean Islands. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 220, 113043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Halbe, J.; Pahl-Wostl, C.; Lange, M.A.; Velonis, C. Governance of Transitions towards Sustainable Development–The Water–Energy–Food Nexus in Cyprus. Water Int. 2015, 40, 877–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Moioli, E.; Salvati, F.; Chiesa, M.; Siecha, R.T.; Manenti, F.; Laio, F.; Rulli, M.C. Analysis of the Current World Biofuel Production under a Water–Food–Energy Nexus Perspective. Adv. Water Resour. 2018, 121, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ziogou, I.; Zachariadis, T. Quantifying the Water–Energy Nexus in Greece. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 2017, 36, 972–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Walsh, B.P.; Murray, S.N.; O’Sullivan, D.T.J. The Water Energy Nexus, an ISO50001 Water Case Study and the Need for a Water Value System. Water Resour. Ind. 2015, 10, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Petrariu, R.; Constantin, M.; Dinu, M.; Pătărlăgeanu, S.R.; Deaconu, M.E. Water, Energy, Food, Waste Nexus: Between Synergy and Trade-Offs in Romania Based on Entrepreneurship and Economic Performance. Energies 2021, 14, 5172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. van den Heuvel, L.; Blicharska, M.; Masia, S.; Sušnik, J.; Teutschbein, C. Ecosystem Services in the Swedish Water-Energy-Food-Land-Climate Nexus: Anthropogenic Pressures and Physical Interactions. Ecosyst. Serv. 2020, 44, 101141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Veijalainen, N.; Ahopelto, L.; Marttunen, M.; Jääskeläinen, J.; Britschgi, R.; Orvomaa, M.; Belinskij, A.; Keskinen, M. Severe Drought in Finland: Modeling Effects on Water Resources and Assessing Climate Change Impacts. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Brears, R. The Circular Economy and the Water-Energy-Food Nexus. 2015. Available online: https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/17904 (accessed on 17 January 2023).
  101. Brandoni, C.; Bošnjaković, B. Energy, Food and Water Nexus in the European Union: Towards a Circular Economy. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 2018, 171, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Navarro, T. Water Reuse and Desalination in Spain–Challenges and Opportunities. J. Water Reuse Desalination 2018, 8, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Ruiz-Salmón, I.; Margallo, M.; Laso, J.; Villanueva-Rey, P.; Mariño, D.; Quinteiro, P.; Dias, A.C.; Nunes, M.L.; Marques, A.; Feijoo, G.; et al. Addressing Challenges and Opportunities of the European Seafood Sector under a Circular Economy Framework. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2020, 13, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. European Commission. A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2018; ISBN 9789279941450. [Google Scholar]
  105. Liu, Q. Interlinking Climate Change with Water-Energy-Food Nexus and Related Ecosystem Processes in California Case Studies. Ecol. Process. 2016, 5, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Famiglietti, J.S. The Global Groundwater Crisis. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 945–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Bandara, J.S.; Cai, Y. The Impact of Climate Change on Food Crop Productivity, Food Prices and Food Security in South Asia. Econ. Anal. Policy 2014, 44, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Pozza, L.E.; Field, D.J. The Science of Soil Security and Food Security. Soil Secur. 2020, 1, 100002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mrozik, W.; Vinitnantharat, S.; Thongsamer, T.; Pansuk, N.; Pattanachan, P.; Thayanukul, P.; Acharya, K.; Baluja, M.Q.; Hazlerigg, C.; Robson, A.F. The Food-Water Quality Nexus in Periurban Aquacultures Downstream of Bangkok, Thailand. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 695, 133923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ghodsvali, M.; Krishnamurthy, S.; de Vries, B. Review of Transdisciplinary Approaches to Food-Water-Energy Nexus: A Guide towards Sustainable Development. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 101, 266–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Varis, O.; Keskinen, M. Discussion of “Challenges in Operationalizing the Water–Energy–Food Nexus”. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2018, 63, 1863–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Ng, T.L.; Eheart, J.W.; Cai, X.; Braden, J.B. An Agent-based Model of Farmer Decision-making and Water Quality Impacts at the Watershed Scale under Markets for Carbon Allowances and a Second-generation Biofuel Crop. Water Resour. Res. 2011, 47, 10399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. D’Oria, M.; Cozzi, C.; Tanda, M.G. Future Precipitation and Temperature Changes over the Taro, Parma and Enza River Basins in Northern Italy. Ital. J. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2018, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Pachauri, R.K.; Allen, M.R.; Barros, V.R.; Broome, J.; Cramer, W.; Christ, R.; Church, J.A.; Clarke, L.; Dahe, Q.; Dasgupta, P. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; ISBN 9291691437. [Google Scholar]
  115. Todaro, V.; D’Oria, M.; Secci, D.; Zanini, A.; Tanda, M.G. Climate Change over the Mediterranean Region: Local Temperature and Precipitation Variations at Five Pilot Sites. Water 2022, 14, 2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Allocca, V.; Celico, F.; Petrella, E.; Marzullo, G.; Naclerio, G. The Role of Land Use and Environmental Factors on Microbial Pollution of Mountainous Limestone Aquifers. Environ. Geol. 2008, 55, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bucci, A.; Allocca, V.; Naclerio, G.; Capobianco, G.; Divino, F.; Fiorillo, F.; Celico, F. Winter Survival of Microbial Contaminants in Soil: An in Situ Verification. J. Environ. Sci. 2015, 27, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Allocca, V.; Tramontano, M.; Celico, F. The Impact of Cattle Grazing on Recreational Ecosystem Services in a Park Area: A Gray Water Footprint Assessment. J. Environ. Account. Manag. 2022, 10, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The number of nexus studies in European countries before 2023.
Figure 1. The number of nexus studies in European countries before 2023.
Sustainability 15 04960 g001
Figure 2. The percentage of different types of nexus in studies that were carried out before 2023.
Figure 2. The percentage of different types of nexus in studies that were carried out before 2023.
Sustainability 15 04960 g002
Figure 3. The number of studies for each resource/sector before 2023.
Figure 3. The number of studies for each resource/sector before 2023.
Sustainability 15 04960 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rezaei Kalvani, S.; Celico, F. The Water–Energy–Food Nexus in European Countries: A Review and Future Perspectives. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064960

AMA Style

Rezaei Kalvani S, Celico F. The Water–Energy–Food Nexus in European Countries: A Review and Future Perspectives. Sustainability. 2023; 15(6):4960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064960

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rezaei Kalvani, Somayeh, and Fulvio Celico. 2023. "The Water–Energy–Food Nexus in European Countries: A Review and Future Perspectives" Sustainability 15, no. 6: 4960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064960

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop