Multi-Source Data-Based Evaluation of Suitability of Land for Elderly Care and Layout Optimization: A Case Study of Changsha, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Sources
2.3. Indicator System
An Evaluation Index System for the Suitability of Elderly Land Development
2.4. Methodology
2.4.1. Buffer Analysis
2.4.2. Thiessen Polygon
- (1)
- Each polygon contains and contains only one discrete point;
- (2)
- If any point (x1, y1) on region B lies within the polygon containing the discrete point (xi, yj), then the following:
- (3)
- If the point (x1, y1) lies on the common side of two polygons containing the discrete point (xi, yj), then the following:
2.4.3. Suitability Evaluation
3. Results and Analysis
3.1. Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Land Development Suitability for Elderly Facilities
3.2. Comprehensive Evaluation Grade Analysis of Land Suitability for Elderly Facilities
- (1)
- Suitable area. The land use characteristics in this type of area are optimal for senior facilities. The index range of community home suitable area is 2.95 to 4.82, accounting for 9.99% of the study area; the index range of institutional suitable area is 2.73 to 4.42, accounting for 10.06%, and the distribution of the two is very similar, concentrated in the municipal district and distributed in a row, and clustered sporadically in the north and south direction of the suburbs and the township centers on the outskirts of the city.
- (2)
- More suitable area. Its construction and development conditions are second only to the suitable construction area, but certain indicators have disadvantages and the development is constrained to some extent. The community home range is 1.55–2.73, accounting for 13.76%; the institutional range is 1.63–2.73, accounting for 12.37%. Spatially, they are all concentrated around the municipal district, extending in the north-south direction, and clustered in a point-like manner in the townships of Changsha County and Wangcheng District.
- (3)
- Less suitable areas. There are more negative characteristics in this category, which hinders the total development of property for senior amenities. The range of the community house index is 0.92 to 1.78, representing 30.25%; the range of the institution index is 0.79 to 1.63, representing 26.7%. Overall, the distribution is comparable, with residential land use and transportation route direction accounting for the majority of the dispersion outside of the municipal area.
- (4)
- Unsuitable area. This category is spread in regions where all indicators are deficient, and it is nearly inappropriate for development and construction usage as land for senior care institutions. The range for community homes is between 0.28 and 0.92, accounting for 45.88% of the total area, whereas the range for institutions is between 0.11 and 0.79, accounting for 50.14%of the total area, indicating that the land requirements for institutional elderly facilities are higher and more stringent for all indicators.
3.3. Suggestions
3.3.1. Optimization of Layout Suggestions
3.3.2. Exploring Strategies for Redeveloping the Stock of Land
4. Conclusions and Discussion
4.1. Discussion
4.2. Conclusions
- (1)
- The spatial distribution characteristics of “strong in the middle and weak in the surroundings” are shown in the evaluation of the suitability of land for elderly facilities. The suitable areas are mainly concentrated in the central part of the city, while the less suitable and unsuitable areas are mainly concentrated in the suburbs and account for more than half of the area. In order to meet the expanding demand for land for elderly facilities, we should also continuously improve the construction of medical and transportation infrastructure in the suburbs to improve the suitability of land for elderly facilities and reserve backup resources.
- (2)
- The Thiessen model centered on senior care facilities shows that the spatial distribution of senior care facilities in different modes varies significantly, with community home senior care facilities concentrated in urban centers and institutional senior care facilities spread throughout urban areas, but both have in common that the number of facilities in central cities is significantly higher than that in suburban areas, and the allocation of senior care facilities in urban and rural areas is less balanced.
- (3)
- To optimize the spatial layout of land for elderly facilities, the following strategies are proposed. ① Enhance the hierarchical structure of senior care institutions in accordance with Changsha Civil Affairs Bureau’s design in order to establish a three-tiered senior care service structure of “district-county-community-street (township)” that connects urban and rural areas effectively. For different types of land proposed for the elderly: the land for the elderly under the jurisdiction of the city due to its high suitability and dense elderly population, to the streets as a unit, with an emphasis on the layout of community home care facilities to provide basic protection for the elderly. In the suburban areas, the elderly population is relatively dense, the traffic and medical facilities are complete, and the overall suitability is good, so the investment in community home and institutional elderly care facilities should be increased; in the peripheral areas of the city, more medium- and high-end elderly institutions can be built; in the distant suburbs, combined with the characteristics of its extensive and sparse population, large elderly institutions should be set up around the township centers, the more suitable areas with developed traffic networks and better medical facilities to expand the scope of services should be expanded. ② Based on the evaluation results of suitability of senior citizen land constructed in this paper, and from the perspective of urban stock land, we actively explore the potential senior citizen land, and take Tianxin District of Yuhua District as a case study, and propose alternative sites for new senior citizen facilities to effectively relieve the pressure on community senior citizens.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Liao, Y.; Lei, A.; Huang, Q.; Zhou, T. Research on pension land policy. China Land 2013, 3, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X. Current situation and regional differences of disability in the elderly population in China. Chin. J. Gerontol. 2022, 42, 1197–1201. [Google Scholar]
- Feng, J.; Hong, G.; Qian, W.; Hu, R.; Shi, G. Aging in China: An International and Domestic Comparative Study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Han, Y. Spatio-temporal evolution of china’s rural population aging and rural revitalization countermeasures. Geogr. Res. 2019, 38, 667–683. [Google Scholar]
- Central Committee of the Communist Party of China State Council. Outline of the Tenth Five-Year Plan for the Development of China’s Aging Career (2001–2005). Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-09/23/content_5111148.htm?from=timeline&isappinstalled=0 (accessed on 28 December 2022). (In Chinese)
- Central Committee of the Communist Party of China State Counci. National Plan for the Development of the Aged Cause and the Elderly Care Service System during the “Fourteenth Five Year Plan”. Available online: https://www.mca.gov.cn/article/xw/mtbd/202202/20220200039833.shtml (accessed on 28 December 2022). (In Chinese)
- Dizon, L.; Wiles, J.; Peiris-John, R. What Is Meaningful Participation for Older People? An Analysis of Aging Policies. Gerontologist 2020, 60, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haines Terry Robinson Andrew, L.; Palmer Andrew, J. A new model of care and in-house general practitioners for residential aged care facilities. Med. J. Aust. 2021, 215, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gan, D. Study on the Dilemma and Suggestions of Rural Pension Model in China. World Sci. Res. J. 2022, 8, 97–101. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, M.; Wu, B.; Li, T. Analysis on the Development Status and Prospects of the Intelligent Pension Model in Tianjin. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2019, 7, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shuang, G.; Lu, Y.; Tao, P. Research Progress on the Model of Combining Medical and Elderly Care in Foreign Countries. J. Nurs. 2021, 36, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
- Yi, H.; Xiaoguang, T. Analysis on the current situation of aging population in Chinese. Chin. J. Gerontol. 2012, 32, 4853–4855. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, X.; Hu, Z. Aging of Chinese population from the perspective of public policy. Chin. Soc. Sci. 2011, 32, 106–124. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, A.; Liu, S.; Ma, Z. Population Aging, Population Growth and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from China’s Interprovincial Panel Data. Popul. Res. 2012, 36, 14–26. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, X.; Wu, D.; Xu, Z. A Review of Aging Geography in China and the Construction of a Research Framework. Prog. Geogr. 2015, 34, 1480–1494. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Fang, Y. Multi-scale spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of population aging in Northeast China. Reg. Res. Dev. 2021, 40, 147–153. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, B.; Huang, B.; Zeng, B. Demand and suitability evaluation of “six-in-one” senior living circle facilities: Taking Gulou District of Nanjing as an example. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2022, 22, 5860–5870. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S.; Liu, H.; Wang, H. Research on the Equilibrium of Institutional Pension Facilities in Tianjin Downtown. Mod. Urban Res. 2022, 1, 38–44. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, X.; Luo, J.; Zhao, G. Research on the Needs and Influencing Factors of Embedded Elderly Care Services in the Elderly Community. J. Nurs. 2022, 37, 91–93. [Google Scholar]
- Peng, J.; Xin, L.; Yang, H. Research on Planning and Layout of Elderly Service Facilities Based on Supply and Demand Matching. J. Geo-Inf. Sci. 2022, 24, 1349–1362. [Google Scholar]
- Ling, Q. Research on the Improvement and Implementation of Land Use Policy for Old-age Service Facilities in China. Contemp. Econ. Manag. 2016, 38, 52–55. [Google Scholar]
- Lu, J.; Guo, F.; Chen, J. Rural Pension System Design in the New Era: Historical Context, Practical Dilemma and Development Path. J. China Agric. Univ. 2021, 38, 113–122. [Google Scholar]
- Xuerui, Q. On the supply optimization and supervision of pension land. China Land Resour. Econ. 2019, 32, 58–62. [Google Scholar]
- Mu, H. From “Pyramid” to “Olive Type”: The Design and Optimization of the New Three-Pillar Old-age Security System. Soc. Sci. 2022, 1, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, B.; Ji, Y.; Zhao, X.; Qiu, W. Research on spatial accessibility of elderly care institutions in Xuzhou based on GIS. J. Suzhou Univ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 38, 65–69+75. [Google Scholar]
- Yong, T. Study on the key factors and characteristics of the future elderly care model. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2020, 127, 291. [Google Scholar]
- Amini-Behbahani, P.; Meng, L.; Gu, N. Walking distances from services and destinations for residential aged-care centres in Australian cities. J. Transp. Geogr. 2020, 85, 102707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, Z. Spatial Matching and Policy-Planning Evaluation of Urban Elderly Care Facilities Based on Multi-Agent Simulation: Evidence from Shanghai, China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16183. [Google Scholar]
- Rahouti, A.; Lovreglio, R.; Nilsson, D.; Kuligowski, E.; Jackson, P.; Rothas, F. Investigating Evacuation Behaviour in Retirement Facilities: Case Studies from New Zealand. Fire Technol. 2021, 57, 1015–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Liu, H.; Zhang, S. Research on Spatial Layout Evaluation of Institutional Elderly Care Facilities in Downtown Tianjin. Urban Hous. 2020, 27, 123–127. [Google Scholar]
- Crooks, V.A.; Finlay, J.; Widener, M. Introduction to the special section: The changing geographies of aging. Can. Geogr. 2022, 66, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xin, Y. How China Responds to the Challenge of Population Aging. Natl. Gov. 2014, 21, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
- Hunan Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Bulletin of the Seventh National Census of Hunan Province (No. 4). Available online: http://tjj.hunan.gov.cn/hntj/wzzl/hnsdqcqgrkpc/qrptzgg/202105/t20210519_19054787.html (accessed on 30 December 2022).
- Hunan Provincial Bureau of Statistics. Hunan Statistical Yearbook (1998–2018); China Statistical Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Li, S.; Song, Q.; Yuan, S. Research on Site selection of elderly care real estate projects based on GIS: A case study of Tianjin. J. Tianjin Univ. 2017, 19, 204–209. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, C.; Li, Y.; Sun, X.; Xu, J.; Fu, Z. Urban public bicycle demand forecast considering land use. J. South China Univ. Technol. 2022, 50, 9–20+37. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, C.; Zhang, D.; He, X. Transportation Accessibility Evaluation of Educational Institutions Conducting Field Environmental Education Activities in Ecological Protection Areas: A Case Study of Zhuhai City. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, M.; Yong, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, X. Spatial layout optimization of rural residential areas under the guidance of urban-rural integration: A case study of Tongshan District, Xuzhou City. Geogr. Geo-Inf. Sci. 2022, 5, 104–110. [Google Scholar]
Data Source | Classification | Quantity |
---|---|---|
POI data | Park | 218 |
Factory | 1555 | |
Residence | 4262 | |
Public transport stations | 4244 | |
Subway Stations | 135 | |
Medical and Health Facilities | 601 | |
Senior Care Facilities | 200 |
Target Layer | Guideline Layer | Indicator Layer | Expert Scoring Method Weights | AHP Weights | Final Weights |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
land development for institutional elderly facilities | Environmental Factor B1 | Park Distance C1 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
Water system lake distance C2 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.06 | ||
Factory distance from C3 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.05 | ||
Rail distance C4 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.04 | ||
Residential land use distance C5 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | ||
Supporting facilities factor B2 | Bus stop distance C6 | 0.07 | 0.1 | 0.08 | |
Subway Station Distance C7 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.07 | ||
Distance of traffic road C8 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 | ||
Living road network density C9 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.07 | ||
Hospital distance C10 | 0.11 | 0.28 | 0.20 | ||
Socio-economic factors B3 | Population density of the elderly aged 65 and over C11 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.05 | |
GDP per capita C12 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.06 | ||
Disposable income per capita C13 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.08 |
Target Layer | Guideline Layer | Indicator Layer | Expert Scoring Method Weights | AHP Weights | Final Weights |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
land development for community home care facilities | Environmental Factor B1 | Water system lake distance C1 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
Park Distance C2 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.15 | ||
Supporting facilities factor B2 | Bus stop distance C3 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.11 | |
Subway Station Distance C4 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||
Traffic road distance C5 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 | ||
Density of living road network C6 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | ||
Hospital distance from C7 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.21 | ||
Socio-economic factors B3 | Population density of the elderly aged 65 and above C8 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.09 | |
GDP per capita C9 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.05 | ||
Disposable income per capita C10 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.10 |
Indicators | Buffer Setting Distance (m) | Corresponding Score |
---|---|---|
Park Distance | 500; 1000; 1500; 2000; 2500 | 5; 4; 3; 2; 1 |
Water system lake distance | 300; 500; 800; 1000; 1200 | 5; 4; 3; 2; 1 |
Factory Distance | 500; 800; >800 | −2; −1; 0 |
Rail distance | 500; 800; >800 | −2; −1; 0 |
Residential land distance | 500; 1000; 1500; 2000; 3000 | 5; 4; 3; 2; 1 |
Bus stop distance | 200; 400; 600; 800; 1000 | 5; 4; 3; 2; 1 |
Subway Station Distance | 200; 400; 600; 800; 1000 | 5; 4; 3; 2; 1 |
Distance from traffic-oriented roads | 100; 200; 300; 4000; 500 | −1; 4; 3; 2; 1 |
Hospital Distance | 500; 1000; 1500; 2000; 3000 | 5; 4; 3; 2; 1 |
Type | Districtc | Furong District | Kaifu District | Tianxin District | Yuhua District | Yuelu District | Changsha County | Wangcheng District | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County Grade | |||||||||
Land for institutional elderly facilities | Unsuitable area | 0.00% | 7.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 40.46% | 60.56% | 49.70% | |
Less suitable area | 0.00% | 29.76% | 14.13% | 5.08% | 23.51% | 27.97% | 34.25% | ||
More suitable area | 9.16% | 29.39% | 18.62% | 23.73% | 15.25% | 9.20% | 12.67% | ||
Suitable area | 90.84% | 32.96% | 67.26% | 71.19% | 20.78% | 2.26% | 3.38% | ||
Land for community home care facilities | Unsuitable area | 0.00% | 7.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.65% | 56.16% | 46.02% | |
Less suitable area | 0.00% | 27.76% | 6.26% | 5.28% | 26.13% | 31.50% | 38.02% | ||
More suitable area | 6.74% | 32.39% | 24.88% | 22.80% | 16.80% | 10.67% | 13.72% | ||
Suitable area | 93.26% | 32.02% | 68.86% | 71.92% | 18.42% | 1.67% | 2.25% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yang, J.; Lou, Z.; Tang, X.; Sun, Y. Multi-Source Data-Based Evaluation of Suitability of Land for Elderly Care and Layout Optimization: A Case Study of Changsha, China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032034
Yang J, Lou Z, Tang X, Sun Y. Multi-Source Data-Based Evaluation of Suitability of Land for Elderly Care and Layout Optimization: A Case Study of Changsha, China. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3):2034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032034
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Jun, Zhifei Lou, Xinglong Tang, and Ying Sun. 2023. "Multi-Source Data-Based Evaluation of Suitability of Land for Elderly Care and Layout Optimization: A Case Study of Changsha, China" Sustainability 15, no. 3: 2034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032034
APA StyleYang, J., Lou, Z., Tang, X., & Sun, Y. (2023). Multi-Source Data-Based Evaluation of Suitability of Land for Elderly Care and Layout Optimization: A Case Study of Changsha, China. Sustainability, 15(3), 2034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032034