Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Seabream Fisheries Stock of Oman Using the Monte Carlo Catch Maximum Sustainable Yield and the Bayesian Schaefer Model Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Substantiation of the Direction for Mining Operations That Develop under Conditions of Shear Processes Caused by Hydrostatic Pressure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of a PV/Battery Micro-Grid for a Data Center in Bangladesh: Resilience and Sustainability Analysis

by
S. M. Mezbahul Amin
1,
Nazia Hossain
2,*,
Molla Shahadat Hossain Lipu
3,
Shabana Urooj
4,* and
Asma Akter
5
1
Department of Information Technology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
2
School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia
3
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Green University Bangladesh, Narayanganj 1461, Bangladesh
4
Department of Electrical Engineering, College of Engineering, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Green University of Bangladesh, Narayanganj 1461, Bangladesh
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(22), 15691; https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215691
Submission received: 22 August 2023 / Revised: 17 October 2023 / Accepted: 27 October 2023 / Published: 7 November 2023

Abstract

:
Energy resiliency plays an important role in the proper functioning of data centers as they heavily rely on an uninterrupted power supply to ensure smooth operation. In the case of a power outage, the data center’s operation might be hampered, which results in system downtime, data, and economic loss. This issue is severe in developing countries where power supply infrastructures are inadequate and conventional. Microgrids can be an effective solution in this regard. Although several studies developed microgrids to observe the energy resilience benefit for some critical facilities, critical facilities like data centers are often overlooked. In addition, sustainability analysis of a microgrid is also scarce in the present literature. Therefore, one new resilience and sustainability indicator has been developed and implemented in this analysis to fill this gap. For this, new indicators, such as the resilience cost index (RCI) and renewable energy penetration (REP), were used in this study. This study used HOMER version 3.13.3 and REopt software to simulate a robust photovoltaic (PV) and battery microgrid for a hypothetical data center in Bangladesh. A random (48 h) outage was assigned to witness the adaptability of the modelled micro-grid. The suitable size of PV and battery was found to be 249,219 kW and 398,547 kWh, respectively. The system’s USD 18,079,948 net present value (NPV) demonstrates the economic potential of utilizing PV and battery microgrids for data centers. The RCI of the system is found to be 35%, while the REP is 87%. The energy consumption saving of the system is USD 21,822,076. The system emits 652% less CO2 than the grid. The result of this system is also compared with a diesel-based system. After comparison, it is found that the developed PV/battery microgrid provides better environmental and economical service than the diesel generator. During blackouts, the system keeps the data center powered up without interruption while improving energy resilience and lowering carbon emissions. The outcome of this current analysis can serve as a blueprint for other microgrid projects in Bangladesh and other developing countries. By integrating PV/battery microgrids, data centers can cut costs, reduce emissions, and optimize energy use. This will make data centers less reliant on grid services and more flexible to forthcoming development.

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

Various nations worldwide suffer badly due to the weak and inadequate grid infrastructure [1,2,3]. A weak or vulnerable grid does not have sufficient capability to manage fault currents, voltage fluctuations, harmonic distortion, and overall power stability [4,5,6,7]. Also, the weather has a notable impact on the grid infrastructure [8]. The world’s temperature has increased significantly in recent years [9]. Extreme heat waves increase the electricity demand, which puts pressure on the grid. As a result, grid outages can occur. In this context, a microgrid could be an effective solution to these problems because a microgrid provides independent and localized power generation [10,11]. Microgrids can be used to fulfill both thermal and electrical needs [12,13]. Due to these numerous benefits, microgrids have found their way into various applications [14,15,16].
The demand for energy is continuously rising rapidly due to the tremendous growth of the population [17,18,19]. This population growth is also the driving factor behind the rise of digital services. Digital services are in increasingly high demand around the world. Global internet traffic has increased 20 fold since 2010, while internet users have more than doubled. Although data infrastructure facilities and networks consume about 1–1.5% of the world’s electricity consumption, the rapid growth in energy demand from these sources has been tempered by these developments in energy efficiency. Data centres worldwide consumed approximately 220 to 320 TWh of electricity in 2021, representing 0.9 to 1.3% of global electricity usage, disregarding the additional 100–140 TWh utilized for Bitcoin mining [20]. Even while the world’s data center power usage has barely increased, several smaller nations with developing data center economies have experienced substantial development. As an illustration, the electricity consumption of data centers in Ireland has seen a notable growth since 2015, constituting 14% of the total electricity usage in the country in 2021 [20]. Denmark’s data center energy consumption is forecasted to triple by 2025, constituting about 7% of the country’s total electricity usage. An anticipated rise in global carbon emissions is expected due to increasing energy usage in data centers [21]. It is estimated that data centers across the globe contribute to approximately 1% of GHG emissions generated from energy consumption [20]. However, this amount needs to be halved to meet the targets of net zero emissions by 2030. Improving infrastructure efficiency, ensuring proper monitoring, and integrating sustainable energy resources can play a significant part in achieving this target [22]. Several studies discuss various initiatives for enhancing the energy efficiency of the data centers, such as “Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS)”, the application of energy and power management, enhancing the efficiency of servers and networks, the usage of direct current instead of alternating current, electric distribution efficiency, etc. [23,24,25,26,27]. However, the implementation of these initiatives has several shortcomings, such as a declined performance, rebound effect, and circuit breaking in the DC power supply [28,29]. Integration of renewable energy resources can be essential in reducing carbon emissions [30,31,32,33]. Several renewable energy sources such as wind, PV, biomass (biogas, biodiesel, etc.), and hydrogen have been identified and implemented worldwide [34,35,36,37]. Among these sources, wind and solar have been popular among researchers due to their economic and environmental benefits [38,39,40,41]. However, these sources are highly unpredictable [42,43]. Therefore, a battery is required to store the excess energy and supply the load when necessary [44,45].

1.2. Literature Review

Several renewable projects are underway or completed in integrating clean energy sources in data centres. For instance, tech giants like Apple, Google, and Facebook have invested in solar power plants, such as Apple’s 200 MW facility in Reno, Nevada, and Google’s combined 300 MW plants in Alabama and Tennessee, to lower their carbon footprint and promote sustainable practices [29]. In the literature, several studies can be found that deal with the simulation of integrating renewable energy (RE)-based microgrids in data centers. Guizzi and Manno (2012) analyzed the financial and energy management performance of a data center building’s natural gas reformer and fuel cell-based cogeneration system [46]. A TRNSYS model was developed by Kummert et al. to showcase a 5 MW chilled water system at a UK data center [47]. A TRNSYS thermal model for a data center’s combined cooling, heating, and power system was developed by Xu and Qu [48]. The study determined the system’s energy, economic, and environmental performance and provided recommendations to improve the energy utilization scenario. Two R&D buildings in Shanghai were utilized as case studies to simulate the energy performance and cost-saving potential in Energy Plus by Pan et al. [49]. Iverson et al. simulated different scenarios of a hybrid energy system utilizing hydrogen energy storage for data centers [50]. Zhu et al. analyzed nine energy-saving and five emission-reduction technologies for the future decarbonization of data centers. The study implemented the saving strategies for twenty case study data centers and found that about 20–40% and 15–27% energy savings can be obtained by optimizing and improving the IT and cooling equipment [51]. Hadad et al. simulated an optimal hybrid system with a 500 kW capacity, effectively incorporating PV panels, wind turbines, fuel cells, batteries, and hydrogen storage and primarily relying on PV and wind turbines with batteries as a backup [52]. Li et al. developed a simulation model for a hybrid system incorporating renewable energy sources to optimize the power consumption and thermal load of cooling and computing appliances [53]. A simulation study was undertaken by Khalaj et al. to analyze 42 hybrid systems comprising solar, wind, and battery power sources deployed in different data centers worldwide. The study found that about 80% and 50% of cooling power reduction and grid dependency can be obtained for the system [54]. Li et al. introduced a power management framework called “Greenworks”, explicitly designed for a sustainable data center that relies on a combination of renewable energy sources [55]. A standalone system comprising of PV, wind turbines, battery, and hydrogen systems were proposed for the optimal sizing of power and IT for a data center [56]. A mixed Linear Integer approach was applied to design a RE-based hybrid system to power up a data center [57]. Integration of Danish data centers and RE was performed by Monsalves et al. The study obtained outstanding results of 63% and 180% cost and emissions reduction after integrating the data centre and RE system [58]. Feasibility analysis of the design and implementation of energy efficient superconducting cables from an RE source to a 100 MW data centre was performed by Chen et al. [59]. The analysis yielded higher technical and financial benefits compared to conventional cables. Gugul et al. determined the study feasibility of the net zero data center in a bank of Kocaeli, Turkey, based on one year of monitored data [60]. The study integrated PV-based electricity generation, a free cooling system, and reusing waste heat for space heating to reduce energy consumption in the bank. The study obtained a higher reduction of 83% in cooling energy consumption and improved power usage ratings from 1.8 to 1.1. Zhao and Zhu developed a new concept of placing virtual machines for cloud data centers and introduced an algorithm to enhance renewable Energy (RE) utilization and obtain the trade-off between carbon emissions and energy consumption [61]. The study achieved a higher RE usage rate of 73.11% for the base case study compared to other simulated cases. Han et al. introduced a new concept of shared energy storage for data centers to improve the RE utilization scenario and reduce financial burdens [62]. Moreover, this study developed a novel optimization technique, “Chance-Constrained Goal Programming”, to consider the availability of renewable resources. The study’s outcomes suggest that adopting shared energy storage in the data centers will not only enhance the financial benefits but also reduce power consumption and thus improve renewable energy penetration and utilization. Duarte and Fan (2023) applied a robust optimization approach and job scheduling techniques to study the penetration of RE in several interconnected data centers. The study found that implementing energy management, renewable energy, and optimal job scheduling techniques yield lower economic costs and environmental emissions [63]. Jahangir et al. presented a comprehensive techno-economic and environmental comparison of local RE generation and free cooling technology to minimize the cooling load for a data center in Tehran, Iran [64]. Moreover, to estimate the maximum energy reduction potential, the combination of both of these technologies was also explored. The study determined that local RE generation can save 37% of cooling energy, while free cooling yields 86% of energy and 30% of net present cost (NPC) saving.

1.3. Problem Statement

Electricity is an indispensable part of everyday life [65]. The electric grid consists of a transmission and distribution infrastructure network connected to end users by generators and storage assets. Power outage is generally caused when there needs to be more generation than the demand, even though the majority are brought on by damage to the distribution grid and transmission line components. Most power outages are due to minor incidents, such as downed trees or animals shorting the lines, high wind, lightning, and transformers breaking. These outages affect fewer people and can be restored relatively quickly. However, large or major outages last several days and affect many people and areas. Such major or large outages occur due to natural hazards like cyclones, hurricanes, etc. [66]. According to Ericson et al., due to natural storms like cyclones and hurricanes, there is a 33% possibility that a 48 h outage will occur [66]. Considering its geographical location, Bangladesh is prone to natural disasters. From 1980–2020, 129 storms passed over Bangladesh, causing significant economic and environmental damage that is illustrated in Figure 1 [67].
In addition, Bangladesh’s current grid infrastructure is conventional and needs to be modernized [68,69]. Uninterrupted power supply is essential to guarantee the proper operation of data centres. In the case of a power outage, the data center’s operation might be hampered, which results in system downtime and data and economic loss. Approximately, 43% of outages are due to power failure and about 4 in 10 outages cause between USD 100,000 and USD 1 million. This issue is more severe for cloud-based computing and online services as it can impact multiple organizations. However, the existing literature shows that energy resiliency and sustainability analysis of a data center during a power outage have yet to be conducted. Although several studies deal with the safety resilience of the data center [70], energy resilience and sustainability analysis still need to be included. The current study aims to overcome this gap and evaluate the energy resilience of a robust photovoltaic (PV) and battery microgrid for a data centre in Bangladesh via simulation and indicators. HOMER Pro software is utilized to model the diesel-based system. At the same time, REopt software (https://reopt.nrel.gov/tool, accessed on 25 May 2023) is used to simulate the impact of grid outages on the data centre and has been successfully implemented to study the effects of power outages in many case studies [71,72,73]. PV/battery system is sized with the help of Renewable Energy Integration and Optimization (REopt) software, while the diesel generator was sized with HOMER Pro software in this analysis. This is because HOMER allows detailed generator modelling. Fuel properties and more economic parameters can be considered in HOMER. Also, it is not possible to assess the shading issue during the modelling of PV in HOMER [74]. Due to this, PV/battery was sized in REopt, not in HOMER. Indicators such as REP and RCI were also used to observe the system’s performance. Bangladesh is chosen as a case study due to the country’s recent IT infrastructure boom. Bangladesh has the world’s seventh largest data center [75]. Currently, 19 data centers are located throughout the country and the capital Dhaka hosts 16 infrastructures. This number is expected to increase more due to low operational costs, favorable Government and business policies, favorable demographic dividends, and increasing income [76]. About 25 hi-tech parks are currently under construction nationwide, hosting many data centers. Bangladesh’s power infrastructure is conventional and prone to frequent power outages [77]. Therefore, it is necessary to prioritize building a backup energy system for data centers and analyze the impact of the power outage on the microgrids. The current analysis can serve as a benchmark model for other developing countries in studying the impact of power outages on microgrids.

1.4. Key Contributions

Main contributions of this study are given below.
  • Perform energy resilience of a microgrid designed for a data center. By energy resilience, it was meant that the developed microgrid could supply electricity during the assigned outage.
  • Carry out sustainability analysis of a microgrid designed for a data center. Through sustainability analysis, we tried to show the proposed microgrid’s energy independence, environmental impact, sustainable development goals (SDG), and resource conservation benefits.
  • Analyze a new sustainability indicator and resilience indicator.

2. Methods

In this study, both indicator- and simulation-based analysis has been carried out. First, necessary input data are collected from the literature review. Then, utilizing the input data, the microgrid and diesel-based systems have been modelled. After that, the necessary indicators have been developed to analyze the designed systems. A flowchart of the study is shown in Figure 2.

2.1. Optimization Simulation Using REopt

Various researchers have applied numerous techniques to size systems based on different constraints [78,79]. Among these techniques, mixed linear integer programming has been widely used for its wide versatility and flexibility. Therefore, this study adopts the REopt-based MILP optimization technique to determine the optimal configuration for sizing a distributed energy system. The process consists of an “optimization module (OM) and a simulation module (SM)” [80]. The primary focus of OM is to minimize the overall energy costs throughout the life cycle of a location, considering various expenses such as taxes and incentives associated with different project options. Additionally, OM guarantees that the microgrid design allows for supplying power to critical or essential loads independently during a blackout, as defined or predetermined. Financial and resilience analyses are integral parts of OM, encompassing dispatch strategy and size optimization to reduce life cycle energy costs effectively [80]. In contrast, resilience analysis serves a similar purpose. However, it offers the additional advantage of enabling a designed model to provide power to essential loads during outages without relying on the utility grid. The SM, which refers to the resilience analysis, assesses the annual resilience of the system by using the recommended sizes and technologies from the OM as inputs. The simulations are performed to test for any service disruptions every hour of the year, totalling 8760 tests. The SM distinguishes itself from the OM by employing modelling techniques. Unlike the OM, which determines the system size, dispatch strategy, and outage period as fixed values, the SM does not consider a single outage but instead simulates outages for every hour of the year. Each outage simulation employs a load-following strategy to determine the hourly dispatch. The evaluation of the optimization simulation has been performed using Equations (1)–(8) [80]. The nomenclature list for each parameter can be found before the reference.
m i n L C C = m i n   ( C E g + C O M + C D n + C P V B A T )
C E g = l L , h ϵ H ( F t l h p d × P t l h × c h e )  
C P V B A T = t T ( X t × c t ) + ( B k W h × c k W h b ) + ( B k W × c k W b )
C D n = r R ( d r × c r d ) + m M ( d m × c m d )
C O M = t T ( X t × c t O M )
These three load constraint expressions minimize the life cycle cost (LCC).
t T ( F t l E x h p d × P t l E x h × F t d g r ) L l h ,       h   ϵ H
t T F t l R h p d × P t l E x h × F t d g r + B h L l h ,       h   ϵ H
h H F P V l h p d × P P V l h × F P V d g r h g L l S h ,   l   ϵ L
The equations mentioned, such as Equation (6), confirm that the cumulative energy generated within a specific location will always be within the combined load of all energy sources. Consequently, combining photovoltaic (PV), grid, and battery power must always fulfill the site’s energy requirements. Conversely, as described in Equation (7), Equation (8) establishes an upper limit on the total solar electricity produced, ensuring it does not exceed the data center’s power demand. Additionally, Equation (9) guarantees that the solar energy generated aligns with the chosen system size for each stage, irrespective of the load being served.
l L P t l h X t h ,       h   ϵ H
Battery storage technology constraints are expressed by Equations (10)–(13). This covers the battery’s charge level throughout a specific time frame and charging and discharging. When the battery is charging, the value of Z h B + will be 1. The battery discharge state is denoted by the value of Z h B , which is equal to 1.
B h + = t T ( F t l B h p d X t F t d g r ɳ B ) ,   h   ϵ H
B h S O C = B h 1 S O C + B h + B h ,   h   ϵ H
B h B h 1 S O C ,     h   ϵ H
Z h B + + Z h B 1 ,   h   ϵ H
Demand rate constraints are represented by Equations (14) and (15). The monthly grid electricity should not be less than or equal to the demand.
h H r ,     l L P G l h d r ,     r   ϵ R
h H m ,     l L P G l h d m ,   m   ϵ M
According to Equation (16), PV technology demonstrates similarity to or a smaller size than the net metering capacity when functioning at that specific capacity. However, it is absent or non-applicable when operating below that capacity.
t T X t L s v N E M Y s v ,   v   ϵ   V ,   s   S
It should be considered that only applicable constraints are included in this analysis. This analysis does not include other technical constraints such as generators, wind, and CHP.
Three financial parameters, such as the “Payback period (PB), Net Present Value (NPV), and Internal rate of return (IRR)”, are considered here to model the system in REopt. PB shows the duration required to retrieve the assets for one project. NPV represents the present value of all future cash flows when adjusted for a specific discount rate. On the other hand, IRR signifies the rate of discount at which the NPV becomes zero. The NPV, PB, and IRR were calculated by Equations (17), (18), and (19), respectively.
N P V = z = 0 N c 1 , z ( 1 + r ) z
0 = z = 0 N C z ( 1 + I R R ) z
P B = I P

2.2. Grid Simulation

Equation (20) was utilized to quantify the electricity supplied by the utility grid, considering that the grid functions as a dependable power source without additional maintenance, capital investment, or operation costs. The utility company’s tariff only covers the costs associated with the electricity provided through the power network [73].
P g t = P l t ( P P V , P b a t t )
To accurately model the electricity system, it is necessary to consider the charging rate, which is assumed to be a flat rate, for this study. The demand rate and grid power price are 0.577 USD/kW/month and 0.094 USD/kWh. The sell back rate is considered 0.060 USD/kWh [73,81].

2.3. Simulation for Photovoltaic Module

The power generated from solar resources can be harnessed and converted into electricity via a PV module [81,82]. Equation (21) was employed to determine the available power derived from the solar energy [73].
P P V = C P P V D P V ( I r I r S T C ) [ 1 + α P ( T C T C , S T C ) ]
Equation (22) can be used to evaluate the efficiency of a photovoltaic module, considering the topmost power generated under standard test conditions [73].
η S T C = C P P V A P V I r S T C  
According to this study, the projected capital cost for the solar panel system is USD 310 per kilowatt (kW) and it is anticipated to operate for 25 years. The estimated operational and maintenance expenses total USD 17 per kW per year [73]. It is essential to mention that the system’s installation will take place on the surface instead of the rooftop and will not incorporate any tracking device. Additionally, any surplus energy produced by the PV system that goes beyond the required load demand and battery charging will not be utilized in this investigation and will be deemed a loss. The assessment of the electricity output from the PV system that is set up is carried out by utilizing the “PVWatts” program that was created by the “National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)” simultaneously with the REopt software. It is believed that every 2.42811 hectares of space that is accessible will be utilized to install one megawatt of photovoltaic capability, quantified in direct current (MW-DC). The installed system will have a “DC-to-AC size ratio” and a system loss of 1.2 and 14%, respectively [73].

2.4. Simulation for Battery

Due to weather variability, the output of PV is unstable. The quality of the distribution system may be impacted when this power is added to the electrical network. So, to accommodate the irregular availability of renewable energy sources, a battery system must be used [83,84,85,86]. If the amount of electricity generated by photovoltaic (PV) systems is higher than required, the excess power is stored in the battery for later use [87]. And, when the power generation is less than the consumption, the battery is recharged. This stored energy can be further used in the absence of solar power. Equation (23) can be employed to determine the critical battery size [73].
C a p b a t = E l o a d D A η c o n n b a t t D O D  
Several types of batteries are available in the market [88,89,90]. However, lithium-ion batteries have several advantages, like a longer life span and high energy density [91,92]. Therefore, this study considers a lithium-ion battery to have a lifetime of 10 years. The battery system is projected to have a capital cost of USD 419 per kWh, while the power capacity cost will be USD 775 per kW [73]. Assumptions have been made regarding charging the battery by the grid, with the battery starting at a SoC of 50% and a minimum value of 20% SoC. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the inverter will need to be replaced once during the system’s lifetime and the replacement cost will be incorporated into the yearly operational and maintenance costs. The inverter’s efficiency is estimated to be 96%.

2.5. Diesel-Based System

Diesel-based generators are commonly used in Bangladesh to provide electricity during an outage [93,94]. Therefore, a diesel-based generator is considered here to supply electricity to the data centre during an outage. Different sizes were considered to determine the optimum system. The generator’s capital, replacement, operational, and maintenance costs are considered as USD 370/kW, USD 296/kW, and USD 0.05/h, respectively [88]. The fuel cost of diesel is also USD 0.91 per liter. The following equation can be used to determine the fuel consumption rate of the diesel generator [95].
L = L 0 , d g Y d g + L 1 , d g P d g
The designed microgrid can be found in Figure 3.

2.6. Indicators

One new resilience indicator (RCI) and one sustainability indicator (REP) are developed in this study to determine the resilience and sustainability of the microgrid.

2.6.1. Resilience Cost Index (RCI)

RCI is the extra expense incurred for incorporating the battery storage system to improve the resilience of the microgrid. RCI can be found from the following Formula (25).
R C I = C o s t   o f   t h e   r e s i l i e n c e   s c e n a r i o C o s t   o f   t h e   P V   s c e n a r i o C o s t   o f   t h e   P V   s c e n a r i o × 100
A higher value of RCI means that the resilient system is more expensive because integrating the battery for resilience purposes will require additional costs.

2.6.2. Renewable Energy Penetration (REP)

REP can be defined as the proportion of sustainable energy employed in the microgrid. Equation (26) can be utilized to determine the REP value of a system.
R E P = E n e r g y   g e n e r a t i o n   f r o m   r e n e w a b l e   s o u r c e s T o t a l   e n e r g y   c o n s u m p t i o n × 100
A higher REP value in one scenario means the system is more sustainable than in other scenarios.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. PV/Battery Microgrid

Since no energy consumption data were available for Bangladesh’s data center, the analysis considered a hypothetical model based on Bangladesh’s climatic condition for energy consumption data, as illustrated in Figure 4 [96]. The annual average load of the data center is around 30,822 kW. It requires servers, storage devices, networking equipment, and hardware to process and store data. For IT loads, these things are considered in this study. Moreover, to keep the proper temperature for networking equipment and servers, data centers also require extensive cooling. This study considers cooling towers, air conditioning units, and chillers as cooling loads. For lighting loads, LED lights are considered in the data center. This study also considers uninterruptible power supplies (UPS), transformers, and switchgear as power system loads since these equipment ensure power quality and supply power during interruptions.
After that, a microgrid consisting of PV/battery was modelled using REopt. Three scenarios, including base, financial, and resilience, are considered here. The critical load is considered 60% so that the system can endure any unexpected variations in energy demand. The base case system only consists of the grid. The financial represents the PV system supplying electricity to the load without storage, while the resilience scenario defines a PV system with storage. Based on the simulation, the suitable size of PV and battery was found to be 249,219 kW and 398,547 kWh, respectively. Implementing the system will save USD 18,079,948 over the project duration. Similar findings are also reported by [97,98]. These studies designed hospital microgrids and observed life cycle savings of USD 440,191 and USD 65,628,837, respectively. Implementing the proposed system in our study will also result in savings of USD 21,822,076 regarding energy consumption (compared to the base case). The IRR and PB of the system were found to be 6% and 14 years. The capital cost to implement the system was found to be 280 million. It is also estimated that the economic benefit of avoiding this outage is USD 1276 million (considering the avoided cost of USD 100 per kWh). It means preventing this 48 h outage, which will result in economic savings of USD 1276 million. Please note that PV will be installed on the ground, not the roof. PV in the resilience scenario generates 67% more energy than in the financial scenario. This is because in the financial scenario, the grid is responsible for supplying 137,245,147 kWh of energy, which is 286% more than the resilience scenario. The proposed system is also environmentally friendlier than the base case system. The resilient system emits 652% less CO2 than the grid. In the resilience scenario, the REP value is 87%, while it is only 49% in the financial scenario. So, the resilient system is more sustainable than the financial system. It also means that the system is more dependent on renewable energy sources. Less import and consumption of fossil fuels to generate electricity happens; as a result, the system does not become affected by the supply disruption of fuel in the global market. It also ensures the promotion of clean energy for data centers, which is aligned with SDG 7. The problem with biomass-based systems is the availability of fuels and their higher cost than wind and solar [99]. Also, the cost of biomass will be a significant factor to be considered. The data center authority must also consider the land issue to cultivate the biomass. In addition, wind-based hybrid systems have higher initial costs than solar-based ones. These systems also need more maintenance than solar ones [100]. The environmental impact, such as noise and bird collisions, also worsens the situation.
The RCI value is found to be 35%. It means that the system in the resilience scenario is 35% more expensive than the financial scenario. But, it should be remembered that a battery is added to withstand the outage in the resilience scenario, resulting in an expensive system. However, the system cannot endure the specified outage without the battery in the financial scenario. So, it means that the system’s ability to withstand the outage is also increased by 35%. Therefore, the system’s ability to endure outages and improve its resilience justifies the higher RCI value. A system’s capacity to adjust or react to the changing situations is constrained when it is designed to consistently meet a specific net side load requirement without any flexibility or autonomy. The system cannot sustain itself or operate independently when unforeseen events or disturbances occur. The system becomes more fragile and less able to tolerate problems due to this lack of self-operation, which lowers the system’s overall resilience. Lightner et al. used community, energy, and critical infrastructure resilience (CIR) to assess the benefits of microgrids [101]. To achieve overall system resilience, CIR maximizes resilience and resource allocation across critical infrastructure sectors, including energy. At the same time, RCI evaluates the economic effectiveness of boosting microgrid resilience. Both ideas aim to balance cost-effective cost management with robustness. Moreover, by facilitating resource diversity, reliability, lessened susceptibility, local energy production, sustainability, and energy independence, REP and RCI help to ensure the CIR, community, and energy resilience. Communities may better allocate funds to strengthen vital infrastructure, enhance disaster preparedness, and improve overall resilience by making cost-effective investments in resilience.
After utilizing a resilient strategy and control, it is obtained that our proposed system offers two significant advantages. The proposed system reduces peak demand and cumulative hours (Figure 5). The cumulative hours (CH) are reduced up to 40,000 h, which as a result, increases the resilience of the system. Furthermore, peak demand costs are reduced, which has a significant economic benefit. A study by Rosales-Asensio et al. validated this finding [97]. This study found that implementing a PV/battery/CHP/TES (thermal energy storage) water tanks/absorption chillers microgrid can reduce CH up to 1000 h.
Before the outage, the grid used to supply electricity to fulfill the demand. At 9 AM on 9 August, the grid stopped functioning for 48 h due to a problem. Due to this, a 48 h outage is considered and assigned in the simulation of this study. During this time, the PV fulfills the demand until 5 PM. After this, the battery meets the load due to the lack of solar resources. From 5 PM to 6 AM till the next day, the battery becomes discharged to supply the electricity. At 6 AM on August 10, PV started to produce electricity. PV, along with the battery, meets the demand till 8 AM. After that, PV alone meets the load till 5 PM. The optimized system can provide sufficient energy to critical loads without the grid connection. Additionally, it ensures that the battery’s SoC is restored to the required levels after the outage, guaranteeing system stability for several hours. Figure 6 illustrates the microgrid’s performance during the outage, while Figure 7 outlines the likelihood of the system surviving the blackout. Based on Figure 7, the probability of an optimal system sustaining a critical load during a power outage decreases as the outage duration increases. An abrupt failure example is when the possibility of failure is 25% while the likelihood of sustaining a critical load is 75%. Abrupt failures are sudden and unexpected and can occur even when the probability of success is relatively high.
To verify the system’s capacity to accommodate the essential load, the program performs 8760 power disruption simulations (for every single hour in the year). These simulations determine the typical length of time the system can maintain the essential load. Following the conclusion of the simulations, the software computes the mean, minimum, and maximum durability based on the respective typical, minimum, and maximum durations withstood during the simulated power outages. The economically ideal dispatch plan determines the battery’s SoC at the starting of each outage. This indicates that the battery may be in a low SoC if it is being utilized for peak shaving before the blackout. Remember that the microgrid will function in the islanded mode for this resiliency. From this figure, the system in the financial scenario has the limited chance of surviving the predefined outage. The system’s maximum duration survivability is 12 h. But, the system in the resilience scenario can survive the predefined outage of 48 h. According to the assessments, the lowest resilience is 3 h, while the highest is 2527 h. The finding of our study is also like [102,103], in which the PV/battery microgrid successfully withstands an outage of 41 and 72 h, respectively.

3.2. Diesel System

After simulation, the optimum generator size was found to be 120,000 kW. The electricity production of the generator is 357,920,811 kWh per year (Figure 8). To produce this electricity, the fuel consumption by the generator is 99,880,422 L. Excess electricity after fulfilling the load is 87,920,426 kWh per year. LCOE of the system was found to be USD 0.6139. The initial capital cost of the system was found to be USD 44.4 M (Figure 9). The cost of the diesel-based system can be found in Figure 9.
The environmental performance of the diesel generator can be found in Table 1. From Table 1, carbon dioxide (CO2) comprises 98.52% of the total emission, followed by carbon monoxide (CO, 0.62%), nitrogen oxide (NOx, 0.58%), sulfur dioxide (SO2, 0.24%), unburned hydrocarbon (UH), and particulate matter, (PM). So, from this economic and environmental perspective, the designed PV/battery system performs better than diesel generators.

3.3. Sensitivity Analysis

An observation of the effects of outages on the system size and NPV was carried out using a sensitivity analysis. Figure 10 represents the sensitivity analysis. The analysis clearly shows that the PV and battery sizes increase as the outage duration increases. As the outage duration increases, large PV systems are required to generate more electricity and recharge the batteries. As a result, larger batteries are necessary to manage and store the increased energy output, guaranteeing a steady stream of power during the system downtime. Another thing is that, as the outage duration increases, NPV becomes reduced. Several factors, such as the cost of larger battery and PV systems during the extended outage periods, are responsible for this decline.

3.4. Challenges and Solutions

Implementing PV/battery microgrids for data centers can face several difficulties in Bangladesh. First, consistent generation will be impacted by the variable sunlight. Batteries could be deployed to solve or reduce this problem. But, it will increase the upfront cost and payback period of the system. Also, integrating the microgrid with the national grid may require regulatory change. Moreover, there also needs to be more financial opportunities. In addition, technical experts for designing, installing, and maintaining the system must be sufficiently available in the country. There is no disposal plan for these technologies available in Bangladesh [69]. Moreover, data centers in Bangladesh are also facing several issues like storage, cooling, real-time monitoring, security, uncertainty of solar resources and load management, etc. [104]. To remove the skill obstacles, the government should introduce training programs. The government should formulate policies promoting renewable energy sources, providing financial incentives, and simplifying administrative procedures. The government should also develop proper disposal policies for these technologies. Affordable financing sources and microfinance programs should be introduced to make the projects financially viable. Hybrid systems to tackle the intermittency problem could be designed. Research into low-cost energy storage options is essential to address battery costs [105]. Novel techniques could be applied to solve the security issues [106]. For real-time monitoring, energy prediction, and load management, several new algorithms and methods can be utilized by data centers [107,108,109]. For example, scaling-basis chirplet transform (SBCT) can be used to determine peak energy demands, which will help data centers implement load-shifting techniques and reduce high electricity costs during peak demand hours. Similarly, an adaptive control system can be put into place to lessen the impact of time delays and unpredictable dynamics in data center teleoperation systems.
To achieve Bangladesh’s ambitious renewable energy adoption goals, policy tools, and funding structures capable of resolving existing impediments must be considered and designed. For instance, the current net metering rules are fundamental in encouraging the installation of rooftop solar power systems in both industrial and commercial structures. Given the competitiveness of solar and wind technologies and their continued cost-reduction tendencies, a feed-in tariff may not be necessary. Instead, Bangladesh may consider encouraging competition in grid-tied projects. Creating a time-bound action plan is also essential for encouraging the growth of renewable energy sources. Another strategic requirement for the growth of renewable energy is a thorough, time-bound action plan. An effective monitoring system would be established, together with annual targets for deploying various types of renewable energy, a commitment from the government to provide the required resources, roles for various government agencies, and definitions of their responsibilities. This strategic roadmap expedites green energy projects and conveys to financiers, technology providers, and financial institutions the government’s ambition for renewable energy. Developing an integrated energy and power master plan constitutes a substantial departure from separate energy and power sector strategies. This integrated approach is crucial because it comprehensively evaluates the advantages of developing renewable energy versus the nation’s reliance on imported fossil fuels. The need to lessen reliance on such fuels is urgently underscored by their vulnerability to price volatility on the global market and their high import cost. The timely implementation of projects on the ground is critical to meeting the 40% renewable energy objective [110]. This calls for thorough regulations that cover all facets of the implementation of renewable energy projects, such as required authorizations, schedules, power evacuation, and grid integration. Financial incentives can play a major role in adopting the renewable-based technology in Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Bank’s green banking policy requires financial institutions to devote at least 5% of their granted loans to green initiatives, but ensuring compliance remains a concern. Strict oversight of financial institutions’ green finance operations can help them meet this goal and encourage investment in renewable energy projects. Apart from these phasing out the thermal power plants, waiving import duties on renewable energy equipment and ensuring resilient grid infrastructure for integrating renewable-based technologies can be viable options [111].

4. Conclusions

This study designed an energy-resilient and sustainable PV and battery microgrid for a data center located in Bangladesh. The energy consumption of the data center was 2,700,000 kWh. The configuration included 262,767 kW of PV and 427,289 kWh of battery designed for a 48 h outage. Using PV and battery microgrids for data centers is economically viable, as evidenced by the system’s NPV of USD 12,746,169. The designed system can withstand simulated power outages and is environmentally benign due to its lower emissions. Based on the outcome of the analysis, policymakers can take the necessary initiatives to improve the current energy infrastructure. For instance, climate resilience can be integrated into national plans and fields.
To better understand the advantages of minimizing life cycle expenses, further investigation may be conducted, such as exploring incentives and a demand-focused pricing model that adjusts to tariffs. Also, hybrid systems combining wind, biomass, and solar systems with batteries can be designed for future studies to observe their impact on data centers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.M.A.; Data curation, N.H.; Formal analysis, S.M.M.A.; Funding acquisition, S.U.; Investigation, S.M.M.A. and N.H.; Methodology, S.M.M.A.; Project administration, S.U.; Validation, S.M.M.A.; Writing—original draft, S.M.M.A. and N.H.; Writing—review and editing, M.S.H.L., S.U. and A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project Number (PNURSP2023R79).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project Number (PNURSP2023R79), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

A P V Surface area of the PV module (m2).
DADays of autonomy.
B k W h Battery capacity (kWh).
STCStandard test conditions.
B k W Battery system size (kW).
DODDepth of charge of the battery.
B m a x k W h Maximum storage capacity of the battery (kWh).
c h e Electricity cost in time step h (USD/kW).
B m a x k W Maximum size of the battery (kW).
d m Monthly peak demand for month m (kW).
B S O C m i n Minimum state of charge of battery (%).
c t O M O&M cost per unit size of the system for technology t (USD/kW).
B h + In a time, step h, power delivered to the battery (kW).
d r Peak demand in ratchet r (kW).
B h In a time, step h, power dispatched from the battery (kW).
C O M Cost of operation & maintenance.
B h S O C In a time, step h, energy stored in the battery (kW).
c r d Demand cost for ratchet r.
c k W b Capital cost of storage inverter per kW (USD/kW).
C 1 , z After Tax Cash Flow in Year Z
C D n Demand cost.
c k W h b Capital cost of battery per kWh (USD/kWh).
E l o a d Average energy demand (kWh/day).
C E g Energy costs.
C P V B A T Capital cost of PV, battery.
C z Cash Flow For Year Z
D P V Derating factor of solar PV array.
c t Capital cost for technology t (USD/kW).
IInvestment
c m d Demand cost for month m.
F d t h s Hourly capacity factor for demand d for energy technology t in time step h at locations s (unitless).
C P P V Rated capacity of PV array (kW)
I r Solar irradiation on the PV panel’s surface (kW/m2).
F t d g r Degradation factor for technology t (unitless).
L l h Production size restriction for load l in time step h(kW).
F t l h p d Production factor for technology t, serving load l, in timestep h (unitless).
L 1 , d g Fuel curve slope
G T n lThe nth condition.
L 0 , d g lFuel curve intercept coefficient
I r S T C lSolar irradiation under STC.
P d g Electrical output of the generator
L s v N E M Capacity of net metering level v at location s.
P l t lLoad power demand.
η B lEfficacy of the roundtrip inverter.
P t l h Rated production of technology t, serving load l. in timestep h (kW).
NProject Life in Years
α P lTemperature coefficient of power (%/°C)
PAnnual net cash flow
η m p Efficiency of solar panel
PgGrid power.
Y s v 1 if location s is operated at the Net metering level v; otherwise, 0.
P P V and P b a t t Power supplied by the corresponding energy sources.
X t System size for energy technology.
T a Ambient temperature ( ).
Y d g Rated capacity of the generator
η S T C Efficiency of the PV module under STC (%).
T C , S T C Temperature under STC.
η c o n n b a t t Efficiency of converter and battery.
T C lPV cell temperature in the current time step ( ).
β T Solar absorption factor.
T s n lAmbient temperature at condition 20 .
Sets
s   S Set of all locations.
h ϵ H Set of time steps
v   ϵ   V Set of net metering levels.
r R Set of all ratchets.
m M Set of all months.
t T Set of energy technologies (solar PV = PV and G = grid).
l L Set of loads, l s for site load, l B for Battery load, l E x for export.

References

  1. Huang, Y.; Masrur, H.; Lipu, M.S.H.; Howlader, H.O.R.; Gamil, M.M.; Nakadomari, A.; Mandal, P.; Senjyu, T. Multi-Objective Optimization of Campus Microgrid System Considering Electric Vehicle Charging Load Integrated to Power Grid. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 98, 104778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saha, S.; Saini, G.; Chauhan, A.; Upadhyay, S.; Madurai Elavarasan, R.; Hossain Lipu, M.S. Optimum Design and Techno-Socio-Economic Analysis of a PV/Biomass Based Hybrid Energy System for a Remote Hilly Area Using Discrete Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 57, 103213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, D.; Guo, X.; Tang, B.; Hu, J.; Zou, X.; Kang, Y. Feedforward Frequency Deviation Control in PLL for Fast Inertial Response of DFIG-Based Wind Turbines. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, X.; Liu, Y.; Yu, J.; Yu, R.; Zhang, J.; Wen, H. Stability Analysis of Three-Phase Grid-Connected Inverter under the Weak Grids with Asymmetrical Grid Impedance by LTP Theory in Time Domain. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 142, 108244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lin, X.; Yu, R.; Yu, J.; Wen, H. Constant-Coupling-Effect-Based PLL for Synchronization Stability Enhancement of Grid-Connected Converter under Weak Grids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2023, 70, 11310–11323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shao, B.; Xiao, Q.; Xiong, L.; Wang, L.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Blaabjerg, F.; Guerrero, J.M. Power Coupling Analysis and Improved Decoupling Control for the VSC Connected to a Weak AC Grid. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 145, 108645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Y.; Ma, H.; Xiao, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H. Harmonic State Estimation for Distribution Networks Based on Multi-Measurement Data. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2023, 38, 2311–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, H.; Wang, B.; Luo, P.; Ma, F.; Zhou, Y.; Mohamed, M.A. State Evaluation Based on Feature Identification of Measurement Data: For Resilient Power System. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 8, 983–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, P.; Yu, P.; Lu, J.; Zhang, Y. The Mediation Effect of Land Surface Temperature in the Relationship between Land Use-Cover Change and Energy Consumption under Seasonal Variations. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 340, 130804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, Z.; Altalbawy, F.M.A.; Al-Bahrani, M.; Riadi, Y. Regret-Based Multi-Objective Optimization of Carbon Capture Facility in CHP-Based Microgrid with Carbon Dioxide Cycling. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 384, 135632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Duan, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, J. An Initialization-Free Distributed Algorithm for Dynamic Economic Dispatch Problems in Microgrid: Modeling, Optimization and Analysis. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2023, 34, 101004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miao, Z.; Meng, X.; Liu, L. Design a New Thermoelectric Module with High Practicability Based on Experimental Measurement. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 241, 114320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Uyanık, T.; Ejder, E.; Arslanoğlu, Y.; Yalman, Y.; Terriche, Y.; Su, C.L.; Guerrero, J.M. Thermoelectric Generators as an Alternative Energy Source in Shipboard Microgrids. Energies 2022, 15, 4248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jiang, J.; Zhang, L.; Wen, X.; Valipour, E.; Nojavan, S. Risk-Based Performance of Power-to-Gas Storage Technology Integrated with Energy Hub System Regarding Downside Risk Constrained Approach. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 39429–39442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, H.; Wu, H.; Kan, T.; Zhang, J.; Li, H. Low-carbon economic dispatch of integrated energy system containing electric hydrogen production based on VMD-GRU short-term wind power prediction. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 154, 109420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Deng, W.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Li, Q.; Yi, Y. A Neural Network-Based Adaptive Power-Sharing Strategy for Hybrid Frame Inverters in a Microgrid. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 10, 1082948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, B.; Wang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Liang, C.; Tang, L.; Yao, X.; Hu, F. The Effects of Environmental Tax Reform on Urban Air Pollution: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on the Environmental Protection Tax Law. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 967524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liao, Q.; Li, S.; Xi, F.; Tong, Z.; Chen, X.; Wan, X.; Ma, W.; Deng, R. High-Performance Silicon Carbon Anodes Based on Value-Added Recycling Strategy of End-of-Life Photovoltaic Modules. Energy 2023, 281, 128345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cai, T.; Dong, M.; Chen, K.; Gong, T. Methods of Participating Power Spot Market Bidding and Settlement for Renewable Energy Systems. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 7764–7772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Data Centres and Data Transmission Networks—Analysis–IEA. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/data-centres-and-data-transmission-networks?fbclid=IwAR06k-0z4GK-dYXYlm_jR2T_A2JOwZQxd0AdX4R2Im6wX_UomUEJGDiCqH8 (accessed on 6 May 2023).
  21. Coroamă, V. Investigating the Inconsistencies among Energy and Energy Intensity Estimates of the Internet Metrics and Harmonising Values; Swiss Federal Office of Energy SFOE Energy Research and Cleantech: Bern, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yang, M.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Q. Nonintrusive Residential Electricity Load Decomposition Based on Transfer Learning. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Orgerie, A.C.; De Assuncao, M.D.; Lefevre, L. A Survey on Techniques for Improving the Energy Efficiency of Large-Scale Distributed Systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 2014, 46, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Beloglazov, A.; Buyya, R.; Lee, Y.C.; Zomaya, A. A Taxonomy and Survey of Energy-Efficient Data Centers and Cloud Computing Systems. Adv. Comput. 2011, 82, 47–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mastelic, T.; Oleksiak, A.; Claussen, H.; Brandic, I.; Pierson, J.M.; Vasilakos, A.V. Cloud Computing: Survey on Energy Efficiency. ACM Comput. Surv. 2015, 47, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zakarya, M.; Gillam, L. Energy Efficient Computing, Clusters, Grids and Clouds: A Taxonomy and Survey. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2017, 14, 13–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shrestha, B.R.; Tamrakar, U.; Hansen, T.M.; Bhattarai, B.P.; James, S.; Tonkoski, R. Efficiency and Reliability Analyses of AC and 380 v DC Distribution in Data Centers. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 63305–63315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oró, E.; Depoorter, V.; Garcia, A.; Salom, J. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Integration in Data Centres. Strategies and Modelling Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 429–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rostirolla, G.; Grange, L.; Minh-Thuyen, T.; Stolf, P.; Pierson, J.M.; Da Costa, G.; Baudic, G.; Haddad, M.; Kassab, A.; Nicod, J.M.; et al. A Survey of Challenges and Solutions for the Integration of Renewable Energy in Datacenters. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 155, 111787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cao, B.; Dong, W.; Lv, Z.; Gu, Y.; Singh, S.; Kumar, P. Hybrid Microgrid Many-Objective Sizing Optimization With Fuzzy Decision. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2020, 28, 2702–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, B.; Zhao, J.; Yang, P.; Gu, Y.; Muhammad, K.; Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.; de Albuquerque, V.H.C. Multiobjective 3-D Topology Optimization of Next-Generation Wireless Data Center Network. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2020, 16, 3597–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Qiu, C.; Jiang, L.; Gao, Y.; Sheng, L. Effects of Oxygen-Containing Functional Groups on Carbon Materials in Supercapacitors: A Review. Mater. Des. 2023, 230, 111952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Das, P.; Islam, K.S.; Uddin, S.M.M. Biogas Production Potential from Animal Farm Waste in Bangladesh: Case Studies of Two Selected Farms. Env. Prog Sustain. Energy 2023, e14214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, D.; Guo, J.; Meng, J.; Sun, T. Biofuel Production by Hydro-Thermal Liquefaction of Municipal Solid Waste: Process Characterization and Optimization. Chemosphere 2023, 328, 138606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, Y.; Qin, J.; Lu, L.; Xu, J.; Su, X. Enhanced Microwave Absorption Property of Silver Decorated Biomass Ordered Porous Carbon Composite Materials with Frequency Selective Surface Incorporation. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2023, 30, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ma, X.; Wan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Dong, X.; Shi, S.; Liang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Mi, H. Multi-Parameter Practical Stability Region Analysis of Wind Power System Based on Limit Cycle Amplitude Tracing. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2023, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, S.; Huang, M.; Lyu, Y. Seismic Performance Analysis of a Wind Turbine with a Monopile Foundation Affected by Sea Ice Based on a Simple Numerical Method. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech. 2021, 15, 1113–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liao, K.; Lu, D.; Wang, M.; Yang, J. A Low-Pass Virtual Filter for Output Power Smoothing of Wind Energy Conversion Systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2022, 69, 12874–12885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, M.; Yang, M.; Yu, Y.; Lee, W.J. A Wind Speed Correction Method Based on Modified Hidden Markov Model for Enhancing Wind Power Forecast. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2022, 58, 656–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, N.; Chen, Q.; Cai, G.; Xu, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, W. Fault Diagnosis of Bearing in Wind Turbine Gearbox under Actual Operating Conditions Driven by Limited Data with Noise Labels. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 3502510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Das, P.; Sifatul Islam, K.; Mijan Uddin, S.M. Unlocking the Resource Potential of Livestock Waste in Bangladesh. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2023, 42, e14063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ma, X.; Liao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, J. Fast Dynamic Phasor Estimation Algorithm Considering DC Offset for PMU Applications. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2023, 38, 3582–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liang, J.; Kato, B.; Wang, Y. Constructing simplified models for dynamic analysis of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines. Ocean. Eng. 2023, 271, 113785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dang, W.; Liao, S.; Yang, B.; Yin, Z.; Liu, M.; Yin, L.; Zheng, W. An encoder-decoder fusion battery life prediction method based on Gaussian process regression and improvement. J. Energy Storage 2023, 59, 106469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sepasi, S.; Roose, L.R.; Matsuura, M.M. Extended Kalman Filter with a Fuzzy Method for Accurate Battery Pack State of Charge Estimation. Energies 2015, 8, 5217–5233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guizzi, G.L.; Manno, M. Fuel Cell-Based Cogeneration System Covering Data Centers’ Energy Needs. Energy 2012, 41, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kummert, M.; Dempster, W.; McLean, K. Thermal Analysis of a Data Centre Cooling System under Fault Conditions. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International IBPSA Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, 27–30 July 2009. [Google Scholar]
  48. Xu, D.; Qu, M. Energy, Environmental, and Economic Evaluation of a CCHP System for a Data Center Based on Operational Data. Energy Build 2013, 67, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pan, Y.; Yin, R.; Huang, Z. Energy Modeling of Two Office Buildings with Data Center for Green Building Design. Energy Build 2008, 40, 1145–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Iverson, Z.; Achuthan, A.; Marzocca, P.; Aidun, D. Optimal Design of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (HRES) Using Hydrogen Storage Technology for Data Center Applications. Renew Energy 2013, 52, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhu, H.; Zhang, D.; Goh, H.H.; Wang, S.; Ahmad, T.; Mao, D.; Liu, T.; Zhao, H.; Wu, T. Future Data Center Energy-Conservation and Emission-Reduction Technologies in the Context of Smart and Low-Carbon City Construction. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022, 89, 104322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Haddad, M.; Nicod, J.M.; Péra, M.C. Hydrogen Infrastructure: Data-Center Supply-Refueling Station Synergy. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, VPPC 2017, Belfort, France, 11–14 December 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Luo, P.; Pan, Q. Thermal-Aware Hybrid Workload Management in a Green Datacenter towards Renewable Energy Utilization. Energies 2019, 12, 1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Habibi Khalaj, A.; Abdulla, K.; Halgamuge, S.K. Towards the Stand-Alone Operation of Data Centers with Free Cooling and Optimally Sized Hybrid Renewable Power Generation and Energy Storage. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 93, 451–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, C.; Wang, R.; Li, T.; Qian, D.; Yuan, J. Managing Green Datacenters Powered by Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC’14), Philadelphia, PA, USA, 18–20 June 2014; ISBN 978-1-931971-11-9. [Google Scholar]
  56. Cau, G.; Cocco, D.; Petrollese, M.; Knudsen Kær, S.; Milan, C. Energy Management Strategy Based on Short-Term Generation Scheduling for a Renewable Microgrid Using a Hydrogen Storage System. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 87, 820–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Haddad, M.; Nicod, J.M.; Péra, M.C.; Varnier, C. Stand-Alone Renewable Power System Scheduling for a Green Data Center Using Integer Linear Programming. J. Sched. 2021, 24, 523–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Monsalves, J.J.; Bergaentzlé, C.; Keles, D. Impacts of Flexible-Cooling and Waste-Heat Recovery from Data Centres on Energy Systems: A Danish Case Study. Energy 2023, 281, 128112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, X.; Jiang, S.; Chen, Y.; Zou, Z.; Shen, B.; Lei, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, M.; Gou, H. Energy-Saving Superconducting Power Delivery from Renewable Energy Source to a 100-MW-Class Data Center. Appl. Energy 2022, 310, 118602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nihal, G.; Gül, G.; Gökçül, F.; Eicker, U. Sustainability Analysis of Zero Energy Consumption Data Centers with Free Cooling, Waste Heat Reuse and Renewable Energy Systems: A Feasibility Study. Energy 2023, 262, 125495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhao, D.; Zhou, J. An Energy and Carbon-Aware Algorithm for Renewable Energy Usage Maximization in Distributed Cloud Data Centers. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 2022, 165, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Han, O.; Ding, T.; Zhang, X.; Mu, C.; He, X.; Zhang, H.; Jia, W.; Ma, Z. A Shared Energy Storage Business Model for Data Center Clusters Considering Renewable Energy Uncertainties. Renew Energy 2023, 202, 1273–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Duarte, J.L.R.; Fan, N. Operations of data centers with onsite renewables considering greenhouse gas emissions. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2023, 40, 100903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jahangir, M.H.; Mokhtari, R.; Mousavi, S.A.; Jahangir, M.H. Performance Evaluation and Financial Analysis of Applying Hybrid Renewable Systems in Cooling Unit of Data Centers—A Case Study. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 46, 101220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Liu, Z.; Tang, P.; Hou, K.; Zhu, L.; Zhao, J.; Jia, H.; Pei, W. A Lagrange-multiplier-based Reliability Assessment for Power Systems Considering Topology and Injection Uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ericson, S.; Cox, J.; Abdelmalak, M.; Rabinowitz, H.; Hotchkiss, E. Exceedance Probabilities and Recurrence Intervals for Extended Power Outages in the United States; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Golden, CO, USA, 2015; NREL/TP-5R00-83092. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/83092.pdf (accessed on 28 September 2023).
  67. Bangladesh-Vulnerability|Climate Change Knowledge Portal. Available online: https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/country/bangladesh/vulnerability (accessed on 8 August 2023).
  68. Chowdhury, H.; Chowdhury, T.; Hossain, N.; Chowdhury, P.; dos Santos Mascarenhas, J.; Bhuiya, M.M.K. Energy, Emission, Profitability, and Sustainability Analyses of a Grid-Connected Solar Power Plant Proposed in Airport Sites of Bangladesh: A Case Study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 61369–61379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Miskat, M.I.; Sarker, P.; Chowdhury, H.; Chowdhury, T.; Rahman, M.S.; Hossain, N.; Chowdhury, P.; Sait, S.M. Current Scenario of Solar Energy Applications in Bangladesh: Techno-Economic Perspective, Policy Implementation, and Possibility of the Integration of Artificial Intelligence. Energies 2023, 16, 1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xiahou, X.; Chen, J.; Zhao, B.; Yan, Z.; Cui, P.; Li, Q.; Yu, Z. Research on Safety Resilience Evaluation Model of Data Center Physical Infrastructure: An ANP-Based Approach. Buildings 2022, 12, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chowdhury, H.; Chowdhury, T.; Rahman, M.S.; Masrur, H.; Senjyu, T. A Simulation Study of Techno-Economics and Resilience of the Solar PV Irrigation System against Grid Outages. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 64846–64857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Islam, K.S.; Hasan, S.; Chowdhury, T.; Chowdhury, H.; Sait, S.M. Outage Survivability Investigation of a PV/Battery/CHP System in a Hospital Building in Texas. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Chowdhury, T.; Chowdhury, H.; Islam, K.S.; Sharifi, A.; Corkish, R.; Sait, S.M. Resilience Analysis of a PV/Battery System of Health Care Centres in Rohingya Refugee Camp. Energy 2023, 263, 125634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hooper, J. Off-Grid Solar Power Design and Battery Storage Optimisation: A Dissertation Submitted Towards the Degree of Bachelor of Engineering (Honours) (Electrical & Electronic). Bachelor’s Thesis, Faculty of Health, Engineering & Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Darling Heights, QLD, Australia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  75. South Asia Data Centre Guide 2022: Country by Country|Network World. Available online: https://www.networkworld.com/article/3658136/south-asia-data-centre-guide-2022-country-by-country.html (accessed on 8 May 2023).
  76. Demand for Data Centers in Bangladesh: Assessing the Rise of Data Consumption. Available online: https://www.lightcastlebd.com/insights/2021/07/demand-for-data-centers-in-bangladesh-assessing-the-rise-of-data-consumption/ (accessed on 8 May 2023).
  77. Islam, A.; Hossain, M.B.; Mondal, M.A.H.; Ahmed, M.T.; Hossain, M.A.; Monir, M.U.; Khan, M.F.H.; Islam, K.; Khandaker, S.; Choudhury, T.R.; et al. Energy Challenges for a Clean Environment: Bangladesh’s Experience. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 3373–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yi, P.; Hong, Y.; Liu, F. Initialization-Free Distributed Algorithms for Optimal Resource Allocation with Feasibility Constraints and Application to Economic Dispatch of Power Systems. Automatica 2016, 74, 259–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, P.; Hu, J.; Qiu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Ghosh, B.K. A Distributed Economic Dispatch Strategy for Power-Water Networks. IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst. 2022, 9, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. REopt Web Tool User Guides|NREL. Available online: https://reopt.nrel.gov/user-guides.html (accessed on 8 May 2023).
  81. Chowdhury, N.; Hossain, C.A.; Longo, M.; Yaïci, W. Optimization of Solar Energy System for the Electric Vehicle at University Campus in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Energies 2018, 11, 2433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lu, C.; Xu, C.; Sun, W.; Ren, R.; Qiao, J.; Wang, Z.; Sun, K.; Pan, G.; Cao, Y. Enhancing Catalytic Activity of CO2 Electrolysis by Building Efficient and Durable Heterostructure for Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell Cathode. J. Power Sources 2023, 574, 233134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Du, Y.; Xie, Y.; Liu, X.; Jiang, H.; Wu, F.; Wu, H.; Mei, Y.; Xie, D. In-Situ Formed Phosphorus Modified Gel Polymer Electrolyte with Good Flame Retardancy and Cycling Stability for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 4498–4508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Xia, H.; Zan, L.; Yuan, P.; Qu, G.; Dong, H.; Wei, Y.; Yu, Y.; Wei, Z.; Yan, W.; Hu, J.S.; et al. Evolution of Stabilized 1T-MoS2 by Atomic-Interface Engineering of 2H-MoS2/Fe−Nx towards Enhanced Sodium Ion Storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202218282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gu, Q.; Li, S.; Gong, W.; Ning, B.; Hu, C.; Liao, Z. L-SHADE with Parameter Decomposition for Photovoltaic Modules Parameter Identification under Different Temperature and Irradiance. Appl. Soft Comput. 2023, 143, 110386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Shen, Y.; Lu, Z.; Wang, Z. Adaptive Dynamic Surface Control with Disturbance Observers for Battery/Supercapacitor-Based Hybrid Energy Sources in Electric Vehicles. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2022, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tran, Q.T.; Davies, K.; Sepasi, S. Isolation Microgrid Design for Remote Areas with the Integration of Renewable Energy: A Case Study of Con Dao Island in Vietnam. Clean Technol. 2021, 3, 804–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Huang, Z.; Luo, P.; Zheng, H.; Lyu, Z.; Ma, X. Novel One-Dimensional V3S4@NC Nanofibers for Sodium-Ion Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2023, 172, 111081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Reza, M.S.; Hannan, M.A.; Ker, P.J.; Mansor, M.; Lipu, M.S.H.; Hossain, M.J.; Mahlia, T.M.I. Uncertainty Parameters of Battery Energy Storage Integrated Grid and Their Modeling Approaches: A Review and Future Research Directions. J. Energy Storage 2023, 68, 107698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, H.X.; Wang, P.F.; Yao, C.G.; Chen, S.P.; Cai, K.D.; Shi, F.N. Recent Advances of Ferro-/Piezoelectric Polarization Effect for Dendrite-Free Metal Anodes. Rare Met. 2023, 42, 2516–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, L.; Jia, S.; Cao, M.; Ji, Y.; Qiu, H.; Zhang, D. Research Progress on Transition Metal Sulfide-Based Materials as Cathode Materials for Zinc-Ion Batteries. J. Energy Storage 2023, 67, 107614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, X.; Xiong, Y.; Pan, Y.; Du, H.; Liu, B. Crushing Stress and Vibration Fatigue-Life Optimization of a Battery-Pack System. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2023, 66, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chowdhury, H.; Chowdhury, T.; Sharifi, A.; Corkish, R.; Sait, S.M. Role of Biogas in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Rohingya Refugee Camps in Bangladesh. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chowdhury, H.; Chowdhury, T.; Miskat, M.I.; Hossain, N.; Chowdhury, P.; Sait, S.M. Potential of Biogas and Bioelectricity Production from Rohingya Camp in Bangladesh: A Case Study. Energy 2021, 214, 118837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Chowdhury, T.; Chowdhury, H.; Miskat, M.I.; Chowdhury, P.; Sait, S.M.; Thirugnanasambandam, M.; Saidur, R. Developing and Evaluating a Stand-Alone Hybrid Energy System for Rohingya Refugee Community in Bangladesh. Energy 2020, 191, 116568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kim, B.; Kim, I. A Case Study of Stand-Alone Hybrid Power Systems for a Data Center Using HOMER and DIgSILENT. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 1136–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Rosales-Asensio, E.; Icaza, D.; González-Cobos, N.; Borge-Diez, D. Peak Load Reduction and Resilience Benefits through Optimized Dispatch, Heating and Cooling Strategies in Buildings with Critical Microgrids. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 68, 106096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lagrange, A.; de Simón-Martín, M.; González-Martínez, A.; Bracco, S.; Rosales-Asensio, E. Sustainable Microgrids with Energy Storage as a Means to Increase Power Resilience in Critical Facilities: An Application to a Hospital. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2020, 119, 105865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Reality Check: Biomass is Costlier than Solar and Wind and Unnecessary for a Reliable U.K. Electricity Supply. Available online: https://www.nrdc.org/resources/reality-check-biomass-costlier-solar-and-wind-and-unnecessary-reliable-uk-electricit (accessed on 7 September 2023).
  100. Alam Hossain Mondal, M.; Kamp, L.M.; Pachova, N.I. Drivers, barriers, and strategies for implementation of renewable energy technologies in rural areas in Bangladesh—An innovation system analysis. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 4626–4634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lightner, E.; Leader, J.; Berdahl, S.; Cory, K.; Morgenstein, J.; Schwabe, P. Voices of Experience: Microgrids for Resiliency. United States. 2021. Available online: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1772428 (accessed on 28 September 2023).
  102. Hwang, S.; Tongsopit, S.; Kittner, N. Transitioning from Diesel Backup Generators to PV-plus-Storage Microgrids in California Public Buildings. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2023, 38, 252–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sepúlveda-Mora, S.B.; Hegedus, S. Resilience Analysis of Renewable Microgrids for Commercial Buildings with Different Usage Patterns and Weather Conditions. Renew Energy 2022, 192, 731–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Bangladesh’s National Data Centre Faces Storage Challenges Due to Unlicensed Chinese Software. Available online: https://telecomtalk.info/bangladeshs-national-data-centre-faces-storage-challenges/713864/ (accessed on 10 September 2023).
  105. Wan, D.; Li, T.; Chen, S.; Chen, W.; Hu, H.; Set, S.Y.; Yamashita, S.; Shen, L.; Zou, Y.; Liu, T.; et al. Hyperuniform Disordered Solids with Morphology Engineering. Laser Photonics Rev. 2023, 2300398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lu, S.; Ding, Y.; Liu, M.; Yin, Z.; Yin, L.; Zheng, W. Multiscale Feature Extraction and Fusion of Image and Text in VQA. International. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 2023, 16, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Li, M.; Wang, T.; Chu, F.; Han, Q.; Qin, Z.; Zuo, M.J. Scaling-Basis Chirplet Transform. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2021, 68, 8777–8788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lu, S.; Ban, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, B.; Liu, S.; Yin, L.; Zheng, W. Adaptive control of time delay teleoperation system with uncertain dynamics. Front. Neurorobot. 2022, 16, 928863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Guo, R.; Zhang, S.; Gao, H.; Senthil Murugan, G.; Liu, T.; Cheng, Z. Blazed subwavelength grating coupler. Photonics Res. 2023, 11, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Karim, M.E.; Karim, R.; Islam, M.T.; Muhammad-Sukki, F.; Bani, N.A.; Muhtazaruddin, M.N. Renewable Energy for Sustainable Growth and Development: An Evaluation of Law and Policy of Bangladesh. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Building Renewable Energy in Bangladesh–The National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR). Available online: https://www.nbr.org/publication/building-renewable-energy-in-bangladesh/ (accessed on 9 September 2023).
Figure 1. Frequency of natural disasters on a yearly basis from 1980–2020 in Bangladesh.
Figure 1. Frequency of natural disasters on a yearly basis from 1980–2020 in Bangladesh.
Sustainability 15 15691 g001
Figure 2. Flowchart of the proposed study.
Figure 2. Flowchart of the proposed study.
Sustainability 15 15691 g002
Figure 3. The recommended robust data centre facility system.
Figure 3. The recommended robust data centre facility system.
Sustainability 15 15691 g003
Figure 4. Energy consumption of data centre.
Figure 4. Energy consumption of data centre.
Sustainability 15 15691 g004
Figure 5. Peak demand reduction by the optimized system.
Figure 5. Peak demand reduction by the optimized system.
Sustainability 15 15691 g005
Figure 6. Performance of the PV/battery system.
Figure 6. Performance of the PV/battery system.
Sustainability 15 15691 g006
Figure 7. Likelihood of the proposed system to withstand the annual outage event.
Figure 7. Likelihood of the proposed system to withstand the annual outage event.
Sustainability 15 15691 g007
Figure 8. Monthly electricity production of the generator (Jan refers to January, Feb-February, and similarly for others).
Figure 8. Monthly electricity production of the generator (Jan refers to January, Feb-February, and similarly for others).
Sustainability 15 15691 g008
Figure 9. Cost summary of the diesel generator.
Figure 9. Cost summary of the diesel generator.
Sustainability 15 15691 g009
Figure 10. Effects of outages on system size and NPV.
Figure 10. Effects of outages on system size and NPV.
Sustainability 15 15691 g010
Table 1. Emission from diesel generator.
Table 1. Emission from diesel generator.
QuantityValue (kg/Year)
CO2261,448,480
CO1,648,027
SO2640,226
UHC71,914
PM9988
NOx1,548,147
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amin, S.M.M.; Hossain, N.; Lipu, M.S.H.; Urooj, S.; Akter, A. Development of a PV/Battery Micro-Grid for a Data Center in Bangladesh: Resilience and Sustainability Analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215691

AMA Style

Amin SMM, Hossain N, Lipu MSH, Urooj S, Akter A. Development of a PV/Battery Micro-Grid for a Data Center in Bangladesh: Resilience and Sustainability Analysis. Sustainability. 2023; 15(22):15691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215691

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amin, S. M. Mezbahul, Nazia Hossain, Molla Shahadat Hossain Lipu, Shabana Urooj, and Asma Akter. 2023. "Development of a PV/Battery Micro-Grid for a Data Center in Bangladesh: Resilience and Sustainability Analysis" Sustainability 15, no. 22: 15691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215691

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop