Next Article in Journal
Local Digital Economy and Corporate Social Responsibility
Previous Article in Journal
Advanced Design for Experimental Optimisation of Physico-Mechanical Characteristics of Sustainable Local Hemp Concrete
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

E-Tourism for Sustainable Development through Alternative Tourism Activities

by
Christiana Koliouska
* and
Zacharoula Andreopoulou
Laboratory of Forest Informatics, Faculty of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, P.O. Box 247, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(11), 8485; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118485
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 17 May 2023 / Accepted: 18 May 2023 / Published: 23 May 2023

Abstract

:
E-tourism refers to the broader integration of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in the tourism sector and infrastructure. In this context, tourists can choose the travel destination, use price comparison sites and buy online tickets at low prices, while tourism entrepreneurs enhance their marketing strategies in response to the increasing demands of modern tourism Over the last few decades, alternative tourism has gained considerable interest among tourists and enterprises in the tourism industry. At the same time, it acts as an enabler and a facilitator of sustainable development. This paper presents an overview of the current situation of content characteristics of the websites of enterprises involved with alternative tourism services in Greece. The websites are evaluated according to 30 characteristics through multicriteria method. Furthermore, the final ranking of websites is presented to identify the most successful strategies, as well as the website that need improvements. According to the results, an e-tourism website model is suggested for the entrepreneurs to exploit the opportunities that arise in the digitalization transformation of the tourism industry.

1. Introduction

E-tourism, also known as electronic tourism or digital tourism, refers to the adoption of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in tourism sector. It involves the application of the internet and other digital technologies to promote, market, and sell tourism products and services, as well as to enhance the overall tourism experience [1]. E-tourism encompasses a wide range of digital tools and platforms, such as websites, social media, mobile applications, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence. These tools can be used to provide travelers with access to travel information, booking and reservation systems, virtual tours of destinations, personalized recommendations, and other travel-related services [2]. ICT and data play a crucial role in the management of tourism, as managers rely on these tools to accomplish various tasks, including online product promotion, strategic decision-making, customer satisfaction and product customization monitoring, and ensuring a sustainable business environment [3]. Therefore, attractive representations of products, such as travel destinations, have consistently played a critical role in the success of the tourism development [4].
This innovative form of tourism has enabled tourism businesses to reach a wider audience, reduce costs, and enhance the customer experience, while also creating new business opportunities and revenue streams. In order to ensure that tourism benefits everyone involved, the industry needs to prioritize working with communities and individuals to create mutually beneficial outcomes [5]. Factors that come before e-tourism websites, such as ease of use, website enjoyment, perceived authenticity, and perceived risk, can influence tourists in their decision-making process when selecting travel destinations [6]. Moreover, e-tourism endeavors to enhance the effectiveness of disseminating information, exchanging ideas, communicating, and carrying out transactions [7]. E-tourism complies with accessible tourism, which aims to enhance the range of travel options accessible to individuals with specific access requirements, encourage the participation and involvement of all members of society and enhance the industry staff’s competencies and abilities [8]. The concept of accessible tourism acknowledges the partnership among stakeholders in the sector of demand, supply, and coordination, to recognize the disability, which involves mobility difficulties, vision problems, hearing disorders, cognitive impairments, and other physical abilities [9].
Sustainable development is based on the three fundamentals pillars: economic development, social development and protection of the environment aiming at a more equitable and sustainable future [10]. Sustainable development is a key goal of the United Nations and is reflected in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which deal with poverty, hunger, health, well-being, education, clean energy, economic development, innovation, inequalities, sustainable cities, peace, justice, combating climate change and environmental degradation [11]. Overall, sustainable development is a holistic approach to development and involves balancing economic, social, and environmental considerations, and requires the involvement of all sectors of society to achieve meaningful progress towards a more sustainable world [12]. The concept of sustainable development prompts us to consider the significance of incorporating effective project management methodologies with contemporary approaches to organizational management, including strategic planning, competitive strategies knowledge management, change management, and governance [13,14]. Growing attention is being paid to studying the advancement of sustainable urban development, whereby frameworks based on issues or themes are predominantly employed to develop indicators that focus on economic, social, and environmental dimensions [15,16,17,18].
E-tourism plays a significant role in promoting sustainable tourism development. The aim of e-tourism is to merge virtual and actual realms by utilizing currently available technologies such as the cloud computing, Internet of Things, and social media [19]. Sustainable tourism refers to the tourism that considers the environmental and socio-economic effects of tourism, both in the short and long term. It ensures the sustainable growth of its contributions to the economy and society, while simultaneously ensuring the sustainable use of natural resources. This means that the benefits of tourism should be shared equitably, while also minimizing any negative impacts on the environment and local communities [20]. Actually, the main idea is to achieve a well-balanced tourism development where all goals hold equal importance [21]. Sustainable tourism management should prioritize the strengthening of its resilience to disruptions and not only its stability [22].
Alternative tourism is considered the most sustainable form of tourism and includes non-traditional forms of tourism that focus on unique and authentic experiences, often involving interaction with local cultures, traditions, and environments [23]. Some examples of alternative tourism activities are the following: ecotourism, cultural tourism, adventure tourism, agrotourism and volunteer tourism. Ecotourism involves travel to natural areas that promotes conservation, supports local communities, and offers educational opportunities. It often involves various activities (bird or wildlife watching, hiking) and emphasizes responsible and sustainable travel practices [24]. The involvement of the community has the potential to enhance the social and economic sustainability of the host community through the creation of passive income streams, innovative product development, and increased employment opportunities [25,26,27].
Cultural tourism involves travel to destinations to learn about the local cultural heritage, history, ethics, values and traditions. It often involves various activities (visiting monuments and museums, attending festivals and other cultural events, participating in cultural workshops and classes) [28]. Adventure tourism involves travel to destinations to participate in physically challenging and adventurous activities (ziplining, bungee jumping, rock climbing, river rafting, mountain biking, skiing, kayaking). It often involves outdoor recreation and exploration of remote and wilderness areas [29]. Adventure tourism can be characterized a type of wellness tourism, that appeals to those seeking self-actualization through participation in challenging activities [30]. Agrotourism involves travel to farms, vineyards, and other agricultural businesses to experience rural life and learn about farming practices. It often includes activities such as farm tours, farm stays, and farm-to-table dining experiences [31]. Volunteer tourism, also known as voluntourism, involves travel to destinations to participate in volunteer work that benefits local communities and environments. It often includes activities such as conservation work, community development projects, and teaching English as a foreign language [32].
E-tourism can play a role in fostering sustainable tourism development through various means. This innovative type of tourism can encourage responsible travelling through providing the travelers with information on sustainable travel practices, such as reducing carbon emissions, minimizing waste, and respecting local cultures and traditions. This can help to promote responsible and sustainable travel behavior among tourists [33]. E-tourism can support local communities by promoting local tourism products and services, such as eco-tourism, cultural tours, and local handicrafts. This can help to create sustainable livelihoods for local people and promote economic development in rural and remote areas. Moreover, the tourist experience can be enhanced by providing travelers with access to personalized recommendations, local tips, and immersive virtual experiences that promote cultural and environmental awareness. This can help to create more meaningful and sustainable tourism experiences [34].
As for the enhancement of the visibility of alternative tourism activities, e-tourism can help to promote alternative tourism activities by providing information about unique and authentic experiences that support local communities, promote sustainable tourism practices, and preserve cultural and natural heritage. This can help to increase the visibility and viability of alternative tourism activities and promote sustainable tourism development. In addition, e-tourism can facilitate online booking and payment systems for alternative tourism activities, which can help to streamline the booking process, reduce transaction costs, and increase accessibility for travelers. This can help to promote sustainable tourism development by making alternative tourism activities more accessible and affordable for travelers [6]. Overall, e-tourism can contribute to sustainable development through alternative tourism activities by promoting responsible and sustainable travel behavior, enhancing the visibility of alternative tourism activities, supporting local communities, and facilitating online booking and payment systems.
This paper provides an overview of the current situation of content characteristics of the websites of enterprises involved with alternative tourism services in the Prefecture of Serres, Greece. The websites are evaluated according to 30 characteristics through the TOPSIS multicriteria method. The final ranking of e-tourism websites is presented to identify the most effective e-marketing strategies. According to the TOPSIS results, an e-tourism website model is suggested for the entrepreneurs to exploit the opportunities that arise in the digital transformation in the tourism sector. It is the first time that the main methodology used in the paper, TOPSIS, is applied in the topic, that is to develop a benchmark. Entrepreneurs ought to incorporate sustainability within their business model in order to meet the challenges of new digital era, sustainability and green strategy in the future. By this way, they will see significant benefits both economically and socially through maintaining a steady pace with the ever-increasing sophistication of products and services entering the market place.
Section 2 describes the data collection, the content characteristics that are studied and the multicriteria method that was applied. In Section 3, the results are presented and finally, in Section 4, a discussion about the results of the study and some conclusions are presented.

2. Materials and Methods

The websites of the alternative tourism enterprises in the Prefecture of Serres were retrieved from the Greek Internet using the most popular search engines such as Google, Bing and Yahoo. The research took place during the second semester of 2022. The first step was to record the name of the enterprise, the type of the enterprise, the form of alternative tourism that serves and the URL. The second step was to develop a 2-dimensional table to identify the existence or not of the 30 content characteristics at each website. These content characteristics constitute the variables X1, X2, …, X30. The total amount of the content characteristics by each alternative tourism enterprise was also studied (Table 1).
The third step was to rank the websites using a multicriteria method to identify the most successful ones and highlight the necessary content characteristics. A multicriteria method is a decision-making approach that involves considering multiple criteria or factors to evaluate and compare different alternatives. These methods are used in a wide range of applications, such as project management, engineering, environmental studies, and business management. There are many types of multicriteria methods, each one with its advantages and disadvantages. Some of the most commonly used multicriteria methods include [36]:
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): AHP is a popular multicriteria decision-making method that splits a complicated decision problem into a hierarchy of simple sub-problems. It uses pairwise comparisons of cases and criteria to determine the relative importance of each one and rank them accordingly [37].
  • Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS): TOPSIS constitutes a method that compares cases evaluated according to their proximity to an optimal solution and their distance from a negative ideal solution. It evaluates the performance of cases based on multiple criteria and ranks them accordingly [38].
  • Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE): PROMETHEE constitutes a multicriteria decision-making method that uses pairwise comparisons for ranking the alternative cases based on their performance relative to each other. It considers both positive and negative criteria and produces a ranking of cases based on a set of preference functions [39].
  • Simple Additive Weighting (SAW): SAW is a straightforward method that assigns weights to each criterion based on their relative importance and sums the weighted scores of cases. It is a popular and widely used method because of its simplicity and ease of implementation [40].
However, the choice of the appropriate multicriteria method depends on the specific decision problem and the preferences of the decision-makers involved. In this research paper, TOPSIS method has been chosen. TOPSIS method is based on the idea that the optimal solution should present greater proximity to the Positive Ideal Solution (PIS) and a longer distance from the Negative Ideal Solution (NIS) [41,42,43]. PIS refers to the solution that maximizes the benefit criteria while minimizing the cost criteria. On the other hand, NIS refers to the solution that minimizes the benefit criteria while maximizing the cost criteria [44]. So, the distance between the value of each alternative with the positive ideal solution (di+) and the negative ideal solution (di) is calculated. The weight of each criterion is predetermined [45]. Alternative solutions are classified depending on the value of their Closeness Coefficient (CC) in decreasing order, which is calculated based on how far the respective alternative is from both the PIS and NIS. CC takes a value between 0 and 1. In this case, TOPSIS multicriteria method was applied, which involves the following steps [46]:
  • Identification of criteria and establishment of a performance matrix: The decision-maker identifies the relevant criteria for the decision problem. Variable zij represents the performance values of the alternative solutions according to the criteria.
M   = A 1 A 2 A m w 1 w 2 w n C 1 C 2 C n z 11 z 12 z 1 n z 21 z 22 z 2 n z m 1 z m 2 z mn
Normalization of criteria: The criteria are normalized to ensure that they have the same scale of measurement. This step involves transforming the raw data of each criterion into a common scale, such as a range of 0 to 1 or −1 to 1.
n i j = z i j / j = 1 m z i j 2 j = 1 ,   ,   n , i = 1 ,   ,   m
2.
Determination of the weighted criteria: The decision-maker identifies the weighting of each criterion to reflect their relative importance.
vij = wj ⊗ nij, j = 1, …, n, i = 1, …, m
3.
Calculation of the positive A+ and negative A ideal solutions: The optimal solution represents the highest potential value, while the negative ideal solution represents the lowest potential value for every criterion.
A+ = {v+i, …, v+n} = {(max vij, j ∈ J) (min vij, j ∈ J′)}, i = 1, 2, …, m
A = {vi, …, vn} = {(min vij, j ∈ J) (max vij, j ∈ J′)}, i = 1, 2, …, m
J deals with the benefit criteria, while J′ deals with cost criteria.
4.
Calculation of the distance between each case and the positive (PIS) and the negative (NIS) ideal solutions: For each case, the distance to the best ideal solution is figured out by using the Euclidean distance formula, while the distance to the negative ideal solution is calculated by using the same formula in reverse.
di+ = {Σn j=1 (vij − vj+)2}1/2, i = 1, …, m
di = {Σn j=1 (vij − vj)2}1/2, i = 1, …, m
5.
Calculation of the relative closeness (Ri) to the best ideal solution: The relative closeness of each case to the best ideal solution is figured out by dividing the distance to the negative ideal solution by the sum of the distances to the ideal and negative ideal solutions.
Ri = di/(di+ + di), i = 1, …, m
If Ri = 1 → Ai = A+
If Ri = 0 → Ai = A
6.
Ranking of cases: The cases are ranked according to their relative closeness to the ideal solution, with the highest score indicating the best case.
TOPSIS is a simple and effective method that provides a clear and transparent ranking of cases based on multiple criteria. However, it has some limitations, such as the assumption of linear relationships between criteria and the sensitivity to changes in the weights assigned to the criteria. TOPSIS methodology fits better to the targets of the project event if it is compared to other well-established methods. The reason for using the TOPSIS method in this case is due to its advanced development and efficiency in addressing multicriteria decision-making problems. it offers a straightforward calculation process and impressive adaptability [47]. Furthermore, there are the following main reasons [48,49]: (a) TOPSIS logic is comprehensible and accessible; (b) the computation processes are clear; (c) this approach highlights the best alternatives by its performance in multiple criteria through a mathematical formula; (d) the weights of the criteria are integrated into the procedures for comparison. In this case study, all criteria hold the same importance (weight = 0.125).
The TOPSIS method has been successfully applied to fields such as evaluation of e-shop websites [50], supplier selection [51], selection of warehouse location [52], ranking RES supply systems [53], assessing the ICT exploitation in EU energy policy [46], evaluating sustainable transportation systems [54], evaluation for photovoltaic strings [55], ranking international markets according to the stringency of food safety measures [56]. The application of TOPSIS analysis for the e-tourism websites assessment in the Prefecture of Serres is presented for the first time in this paper.

3. Results

The research through the Greek Internet resulted in the retrieval of 48 of the Alternative Tourism Enterprises (ATEs) in the Prefecture of Serres. Figure 1 presents the areas where these ATEs are located. Most ATEs (16) are located in the city of Serres, six ATE are located near Lailias ski area and 12 ATEs are located in the city of Sidirokastro and in Agistro village (famous areas for their therapeutic baths). Furthermore, three ATEs are established near Lake Kerkini, an attractive eco-tourism destination.
Figure 2 shows the alternative forms of tourisms that are provided in the Prefecture of Serres. In particular, the most popular forms of alternative tourism is ecotourism (Lake Kerkini, Orfanos Gulf, Lailias Forest, Alistrati Cave, Akritochori Lake, etc.) and heritage tourism (Roupel Fortress, Monastery of Timios Prodromos, Monastery of Saint John the Baptist of Serres, Sarakatsani Folklore Museum, Lion of Amphipolis, Ancient Amphipolis, Zinzirli Mosque, etc.). On the other hand, the less popular forms of alternative tourism in the area is dark and gastronomic tourism (akanes, wine, etc.).
Figure 3 presents the summary of achieved characteristics of each ATEs. Most characteristics (20) are achieved by two ATEs, two ATEs achieve 19 characteristics, one ATEs achieve 18 characteristics, three ATEs achieve 17 characteristics, six ATEs achieve 16 characteristics, while 10 ATEs achieve 15 characteristics. The rest of the ATEs achieve less than 15 characteristics. It is important to note that the ATEs with the same sum of characteristics, don’t achieve the same characteristics, too. The analytical table is presented in the Appendix A.
As for the existence or not of social media profile of the ATEs, most ATEs (36 out of 48) have created a social media profile (Facebook, Instagram and Youtube) and take advantage of social media marketing (Figure 4). In particular, most ATEs join Facebook, while only 15 ATEs make use of Instagram, which is the most effective social platform for engaging audiances. Only 9 out of 48 ATEs join Youtube and produce videos or utilize Youtube Ads to promote their products or services.
Table 2 presents the complete rankings of the 48 ATEs in the Prefecture of Serres, which are based on the CC. The CC is estimated for each ATE, and it is used for the total ranking, as each ATE with a higher CC is considered superior in ranking. According to the results of TOPSIS method, the total scores (CC) of ATEs present a great spectrum of values between 0.62743411 and 0.37582468 and that shows a significant contrast between the top and bottom ranked ATE. The ATE with the highest CC (ATE_1) adopts a variety of digital tools, such as a multilanguage website, it provides information about its products and services, provides contact information and an online communication form, local information, digital map, audiovisual material, live web camera, sitemap, news about the enterprise, a weather forecast application, a website visitor tracker, a tab entitled Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), links to other companies, additional topics of information, social media profile and social media sharing button, related sources of information, third person advertisement and RSS. The ATE with the lowest CC (ATE_41) presents the following characteristics: information about products/services/activities, contact information, local information and online communication form.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, E-tourism has the potential to promote sustainable development through alternative tourism activities. By leveraging digital technologies, tourists can be encouraged to engage in activities that promote environmental conservation, social and cultural preservation, and economic growth for local communities. Alternative tourism activities such as ecotourism, agrotourism, and community-based tourism can provide a unique and authentic travel experience for tourists while also creating opportunities for sustainable development. However, it is important to ensure that these activities are developed in a responsible and sustainable manner, taking into consideration the needs and concerns of local communities and ecosystems. With careful planning and collaboration between stakeholders, E-tourism can be a powerful tool for promoting sustainable tourism practices and achieving the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.
Through the Internet research, 48 ATEs in the Prefecture of Serres were identified. According to the results, the most common form of tourism in the Prefecture of Serres tends to be ecotourism, while heritage tourism, spa tourism and religious tourism are less popular in the area. Based on the results obtained through the TOPSIS method, there was a significant variation in the total score CC values, indicating a considerable difference in the superiority of ATE websites. The top-performing websites can serve as a benchmark for developing a conceptual content model for creating an improved website for an alternative sustainable tourism enterprise. To conclude, the e-tourism website model presents the following characteristics: multilingual content, embedded Google Map, a search engine, an online communication, a weather forecasting app, information on different fields, social sharing button and related sources of information.
The results show that these enterprises in the Prefecture of Serres have to adjust to the new digital era and have to Improve their effectiveness and efficiency in developing their independent website. It has been noticed that many enterprises in the tourism sector who have created their own websites are mostly at the early stage of ICTs adoption, typically focused on promotion. These enterprises should progress to the later stages of ICTs adoption, which involve actively engaging with customers and fully integrating e-commerce activities with supply chain optimization. The websites with low total score should use as a model the website with high total score. Moreover, there is potential to incorporate further features into an entrepreneurial website in order to enhance its success. Examples of such features include multimedia content, a survey tool, a website analytics tracker, and a discussion forum.
The results of this study can be a valuable resource for entrepreneurs and web designers who are creating websites for enterprises that promote alternative tourism and want to participate in the new era of digital transformation. The findings of this study can assist in enhancing internet adoption by improving website design and implementation to achieve specific features and enhance digital services in the tourism industry in the Prefecture of Serres.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, C.K.; Supervision, Z.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to restrictions. The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Sum of characteristics of ATE in the Prefecture of Serres (Analytical table).
Table A1. Sum of characteristics of ATE in the Prefecture of Serres (Analytical table).
ATESum of Characteristics
1ATE_1 ATE_3320
2ATE_37 ATE_919
3ATE_4418
4ATE_11 ATE_45 ATE_4317
5ATE_13 ATE_32 ATE_2 ATE_36 ATE_23 ATE_1816
6ATE_35 ATE_15 ATE_12 ATE_19 ATE_46 ATE_4 ATE_26 ATE_14 ATE_20 ATE_4815
7ATE_22 ATE_31 ATE_40 ATE_3 ATE_34 ATE_3814
8ATE_6 ATE_24 ATE_5 ATE_42 ATE_1713
9ATE_28 ATE_8 ATE_2512
10ATE_27 ATE_29 ATE_4711
11ATE_219
12ATE_10 ATE_7 ATE_168
13ATE_396
14ATE_414

References

  1. Rehman Khan, H.U.; Lim, C.K.; Ahmed, M.F.; Tan, K.L.; Bin Mokhtar, M. Systematic review of contextual suggestion and recommendation systems for sustainable e-tourism. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stankov, U.; Filimonau, V. Reviving calm technology in the e-tourism context. Serv. Ind. J. 2019, 39, 343–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Leung, R. Development of Information and Communication Technology: From e-Tourism to Smart Tourism. In Handbook of e-Tourism; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 23–55. [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger, H.; Dittenbach, M.; Merkl, D.; Bogdanovych, A.; Simoff, S.; Sierra, C. Opening new dimensions for e-tourism. Virtual Real. 2007, 11, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hamid, R.A.; Albahri, A.S.; Alwan, J.K.; Al-Qaysi, Z.T.; Albahri, O.S.; Zaidan, A.A.; Zaidan, B.B. How smart is e-tourism? A systematic review of smart tourism recommendation system applying data management. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2021, 39, 100337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chatterjee, S.; Majumdar, D.; Misra, S.; Damasevicius, R. The determinants of e-tourism websites for tourists while selecting a travel destination. Int. J. Electron. Mark. Retail. 2022, 13, 334–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liberato, P.; Liberato, D.; Abreu, A.; Alén-González, E.; Rocha, Á. Generation Y: The competitiveness of the tourism sector based on digital technology. In Information Technology Science; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 227–240. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dileep, M.R.; Pagliara, F. Accessibility of Destinations. In Transportation Systems for Tourism; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 65–83. [Google Scholar]
  9. Michopoulou, E.; Darcy, S.; Ambrose, I.; Buhalis, D. Accessible tourism futures: The world we dream to live in and the opportunities we hope to have. J. Tour. Futures 2015, 1, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rogers, P.P.; Jalal, K.F.; Boyd, J.A. An Introduction to Sustainable Development; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  11. Holmberg, J.; Sandbrook, R. Sustainable development: What is to be done? In Policies for a Small Planet; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2019; pp. 19–38. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sachs, J.D. The age of sustainable development. In The Age of Sustainable Development; Columbia University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ansah, R.H.; Sorooshian, S. Effect of lean tools to control external environment risks of construction projects. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 32, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moreno-Monsalve, N.; Delgado-Ortiz, M.; Rueda-Varón, M.; Fajardo-Moreno, W.S. Sustainable development and value creation, an approach from the perspective of project management. Sustainability 2023, 15, 472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fan, S.; Huang, H.; Mbanyele, W.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, C. Inclusive green growth for sustainable development of cities in China: Spatiotemporal differences and influencing factors. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 11025–11045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cheng, D.Y.; Xue, Q.Y.; Hubacek, K.; Fan, J.L.; Shan, Y.L.; Zhou, Y.; Coffman, D.; Managi, S.; Zhang, X. Inclusive wealth index measuring sustainable development potentials for Chinese cities. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2021, 72, 102417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kissinger, M.; Stossel, Z. An integrated, multi-scale approach for modelling urban metabolism changes as a means for assessing urban sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 67, 102695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sharifi, A. Urban sustainability assessment: An overview and bibliometric analysis. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 21, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ping, L.; Ying, Z.; Huang, S. Role of information technology in the development of e-tourism marketing: A contextual suggestion. Econ. Anal. Policy 2023, 78, 307–318. [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, Z. Sustainable tourism development: A critique. J. Sustain. Tour. 2003, 11, 459–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Müller, H.-R. The thorny path to sustainable tourism development. J. Sustain. Tour. 1994, 2, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lu, J.; Nepal, S.K. Sustainable tourism research: An analysis of papers published. J. Sustain. Tour. 2009, 17, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Isaac, R.K.; Eid, T.A. Tourists’ destination image: An exploratory study of alternative tourism in Palestine. Curr. Issues Tour. 2019, 22, 1499–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Samdin, Z.; Abdullah, S.I.N.W.; Khaw, A.; Subramaniam, T. Travel risk in the ecotourism industry amid COVID-19 pandemic: Ecotourists’ perceptions. J. Ecotourism 2022, 21, 266–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pineda, F.; Padilla, J.; Granobles-Torres, J.C.; Echeverry-Rubio, A.; Botero, C.M.; Suarez, A. Community preferences for participating in ecotourism: A case study in a coastal lagoon in Colombia. Environ. Chall. 2023, 11, 100713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Manu, I.; Kuuder, C.J.W. Community-based ecotourism and livelihood enhancement in Sirigu, Ghana. Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2012, 2, 18. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mäntymaa, E.; Ovaskainen, V.; Juutinen, A.; Tyrväinen, L. Integrating nature-based tourism and forestry in private lands under heterogeneous visitor preferences for forest attributes. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2018, 61, 724–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Du Cros, H.; McKercher, B. Cultural Tourism; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  29. Janowski, I.; Gardiner, S.; Kwek, A. Dimensions of adventure tourism. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 37, 100776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ritpanitchajchaval, N.; Ashton, A.S.; Apollo, M. Eudaimonic well-being development: Motives driving mountain-based adventure tourism. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2023, 42, 100607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vukolić, D.; Gajić, T.; Petrović, M.D.; Bugarčić, J.; Spasojević, A.; Veljović, S.; Petrović, T. Development of the Concept of Sustainable Agro-Tourism Destinations—Exploring the Motivations of Serbian Gastro-Tourists. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Thompson, J. Volunteer tourism fields: Spaces of altruism and unsustainability. Curr. Issues Tour. 2022, 25, 779–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Coronel, M.; Papp-Váry, Á.F.; Pinke-Sziva, I.; Berezvai, Z.; Smith, M.K. Post-Pandemic Re-Positioning in a Cultural Tourism City: From Overtourism to E-Tourism. In Handbook of Research on Digital Communications, Internet of Things, and the Future of Cultural Tourism; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 430–449. [Google Scholar]
  34. Novera, C.N.; Ahmed, Z.; Kushol, R.; Wanke, P.; Azad, M.A.K. Internet of Things (IoT) in smart tourism: A literature review. Span. J. Mark.-ESIC, 2022; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar]
  35. Andreopoulou, Z.; Koliouska, C.; Lemonakis, C.; Zopounidis, C. National Forest Parks development through Internet technologies for economic perspectives. Oper. Res. 2014, 15, 395–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Basílio, M.P.; Pereira, V.; Costa, H.G.; Santos, M.; Ghosh, A. A systematic review of the applications of multi-criteria decision aid methods (1977–2022). Electronics 2022, 11, 1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nguyen, T.A.V.; Tucek, D.; Pham, N.T. Indicators for TQM 4.0 model: Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) analysis. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2022, 34, 220–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Andreopoulou, Z.; Koliouska, C. Benchmarking Internet Promotion of Renewable Energy Enterprises: Is Sustainability Present? Sustainability 2018, 10, 4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Koliouska, C.; Andreopoulou, Z. A Multicriteria Approach for Assessing the Impact of ICT on EU Sustainable Regional Policy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vafaei, N.; Ribeiro, R.A.; Camarinha-Matos, L.M. Assessing Normalization Techniques for Simple Additive Weighting Method. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2022, 199, 1229–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Belenson, S.M.; Kapur, K.C. An algorithm for solving multicriterion linear programming problems with examples. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1973, 24, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zeleny, M. A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal. Comput. Oper. Res. 1974, 1, 479–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yue, Z. TOPSIS-based group decision-making methodology in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Inf. Sci. 2014, 277, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Park, J.H.; Park, I.Y.; Kwun, Y.C.; Tan, X. Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision making problems under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl. Math. Model. 2011, 35, 2544–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, T.Y. The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision-making. Appl. Soft Comput. 2015, 26, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Andreopoulou, Z.; Koliouska, C.; Zopounidis, C. Assessing the ICT exploitation in EU energy policy: A multicriteria evaluation. Manag. Decis. 2020, 58, 2417–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hatami-Marbini, A.; Kangi, F. An extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for a group decision making with an application to Tehran stock exchange. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017, 52, 1084–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. García-Cascales, M.S.; Lamata, M.T. On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Math. Comput. Model. 2012, 56, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zeleny, M.; Cochrane, J.L. Multiple Criteria Decision Making; University of South Carolina Press: Columbia, SC, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sun, C.C.; Lin, G.T. Using fuzzy TOPSIS method for evaluating the competitive advantages of shopping websites. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 11764–11771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Boran, F.E.; Genç, S.; Kurt, M.; Akay, D. A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 11363–11368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ashrafzadeh, M.; Rafiei, F.M.; Isfahani, N.M.; Zare, Z. Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for the selection of warehouse location: A case study. Interdiscip. J. Contemp. Res. Bus. 2012, 3, 655–671. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sengul, U.; Eren, M.; Shiraz, S.E.; Gezder, V.; Sengul, A.B. Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey. Renew. Energy 2015, 75, 617–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Awasthi, A.; Chauhan, S.S.; Omrani, H. Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 12270–12280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Pei, L.; Wu, A.; Zhu, H. A Novel Operating State Evaluation Method for Photovoltaic Strings Based on TOPSIS and Its Application. Sustainability 2023, 15, 7268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yadav, D.; Dutta, G.; Saha, K. Assessing and ranking international markets based on stringency of food safety measures: Application of fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method. Br. Food J. 2023, 125, 262–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Partial Location of ATE.
Figure 1. Partial Location of ATE.
Sustainability 15 08485 g001
Figure 2. Alternative forms of tourism in the Prefecture of Serres.
Figure 2. Alternative forms of tourism in the Prefecture of Serres.
Sustainability 15 08485 g002
Figure 3. Sum of characteristics of ATE in the Prefecture of Serres.
Figure 3. Sum of characteristics of ATE in the Prefecture of Serres.
Sustainability 15 08485 g003
Figure 4. Profile on Social Media (%).
Figure 4. Profile on Social Media (%).
Sustainability 15 08485 g004
Table 1. Content characteristics [35].
Table 1. Content characteristics [35].
VariableContent CharacteristicVariableContent Characteristic
X1Two or more languagesX16Links to other companies etc
X2Information about products—services—activitiesX17Additional topics with information on different categories
X3Contact informationX18Downloadable files
X4Local informationX19Calendar application
X5Digital mapX20Event calendar application
X6Audiovisual materialX21Celebration calendar application
X7Live web cameraX22Social media sharing
X8Search engineX23Social media profile
X9SitemapX24Forum
X10Updated enterprise informationX25Related sources of information
X11Online surveyX26Third person advertisement
X12Online communication formX27Newsletter
X13Weather forecastX28RSS
X14Website visitor trackerX29Code access
X15Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)X30Personalization of the page, trace, safety
Table 2. Total ranking of ATE in the Prefecture of Serres.
Table 2. Total ranking of ATE in the Prefecture of Serres.
Evaluation RankingATEdi+diCC
1ATE_10.1110.1870.627
2ATE_330.1110.1870.627
3ATE_370.1110.1870.627
4ATE_90.1110.1870.627
5ATE_440.1110.1870.627
6ATE_110.1240.1880.603
7ATE_450.1240.1880.603
8ATE_430.1240.1870.602
9ATE_130.1240.1810.594
10ATE_320.1240.1780.588
11ATE_20.1210.1680.581
12ATE_360.1440.1840.561
13ATE_230.1690.2130.558
14ATE_180.1370.1650.547
15ATE_350.1370.1650.547
16ATE_150.1420.1680.542
17ATE_120.1140.1340.540
18ATE_190.1380.1540.528
19ATE_460.1830.1950.517
20ATE_40.1900.1950.507
21ATE_260.1690.1710.503
22ATE_140.1580.1550.496
23ATE_200.1580.1540.495
24ATE_480.1580.1540.495
25ATE_220.1600.1430.473
26ATE_310.1380.1230.472
27ATE_400.1680.1450.463
28ATE_30.1670.1440.462
29ATE_340.1670.1440.462
30ATE_380.1670.1440.462
31ATE_60.1680.1440.461
32ATE_240.1680.1440.461
33ATE_50.1600.1350.459
34ATE_420.1820.1480.448
35ATE_170.1940.1540.443
36ATE_280.1690.1290.433
37ATE_80.1780.1340.429
38ATE_250.1780.1340.429
39ATE_270.1780.1340.429
40ATE_290.1690.1220.419
41ATE_470.1690.1220.419
42ATE_300.1700.1220.418
43ATE_210.1890.1320.411
44ATE_100.1780.1240.410
45ATE_70.1700.1140.401
46ATE_160.1770.1090.381
47ATE_390.1770.1070.376
48ATE_410.1770.1070.376
In general, ATE with higher CC are the e-tourism websites that provide the tourists with their content in multiple languages (×1), use navigation in the Google Maps (×5) and search engines (×8). These are the characteristics with the maximum contribution to the methodology. Also, e-tourism websites provide online communication (×12), a weather forecasting app (×13), information on different topics (×17), social sharing tool/button (×22), and related sources of information (×25).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koliouska, C.; Andreopoulou, Z. E-Tourism for Sustainable Development through Alternative Tourism Activities. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118485

AMA Style

Koliouska C, Andreopoulou Z. E-Tourism for Sustainable Development through Alternative Tourism Activities. Sustainability. 2023; 15(11):8485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118485

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koliouska, Christiana, and Zacharoula Andreopoulou. 2023. "E-Tourism for Sustainable Development through Alternative Tourism Activities" Sustainability 15, no. 11: 8485. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118485

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop